Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 77
Filter
3.
Int J Nurs Pract ; 27(3): e12886, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32926505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Child health research comprises complex ethical considerations. Understanding the extent to which the ethical process is reported in child health research is needed to improve reporting. AIMS: To identify reportage of ethical considerations in child health research in leading nursing and paediatric journals. METHODS: All child health research published between 2015 and 2019 in 10 leading nursing journals and two paediatric journals were retrieved and critically appraised for the reportage of informed consent and ethical approval. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifty-one child health research papers were included. Although 544 (79.9%) of the prospective studies mentioned informed consent, only 300 (55.2%) reported that written informed consent was obtained from the participants. Overall, 748 (87.9%) of child health research papers noted obtaining research ethics committee approval. Articles that mentioned financial support were significantly more likely to report informed consent and ethical approval than unfunded studies (all P < 0.001). Prospective studies showed higher rates of reportage of ethical approval compared to retrospective studies (P = 0.027). Rates of child consent (assent) obtained in different age groups of children ranged from 29.6% to 66.3%. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in the reportage of ethical review and approval processes in child health research, consistent and transparent reports are still lacking.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Child Health , Ethics, Nursing , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Periodicals as Topic , Child , Humans , Informed Consent , Journal Impact Factor , Retrospective Studies
4.
Nurs Ethics ; 27(7): 1517-1528, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32436463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized children have the right to "partake in practices related to their treatment and care." Midwives and nurses have important roles and responsibilities regarding the protection and enforcement of these rights, such as providing information and advocating for children. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the attitudes of midwives and nurses toward their roles and responsibilities in the implementation of child rights in healthcare services and the factors affecting their attitudes. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study included 122 midwives and nurses in total. The data were collected through a questionnaire. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Written permission was obtained from an ethics committee in the center of the city where the research was conducted. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 36.70 ± 8.03 years; 58.9% of midwives and nurses stated that they understood the child's consent about the treatment by looking at the child's facial expression; 36% of midwives and nurses stated that children could not participate in decisions regarding their own health. It was observed that obtaining the child's consent in matters related to treatment does not make any difference between midwives and nurses. The rate of the midwives stating that they would report suspicious violence-neglect and abuse was found to be higher. CONCLUSION: The variables of the unit of employment, the state of having children, choosing the profession and practicing in it willingly, and getting training on children's rights make a difference in terms of children's rights in healthcare services. Midwives and nurses should be reminded of child rights in healthcare services through regular in-service training programs.


Subject(s)
Human Rights/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethics, Nursing , Female , Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/psychology , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Turkey
5.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 39(2): 101-109, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32000243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION: Despite a growing population of chronically and acute critically ill neonatal and pediatric patients, there were few published articles related to moral distress as experienced by nurses caring for these patients. OBJECTIVES/AIMS: The aim of this study was to define moral distress based on the perceptions and experiences of neonatal and pediatric critical care nurses. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study using focus group methodology was undertaken. All nurses with 2 or more years of experience from the 4 neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in a large 404-bed urban pediatric hospital located in the northeast were invited to attend 1 of 15 audio-recorded focus groups lasting 60 to 90 minutes. Once data were transcribed, conventional content analysis was used to develop the definition and categories of moral distress. RESULTS: Nurse participants defined moral distress as "patient care situations where there is a mismatch or incongruity between expected behaviors of the nurse and his/her personal values/beliefs in the neonatal/pediatric critical care setting." The 2 overarching categories that emerged from the data were patient-focused factors and nurse-focused factors. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how neonatal and pediatric critical care nurses define moral distress and what contributes to its development is foundational to developing targeted strategies for nursing support and education, with the goal of creating a culture of moral resiliency.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Critical Care Nursing/ethics , Morals , Neonatal Nursing/ethics , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/ethics
6.
Nurs Child Young People ; 31(4): 28-33, 2019 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31468764

ABSTRACT

This article explores ethical decision-making surrounding clinical holding of children and young people in healthcare environments with the aim of enhancing autonomy and engagement on their behalf. A considerable body of evidence, published over the last 20 years, suggests that this complex and challenging area of practice is not always well managed, with mixed messages about the nature of consent, choice and negotiated practice countered by best interests decisions taking precedence ahead of the child's wishes. An ethical framework is proposed comprising four levels of value-based interventions and how they may be applied in clinical practice, allowing for increased engagement, empowerment and support on behalf of children and young people in relation to clinical holding decisions.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Nursing , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Pediatric Nursing/trends , United Kingdom
7.
Home Healthc Now ; 36(3): 154-158, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29722705

ABSTRACT

Pediatric home care nurses often become a valuable part of the family unit, and this can blur the professional boundary between nurse and patient. Home care professionals must educate themselves as well as patients and family members about the integrity of their professional relationship, and prevent boundary crossing before it occurs. This article highlights four case studies that describe situations of boundary crossing that could have been managed differently. Strategies for maintaining professional boundaries with patients and their families are provided.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Professional , Home Care Services/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/ethics , Professional Competence , Child , Humans , Nurse's Role , Nurse-Patient Relations/ethics
8.
Nurs Ethics ; 25(1): 111-122, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27005952

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Paediatric nurses often face complex situations requiring decisions that sometimes clash with their own values and beliefs, or with the needs of the children they care for and their families. Paediatric nurses often use new technology that changes the way they provide care, but also reduces their direct interaction with the child. This may generate ethical issues, which nurses should be able to address in the full respect of the child. Research question and objectives: The purpose of this review is to describe the main ethical dimensions of paediatric nursing. Our research question was, 'What are the most common ethical dimensions and competences related to paediatric nursing?' RESEARCH DESIGN: A rapid evidence assessment. METHOD: According to the principles of the rapid evidence assessment, we searched the PubMed, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases for papers published between January 2001 and March 2015. These papers were then independently read by two researchers and analysed according to the inclusion criteria. Ethical considerations: Since this was a rapid evidence assessment, no approval from the ethics committee was required. FINDINGS: Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Ethical issues in paediatric nursing were grouped into three areas: (a) ethical issues in paediatric care, (b) social responsibility and (c) decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Few studies investigate the ethical dimensions and aspects of paediatric nursing, and they are mainly qualitative studies conducted in critical care settings based on nurses' perceptions and experiences. Paediatric nurses require specific educational interventions to help them resolve ethical issues, contribute to the decision-making process and fulfil their role as advocates of a vulnerable population (i.e. sick children and their families). Further research is needed to investigate how paediatric nurses can improve the involvement of children and their families in decision-making processes related to their care plan.


Subject(s)
Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Child , Clinical Competence , Humans , Social Responsibility
10.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 34: 17-22, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28215447

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of child maltreatment among inpatient pediatric nurses. DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was used to obtain responses to an online survey designed to examine perceptions of child maltreatment from inpatient pediatric nurses. RESULTS: Many nurses surveyed (41.25%) indicated that they had not received adequate training or had never received training on child maltreatment identification and many (40%) also indicated they were not familiar with the applicable reporting laws. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the serious immediate and long term effects of child maltreatment, it is imperative that pediatric inpatient nurses have adequate training on how to identify potential abuse and neglect cases, as well as legal reporting requirements, since they are in a unique position to identify potential cases of maltreatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: There is a continuing need for training on child maltreatment identification and reporting laws for inpatient pediatric nurses.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Child Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Nurse-Patient Relations/ethics , Nurses, Pediatric/ethics , Nursing Staff, Hospital/ethics , Adult , Child , Child Abuse/ethics , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Needs Assessment , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Perception , United States
13.
Nurs Stand ; 29(38): 64-5, 2015 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25990185
14.
Nurs Child Young People ; 26(8): 15, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25289625

ABSTRACT

RECENTLY I WAS involved in a situation in which I was asked to assist two staff nurses in an invasive procedure with a young child. Initially, I held the child down as instructed to do by the staff nurses. The child became distressed, so I asked the nurses to stop the procedure and to give the child a break.


Subject(s)
Child Advocacy , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/nursing , Nurse-Patient Relations , Pediatric Nursing , Students, Nursing , Child , Child Advocacy/ethics , Crying , Health Facility Environment/ethics , Humans , Intensive Care Units/ethics , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/ethics , Nurse-Patient Relations/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Restraint, Physical/ethics
15.
Nurs Ethics ; 21(5): 608-20, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24493711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The interest in the children's role in pediatric care is connected to children's health-related autonomy and informed consent in care. Despite the strong history of children's rights, nurses' role in the everyday nursing phenomenon, that is, restraint in somatic pediatric care, is still relatively seldom reported. AIM: The aim of this study is to describe nurses' perceptions of the use of restraint in somatic pediatric care. The ultimate aim is to deepen the understanding of the phenomenon of restraint, whose previous study has been fragmented. METHODS: Qualitative approach was selected because of the lack of previous information. Due to the sensitivity of the research question, individual interviewees were selected among voluntary nurses (n = 8). All participants were registered nurses with general work experience as nurses of 5-16 years on average and specifically 1.5-10 years in pediatric nursing. Inductive content analysis was used for aiming to produce a synthesis of the research phenomenon. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The research received organizational approval by the university hospital, and informed consent and confidentiality were ensured. RESULTS: Restraint in pediatric nursing was process-like, but occurred without advanced planning. The restraint-related process included five categories: (a) identification of the situations where restraint may occur, (b) finding preventive methods, (c) identification of different forms of restraint, (d) rationing the use of restraint, and (e) post-restraint acts. Restraint was seen as a part of pediatric nursing which occurred daily and involved several professionals. According to the nurses' illustrations, restraint means doing things even when a child is not agreeable. CONCLUSION: Restraint is part of somatic pediatric nursing, described as the last, but in some cases, the only resort for carrying out care or treatment. Restraint is not a goal in itself, but an instrumental tool and procedure in carrying out care. In the future, more information about nurses' role and the use of restraint in pediatric nursing is still needed.


Subject(s)
Patient Rights , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Restraint, Physical/ethics , Attitude of Health Personnel , Confidentiality , Humans , Informed Consent , Interviews as Topic , Personal Autonomy , Qualitative Research
16.
Nurs Ethics ; 21(2): 245-56, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23702897

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to identify key aspects in the exchange of information and to determine how nurses communicate news to hospitalised children. For this study, we applied the critical incident technique with 30 children aged between 8 and 14 years. Data were collected in paediatric units in a hospital in Alicante (Spain) using participant observation and semi-structured interviews. The analysis yielded three main categories: the children's reaction to the information, nursing staff behaviour as a key aspect in the exchange of information and communication of news as well as children's experience. This article emphasises the need to promote children's consent and participation in nursing interventions. An analysis of these aspects will verify whether children's rights are being respected and taken into account in order to promote children's well-being and adaptation to hospitalisation.


Subject(s)
Communication , Information Dissemination/ethics , Nurse-Patient Relations/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Perception , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Qualitative Research , Spain
17.
Nurs Health Sci ; 15(4): 410-4, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23656564

ABSTRACT

Observational research has a history of controversy, particularly when the research is conducted in a clinical setting. Existing ethical approval processes focus on protecting participants and the researcher's responsibilities, in particular where vulnerable populations are concerned. In this study, the authors explored the less overt and often understated ethical challenges that can arise when conducting observational research in a clinical setting. Reflecting on two recent studies conducted in different clinical settings, the authors described the challenges of blurring role boundaries, the risk of collecting redundant data, and the impact of reverse power relationships between researchers, clinicians, and managers. From their experiences, the authors suggested that the preparatory work undertaken with clinicians and managers onsite, which typically focuses on how the researchers will maintain the ethical robustness of the research and protect the rights of participants and the vulnerable, should also highlight the sometimes overlooked ethical issues associated with participatory research. This can help ensure that participants and managers understand the scope and limitations of the research, and consider the ways in which the observed can influence the researcher and the findings.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/ethics , Observation/methods , Qualitative Research , Researcher-Subject Relations/ethics , Adult , Anthropology, Cultural/ethics , Australia , Beneficence , Child , Data Collection/methods , Humans , Observer Variation , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Professional Misconduct , Professional-Patient Relations/ethics , Research Subjects/psychology , Terminal Care/ethics , United Kingdom , Vulnerable Populations
18.
J Emerg Nurs ; 39(3): 273-9, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23102934

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recommendations by the ENA and other professional organizations have not resulted in widespread adoption of routine assessment for family violence such as child abuse and intimate partner violence. The aim of this qualitative study was to use a theory-driven approach to explore the salient beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians related to routine assessment of child abuse and intimate partner violence in the pediatric emergency department. METHODS: Nurse and physician participants from a large Midwestern pediatric trauma center responded to a series of open-ended questions designed to identify positive or negative attitudes toward family violence assessment, approving or disapproving beliefs about family violence assessment, and the perception of ease or difficulty in performing family violence assessment. RESULTS: Respondents valued early identification and the associated health benefits of keeping pediatric patients safe, as well as linking at-risk families to community resources. They believe that victims, health care organizations, and some providers approve of routine family violence assessment but also believe that some providers and families who value privacy disapprove. Previously identified barriers and facilitators to family violence assessment were confirmed by participants. A finding unique to this study was that participants expressed the belief that routine family violence assessment offers more complete health care to children. DISCUSSION: Participants viewed child abuse and intimate partner violence as an event in a child's life that affects the child's health. Participants valued the benefits of routine family violence assessment; however, translating these value beliefs into practice remains elusive. A theoretical framework may provide insight into yet unidentified aspects of known barriers and facilitators.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Child Welfare/psychology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Pediatrics/methods , Child , Child Welfare/ethics , Confidentiality , Emergency Nursing/ethics , Emergency Nursing/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/ethics , Humans , Medical Staff, Hospital/ethics , Midwestern United States , Nursing Staff, Hospital/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/methods , Pediatrics/ethics , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Rev. cuba. enferm ; 28(2): 144-155, abr.-jun. 2012.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing, CUMED | ID: lil-653823

ABSTRACT

El dolor es una realidad, una experiencia subjetiva culturalmente construida y sociohistóricamente determinada desde la más tierna infancia. Con respecto a los cuidados proporcionados a niños y adolescentes un reto de vigente actualidad es el alivio del dolor tanto agudo como crónico. Los abordajes para su tratamiento han ido cambiando y mejorando a medida que aumentaban los conocimientos por lo que disponemos de una gran variedad de intervenciones terapéuticas tanto farmacológicas como no farmacológicas. El objetivo del trabajo es visibilizar cómo se lleva a cabo la valoración del dolor en ciertas técnicas, procedimientos y procesos patológicos, así como los conocimientos que sobre intervenciones terapéuticas enfermeras para el alivio del dolor y su grado de aplicación en contextos asistenciales hospitalarios. En este artículo exclusivamente se muestran los resultados relativos a la valoración del dolor. Pude concluirse que existen algunos procesos patológicos en los que no se apuntaba la pertinencia de valorar el dolor., posiblemente no se trate de una inadecuada valoración del dolor sino por el motivo de ingreso en las unidades estudiadas. Con respecto a técnicas y procedimientos apuntan en el mismo sentido, aunque se cree importante profundizar en las causas que subyacen en aquellos casos en los que no se valora en ningún momento del procedimiento el dolor del paciente pediátrico(AU)


Pain is a reality, a subjective experience culturally built and socio-historically determined from the earliest childhood. With regard to the care provided to children and adolescents, a challenge of a present validity is the pain relief, both acute and chronic. Approaches for treatment have been changing and improving as knowledge increased so we have a wide variety of therapeutic interventions both pharmacological and non-pharmacological. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how to carry out the assessment of pain in certain techniques, procedures and pathological processes and as well as the knowledge on therapeutic interventions nursing for pain relief and its level of application in welfare hospital contexts. In this article exclusively is shown the results related to pain assessment. It may be concluded that there are some pathological processes that were not pointed out the relevance of evaluating the pain, possibly is not a case of an inadequate assessment of pain but the reason for admission in the studied units. With regard to techniques and procedures they pointed in the same direction, although it is believed important to look into the causes underlying those cases where the procedure of the pain of the pediatric patient is not valued at any moment(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Child , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Pain Measurement/adverse effects , Neonatal Nursing/ethics , Nursing Care/methods , Pain Clinics/ethics
20.
Nurs Ethics ; 19(2): 268-78, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22457386

ABSTRACT

The present article aims to scrutinize publishing ethics in the fields of paediatrics and paediatric nursing. Full-text readings of all original research articles in paediatrics from a high-income economy, i.e. Sweden, and from all low-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa, were reviewed as they were indexed and stored in Web of Science for the search period from 1 January 2007 to 7 October 2009. The application of quantitative and qualitative content analysis revealed a marked discrepancy in publishing frequencies between the two contrasting economies. Authors from 16 low-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa, with at least one article stored, were obviously closely linked to co-authorships and foreign funding sources, predominantly from Europe and the USA. Statements concerning conflicts of interest were frequently missing (both regions), even when multiple financial sources, including companies, were involved. It is necessary to be aware of possible systematic bias when using electronic databases to search for certain topics and regions. Further research regarding publishing ethics in paediatrics and paediatric nursing is emphasized.


Subject(s)
Nursing Research/ethics , Pediatric Nursing/ethics , Pediatrics/ethics , Publishing/ethics , Abstracting and Indexing , Authorship/standards , Conflict of Interest , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Databases, Factual , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , Financing, Government/ethics , Humans , Nursing Research/methods , Selection Bias
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...