ABSTRACT
Metformin is best known as a foundational therapy for type 2 diabetes but is also used in other contexts in clinical medicine with a number of emerging and potential indications. Many of its beneficial effects may be mediated by modest effects on weight loss and insulin sensitivity, but it has multiple other known mechanisms of action. Current clinical uses beyond type 2 diabetes include: polycystic ovarian syndrome; diabetes in pregnancy/gestational diabetes; prevention of type 2 diabetes in prediabetes; and adjunct therapy in type 1 diabetes. As metformin has been in clinical use for almost 70 years, much of the underpinning evidence for its use in these conditions is, by definition, based on trials conducted before the advent of contemporary evidence-based medicine. As a result, some of the above-established uses are 'off-label' in many regulatory territories and their use varies accordingly in different countries. Going forward, several current 'repurposing' investigational uses of metformin are also being investigated: prevention of cancer (including in Li Fraumeni syndrome), renal protection, Alzheimer's disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and promotion of healthy ageing. Despite the longevity of metformin and its important current roles beyond type 2 diabetes in clinical medicine, it has further potential and much research is ongoing.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetes, Gestational , Hypoglycemic Agents , Metformin , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Prediabetic State , Metformin/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Female , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/drug therapy , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Prediabetic State/drug therapy , Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/prevention & control , Off-Label Use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapyABSTRACT
Aim The efficacy of hybrid closed-loop systems (HCLs) in managing glycemic control in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes remains inadequately characterized. We evaluated the use of the Medtronic Minimed 780G HCLs. METHODS: The retrospective observational study analyzed the glycemic and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women using the HCLs, followed at our tertiary centre. Independent t-tests were employed to compare data among trimesters based on pre-pregnancy HbA1c. The associations between glycemic parameters and perinatal outcomes were explored using Spearman rho. RESULTS: Among the 21 women (age: 33.5 ± 4.2 years, diabetes duration: 21.2 ± 7.6 years, pre-pregnancy HbA1c 7.0 ± 1.1 % (52.9 ± 11.9 mmol/mol)) time in range (pTIR, 63-140 mg/dl; 3.5-7.8 mmol/l) increased progressively throughout pregnancy (trimesters: first: 64.0 ± 9.0 %; second:71.3 ± 11.8 %; third: 75.7 ± 8.1 %). Simultaneously, mean sensor glucose decreased (trimesters: first: 130 ± 10.4 mg/dl (7.2 ± 0.6 mmol/l); second: 120.9 ± 13.4 mg/dl (6.7 ± 0.7 mmol/l); third: 117.3 ± 9.1 mg/dl (6.5 ± 0.5 mmol/l)). Although a majority of women achieved the target pTIR until the third trimester, this did not consistently prevent the delivery of a large-for-gestational-age baby. Notably, one ketoacidosis event occurred, and there were no reported instances of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Use of the Minimed 780G HCLs enabled the attainment of recommended pregnancy glycemic targets for most women with type 1 diabetes in a real-world setting.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Glycemic Control , Insulin Infusion Systems , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Blood Glucose/analysis , Glycemic Control/methods , Glycemic Control/instrumentation , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemia/epidemiology , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Metformin is a first-line pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes, but there is limited evidence about its safety in early pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the teratogenicity of metformin use in the first trimester of pregnancy. DESIGN: In an observational cohort of pregnant women with pregestational type 2 diabetes receiving metformin monotherapy before the last menstrual period (LMP), a target trial with 2 treatment strategies was emulated: insulin monotherapy (discontinue metformin treatment and initiate insulin within 90 days of LMP) or insulin plus metformin (continue metformin and initiate insulin within 90 days of LMP). SETTING: U.S. Medicaid health care administration database (2000 to 2018). PARTICIPANTS: 12 489 pregnant women who met the eligibility criteria. MEASUREMENTS: The risk and risk ratio of nonlive births, live births with congenital malformations, and congenital malformations among live births were estimated using standardization to adjust for covariates. RESULTS: A total of 850 women were in the insulin monotherapy group and 1557 in the insulin plus metformin group. The estimated risk for nonlive birth was 32.7% under insulin monotherapy (reference) and 34.3% under insulin plus metformin (risk ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]). The estimated risk for live birth with congenital malformations was 8.0% (CI, 5.7% to 10.2%) under insulin monotherapy and 5.7% (CI, 4.5% to 7.3%) under insulin plus metformin (risk ratio, 0.72 [CI, 0.51 to 1.09]). LIMITATION: Possible residual confounding by glycemic control and body mass index. CONCLUSION: Compared with switching to insulin monotherapy, continuing metformin and adding insulin in early pregnancy resulted in little to no increased risk for nonlive birth among women receiving metformin before pregnancy. Under conventional statistical criteria, anything between a 49% decrease and a 9% increase in risk for congenital malformations was highly compatible with our data. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin , Metformin , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Metformin/adverse effects , Metformin/therapeutic use , Female , Pregnancy , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Insulin/adverse effects , Insulin/therapeutic use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , United States , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) accumulate in the plasma of pregnant women with hyperglycemia, potentially inducing oxidative stress and fetal developmental abnormalities. Although intrauterine hyperglycemia has been implicated in excessive fetal growth, the effects of maternal AGEs on fetal development remain unclear. We evaluated the differentiation regulators and cellular signaling in the skeletal muscles of infants born to control mothers (ICM), diabetic mothers (IDM), and diabetic mothers supplemented with either cis-palmitoleic acid (CPA) or trans-palmitoleic acid (TPA). Cell viability, reactive oxygen species levels, and myotube formation were assessed in AGE-exposed C2C12 cells to explore potential mitigation by CPA and TPA. Elevated receptors for AGE expression and decreased Akt and AMPK phosphorylation were evident in rat skeletal muscles in IDM. Maternal palmitoleic acid supplementation alleviated insulin resistance by downregulating RAGE expression and enhancing Akt phosphorylation. The exposure of the C2C12 cells to AGEs reduced cell viability and myotube formation and elevated reactive oxygen species levels, which were attenuated by CPA or TPA supplementation. This suggests that maternal hyperglycemia and plasma AGEs may contribute to skeletal muscle disorders in offspring, which are mitigated by palmitoleic acid supplementation. Hence, the maternal intake of palmitoleic acid during pregnancy may have implications for fetal health.
Subject(s)
Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated , Glycation End Products, Advanced , Muscle, Skeletal , Reactive Oxygen Species , Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated/pharmacology , Glycation End Products, Advanced/metabolism , Female , Animals , Pregnancy , Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products/metabolism , Rats , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Mice , Dietary Supplements , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Insulin Resistance , Humans , Phosphorylation , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Pregnancy in Diabetics/metabolism , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Male , Fetal Development/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) therapy can improve glycaemic control in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. However, data are needed on the efficacy and safety of AHCL systems as these systems, such as the MiniMed 780G, are not currently approved for use in pregnant women. We aimed to investigate whether the MiniMed 780G can improve glycaemic control with less hypoglycaemia in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: CRISTAL was a double-arm, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted in secondary and tertiary care specialist endocrinology centres at 12 hospitals (11 in Belgium and one in the Netherlands). Pregnant women aged 18-45 years with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned (1:1) to AHCL therapy (MiniMed 780G) or standard insulin therapy (standard of care) at a median of 10·1 (IQR 8·6-11·6) weeks of gestation. Randomisation was done centrally with minimisation dependent on baseline HbA1c, insulin administration method, and centre. Participants and study teams were not masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of time spent in the pregnancy-specific target glucose range (3·5-7·8 mmol/L), measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at 14-17 weeks, 20-23 weeks, 26-29 weeks, and 33-36 weeks. Key secondary outcomes were overnight time in target range, and time below glucose range (<3·5 mmol/L) overall and overnight. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04520971). FINDINGS: Between Jan 15, 2021 and Sept 30, 2022, 101 participants were screened, and 95 were randomly assigned to AHCL therapy (n=46) or standard insulin therapy (n=49). 43 patients assigned to AHCL therapy and 46 assigned to standard insulin therapy completed the study. At baseline, 91 (95·8%) participants used insulin pumps, and the mean HbA1c was 6·5% (SD 0·6). The mean proportion of time spent in the target range (averaged over four time periods) was 66·5% (SD 10·0) in the AHCL therapy group compared with 63·2% (12·4) in the standard insulin therapy group (adjusted mean difference 1·88 percentage points [95% CI -0·82 to 4·58], p=0·17). Overnight time in the target range was higher (adjusted mean difference 6·58 percentage points [95% CI 2·31 to 10·85], p=0·0026), and time below range overall (adjusted mean difference -1·34 percentage points [95% CI, -2·19 to -0·49], p=0·0020) and overnight (adjusted mean difference -1·86 percentage points [95% CI -2·90 to -0·81], p=0·0005) were lower with AHCL therapy than with standard insulin therapy. Participants assigned to AHCL therapy reported higher treatment satisfaction. No unanticipated safety events occurred with AHCL therapy. INTERPRETATION: In pregnant women starting with tighter glycaemic control, AHCL therapy did not improve overall time in target range but improved overnight time in target range, reduced time below range, and improved treatment satisfaction. These data suggest that the MiniMed 780G can be safely used in pregnancy and provides some additional benefits compared with standard insulin therapy; however, it will be important to refine the algorithm to better align with pregnancy requirements. FUNDING: Diabetes Liga Research Fund and Medtronic.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Adult , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Young Adult , Adolescent , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Glycemic Control/methods , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Automated insulin delivery (AID) devices have shown to be a promising treatment to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, its efficacy in pregnant women with T1DM remains uncertain. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID to standard care (SC), defined as use of sensor-augmented pump and multiple daily insulin injections. Outcomes included time in range (TIR), nocturnal TIR, time in hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges, among others. Sensitivity and trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023474398. RESULTS: We included five RCTs with a total of 236 pregnant women, of whom 117 (50.6%) received AID. There was a significant increase in nocturnal TIR (mean difference [MD] 12.69%; 95% CI 8.74-16.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and a decrease in glucose variability (standard deviation of glucose; MD -2.91; 95% CI -5.13 to -0.69; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed for TIR, HBGI, LGBI, mean glucose and time spent in hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Regarding TSA, the statistical significance obtained in nocturnal TIR was conclusive and with minimal risk of a type I error. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that AID systems can significantly improve nocturnal glycemic control and potentially reduce glycemic variability in pregnant women with T1DM, with no effect in the risk of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia compared with current insulin treatments.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Glycemic Control/methods , Glycemic Control/instrumentation , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using multiple daily injection therapy (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and to compare outcomes of women treated with long-acting insulin or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH). METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study involved women with pregestational T1DM treated with MDI and CSII. Primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) before and during pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 121 studied women, the average age was 28.48 years, and the average body mass index was 21.29 kg/m2 at conception and 26.32 kg/m2 at delivery. Of the studied women, 78.51% had planned pregnancy. Women treated with MDI and CSII had comparable HbA1c before pregnancy or in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, women on CSII therapy had significantly lower HbA1c (6.07 ± 0.62 vs 6.20 ± 0.88%, p = .017), higher HbA1c on-target rate (71.43% vs 64.62%, p = .030), and greater decline of HbA1c from preconception to the third trimester (-0.65 vs -0.30%, p = .047). Fewer daily insulin requirements were observed in those used CSII compared with MDI-treated women (0.60 ± 0.22 vs 0.73 ± 0.25 U/kg/day, p = .004). Newborns born of mothers treated with the CSII method were more likely to have neonatal jaundice (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-6.57) and neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted OR 3.73, 95%CI 1.24-11.16), and women on CSII had lower scores in patient-reported quality of life (p = .045). In the MDI group, those receiving long-acting insulin had nonsignificant lower HbA1c and higher HbA1c on-target rate in the second and third trimesters, compared with those treated with NPH. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin pump users may achieve better glycemic control than multiple daily insulin injections, which did not substantially improve pregnancy outcome.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Glycated Hemoglobin , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Adult , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Injections, Subcutaneous , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Infusions, Subcutaneous , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Quality of Life , Glycemic Control/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and more recently for weight loss. The aim of this study was to assess the risks associated with GLP1-RA exposure during early pregnancy. DESIGN: This multicentre, observational prospective cohort study compared pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to GLP1-RA in early pregnancy either for diabetes or obesity treatment with those in two reference groups: (1) women with diabetes exposed to at least one non-GLP1-RA antidiabetic drug during the first trimester and (2) a reference group of overweight/obese women without diabetes, between 2009 and 2022. SETTING: Data were collected from the databases of six Teratology Information Services. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 168 pregnancies of women exposed to GLP1-RA during the first trimester, alongside a reference group of 156 pregnancies of women with diabetes and 163 pregnancies of overweight/obese women. RESULTS: Exposure to GLP1-RA in the first trimester was not associated with a risk of major birth defects when compared with diabetes (2.6% vs 2.3%; adjusted OR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.16 to 5.82)) or to overweight/obese (2.6% vs 3.9%; adjusted OR 0.54 (0.11 to 2.75)). For the GLP1-RA group, cumulative incidence for live births, pregnancy losses and pregnancy terminations was 59%, 23% and 18%, respectively. In the diabetes reference group, corresponding estimates were 69%, 26% and 6%, while in the overweight/obese reference group, they were 63%, 29% and 8%, respectively. Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models indicated no increased risk of pregnancy losses in the GLP1-RA versus the diabetes and the overweight/obese reference groups, in both crude and adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers reassurance in cases of inadvertent exposure to GLP1-RA during the first trimester of pregnancy. Due to the limited sample size, larger studies are required to validate these findings.
Subject(s)
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor , Hypoglycemic Agents , Obesity , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Adult , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Databases, Factual , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapySubject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetes, Gestational , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin , Metformin , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/blood , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Metformin/administration & dosage , Metformin/adverse effects , Metformin/blood , Metformin/therapeutic use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Fertility/drug effects , Male , Testis/drug effectsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Given the rarity and elderly onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced type 1 diabetes (ICI-T1DM), cases leading to delivery are rare. METHOD: To our knowledge, this is the first case report of childbirth in a patient with ICI-T1DM after cancer survival. A 32-year-old woman was started on Nivolumab for metastatic parotid cancers one year after total parotidectomy. RESULT: The patient developed ICI-T1DM after 43 cycles and started multiple daily insulin therapy and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Complete response was maintained for 2 years by nivolumab, and she finished nivolumab in 77 cycles to attempt pregnancy. During the follow-up period, she began using a sensor-augmented pump (SAP). She had undetectable serum and urinary C-peptide when she started SAP. Her HbA1c level decreased from 7.8 to 6.6% without increasing hypoglycemia in one year. The patient remained in complete response after ICI discontinuation, and embryo transfer was initiated. Pregnancy was confirmed after a second embryo transfer (21 months after ICI discontinuation). At 36 weeks and 6 days, an emergency cesarean section was performed due to the onset of preeclampsia. The baby had hypospadias and bifid scrotum but no other complications or neonatal intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: Because ICI discontinuation and ICI-T1DM carry risks for the patient and child, the decision regarding pregnancy warrants careful consideration. Diabetologists should collaborate with patients and other clinical departments to develop a treatment plan for childbirth.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Adult , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Parotid Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although aspirin therapy is being increasingly advocated with the intention of risk modification for a wide range of pregnancy complications, women with prepregnancy diabetes mellitus are commonly excluded from clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to examine the effect of aspirin therapy on a composite measure of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted at 6 university-affiliated perinatology centers. Women with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus of at least 6 months' duration were randomly allocated to 150-mg daily aspirin or placebo from 11 to 14 weeks' gestation until 36 weeks. Established vascular complications of diabetes mellitus, including chronic hypertension or nephropathy, led to exclusion from the trial. The primary outcome was a composite measure of placental dysfunction (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation, or perinatal mortality). The planned sample size was 566 participants to achieve a 35% reduction in the primary outcome, assuming 80% statistical power. Secondary end points included maternal and neonatal outcomes and determination of insulin requirements across gestation. Data were centrally managed using ClinInfo and analyzed using SAS 9.4. The 2 treatment groups were compared using t tests or chi-square tests, as required, and longitudinal data were compared using a repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: From February 2020 to September 2022, 191 patients were deemed eligible, 134 of whom were enrolled (67 randomized to aspirin and 67 to placebo) with a retrospective power of 64%. A total of 101 (80%) women had type 1 diabetes mellitus and 25 (20%) had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reaching the target sample size was limited by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline characteristics were similar between the aspirin and placebo groups. Treatment compliance was very high and similar between groups (97% for aspirin, 94% for placebo). The risk of the composite measure of placental dysfunction did not differ between groups (25% aspirin vs 21% placebo; P=.796). Women in the aspirin group had significantly lower insulin requirements throughout pregnancy compared with the placebo group. Insulin requirements in the aspirin group increased on average from 0.7 units/kg at baseline to 1.1 units/kg by 36 weeks' gestation (an average 83% within-patient increase), and increased from 0.7 units/kg to 1.3 units/kg (a 181% within-patient increase) in the placebo group, over the same gestational period (P=.002). Serial hemoglobin A1c levels were lower in the aspirin group than in the placebo group, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial, aspirin did not reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by prepregnancy diabetes mellitus. Compared with the placebo group, aspirin-treated patients required significantly less insulin throughout pregnancy, indicating a beneficial effect of aspirin on glycemic control. Aspirin may exert a plausible placenta-mediated effect on pregestational diabetes mellitus that is not limited to its antithrombotic properties.
Subject(s)
Aspirin , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Female , Double-Blind Method , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Adult , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Ireland/epidemiology , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Fetal Growth Retardation/prevention & control , Insulin/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Background: We evaluated accuracy and safety of a seventh-generation real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: Evaluable data for accuracy analysis were obtained from 96 G7 sensors (Dexcom, Inc.) worn by 96 of 105 enrolled pregnant women with type 1 (n = 59), type 2 (n = 21), or gestational diabetes (n = 25). CGM values were compared with arterialized venous glucose values from the YSI comparator instrument during 6-h clinic sessions at different time points throughout the sensors' 10-day wear period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CGM values in the 70-180 mg/dL range within 15% of comparator glucose values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of comparator values ≥ or <100 mg/dL, respectively (the %20/20 agreement rate). Results: Of the 1739 pairs with CGM in the 70-180 mg/dL range, 83.2% were within 15% of comparator values. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 79.8%. Of the 2102 pairs with CGM values in the 40-400 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.5%. Of the 1659 pairs with comparator values in the 63-140 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.3%. The %20/20 agreement rates on days 1, 4 and 7, and 10 were 78.6%, 96.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Consensus error grid analysis showed 99.8% of pairs in the clinically acceptable A and B zones. There were no serious adverse events. The sensors' 10-day survival rate was 90.3%. Conclusion: The G7 system is accurate and safe during pregnancies complicated by diabetes and does not require confirmatory fingerstick testing. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04905628.
Subject(s)
Continuous Glucose Monitoring , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes, Gestational , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if antenatal steroid use was associated with a lower rate of respiratory complications in neonates born late preterm to patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of live, singleton, non-anomalous, late preterm births complicated by PGDM using data from the Centers for Disease Control and National Vital Statistics System from 2017 to 2021. The primary (assisted ventilation use >6 h) and secondary neonatal outcomes (immediate assisted ventilation, Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission, and surfactant use) were compared between births that received steroids and those that did not. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: There were 24 323 late preterm births with PGDM, of which 4613 received antenatal steroids and 19 710 did not receive steroids. After adjusting for the differences among the two groups, the need for assisted neonatal ventilation for more than 6 h (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-1.86), immediate assisted neonatal ventilation (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.55-1.80), NICU admission (aOR 1.95, 95% CI 1.81-2.10), and surfactant use (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.40-2.02) were higher in the births that received steroids compared with those that did not. These findings did not differ when examining outcomes at each gestational week of delivery between 34 weeks 0 days and 36 weeks 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal steroid use in late preterm births complicated with PGDM was associated with worse immediate respiratory neonatal outcomes. Our findings support current recommendations against the use of steroids in the late preterm period in pregnancies with PGDM.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy in Diabetics , Premature Birth , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Premature , Apgar Score , Gestational Age , Male , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Steroids/administration & dosage , Steroids/therapeutic use , Prenatal Care/methods , Pulmonary Surfactants/administration & dosage , Pulmonary Surfactants/therapeutic use , Pregnancy OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves neonatal outcomes in type 1 diabetes pregnancies; however, its effectiveness has not been assessed in a real-world setting in the United States. Objective: The Triple C Study aimed to examine the clinical effectiveness, assessed through maternal glucose control and gestational health outcomes, of CGM use compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in pregnancies associated with type 1 diabetes in a real-world setting. Research Design and Methods: We retrospectively identified 160 type 1 diabetes pregnancies at the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes managed with CGM therapy (n = 109) or SMBG (n = 51) over a 6.5-year period (2014-2020). Obstetric care was provided at multiple practices. CGM use was defined as ≥60% wear in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record system, hospital records, and vital statistics departments (Colorado and Wyoming). We used Student's t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables to compare outcomes between groups. Results: The CGM group had more participants meeting trimester-specific hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) goals throughout pregnancy and postpartum (P < 0.01 in each time period). The CGM group had fewer participants never meeting HbA1c goals in any trimester than the SMBG group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between groups, other than for macrosomia (12.8% CGM vs. 29.4% SMBG, P = 0.01). Infants of CGM users required a neonatal intensive care unit admission less often (52.9% CGM vs. 68.3% SMBG, P = 0.0989). Conclusions: CGM use was associated with improved maternal glucose levels in a diverse real-world cohort.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Adult , Blood Glucose/analysis , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Glycemic Control/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Outcome , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Continuous Glucose MonitoringABSTRACT
Objective: Examine gestational safety, glycemic and health outcomes, of a hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system without pregnancy-specific glucose targets. Research Design: This was a pilot feasibility investigator-initiated, two-site, single-blind, randomized controlled trial of sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAPT) versus HCL therapy in type 1 diabetes pregnancies. Participants were enrolled in the first trimester and randomized at 14-18 weeks of gestation and used SAPT or HCL until 4-6 weeks postpartum. We compared continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics, severe hypoglycemia (SH), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), adverse skin reactions, and pregnancy outcomes between groups. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (n = 11 HCL and n = 12 SAPT). There was no SH or DKA episode after randomization. Time spent <54 mg/dL did not differ between groups. Time spent <63 mg/dL decreased in both groups, significantly in the HCL group (3.5% [1.3% standard error] second trimester and 2.8% [1.3%] third trimester vs. 7.9% [1.3%] run-in phase, P < 0.05 for both). Mean sensor glucose was lower with SAPT compared to HCL therapy in the third trimester (119 [4] mg/dL SAPT vs. 132 [4] mg/dL HCL, P < 0.05). Third trimester time-in-range (TIR; 63-140 mg/dL) increased with SAPT (68.2% [3.1%] vs. 64.3% [3.1%] run-in phase, P < 0.05). Gestational health outcomes did not differ between groups. The HCL group used assistive techniques, such as fake carbohydrate boluses and exiting HCL overnight. Conclusions: CGM within group differences were seen for time <63 mg/dL favoring HCL therapy and TIR favoring SAPT (third trimester vs. baseline). Safety and adverse pregnancy outcomes were similar between groups.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/instrumentation , Single-Blind Method , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy Outcome , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Diabetic Ketoacidosis , Feasibility StudiesABSTRACT
Aims: To compare glycemic control and maternal-fetal outcomes of women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using hybrid closed loop (HCL) versus multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Methods: Multicenter prospective cohort study of pregnant women with T1D in Spain. We evaluated HbA1c and time spent within (TIR), below (TBR), and above (TAR) the pregnancy-specific glucose range of 3.5-7.8 mmol/L. Adjusted models were performed for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including baseline maternal characteristics and center. Results: One hundred twelve women were included (HCL n = 59). Women in the HCL group had a longer duration of diabetes and higher rates of prepregnancy care. There was no between-group difference in HbA1c in any trimester. However, in the second trimester, MDI users had a greater decrease in HbA1c (-6.12 ± 9.06 vs. -2.16 ± 7.42 mmol/mol, P = 0.031). No difference in TIR (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) and TAR was observed between HCL and MDI users, but with a higher total insulin dose in the second trimester [+0.13 IU/kg·day)]. HCL therapy was associated with increased maternal weight gain during pregnancy (ßadjusted = 3.20 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-5.50). Regarding neonatal outcomes, newborns of HCL users were more likely to have higher birthweight (ßadjusted = 279.0 g, 95% CI 39.5-518.5) and macrosomia (ORadjusted = 3.18, 95% CI 1.05-9.67) compared to MDI users. These associations disappeared when maternal weight gain or third trimester HbA1c was included in the models. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, HCL users gained more weight during pregnancy and had larger newborns than MDI users, while achieving similar glycemic control in terms of HbA1c and TIR.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Glycated Hemoglobin , Hypoglycemic Agents , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Adult , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/blood , Prospective Studies , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Blood Glucose/analysis , Glycemic Control/methods , Pregnancy Outcome , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Spain , Infant, NewbornABSTRACT
Norbert Freinkel emphasized the need for "more aggressive therapy with exogenous insulin" during type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancy. Recent advances in diabetes technology, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems allow us to revisit Freinkel's observations from a contemporary perspective. The Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women With Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT) led to international recommendations that CGM be offered to all pregnant women with T1D to help them meet their pregnancy glucose targets and improve neonatal outcomes. However, despite CGM use, only 35% of trial participants reached the pregnancy glucose targets by 35 weeks' gestation, which is too late for optimal obstetric and neonatal outcomes. The constant vigilance to CGM data and insulin dose adjustment, with perpetual worry about the impact of hyperglycemia on the developing fetal structures, leave many pregnant women feeling overwhelmed. HCL systems that can adapt to marked gestational changes in insulin sensitivity and pharmacokinetics may help to bridge the gap between the nonpregnant time in range glycemic targets (70-180 mg/dL) and the substantially more stringent pregnancy-specific targets (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL) required for optimal obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Use of HCL (CamAPS FX system) was associated with a 10.5% higher TIRp, 10.2% less hyperglycemia, and 12.3% higher overnight TIRp. Clinical benefits were accompanied by 3.7 kg (8 lb) less gestational weight gain and consistently achieved across a representative patient population of insulin pump or injection users, across trial sites, and across maternal HbA1c categories. Working collaboratively, women, HCL technology, and health care teams achieved improved glycemia with less worry, less work, and more positive pregnancy experiences.
Subject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetes, Gestational , Hyperglycemia , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapy , Insulin/therapeutic use , Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Insulin, Regular, Human/therapeutic use , Hyperglycemia/drug therapy , Pregnancy OutcomeSubject(s)
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists , Hypoglycemic Agents , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor/agonists , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Pregnancy in Diabetics/drug therapyABSTRACT
AIMS: Bespoke glycaemic control strategies following antenatal corticosteroids for women with diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) may mitigate hyperglycaemia. This study aims to identify predictive factors for the glycaemic response to betamethasone in a large cohort of women with DIP. METHODS: Evaluation of a prospective cohort study of 347 consecutive DIP pregnancies receiving two doses of 11.4 mg betamethasone 24 h apart between 2017 and 2021 and treated with the Pregnancy-IVI intravenous insulin protocol. Regression modelling identified factors associated with maternal glycaemic time-in-range (TIR) and maternal insulin requirements following betamethasone. Factors associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia (glucose <2.6 mmol/L) in infants born within 48 h of betamethasone administration (n = 144) were investigated. RESULTS: The mean maternal age was 31.9 ± 5.8 years, with gestational age at betamethasone of 33.5 ± 3.4 weeks. Gestational diabetes was present in 81% (12% type 1; 7% type 2). Pre-admission subcutaneous insulin was prescribed for 63%. On-infusion maternal glucose TIR (4.0-7.8 mmol/L) was 83% [IQR 77%-90%] and mean on-IVI glucose was 6.6 ± 0.5 mmol/L. Maternal hypoglycaemia (<3.8 mmol/L) was uncommon (0.47 h/100 on-IVI woman hours). Maternal glucose TIR was negatively associated with indicators of insulin resistance (type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome), late-pregnancy complications (pre-eclampsia, chorioamnionitis) and the 1-h OGTT result. Intravenous insulin requirements were associated with type of diabetes, pre-eclampsia and intrauterine infection, the 1-h OGTT result and the timing of betamethasone administration. Neonatal hypoglycaemia was associated with pre-existing diabetes but not with measures of glycaemic control. CONCLUSION: An intravenous infusion protocol effectively controls maternal glucose after betamethasone. A risk-factor-based approach may allow individualisation of therapy.