Brincidofovir inhibits polyomavirus infection in vivo.

Polyomaviruses are species-specific DNA viruses that can cause disease in immunocompromised individuals. Despite their role as the causative agents for several diseases, there are no currently approved antivirals for treating polyomavirus infection. Brincidofovir (BCV) is an antiviral approved for the treatment of poxvirus infections and has shown activity against other double-stranded DNA viruses. In this study, we tested the efficacy of BCV against polyomavirus infection in vitro and in vivo using mouse polyomavirus (MuPyV). BCV inhibited virus production in primary mouse kidney cells and brain cortical cells. BCV treatment of cells transfected with MuPyV genomic DNA resulted in a reduction in virus levels, indicating that viral inhibition occurs post-entry. Although in vitro BCV treatment had a limited effect on viral DNA and RNA levels, drug treatment was associated with a reduction in viral protein, raising the possibility that BCV acts post-transcriptionally to inhibit MuPyV infection. In mice, BCV treatment was well tolerated, and prophylactic treatment resulted in a reduction in viral DNA levels and a potent suppression of infectious virus production in the kidney and brain. In mice with chronic polyomavirus infection, therapeutic administration of BCV decreased viremia and reduced infection in the kidney. These data demonstrate that BCV exerts antiviral activity against polyomavirus infection in vivo, supporting further investigation into the use of BCV to treat clinical polyomavirus infections. IMPORTANCE: Widespread in the human population and able to persist asymptomatically for the life of an individual, polyomavirus infections cause a significant disease burden in the immunocompromised. Individuals undergoing immune suppression, such as kidney transplant patients or those treated for autoimmune diseases, are particularly at high risk for polyomavirus-associated diseases. Because no antiviral agent exists for treating polyomavirus infections, management of polyomavirus-associated diseases typically involves reducing or discontinuing immunomodulatory therapy. This can be perilous due to the risk of transplant rejection and the potential development of adverse immune reactions. Thus, there is a pressing need for the development of antivirals targeting polyomaviruses. Here, we investigate the effects of brincidofovir, an FDA-approved antiviral, on polyomavirus infection in vivo using mouse polyomavirus. We show that the drug is well-tolerated in mice, reduces infectious viral titers, and limits viral pathology, indicating the potential of brincidofovir as an anti-polyomavirus therapeutic.

A comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between conversion to mTOR inhibitor and calcineurin inhibitor reduction in managing BK viremia among kidney transplant patients.

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) exerts a substantial impact on allograft survival, however, the absence of robust clinical evidence regarding treatment protocols adds to the complexity of managing this condition. This study aimed to compare the two treatment approaches. The study population consisted of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2016 and June 2020 at two tertiary hospitals in Korea. Patients diagnosed with BK viremia were evaluated based on their initial viral load and the treatment methods. The 'Reduction group' involved dose reduction of tacrolimus while the 'Conversion group' included tacrolimus discontinuation and conversion to sirolimus. A total of 175 patients with an initial viral load (iVL) ≥ 3 on the log10 scale were evaluated within two iVL intervals (3-4 and 4-5). In the iVL 4-5 interval, the Reduction group showed potential effectiveness in terms of viral clearance without statistically significant differences. However, within the iVL 3-4 interval, the Reduction group demonstrated superior viral clearance and a lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) than the Conversion group. The renal function over 12 months after BKV diagnosis showed no statistically significant difference. Reducing tacrolimus compared to converting to mTORi would be a more appropriate treatment approach for BK viral clearance in kidney transplantation. Further research is warranted in a large cohort of patients.

Intravenous Human Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant: A Case Report.

The BK virus infection is common in the immunocompetent population and is asymptomatic in the majority of cases. However, in renal transplant patients, reactivation and replication can occur, leading to the development of BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN), which is associated with renal injury and graft loss. The objective of this case report was to demonstrate a case of BKVN that showed a good response to the use of human immunoglobulin. A 37-year-old man who underwent a second transplant received rabbit-derived antithymocyte human immunoglobulin at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously as induction immunosuppressive therapy, and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, prednisone, and mycophenolate sodium (MFS). At 3 months post-transplant, he presented sustained BK virus viremia (70,000-100,000 copies/mL), leading to a reduction in the dose of MFS and tacrolimus. A biopsy diagnosed BKVN class 2/B2, and viremia increased to over 1 million copies/mL at 22 months, prompting the discontinuation of tacrolimus without response. Intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered at 2 g/kg at 22 months and again at 33 months, with viremia peaking at 2 million copies 3 months later. However, it steadily declined to 5500 copies/mL at 52 months post-transplant. Currently, the only proven therapy for BKVN is the reduction of immunosuppression. However, in patients who do not respond, IVIG is considered as an option, with good results demonstrated in case reports, as shown here. Nevertheless, the data are based on case reports or case series, and the development of controlled clinical trials is necessary for confirmation of the efficacy.

AIDS-Associated BK Virus Nephropathy in Native Kidneys: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BK virus (BKV) is a small DNA virus, a member of the polyomavirus family, that causes an opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients, especially kidney transplant patients. This virus establishes a lifelong infection in most of the population, and once it reactivates in an immunocompromised state, leads to BKV nephropathy. This review seeks to assess the correlation between severe immunosuppression, evident by low CD4 cell counts in HIV-positive patients, and the reactivation of BKV, causing nephropathy. A literature review was conducted, extracting, and analyzing case reports of HIV-positive patients showing correlations between their degree of immunosuppression, as evidenced by their CD4 counts, and the degree of BKV infectivity, confirmed by kidney biopsy. A total of 12 cases of BKV nephropathy in HIV-infected patients were reviewed. A common finding was the presence of profound immunosuppression, with most patients having CD4 counts ≤50 cells/ mm3. A substantial number also had comorbid malignancies, with some undergoing chemotherapy, potentially increasing the risk of BKV reactivation. In addition to the HIV status and malignancies, other risk factors for BKV reactivation included older age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, Caucasian race, and ureteral stent placement. BKV nephropathy in HIV patients with native kidneys is closely correlated with severe immunosuppression. Although therapeutic strategies exist for post-transplant patients, aside from the treatment of HIV with highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART), which potentially helps with clearing BKV by increasing CD4 count, there is no definitive treatment for a native kidney BKV nephropathy in patients with AIDS. The complexity of the cases and severity of comorbidities indicate the need for further research to develop therapeutic strategies tailored to this population.

High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Treat Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Induction-Related BK Virus and Cytomegalovirus Infection in Patients with ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation is a novel method transplantation method that carries a heightened risk of infection caused by the use of high immunosuppressant doses. This elevated risk is particularly concerning for viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the BK virus (BKV) increases. Herein, we present a case where high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was effective in treating viral infections after transplantation. METHODS: A 41-year-old man underwent an ABOi transplantation. The initial isoagglutinin titer was 1:32. The patient received 200 mg of rituximab, and 3 rounds of plasmapheresis were performed. Subsequently, renal function remained normal; however, 7 months later, the renal function declined, and BK nephropathy and CMV infection were diagnosed through biopsy and serologic tests. The FK level was reduced, and mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued. Although ciprofloxacin and leflunomide were administered, their effects were minimal. Therefore, high-dose IVIG (1 g/kg) was administered 5 times over 5 weeks, which led to a reduction in BK viral load and CMV infectivity in the serum. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose IVIG may serve as a promising alternative treatment to mitigate early transplant rejection and BKV and CMV infections.

Efficacy of mTOR Inhibitors and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treatment of Polyoma BK Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Biopsy-Proven Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy of a predetermined protocol that consisted of immunosuppressive drug reduction/withdrawal and intravenous immunoglobulin administration for the treatment of polyoma BK virus nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven polyoma BK virus nephropathy received a treatment regimen based on discontinuation of both calcineurin inhibitors and antiproliferative agents and switching to mTOR inhibitors accompanied by intravenous immunoglobulin administration. RESULTS: Our study included 508 patients, with polyoma BK viremia detected in 80 patients. The mean age was 45.3 ± 9.5 years (range, 18-71 y), 64% were male, and mean follow-up was 37 ± 21 months (6-94 mo). All 16 patients who developed polyoma BK virus nephropathy and 9 patients who had highgrade polyoma BK viremia without nephropathy received intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Compared with patients with viremia, patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy had significantly higher rates of graft loss due to rejection (18.8% vs 1.6%; P = .024) and all-cause graft loss (31.2% vs 6.3%; P = .014). Histopathologically, viral inclusion bodies disappeared and SV40 became negative after treatment in all 13 patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Unfortunately, histopathologically complete recovery without chronic tubular and interstitial tissue damage was achieved in only 4 patients after treatment. In addition, 3 patients lost their grafts due to acute antibody-mediated or mixed-type rejection (18.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy, clearance of viremia and SV40 should not be the sole outcomes to obtain. Aggressive reductions in maintenance immunosuppression and switching to double-drug therapy combined with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to high rates of graft loss/rejection and sequalae of chronic histological changes.

Treatment of BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Leflunomide Versus Cidofovir.

OBJECTIVES: BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is a clinicopathological entity that negatively affects graft function in kidney transplant recipients. We compared the efficacy of leflunomide and cidofovir to treat BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of pediatric recipients with BK viremia for the period 2004 through 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, and patients diagnosed with BK polyomavirusassociated nephro-pathy were included in the study. A serum BK virus level above 104 copies/mL was accepted as BK viremia. We defined BK polyomavirusassociated nephropathy as detection of BK virus SV40 antigen on immunochemistry staining of renal graft tissue accompanied by signs of tubulointerstitial nephritis or elevated serum creatinine in addition to BK viremia. RESULTS: Of 304 kidney transplant recipients, 53 had persistent BK viremia; 36 of these patients (61.1% male) were included in the study with the diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Twelve patients (33.3%) received cidofovir, and 14 (38.8%) received leflunomide. Results were similar between the cidofovir and leflunomide groups for serum creatinine level at last follow-up (0.91 ± 0.29 vs 0.94 ± 0.37 mg/dL, respectively; P = .843) and graft failure rate (8.3% vs 14.2%, respectively; P = .632). Graft failure was observed in 8.3% of patients with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Leflunomide and cidofovir showed similar efficacy for treatment of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

Therapeutic strategies against BK polyomavirus infection in kidney transplant recipients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The selection of antiviral therapy for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection has been extensively debated. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of various treatments for BKPyV infection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies regarding drug treatments for BKPyV viremia/DNAemia published between January 1, 1970 and September 30, 2022. Two independent authors screened the published studies, extracted pertinent data, and evaluated their methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software version 4.2.2. RESULTS: A total of 33 published studies involving 986 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, therapeutic interventions comprised immunosuppression reduction alone or in combination with leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), cidofovir, or mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. The meta-analysis revealed that the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction alone for serum BKPyV clearance was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.77; I2 = 78%). Moreover, the efficacy of immunosuppression reduction in combination with leflunomide, cidofovir, IVIG, or mTORi therapy for serum BKPyV clearance was 61% (95% CI: 0.47-0.74; I2 = 83%), 71% (95% CI: 0.63-0.78; I2 = 0), 87% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 45%), and 80% (95% CI: 0.59-1.00; I2 = 58%), respectively. Compared to immunosuppression reduction alone, immunosuppression reduction combined with IVIG therapy offered a statistically significant benefit in serum BKPyV clearance (P < 0.01) with minimal adverse reactions, whereas other adjunctive drug treatments did not demonstrate considerable effects. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing immunosuppression remains the primary approach for treating BKPyV infection. Although the combination treatment with IVIG proved to be most effective, other agents might offer varied antiviral advantages of high heterogeneity, which should be substantiated in future long-term randomized controlled trials.

Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Leflunomide Combination Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Single Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Virus Infection: Single-Center Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and leflunomide versus intravenous immunoglobulin to treat BK virus nephropathy after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixteen kidney transplant patients with BK virus infection were randomly divided into 2 groups; 1 group received intravenous immunoglobulin, and another group received leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Results of a polymerase chain reaction test for BK virus after 2 months of treatment were negative in 3 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group and in 7 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group. The amount of BK virus decreased significantly in each group, and a significant difference was observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .014). The average level of creatinine in the intravenous immunoglobulin group at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment was 1.7 ± 0.23, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively, and in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group was 2.1 ± 0.75, 1.76 ± 0.37, and 1.4 ± 0.18, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although BK viral load decreased significantly in both groups, there was a significant difference between patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin versus those who received the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide after 3 months. The addition of leflunomide to the intravenous immunoglobulin treatment seems to have a better effect in reducing BK viral load. However, further studies with a larger sample and longer duration are needed.

Effect of Leflunomide on Treatment of Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients With BK Virus Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Infection with the BK virus is a significant complication after renal transplant and can progress to BK virus nephropathy and graft dysfunction. There is no consensus on the management of BK virus infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients. The most common therapeutic option is immunosuppression reduction, which can increase rejection risk. We aimed to examine the effect of leflunomide, an agent with antiviral and immunosuppressive actions, in a case series of pediatric renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine screening with blood BK virus DNA polymerase chain reaction was performed regularly in all of our renal transplant patients. When BK virus was detected, we reduced tacrolimus levels, discontinued mycophenolate mofetil, and started active treatment with leflunomide. Treatment with leflunomide was continued until BK virus was undetectable by polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 blood samples 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: All pediatric patients developed BK virus infection in a mean period of 3.9 months after transplant. Graft dysfunction was evident in all patients with 20% to 100% elevation of creatinine from baseline. Afterleflunomide initiation, all patients had undetectable levels of BK virus by plasma polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 different samples within a mean period of 3.4 months, and renal function had normalized back to the baseline. None of our patients had evidence of hepatotoxicity or anemia on regular monitoring, with no other adverse events. Renal function remained stable in the follow-up period with no reoccurrence of BK viremia up to the date of this writing. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with leflunomide resulted in rapid BK virus clearance and preservation of renal function with no adverse effects.

Predictive Factors of BK Virus Development in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Effect of Low-Dose Tacrolimus Plus Everolimus on Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the predictive factors of BK virus viremia/nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients and to evaluate the effects of low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 3654 kidney transplant recipients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 were BK virus negative (n = 3525, 96.5%) and group 2 were BK virus positive (n = 129, viremia 3.5%, nephropathy 1%). Predictive factors were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression models.We also divided and analyzed patients with BK virus viremia/nephropathy into 2 groups according to immunosuppressive changes. Group 2a had been switched to low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus (n = 54, 41.9%), and group 2b had been switched to other immunosuppressive protocols (n = 75, 58.1%). RESULTS: We found that use of anti-T-cell lymphocyte globulin and tacrolimus, deceased donor transplant, and rejection were predictive factors for BK virus viremia/nephropathy. In addition, patients who had low-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor regimens showed a low rate of BK virus development(only 6.2% of all cases). In Group 2a, both the BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy rate (n = 23 [42.6%] vs n = 12 [16%] in group 2b; P = .001) and viral load (DNA > 104 copies/mL) (n = 49 [90.7%] vs n = 27 [36%] in group 2b; P = .001) were increased versus group 2b. Graft function, graft survival, viral clearance, and rejection rate were similar between the groups after protocol change. CONCLUSIONS: BK virus viremia/nephropathy rate was lower in patients who received low-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor protocols; the low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus switch protocol after BK virus was more effective and safe than other protocols.

Impact of Converting from Immediate-Release Tacrolimus to Envarsus on BK Viremia Incidence in Kidney Transplant Patients with Rapid Metabolism.

BACKGROUND BK infections have been observed more frequently among people who are rapid metabolizers. The tacrolimus c/d ratio identifies rapid metabolizers after transplantation. Envarsus has a lower peak drug level exposure than tacrolimus and is more pronounced in rapid metabolizers. This study hypothesized that less exposure to high tacrolimus levels through use of Envarsus would reduce the incidence of BK infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study prospectively converted 43 consecutive kidney transplant recipients (identified as rapid metabolizers by c/d ratio of.

Increased CMV disease and "severe" BK viremia with belatacept vs. sirolimus three-drug maintenance immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVES: Belatacept may provide benefit in delayed graft function, but its association with infectious complications is understudied. We aim to assess the incidence of CMV and BK viremia in patients treated with sirolimus or belatacept as part of a three-drug immunosuppression regimen after kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients from 01/01/2015 to 10/01/2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Maintenance immunosuppression was either tacrolimus, mycophenolate and sirolimus (B0) or tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and belatacept (5.0 mg/kg monthly) (B1). Primary outcomes of interest were BK and CMV viremia which were followed until the end of the study period. Secondary outcomes included graft function (serum creatinine, eGFR) and acute rejection through 12 months. RESULTS: Belatacept was initiated in patients with a higher mean kidney donor profile index (B0:0.36 vs. B1:0.44, p = .02) with more delayed graft function (B0:6.1% vs. B1:26.1%, p < .001). Belatacept therapy was associated with more "severe" CMV viremia >25,000 copies/mL (B0:1.2% vs. B1:5.9%, p = .016) and CMV disease (B0:0.41% vs. B1:4.2%, p = .015). However, there was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:9.4% vs. B1:13.5%, p = .28). There was no difference in the incidence of BK viremia >200 IU/mL (B0:29.7% vs. B1:31.1%, p = .78) or BK-associated nephropathy (B0:2.4% vs. B1:1.7%, p = .58), but belatacept was associated with "severe" BK viremia, defined as >10,000 IU/mL (B0:13.0% vs. B1:21.8%, p = .03). The mean serum Cr was significantly higher with belatacept therapy at 1-year follow up (B0:1.24 mg/dL vs. B1:1.43 mg/dL, p = .003). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (B0:1.2% vs. B1:2.6%, p = .35) and graft loss (B0:1.2% vs. B1:0.84%, p = .81) were comparable at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Belatacept therapy was associated with an increased risk of CMV disease and "severe" CMV and BK viremia. However, this regimen did not increase the overall incidence of infection and facilitated comparable acute rejection and graft loss at 12-month follow up.

IVIg therapy in the management of BK virus infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) induces kidney allograft dysfunction. Although decreasing immunosuppression is the standard for managing BK virus (BKPyV) infection, this strategy is not always effective. The use of polyvalent immunoglobulins (IVIg) may be of interest in this setting. We performed a retrospective single-center evaluation of the management of BKPyV infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients. Among the 171 patients who underwent transplantation between January 2010 and December 2019, 54 patients were excluded (combined transplant n = 15, follow-up in another center n = 35, early postoperative graft loss n= 4). Thus, 117 patients (120 transplants) were included. Overall, 34 (28%) and 15 (13%) transplant recipients displayed positive BKPyV viruria and viremia, respectively. Three had biopsy-confirmed BKPyVAN. The pre-transplant prevalence of CAKUT and HLA antibodies was higher among BKPyV-positive patients compared to non-infected patients. After the detection of BKPyV replication and/or BKPyVAN, the immunosuppressive regimen was modified in 13 (87%) patients: either by decreasing or changing the calcineurin inhibitors (n = 13) and/or switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mTor inhibitors (n = 10). Starting IVIg therapy was based on graft dysfunction or an increase in the viral load despite reduced immunosuppressive regimen. Seven of 15(46%) patients received IVIg. These patients had a higher viral load (5.4 [5.0-6.8]log vs. 3.5 [3.3-3.8]log). In total, 13 of 15 (86%) achieved viral load reduction, five of seven after IVIg therapy. As long as specific antivirals are not available for the management of BKPyV infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients, polyvalent IVIg may be discussed for the management of severe BKPyV viremia, in combination with decreased immunosuppression.

Daily low dose intravesical cidofovir for the treatment of BK virus associated hemorrhagic cystitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: BK virus associated hemorrhagic cystitis(BKV-AHC) is a serious complication observed after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the current therapeutic options are scarce with substantial renal side effects. Although the guidelines recommend intravenous cidofovir application with caution to nephrotoxicity, there are few studies which investigated intravesical administration and reported similar therapeutic results with less renal side effects. METHODS: We administered low dose, daily and consecutive (75 mg/day, for 5 days) intravesical cidofovir to 25 patients with BKV-AHC that developed after (ASCT). RESULTS: The response rate in our cohort was 92% and relapse was not encountered in 84% of the patient population during one year of follow-up. The median BK urine viral load significantly decreased from 260,000,000 IU/mL to 53,000,000 IU/mL after a week of treatment (p = 0.0001). Rise in serum creatinine was observed in 5 patients during treatment and post-treatment nephrotoxicity was seen in only 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Daily low dose intravesical cidofovir might be an effective treatment option for BKV-AHC after ASCT with favorable less systemic side effects.

Endovesical instillation of Cidofovir in the treatment of BK polyomavirus hemorrhagic cystitis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) with BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) that may lead to severe discomfort for the patient and significant morbidity (urinary obstruction, increased transfusion requirements and prolonged hospitalization). So far, there is no clear consensus on how to manage this complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Here, we report a single-center case series of 9 patients (4 children and 5 adults) treated with cidofovir endovesical (EV) instillation(s) for BKPyV-HC after alloHCT. EV Cidofovir was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg, for 1 to 3 instillations (with a minimum delay between 2 successive doses of 5 days). RESULTS: Eight out of the 9 treated patients with EV Cidofovir achieved a complete resolution of HC after 1-3 instillation(s), without recurrence of symptomatic infection within the next 3 months. Only 1 adult patient did not improve after treatment and developed severe morbidity (emphysematous cystitis). CONCLUSION: Although this single-center case series of EV cidofovir for BKPyV HC after alloHCT shows encouraging results, only large prospective studies will definitively establish the effectiveness of this therapy.

Everolimus reduces BK polyomavirus infection by suppressing its replication and spread of infection.

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is one of serious complications in transplant recipients. Everolimus-a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-has been shown to reduce the incidence of BK polyomavirus infection in transplant recipients. In this study, the effects of everolimus were examined on viral replication and the spread of infection in BK polyomavirus-infected cultures. BK polyomavirus replicated in renal and pulmonary cells, contrary to that in hepatocytes, and spread as diffusely scattered patterns of infected cells, unlike plaque formation through the cell-to-cell mode. BK polyomavirus is stable to heat up to 65 °C with a particle per infectivity ratio of 5000, and the replication cycle was for approximately 34 h. Everolimus administration remarkably reduced the viral replication to 20% in cells treated with 0.1-10 ng/mL, the concentration at which everolimus reached the serum of transplant recipients. In addition, it reduced the amount of viral capsid protein 1 at 5 ng/mL without reducing the ratio of viral capsid protein 1 versus ß-actin, and it also retained the pattern of viral capsid protein 1 localization in the nuclei. Everolimus suppressed the number of infected cells to 32.8% during a 14-day treatment, indicating the reduction of BK polyomavirus-infected cell mass to 18.8% of untreated cultures by modifying cellular functions. The reduction in the total number of BK polyomavirus infected cells by everolimus indicates that everolimus alleviates BK polyomavirus infection, including nephropathy in transplant recipients.

Basiliximab for the therapy of acute T cell-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipient with BK virus infection: A case report.

A 66-year-old Chinese man underwent a deceased donor kidney transplantation. Induction-immunosuppressive protocol consisted of basiliximab (BAS) and methyl prednisolone (MP), followed by maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (PED). The patient's post-transplantation course was almost uneventful, and the graft was functioning well [serum creatinine (Scr) 2.15 mg/dL]. The MMF and CsA doses were decreased 1-month post-operative as the BK virus activation was serologically positive. His Scr was elevated to 2.45 mg/dL 45 days after the transplant. A graft biopsy showed BKV nephropathy (BKVN) and acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) Banff grade IIA (I2, t2, ptc2, v1, c4d1, g0, and SV40 positive). The conventional anti-rejection therapy could deteriorate his BKVN, therefore, we administered BAS to eliminate activated graft-infiltrating T cells and combined with low-dose steroid. He responded well to the therapy after two doses of BAS were given, and the kidney graft status has been stable (recent Scr 2.1 mg/dL).

Incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and clinical management of BK viremia in the modern era of kidney transplantation.

BK viremia is endemic among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and clinical management of detectable versus high BK viremia have not been considered previously in KTR in the modern era. This observational study examined KTR transplanted between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016. Any BK viral load in the serum constituted detectable BK viremia and ≥103 copies/ml constituted high viremia. Among 1193 KTRs, the cumulative probability of developing detectable and high BK viremia within 2 years posttransplant were 27.8% and 19.6%, respectively. Significant risk factors for detectable BK viremia included recipient age (HR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.03]) and donor age (HR 1.01 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.02]). Recipient age also predicted high BK viremia (HR 1.02 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.03]), whereas White race (HR 0.70 [95% CI: 0.52, 0.95]), nondepleting induction therapy (HR 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.89]), and delayed graft function (HR 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.88]) were protective. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates were 4.28 ml/min/1.72 m2 (95% CI: 2.71, 5.84) lower with detectable BK viremia. Although low viral load was usually not acted upon at first presentation, antiproliferative dose reductions were the most common initial management. BK viremia remains a common early complication in a modern cohort of KTRs. These findings highlight the benefit of early BKV monitoring in addition to intensive clinical management. Clinical responses beyond first positive BK viremia tests, and their implications for graft outcomes, merit further investigation.