The history of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of myasthenia gravis.

The beneficial effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) was a major discovery that came about through one young physician putting together a string of previous observations. To understand how this discovery came to light, we must first go back to earlier times when men hunted by bow-and-arrow to capture their prey. The substance used to poison the prey was eventually was identified as curare. Centuries later, a connection was made between the physiological effects of curare and a disease entity with no known pathological mechanism or treatment, myasthenia gravis. In 1935, house officer Dr. Mary Walker was the first physician to try physostigmine in the treatment of MG, which had previously been used to treat curare poisoning. What she saw was a dramatic improvement in the symptoms experienced in patients with MG, and thus became the first documented case of use of physostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, in the treatment of MG. This article is a summary of the history of the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: From Bench to Bedside to Battlefield'.

Mary Broadfoot Walker: 83 years since a historical discovery.

Mary Broadfoot Walker was a Scottish physician who, in 1935, described in great detail the effect of an anticholinesterase drug (physostigmine) on the signs and symptoms of myasthenia gravis. An original five-minutes movie is available online and the skepticism of her contemporary British medical doctors is understandable when the drastic effect of the treatment is shown in this movie. What Mary Walker taught us, more than eight decades ago, about myasthenia gravis continues to be the basis of a pharmacological diagnostic test and treatment of this disease.

Mary Broadfoot Walker: 83 years since a historical discovery / Mary Broadfoot Walker: 83 anos desde uma descoberta histórica

ABSTRACT Mary Broadfoot Walker was a Scottish physician who, in 1935, described in great detail the effect of an anticholinesterase drug (physostigmine) on the signs and symptoms of myasthenia gravis. An original five-minutes movie is available online and the skepticism of her contemporary British medical doctors is understandable when the drastic effect of the treatment is shown in this movie. What Mary Walker taught us, more than eight decades ago, about myasthenia gravis continues to be the basis of a pharmacological diagnostic test and treatment of this disease.

RESUMO Mary Broadfoot Walker foi uma médica escocesa que em 1935 descreveu em grande detalhe o efeito de uma droga anticolinesterásica (fisostigmina) nos sinais e sintomas da myasthenia gravis. Um filme original com cinco minutos de duração está disponível online e a reação cética dos colegas médicos contemporâneos de Mary é compreensível dado o drástico efeito terapêutico mostrado neste filme. O que Mary Walker nos ensinou mais de oito décadas atrás continua a ser a base de um teste diagnóstico farmacológico e do tratamento da myasthenia gravis.

Alzheimer's disease drugs: an application of the hormetic dose-response model.

This article provides an evaluation of the dose-response features of drugs that are intended to improve memory, some of which have been used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A common feature of these drugs is that they act via an inverted U-shaped dose response, consistent with the hormetic dose response model. This article assesses historical foundations that lead to the development of AD drugs, their dose-response features and how the quantitative features of such dose responses affected drug discovery and development, and the successes and possible failures of such agents in preclinical and clinical settings. This story begins about 150 years ago with the discovery of an active agent in the Calabar bean plant called physostigmine, its unfolding medical applications, and its implications for dose-response relationships, memory enhancement, and improved drug discovery activities. The article also demonstrates the occurrence of U-shaped dose responses for memory with numerous endogenous agonists including neurosteroids, various peptides (e.g., vasopressin, CCK-8, neuropeptide Y), and other agents (e.g., epinephrine, antagonists for platelet activity factor and nicotinic receptors), supporting the generalizability of the hormetic biphasic dose response. Finally, the significance of the U-shaped dose response is critical for successful clinical application, since it defines the therapeutic window.

The early toxicology of physostigmine: a tale of beans, great men and egos.

Mid-19th century European visitors to Old Calabar, an eastern province of Nigeria, could not avoid becoming aware of native belief in the power of the seeds of a local plant to determine whether individuals were innocent or guilty of some serious misdemeanour. The seeds were those of a previously unknown legume and soon referred to as the ordeal bean of Old Calabar. Their administration was known locally as 'chop nut'. Missionaries who arrived in Calabar in 1846 estimated that chop nut caused some 120 deaths annually and documented the course of poisoning. The latter information and samples of the beans rapidly found their way to Scotland, the home of the missionaries' parent church, explaining why the early toxicology of physostigmine, quantitatively the most important of three active alkaloids in the beans, has such strong Scottish, predominantly Edinburgh, associations. However, it was 1855 before the first of many medical scientists, Robert Christison, a toxicologist of repute, investigated the effects of the beans to the extent of eating part of one himself and documenting the moderate, if not severe, consequences. A further 6 years were to pass before Balfour's comprehensive botanical description of the bean plant appeared. It was he who named it Physostigma venenosum. It was not so long until the next event, one that sparked more intensive and international interest in the beans. In 1863 a young Edinburgh ophthalmologist, Argyll Robertson, published a paper announcing the arrival of the first agent that constricted the pupil of the eye. The drug was an extract of Calabar beans and Argyll Robertson openly admitted that he had been alerted to its unusual property by his physician friend, Thomas Fraser. A minor flood of contributions on the ophthalmic uses of bean extracts followed in the medical press in the next few months; those on their systemic toxicity were fewer. Fraser's MD thesis, submitted to the University of Edinburgh in 1862 and clearly pre-dating Argyll Robertson's involvement with the beans, became generally available a few weeks after the appearance of Argyll Robertson's paper and was the first to address in detail the features of systemic administration of extracts of the beans. A major problem facing all early researchers of the beans was that of deciding how best to extract their active principle, a task made all the more difficult because bioassays were the only means of determining if the toxin was being tracked. The stability of extracts was an inevitable issue and the active principle finally became known as physostigma or physostigmine, after the botanical name of the parent plant. The features of physostigmine toxicity were soon exhaustively documented, both in animals and humans. How they were mediated was another matter altogether. Fraser maintained that muscular paralysis, the cardinal feature, was the result of depression of the spinal cord and was generally, but far from unanimously, supported. Of those who had reservations, Harley was the most prominent. He concluded that paralysis was secondary to effects on the motor nerve endings and, in so doing, came nearest to present-day knowledge at a time when acetylcholine, cholinesterases and cholinesterase inhibitors were not even imagined. Differences of opinion on the mode of action of the beans were to be expected and it is hardly surprising that they were not resolved. No standard formulation of physostigmine was available so the potency of those used would have varied from one investigator to another, the range of animals experimented upon was large while the number used by any researcher was commonly in single figures, more readily available cold-blooded creatures seemed less sensitive to physostigmine toxicity than warm-blooded ones and only Fraser determinedly pursued an answer; in general, the others made one foray into bean research then turned their attentions elsewhere. The same problems would beset other aspects of bean research. While Fraser did not get as close to the mode of action of physostigmine as Harley, he reigns supreme when it comes to antagonism between physostigmine and atropine. By this time, the 1870s had dawned and although the concept of antagonism between therapeutic agents was not new, it had little, if any, reliable scientific foundation. This was about to change; antagonism was becoming exciting and rational. Fraser's firm belief that physostigmine and atropine were mutually antagonistic at a physiological level was contrary to the conventional wisdom of his contemporaries. This alone would earn him a place in history but his contribution goes much, much further. Unlike any other at the time, he investigated it with scientific rigour, experimenting on only one species, ensuring as best he could the animals were the same weight, adjusting the doses of drugs he gave them for bodyweight, determining the minimum lethal dose of each drug before assessing their antagonistic effects, adopting a single, incontrovertible endpoint for efficacy and carrying out sufficient numbers of experiments to appear convincing in a later era where the statistical power of studies is all-important. To crown it all, he presented his results graphically. Fraser never claimed to have discovered the antagonism between physostigmine and atropine. Bartholow in 1873 did, based on work done in 1869. But his data hardly justify it. If anyone can reasonably claim this particular scientific crown it is an ophthalmologist, Niemetschek, working in Prague in 1864. His colleague in the same discipline, Kleinwächter, was faced with treating a young man with atropine intoxication. Knowing of the contrary actions of the two drugs on the pupil, Niemetschek suggested that Calabar bean extract might be useful. Kleinwächter had the courage to take the advice and his patient improved dramatically. Clearly, this evidence is nothing more than anecdotal, but the ophthalmologists were correct and, to the present day, physostigmine has had an intermittent role in the management of anticholinergic poisoning. The converse, giving atropine to treat poisoning with cholinesterase inhibitors, of which physostigmine was the first, has endured more consistently and remains standard practice today. It is salutary to realise that the doses and dosage frequency of atropine together with the endpoints that define they are adequate were formulated by Fraser and others a century and a half ago.

Contemporary opinions about Mary Walker: a shy pioneer of therapeutic neurology.

OBJECTIVE: To contribute to a better understanding of a poorly appreciated pioneer of therapeutic neurology, Mary Broadfoot Walker, MD. BACKGROUND: At a time when the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) was "a source of discouragement to the patient and a cause of nightmare for the physician," Mary Walker demonstrated that temporary relief of myasthenic symptoms could be produced by subcutaneous injection of physostigmine or neostigmine (Prostigmin; Roche, Basel, Switzerland). She also pioneered the concept of a circulating factor as the etiology of myasthenia and was the first to report hypokalemia in familial periodic paralysis. Throughout her career she was dependent on her salaried jobs as a medical officer in several large London hospitals and was thus forced to turn down an offer of an honorary staff position with research beds. DESIGN/METHODS: Previously unpublished material written by persons who lived at the same time as Mary Walker is incorporated with the published record into an account of Mary Walker's accomplishments as assessed by her contemporaries. RESULTS: 1) Although Mary Walker's 1934 report on physostigmine for MG was ignored by most of those in clinical medicine at the time, those responsible for the financing of British medical research vainly hoped that it could be used as an example of the practical outcome of basic research. 2) Her 1935 demonstration of the beneficial effect of neostigmine (Prostigmin) was greeted with general skepticism because of the rapidity with which the patient's symptoms of myasthenic weakness improved, but she was soon vindicated by published confirmatory reports from several contemporaries. 3) Her 1938 demonstrations of what came to be known as "the Mary Walker effect" may have helped her reputation because subsequent published opinions of her contributions were generally favorable, although some people continue to disparage her even today. CONCLUSION: Mary Walker, with her brief case reports and her frequent demonstrations, not only offered symptomatic treatment for MG that has stood the test of time, but also provided the most convincing evidence at the time that the neuromuscular junction was the focus of the disease.

Argyll Robertson: 'twas better to be his pupil than to have his pupil.

The Scottish ophthalmologist Douglas Argyll Robertson (1837-1909) is best known for his description of the syphilitic pupil. He also made important contributions concerning the ocular effects of physostigmine and to filtration surgery for glaucoma. Outside of his medical practice, he was club champion at the Royal and Ancient Golf Club, St. Andrews, and the Honorable Company of Edinburgh Golfers many times. He was a champion archer of the Royal Company of Archers, the Queen's Bodyguard in Scotland. Robertson was honored as surgeon-oculist in Scotland to Queen Victoria and to King Edward VII.

[Development of physostigmine from a poisonous plant to an antidote. One of the most important drugs in the development of modern medicine?]. / Fysostigminets utvikling fra gift til motgift. Et av de mest betydningsfulle stoffer i utviklingen av moderne medisin?

Physostigmine was originally isolated from the Calabar Bean, which was used for ordeal by poison in West Africa. The main alkaloid was isolated in 1864. It acts through inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, and has been of major importance in elucidating the kinetics and configuration of the enzyme. Physostigmine has been important for our understanding of neurohumoral chemical transmission, and in mapping the cholinergic nerves. It was the first antagonist to curare, and has been widely used for various therapeutic purposes. Today it has been largely replaced by more efficient and safe drugs. It is still used as an antidote to poisoning from various psychopharmacological drugs, and to treat postoperative somnolence and respiratory depression. It is considered a potent antidote to organophosphorous poisoning and is used experimentally to treat Alzheimer's disease.