Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 486
Filter
1.
Aust J Prim Health ; 302024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39283976

ABSTRACT

Background Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and debilitating condition, and sufferers present to healthcare professionals with variable complex symptoms and co-morbidities. This study aimed to investigate the current beliefs and practice behaviours of healthcare professionals towards the management of CPP in Australian females. Methods We distributed an online survey to Australian healthcare professionals. Participants were questioned regarding their beliefs, the importance of various contributing factors and assessment variables, and their management preferences for two CPP vignettes. Demographic information and responses were analysed with descriptive statistics. Results Complete data were obtained and analysed from 446 respondents including gynaecologists (n =75), general practitioners (GPs) (n =184) and physiotherapists (n =187). Most of the respondents were female (88.1%), with male (11.7%) and other (0.2%) making up a smaller representation. Physiotherapists rated themselves higher in understanding mechanisms of CPP (64.7% very good to excellent) compared to gynaecologists (41.3%) and GPs (22.8%). Physiotherapists also reported higher levels of confidence in managing patients with CPP (57.8% quite or extremely confident) compared to 41.3% of gynaecologists and 22.3% of GPs who reported being quite or extremely confident. All three professions rated patient's beliefs (89.8%), nervous system sensitisation (85.7%), stress/anxiety/depression (91.9%), fear avoidance (83.3%), history of sexual/emotional/physical abuse (94.1%) and pelvic floor muscle function (85.0%) as very/extremely important factors in the development of chronic pelvic pain. Most gynaecologists (71.0%) and GPs (70.2%) always referred for pelvic ultrasound during assessment. Physiotherapists assessed goal setting (88.8%) and screened for patients' beliefs (80.9%) more often than gynaecologists (30.4% and 39.1% respectively) and GPs (46.5% and 29.0% respectively). Conclusions All three groups of healthcare professionals demonstrated a good understanding of pain mechanisms and incorporated a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to management of females with chronic pelvic pain. However, both gynaecologists and GPs were less confident in their understanding of and management of CPP, and less likely to consider patient beliefs and goals. The findings of this online survey may assist in the provision of more targeted education to further improve management of this condition.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Chronic Pain , Pelvic Pain , Humans , Female , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Australia , Male , Adult , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , General Practitioners/psychology , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapists/psychology , Physical Therapists/statistics & numerical data
2.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 503, 2024 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39261782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain(CPP) in refugee and non-refugee women, determine the factors associated with CPP, and evaluate the effect of CPP on life quality. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among 283 non-refugee and 278 refugee women in Turkey. A questionnaire including questions assessing chronic pelvic pain and related factors, World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Short Form(WHOQOL-BREF), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, were administered to the participants. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and multiple logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic pelvic pain was 41.0% in refugee women and 19.1% in non-refugee women (p< 0.001). The prevalence of CPP was 1.68 times higher in refugee women than in non-refugee women (OR;95%CI:1.68;1.01-2.81). In the multivariate analysis performed in the study group, refugee status, low family income status(OR;95%CI:2.09;1.26-3.46), low back pain(OR;95%CI:2.02;1.21-3.35), dyspareunia (OR; 95%CI:2.96;1.75-4.99), number of three or more miscarriages (OR;95%CI:3.07;1.18-8.01), history of gynaecological surgery (OR;95%CI:2.44;1.33-4.50), diarrhea (OR;95%CI:2.01;1.07-3.76), urinary tract infections(OR; 95%CI:1.66;1.02-2.71) and anxiety(OR; 95%CI:1.17;1.10-1.24) were found to be risk factors for CPP. In the refugee and non-refugee groups, those with CPP had lower scores in all subdomains of the WHOQOL-BREF scale than those without CPP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Refugee status independently contributes to the risk of developing CPP. Targeted interventions to address CPP and its associated risk factors are needed, particularly in vulnerable refugee populations, to improve their quality of life.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Pelvic Pain , Quality of Life , Refugees , Humans , Female , Quality of Life/psychology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Adult , Refugees/psychology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Turkey/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e085879, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830733

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Synthesis of the experience of women with pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal, to identify pain-related problems and to formulate psychological aspects of pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies of pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh, or mesh removal, in women over 18 years, using individual interviews, focus groups, free text, or written or oral contributions to formal enquiries. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and PsycINFO, from inception to 26 April 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Qualitative studies of pain and other symptoms from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal; adults; no language restriction. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Line-by-line coding of participant quotations and study author statements by one author to provide codes that were applied to half the studies by another author and differences resolved by discussion. Codes were grouped into subthemes and themes by both authors, then scrutinised and discussed by a focus group of mesh-injured women for omissions, emphasis and coherence. Studies were appraised using an amalgamation of the CASP and COREQ tools. RESULTS: 2292 search results produced 9 eligible studies, with 7-752 participants, a total of around 2000. Four recruited patients, four totally or partially from mesh advocacy groups, and two were national enquiries (UK and Australia). Four major themes were as follows: broken body, broken mind; distrust of doctors and the medical industry; broken life and keeping going-a changed future. Psychological content mainly concerned the loss of trust in medical care, leaving women unsupported in facing an uncertain future. Mesh-injured women strongly endorsed the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and other problems associated with pelvic mesh are profound and far-reaching for women affected. Worse, they feel subject to continued gaslighting, including denial of their mesh-related problems and dismissal of their concerns about continued mesh insertion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022330527.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Surgical Mesh , Humans , Female , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/psychology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/etiology
4.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 321, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834977

ABSTRACT

Violence against women is a phenomenon that involves at least 35% of women worldwide. Violence can be sexual, physical, and/or psychological, perpetrated by the partner, another family member, or a stranger. Violence is a public health problem because its consequences include higher morbidity, higher mortality, and short and long-term physical and psychological health diseases. Most studies prove an association between any type of violence and some chronic pain diagnoses but no one has done a complete collection of this evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether this association is statistically significant, including the largest number of studies. Through the inclusion of 37 articles, the association has been demonstrated. Compared with no history of violence, women who did experience violence showed 2 times greater odds of developing chronic pain. The impact of violence was significant also on fibromyalgia separately, but not on pelvic pain.PROSPERO registrationPROSPERO CRD42023425477.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Humans , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Female , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Fibromyalgia/psychology , Fibromyalgia/epidemiology , Fibromyalgia/complications
5.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301095, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP), which is identified by tender points in the pelvic floor musculature, is a prevalent source of chronic pelvic pain in women. It may lead to physical and mental exhaustion, reproductive concerns, and coping difficulties in daily life and work than the disease itself. Pain-related cognitive processes can affect pain relief and quality of life. Kinesiophobia, self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing are frequently treated as mediators between pain and its related consequences. Greater kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing have been shown to be associated with adverse functional outcomes, while higher self-efficacy has been related with improved quality of life. Regarding MFPP in females of childbearing age, it remains unclear whether the effects of kinesiophobia, self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing on daily interference are direct or indirect; the influence on each variable is, therefore, not entirely evident. AIM: The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between pain and daily interference in reproductive-age women with MFPP through kinesiophobia, self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing, as well as to identify areas for future investigation and intervention based on the data collected from this population. METHODS: This is a multi-center cross-sectional study. The study was conducted from November 15, 2022 to November 10, 2023, 202 reproductive-age women with MFPP were recruited from 14 hospitals in ten provinces of China. The demographic variables, Brief Pain Inventory, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale were used to measure the participants' related information. The data was described and analyzed using Descriptive analyses, Pearson correlation analysis, and Serial mediation modeling. RESULTS: Pain not only had a direct positive impact (B = 0.575; SE = 0.081; 95%CI: LL = 0.415, UL = 0.735) on daily interference, but also had an indirect impact on daily interference through the independent mediating role of pain catastrophizing (B = 0.088; SE = 0.028; 95%CI: LL = 0.038, UL = 0.148), the chain mediating of kinesiophobia and catastrophizing (B = 0.057; SE = 0.019; 95%CI: LL = 0.024, UL = 0.098), and the four-stage serial mediating of kinesiophobia, self-efficacy and catastrophizing (B = 0.013; SE = 0.006; 95%CI: LL = 0.003, UL = 0.027). The proposed serial mediation model showed a good fit with the collected data. CONCLUSION: The findings illustrate the significance of addressing pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia (especially catastrophizing), and increasing self-efficacy in pain therapy, and suggest that functional recovery be integrated into pain therapy for reproductive-age women suffering from MFPP.


Subject(s)
Catastrophization , Pelvic Pain , Self Efficacy , Humans , Female , Catastrophization/psychology , Adult , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Young Adult , Quality of Life/psychology , Pain Measurement , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Fear/psychology , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Kinesiophobia
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 44(1): 2359126, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A biopsychosocial approach to the understanding of pelvic pain is increasingly acknowledged. However, there is a lack of standardised instruments - or their use - to assess risk factors and their impact on pelvic pain in both clinical and research settings. This review aims to identify validated tools used to assess known contributory factors to pelvic pain, as well as the validated tools to measure the impact of pelvic pain in adolescents and young adults, in order to provide a framework for future standardised, adolescent specific assessment and outcome tools. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, PsycInfo and PubMed. Search terms included pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, endometriosis, adolescent, pain measurement, quality of life, sleep, mental health, coping strategies and traumatic experience. RESULTS: We found validated instruments to assess adverse childhood experiences and coping strategies, both known contributing factors to pelvic pain. The impact of pain was measured through validated tools for health-related quality of life, mental health and sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic pain evaluation in adolescents should include a multi-factorial assessment of contributing factors, such as childhood adversity and coping strategies, and impacts of pelvic pain on quality of life, mental health and sleep, using validated instruments in this age group. Future research should focus on the development of consensus amongst researchers as well as input from young women to establish a standardised international approach to clinical trials involving the investigation and reporting of pelvic pain in adolescents. This would facilitate comparison between studies and contribute to improved quality of care delivered to patients.


Pelvic pain is pain located in the lower abdomen, and includes period pain, which is the most common gynaecologic condition in adolescents and young adults. An approach that includes biological, psychological and social factors is important to understand and manage pelvic pain. Nonetheless, these factors are often poorly assessed in the clinic and research setting. We performed a literature review to identify tools that measure risk factors for pelvic pain, and those that evaluate the impact of pelvic pain. We found instruments that measure exposure to childhood trauma and coping strategies, which are risk factors for developing pelvic pain. We found tools to assess quality of life, mental health and sleep as an impact of pelvic pain. A standardised approach to pelvic pain, including instruments to measure risk factors and impact of pelvic pain, would facilitate comparison between studies and improve quality of care for patients.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Pelvic Pain , Quality of Life , Humans , Adolescent , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Female , Pain Measurement/methods , Risk Factors , Mental Health , Adverse Childhood Experiences/psychology , Dysmenorrhea/psychology , Young Adult , Sleep/physiology
7.
J Sex Med ; 21(6): 566-572, 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genitopelvic pain following childbirth is common and likely to challenge the psychological, relational, and sexual well-being of new mothers. While genitopelvic pain generally decreases during the postpartum period, personal and interpersonal characteristics may explain why genitopelvic pain persists beyond the period of physical recovery in some mothers. Body image concerns, increased stress, and relationship challenges would be particularly salient during pregnancy and the postpartum period, which could put new mothers at greater risk of sexual difficulties. Also, mothers may display a negative appraisal regarding genitopelvic pain and doubt their ability to cope with it, which may contribute to the pain. AIM: The current study aimed to examine the role of perfectionism, body image concerns, and perceived intimacy in the occurrence and change in genitopelvic pain in new mothers in postpartum. METHODS: A total of 211 new mothers and their partners were recruited for a larger prospective dyadic study on the transition to parenthood. OUTCOMES: Mothers completed a single item assessing genitopelvic pain, in addition to brief validated questionnaires measuring perfectionism, body image concerns, and perceived couple intimacy during pregnancy and at 4, 8, and 12 months postpartum. RESULTS: Five multilevel modeling analyses revealed that adaptive perfectionism, maladaptive perfectionism, and body image concerns were associated with a higher occurrence of genitopelvic pain from 4 to 12 months postpartum. Mothers' and partners' perceived intimacy was not significantly related to new mothers' genitopelvic pain. None of the predictors modified the trajectory of genitopelvic pain over time. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Raising awareness among health care professionals regarding the role of perfectionism and body image concerns in genitopelvic pain may help them identify new mothers at risk of chronic genitopelvic pain, while offering a new avenue of intervention. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: There has been little research examining the role of perfectionism, body image concerns, and intimacy in postpartum genitopelvic pain. Based on a longitudinal prospective approach, this study identified perfectionism and body image concerns as significant predictors of postpartum genitopelvic pain. However, prepregnancy genitopelvic pain, genitopelvic pain intensity, and sexual distress were not measured. CONCLUSION: Adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism and body image concerns are associated with new mothers' genitopelvic pain up to 12 months postpartum.


Subject(s)
Body Image , Mothers , Pelvic Pain , Perfectionism , Postpartum Period , Humans , Female , Body Image/psychology , Adult , Prospective Studies , Postpartum Period/psychology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Mothers/psychology , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Male , Adaptation, Psychological , Sexual Partners/psychology
8.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(6): 2741-2749, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563981

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of life, sexual function, anxiety, and depression of women with endometriosis according to pain symptoms and infertility. METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter study included 229 women with endometriosis followed up at a tertiary hospital in Campinas, a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, and a reproductive medicine clinic in Campinas from 2018 to 2021. The women were divided into four groups according to the presence of pain symptoms and infertility. The Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire, Female Sexual Function Index, Beck Depression Inventory, and Beck Anxiety Index were applied to assess quality of life, sexual function, depression, and anxiety of women with endometriosis. RESULTS: The women were grouped as follows: group 1 (45 women without infertility and without pain), group 2 (73 women without infertility and with pain), group 3 (49 women with infertility and without pain), and group 4 (62 women with infertility and pain). Of the women with infertility, the majority had primary infertility. Most women had deep endometriosis (p = 0.608). Women with pain had higher anxiety and depression scores and worse quality of life than women without pain (p < 0.001). Regarding sexual function, all the groups were at risk for sexual dysfunction (p = 0.671). The group of women with pain and infertility have worse anxiety scores (25.31 ± 15.96) and depression (18.81 ± 11.16) than the other groups. CONCLUSION: Pain symptoms worsen anxiety, depression, and quality of life of women with endometriosis and when associated with infertility, greater impairment of psychological aspects may occur.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Endometriosis , Infertility, Female , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/psychology , Endometriosis/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Depression/psychology , Depression/etiology , Anxiety/psychology , Infertility, Female/psychology , Infertility, Female/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/psychology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
9.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 53(4): 416-426, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599242

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine women's experiences of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) pain. DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional. SETTING: Online questionnaires in a Facebook PCS support group. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 143 women who self-identified as being diagnosed with PCS. METHODS: We recruited women through a social media support group and invited them to participate in a self-reported questionnaire. We collected demographic information and used the McGill Pain Questionnaire to elicit responses related to pain quality, pain intensity, quality of life, and satisfaction with health care. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Respondents characterized their PCS pain as exhausting, stabbing, sharp, shooting, and tender. Respondents indicated that 19 of 24 daily activities increased PCS pain, whereas only 5 reduced PCS pain. Pain intensity was negatively related to the quality of life, health satisfaction, sleep, and sexual relationships. CONCLUSION: Chronic pelvic pain from PCS severely affected quality of life among respondents. These findings suggest a difference in the presentation of PCS from historical pain depictions and further highlight the need to identify pain profiles to increase timely and precise diagnosis. Further research is needed to evaluate interventions to increase the quality of life for women with PCS.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Pain Measurement , Pelvic Pain , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Quality of Life/psychology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pain Measurement/methods , Middle Aged , Syndrome , Chronic Pain/psychology , Young Adult
10.
Pain ; 165(9): 2111-2118, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564184

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: A cross-sectional multinational collaborative study on women with endometriosis from Latin America and Spain uncovered high levels of painful symptomatology and high pain catastrophizing scores. Associations between pain perception/catastrophizing and race/ethnicity have been documented. This study was conducted to uncover factors moderating pelvic pain severity, including socioeconomic variables, self-identified race, and pain catastrophizing in women with endometriosis from Latin America and Spain, a population encompassing diverse racial and sociocultural contexts. Self-reported data on demographics, clinical history, Ob-Gyn history, pelvic pain intensity, and pain catastrophizing were collected with the Spanish World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) Endometriosis Phenome Project (EPhect) Clinical Questionnaire (ECQ). Multiple logistic regression was conducted to analyze effects of self-identified race, demographic clusters (defined as countries with similar racial population distribution), socioeconomic factors, and pain catastrophizing on reporting severe vs moderate-mild levels of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and pelvic pain. Self-identified race did not affect the likelihood of reporting severe pelvic pain; however, there were significant differences in reporting severe dysmenorrhea at worst among demographic clusters. Older age was associated with severe dyspareunia at worst and recent pelvic pain. Pain catastrophizing score was highly predictive of reporting most types of severe pelvic pain, regardless of race and demographic cluster. These results negate a role of racial categories as moderator of pain in women from Latin America and Spain and support integration of pain catastrophizing assessments and psychological interventions into the pain management plan to enhance therapeutic outcomes and QoL for patients with endometriosis.


Subject(s)
Catastrophization , Endometriosis , Pain Perception , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/psychology , Endometriosis/ethnology , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/epidemiology , Catastrophization/psychology , Latin America/ethnology , Latin America/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pain Perception/physiology , Middle Aged , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Pelvic Pain/ethnology , Young Adult , Pain Measurement , Self Concept , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sociodemographic Factors
11.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 217, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570870

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women's pelvic health is a globally important subject, included in international and United Kingdom health policies, emphasising the importance of improving information and access to pelvic health services. Consequences of pelvic symptoms are intimate, personal, and varied, often causing embarrassment and shame, affecting women's quality of life and wellbeing. AIM: To understand the experience of seeking healthcare for stigmatised pelvic health symptoms by synthesising all types of published primary research and mapping the results to behavioural theory, to identify potential targets for intervention. METHODS: Systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, PubMED databases, CDSR and CENTRAL registers, from inception to May 2023 for all types of research capturing women's views and experiences of seeking help with stigmatised urogenital and bowel symptoms. Studies only reporting prevalence, predictors of help-seeking, non-health related help-seeking, or written in languages other than English, German, French, Spanish and Swedish were excluded. Reference checking and forward citation searching for all included studies was performed. A results-based synthesis approach was used to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Themes were mapped to the Common-Sense model and Candidacy framework. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for critical appraisal. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research for assessing certainty of review findings. RESULTS: 86 studies representing over 20,000 women from 24 high income countries were included. Confidence was high that barriers to help-seeking were similar across all study types and pelvic symptoms: stigma, lack of knowledge, women's perception that clinicians dismissed their symptoms, and associated normalising and deprioritising of low bother symptoms. Supportive clinicians and increased knowledge were key facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Common-Sense Model to explore women's help-seeking behaviour with stigmatised pelvic symptoms reveals problems with cognitive representation of symptom identity, emotional representations of embarrassment and shame, and a subjective norm that women believe their symptoms will be trivialised by clinicians. Together these barriers frustrate women's identification of their candidacy for healthcare. Addressing these issues through behavioural change interventions for women and clinicians, will help to achieve universal access to pelvic healthcare services (United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3.7). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021256956.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Social Stigma , Humans , Female , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Help-Seeking Behavior , Health Services Accessibility , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Quality of Life/psychology
12.
Pain ; 165(9): 1990-2001, 2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452219

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Pain science education (PSE) provides people with an understanding of "how pain works" grounded in the biopsychosocial model of pain; it has been demonstrated to improve outcomes in musculoskeletal pain conditions. Preliminary evidence suggests PSE may be effective for female individuals with persistent pelvic pain, but how the content of PSE needs to be modified for this group remains to be determined. A reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative data was performed to identify PSE concepts that female individuals with persistent pelvic pain consider important and why. Twenty individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult females who had engaged with PSE and had self-identified as having "improved" pelvic pain. Most participants had been diagnosed with endometriosis (n = 16). Four themes were generated capturing PSE concepts considered important by female individuals with "improved" pelvic pain: (1) "A sensitised nervous system leads to overprotective pain" validated their pelvic pain as being real; (2) "Pain does not have to mean the body is damaged (although sometimes it does)" provided reassurance that pelvic pain does not mean their condition is worsening; (3) "How I think, feel, and 'see' my pain can make it worse" enabled participants to find optimal ways to manage their pain; and (4) "I can change my pain… slowly" provided hope that pelvic pain can improve and empowered them to pursue pain improvement as a viable goal. This study generated 4 PSE learning concepts that were important to female individuals with improved pelvic pain and may be incorporated into PSE curricula for female individuals with pelvic pain.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Pain , Humans , Female , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Adult , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Young Adult , Pain Management/methods , Endometriosis/psychology , Endometriosis/complications
13.
Ginekol Pol ; 95(5): 356-364, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38334348

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Endometriosis is a disease that involves the ectopic growth of the endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Its average occurrence is about 10% of women of reproductive age. Making a diagnosis of the disease is commonly long-lasting and ambiguous due to the wide variety and intensity of symptoms. The aim of the study is to determine factors affecting the quality of life of women struggling with endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a diagnostic survey method with the use of the author's questionnaire and the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. The study population included 650 people (group with endometriosis - 361 women and group without endometriosis - 289 women). RESULTS: In the group of women with endometriosis, the mean age was significantly higher (31.87 vs 24.99). Difficulties with conception were significantly more common (51.67%) in the endometriosis group compared to 5.52% in the non-endometriosis group. In each area, the quality of life of women with endometriosis was significantly lower (p = 0.000). Women with the history of the disease of over 3 years significantly more often complained of dyspareunia (p = 0.048), bladder pain (p = 0.01) and lower back pain (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Endometriosis significantly reduces women's quality of life. Factors that deteriorate the quality of life of women with endometriosis include severe pain, infertility, dyspareunia and reduced satisfaction in various spheres of life (somatic, mental, social). More research is necessary to improve the quality of life of women with endometriosis.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/psychology , Endometriosis/complications , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health , Poland , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/etiology
14.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(1-2): 27-31, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An expectation that pelvic pain should be 'visible' at laparoscopy can lead to disappointment for patients and confusion among health practitioners when no abnormalities are found. OBJECTIVE: This article outlines an approach for understanding, explaining and managing chronic pelvic pain in women with a normal laparoscopy. It divides symptoms into those associated with pelvic organs, pelvic muscles, the central nervous system and psychosocial factors. DISCUSSION: Management requires considering the origin of the pain, the extent of pelvic muscle reaction to the pain, the severity of central pain sensitisation and additional psychosocial aggravating factors. Considering symptoms within these categories provides a useful framework to best target therapeutic interventions. A patient who knows that management of her pain will continue and that an absence of lesions does not diminish the validity of her pain experience can feel confident in herself and her health practitioner.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Laparoscopy , Humans , Female , Chronic Disease , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/therapy
15.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 43(3): 727-737, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38270336

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In patients with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS), the presence of widespread pain appears to identify a distinct phenotype, with a different symptom trajectory and potentially different response to treatment than patients with pelvic pain only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 76-site body map was administered four times, at weekly intervals, to 568 male and female UCPPS participants in the MAPP Network protocol. The 76 sites were classified into 13 regions (1 pelvic region and 12 nonpelvic regions). The degree of widespread pain was scored from 0 to 12 based on the number of reported nonpelvic pain regions. This continuous body map score was regressed over other measures of widespread pain, with UCPPS symptom severity, and with psychosocial variables to measure level of association. These models were repeated using an updated body map score (0-12) that incorporated a threshold of pain ≥ 4 at each site. RESULTS: Body map scores showed limited variability over the 4 weekly assessments, indicating that a single baseline assessment was sufficient. The widespread pain score correlated highly with other measures of widespread pain and correlated with worsened UCPPS symptom severity and psychosocial functioning. Incorporating a pain severity threshold ≥4 resulted in only marginal increases in these correlations. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the use of this 13-region body map in the baseline clinical assessment of UCPPS patients. It provides reliable data about the presence of widespread pain and does not require measurement of pain severity, making it relatively simple to use for clinical purposes.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Cystitis, Interstitial , Prostatitis , Humans , Male , Female , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/psychology , Syndrome , Pain Threshold , Pain Measurement , Cystitis, Interstitial/diagnosis
16.
J Pain ; 25(7): 104481, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246253

ABSTRACT

To correlate pain-related phenotyping for central nervous system sensitization in endometriosis-associated pain with mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, the prospective Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Interdisciplinary Cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02911090) was linked to the COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Study of a Provincial Population-Based Cohort for Gender and Sex (RESPPONSE) dataset. The primary outcomes were depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) scores during the pandemic. The explanatory variables of interest were the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score (0-100) and endometriosis-associated chronic pain comorbidities/psychological variables before the pandemic. The explanatory and response variables were assessed for correlation, followed by multivariable regression analyses adjusting for PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores pre-pandemic as well as age, body mass index, and parity. A higher CSI score and a greater number of chronic pain comorbidities before the pandemic were both positively correlated with PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores during the pandemic. These associations remained significant in adjusted analyses. Increasing the CSI score by 10 was associated with an increase in pandemic PHQ-9 by .74 points (P < .0001) and GAD-7 by .73 points (P < .0001) on average. Each additional chronic pain comorbidity/psychological variable was associated with an increase in pandemic PHQ-9 by an average of .63 points (P = .0004) and GAD-7 by .53 points (P = .0002). Endometriosis patients with a history of central sensitization before the pandemic had worse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a risk factor for mental health symptoms in the face of major stressors, clinical proxies for central sensitization can be used to identify endometriosis patients who may need additional support. PERSPECTIVE: This article adds to the growing literature of the clinical importance of central sensitization in endometriosis patients, who had more symptoms of depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical features of central sensitization may help clinicians identify endometriosis patients needing additional support when facing major stressors.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Central Nervous System Sensitization , Depression , Endometriosis , Humans , Endometriosis/psychology , Endometriosis/epidemiology , Endometriosis/complications , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Adult , Central Nervous System Sensitization/physiology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Comorbidity , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Prospective Studies , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Middle Aged , Mental Health
17.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 69(4): 543-549, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178322

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It is important for health care professionals to address women's pain and anxiety during pelvic examinations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of virtual reality (VR) on pain and anxiety management during pelvic examinations. METHODS: The study was a randomized controlled clinical trial reported in according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 Guidelines. The research was conducted with 128 women (64 intervention, 64 control) who received care at a tertiary hospital outpatient clinic between November 2021 and February 2022. The intervention group received VR application via virtual glasses during pelvic examination, while the control group received routine care. Anxiety was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory before and after the pelvic examination, and the Visual Analog Scale was used to assess pain after the pelvic examination. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05545488). RESULTS: The mean anxiety scores of the women in the intervention and control groups were similar pretest (59.00 and 57.77). The mean anxiety score decreased after the pelvic examination to 36.53 in the intervention group and 47.55 in the control group. Results indicated a significant main effect for group assignment (F9.56; η2 = .071; P = .002), a significant main effect for time (F384.14; η2 = .753; P < .001), and a significant interaction between group and time (F53.95; η2 = .300; P < .001). Pain scores after the pelvic examination were lower in the intervention group (4.25) than in the control group (6.41; P < .001). CONCLUSION: VR was effective in the management of pain and anxiety during pelvic examination. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of VR with other methods in reducing pain and anxiety during a pelvic examination.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Gynecological Examination , Pain Management , Virtual Reality , Humans , Female , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/therapy , Adult , Gynecological Examination/methods , Gynecological Examination/psychology , Gynecological Examination/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Young Adult , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Pelvic Pain/psychology
18.
Curr Opin Urol ; 34(2): 69-76, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823725

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic pelvic pain is much of a burden to those who suffer from it. Additionally, in many patients medical doctors, such as urologists are unable to identify a cause or clear pathology that can explain the pain. Still numerous patients and doctors keep on searching for a cause, focussing particularly on the pelvic organs. Lots of diagnostics and treatment methods are used but often without success. In recent years, we have gained increased insight into the mechanisms of pain and adapted the terminology accordingly. RECENT FINDINGS: Two aspects of chronic pelvic pain have gained more attention. First, the myofascial aspects, especially the role of the pelvic floor muscles in maintaining the pain and as a therapeutic option. Second, the role of the brain and the psychological aspects intertwine with the pain and its consequences also open up for alternative management options. In terminology chronic pain is now included in the ICD-11, a historical change. Introducing chronic primary pain (no cause found) helps us to look away from the organ and deal with the patient as a whole human being. SUMMARY: The findings reported here are helpful for your daily practice. Looking from a broad perspective gives the patient the feeling of being seen and heard. Working together in a multidisciplinary team makes your work easier and gives more satisfaction. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COU/A44.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Myofascial Pain Syndromes , Humans , Chronic Pain/complications , Chronic Pain/therapy , Urinary Bladder , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/complications , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/therapy , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Pelvis
19.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 229(5): 530.e1-530.e17, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516398

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central sensitization is frequently associated with chronic pelvic pain and requires specific management. The pain is described as hypersensitivity to an innocuous stimulus that is both widespread and persistent. However, no study has evaluated if central sensitization can be measured objectively with neurophysiological tests in the pelvic and perineal area to prove this concept in women with chronic pelvic pain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate nociceptive thresholds (primary objective) and spatial and temporal diffusion of pain among women with chronic pelvic pain and high or low scores of central sensitization. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, assessor-blinded, comparative study compared a cohort of women with chronic pelvic pain and a high (>5/10; n=29) vs low (<5/10; n=24) score of sensitization according to the Convergences PP criteria. Participants underwent a noninvasive bladder sensory test, a rectal barostat test, and a muscular (algometer) and a vulvar (vulvagesiometer) sensory test. Poststimulation pain (minutes), quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Survey), and psychological state, comprising anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression (Beck Depression Inventory Short Form), and catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), were assessed. RESULTS: The participants mostly suffered from endometriosis (35.8%), irritable bowel syndrome (35.8%), bladder pain syndrome (32.1%), and vestibulodynia (28.3%). Baseline characteristics were similar. Women with a high sensitization score had more painful diseases diagnosed (2.7±1.3 vs 1.6±0.8; P=.002) and suffered for longer (11±8 vs 6±5 years; P=.028) than participants with a low score. The bladder maximum capacity was equivalent between participants (399±168 vs 465±164 mL; P=.18). However, the pain felt at each cystometric threshold was significantly increased in women with a high sensitization score. No difference was identified for the rectal pain pressure step (29.3±5.5 vs 30.7±6.5 mm Hg; P=.38). Rectal compliance was decreased in women with a high sensitization score with a considerable increase in pain felt. The average of pain pressure thresholds at the 5 vulvar sites tested was decreased in these participants (162.5±90.5 vs 358.7±196.5 g; P=.0003). Similar results were found for the average of the pain pressure thresholds at 6 muscles tested (1.34±0.41 vs 2.63±1.52 kg/m2; P=.0002). A longer period was needed for patients with high sensitization score to obtain a VAS <3 out of 10 after the stimulation of the bladder (4.52±5.26 vs 1.27±2.96 minutes; P=.01), the rectum (3.75±3.81 vs 1.19±1.23 minutes; P=.009), and the muscles (1.46±1.69 vs 0.64±0.40 minutes; P=.002). The psychological state was equivalent between groups. No association was found between the sensory thresholds and the psychological state results. The physical component of the quality of life score was reduced in women with high sensitization score (P=.0005), with no difference in the mental component. CONCLUSION: Using neurophysiological tests, this study showed that there are objective elements to assess for the presence of central sensitization, independently of psychological factors.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Sensitization , Chronic Pain , Humans , Female , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Pain Measurement , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/psychology
20.
Pain ; 164(9): 1995-2008, 2023 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37144687

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) is a complex, debilitating condition in which patients often report nonpelvic pain in addition to localized pelvic pain. Understanding differential predictors of pelvic pain only vs widespread pain may provide novel pathways for intervention. This study leveraged baseline data from the Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain (MAPP) Research Network's Symptom Pattern Study to investigate the impact of childhood sexual and nonsexual violent trauma on pelvic and nonpelvic pain sensitivity among adult patients with UCPPS, as well as potential mediators of this association. Study participants who met inclusion criteria for UCPPS completed questionnaires assessing childhood and recent trauma, affective distress, cognitive dysfunction, and generalized sensory sensitivity. Experimental pain sensitivity was also evaluated using standardized pressure pain applied to the pubic region and the arm. Bivariate analyses showed that childhood violent trauma was associated with more nonviolent childhood trauma, more recent trauma, poorer adult functioning, and greater pain sensitivity at the pubic region, but not pain sensitivity at the arm. Path analysis suggested that childhood violent trauma was indirectly associated with pain sensitivity at both sites and that this indirect association was primarily mediated by generalized sensory sensitivity. More experiences of recent trauma also contributed to these indirect effects. The findings suggest that, among participants with UCPPS, childhood violent trauma may be associated with heightened pain sensitivity to the extent that trauma history is associated with a subsequent increase in generalized sensory sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Adverse Childhood Experiences , Chronic Pain , Pain Threshold , Pelvic Pain , Psychological Trauma , Sexual Trauma , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Adverse Childhood Experiences/psychology , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/physiopathology , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Psychological Trauma/physiopathology , Sexual Trauma/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL