Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.810
Filter
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(9): 857-864, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965801

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To update and extend the examination of cancer incidence in a cohort of Danish firefighters, now adding 7 years of follow-up and 2766 additional firefighters. The primary focus was directed toward cancer sites that recently contributed to the hazard evaluation conducted by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). METHODS: The updated cohort consisted of 11,827 male Danish firefighters who were followed up for cancer from 1968 to 2021. Cohort cancer morbidity was compared with a working population reference group, and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were used for estimation of relative risks, along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Among full-time firefighters, SIR of skin melanoma was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.02-1.66), and SIR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.02-1.85) for over 5 years of employment. Slightly positive associations were also observed for cancer of the urinary bladder (SIR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.93-1.45), prostate (SIR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.97-1.28), and testis (SIR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.75-1.63). CONCLUSIONS: This updated study provides evidence indicating an elevated risk of skin melanoma in firefighters. Consistent with IARC's evaluation, we also identified positive associations for urinary bladder, prostate, and testis cancer. In contrast, our findings did not suggest an increased risk of colon cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and mesothelioma. The latter may be due to small numbers in our still relatively young cohort. Continuous follow-up for cancer in firefighters is warranted, including assessment of influence from surveillance bias.


Subject(s)
Firefighters , Melanoma , Neoplasms , Occupational Diseases , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Firefighters/statistics & numerical data , Denmark/epidemiology , Incidence , Middle Aged , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
2.
Int J Epidemiol ; 53(4)2024 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39018665

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The carcinogenicity of air pollution and its impact on the risk of lung cancer is well known; however, there are still knowledge gaps and mixed results for other sites of cancer. METHODS: The current study aimed to evaluate the associations between ambient air pollution [fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)] and cancer incidence. Exposure assessment was based on historical addresses of >900 000 participants. Cancer incidence included primary cancer cases diagnosed from 2007 to 2015 (n = 30 979). Cox regression was used to evaluate the associations between ambient air pollution and cancer incidence [hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI]. RESULTS: In the single-pollutant models, an increase of one interquartile range (IQR) (2.11 µg/m3) of PM2.5 was associated with an increased risk of all cancer sites (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.47-1.54), lung cancer (HR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.60-1.87), bladder cancer (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.37-1.65), breast cancer (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.42-1.58) and prostate cancer (HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.31-1.52). In the single-pollutant and the co-pollutant models, the estimates for PM2.5 were stronger compared with NOx for all the investigated cancer sites. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the carcinogenicity of ambient air pollution on lung cancer and provide additional evidence for bladder, breast and prostate cancers. Further studies are needed to confirm our observation regarding prostate cancer. However, the need for more research should not be a barrier to implementing policies to limit the population's exposure to air pollution.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution , Breast Neoplasms , Environmental Exposure , Lung Neoplasms , Particulate Matter , Prostatic Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Incidence , Female , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/chemically induced , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/etiology , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/chemically induced , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Nitrogen Oxides/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors
3.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 43(1): 90, 2024 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902815

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: According to our knowledge, the relationship between dietary patterns such as pro-healthy, pro-vegetarian, and non-healthy dietary patterns and prostate cancer risk has not been clearly investigated in Iranian men. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between adherence to a pro-healthy (PHDI), pro-vegetarian (PDP), and non-healthy dietary indices (NHDI) and the risk of prostate cancer. METHOD: In this matched case-control study, 125 participants (62 cases and 63 hospital-based controls) were enrolled from April to September 2015. Participants' dietary intakes were evaluated using a valid and reliable 160-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Dietary indices calculated based on previous studies. The relationship between dietary indices (PHDI, NHDI and PDP) and prostate cancer risk was assessed using binary regression models. RESULTS: According to adjusted model, significant negative correlations were found between PHDI and PDP with prostate cancer (PHDI: OR = 0.31; 95% CI; 0.11-0.85; P = 0.023 - PDP: OR = 0.34; 95% CI; 0.15-0.75; P = 0.008). Also, a positive association was seen between NHDI and prostate cancer (OR = 3.01; 95% CI; 1.20-7.57; P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: We found that adherence to healthy dietary indices which includes high amounts of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains reduces the risk of prostate cancer. While adherence to a dietary pattern high in red and processed meat, refined grains, and sweetened beverages increases the risk of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy , Diet , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Iran/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Diet, Healthy/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Aged , Diet/adverse effects , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Diet, Vegetarian , Feeding Behavior , Adult , Diet Surveys
4.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5116, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879581

ABSTRACT

Exposure to ambient air pollution has significant adverse health effects; however, whether air pollution is associated with urological cancer is largely unknown. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with epidemiological studies, showing that a 5 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 exposure is associated with a 6%, 7%, and 9%, increased risk of overall urological, bladder, and kidney cancer, respectively; and a 10 µg/m3 increase in NO2 is linked to a 3%, 4%, and 4% higher risk of overall urological, bladder, and prostate cancer, respectively. Were these associations to reflect causal relationships, lowering PM2.5 levels to 5.8 µg/m3 could reduce the age-standardized rate of urological cancer by 1.5 ~ 27/100,000 across the 15 countries with the highest PM2.5 level from the top 30 countries with the highest urological cancer burden. Implementing global health policies that can improve air quality could potentially reduce the risk of urologic cancer and alleviate its burden.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution , Particulate Matter , Urologic Neoplasms , Humans , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , Urologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urologic Neoplasms/etiology , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Male , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/etiology , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Female
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(23): e38422, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847698

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between fat mass (FM), body fat percentage (BF%), lean body mass (LM), and prostate cancer (PCa), and evaluate their potential impact on the risk of PCa. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) of the United States were utilized. Adult male participants from 6 survey cycles between 1999 and 2010 were selected as the study sample. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between BF%, LM, and PCa, while controlling for potential confounding variables. Among the 8440 participants, 359 cases of PCa were diagnosed. The relationship between BF%, LM, and PCa was nonlinear. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, there was an independent association between BF% and PCa risk (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06), suggesting that higher BF% levels are associated with an increased risk of PCa. Conversely, higher LM levels were associated with a decreased risk of PCa (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98). The findings of this study demonstrate a correlation between BF% and LM with PCa, but do not provide direct evidence of a causal relationship. Higher BF% levels are associated with an increased risk of PCa, while higher LM levels are associated with a decreased risk. These results provide valuable insights for understanding and potentially preventing PCa, although further research is needed to fully comprehend the underlying mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Nutrition Surveys , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Body Mass Index , Aged , Body Composition , Adult , Logistic Models
6.
Immunol Lett ; 268: 106883, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852888

ABSTRACT

The gut microbiota is a system of microorganisms in the human gastrointestinal (GI) system, consisting of trillions of microorganisms residing in epithelial surfaces of the body. Gut microbiota are exposed to various external and internal factors and form a unique gut-associated immunity maintained through a balancing act among diverse groups of microorganisms. The role of microbiota in dysbiosis of the gut in aiding prostate cancer development has created an urgency for extending research toward comprehension and preventative measures. The gut microbiota varies among persons based on diet, race, genetic background, and geographic location. Bacteriome, mainly, has been linked to GI complications, metabolism, weight gain, and high blood sugar. Studies have shown that manipulating the microbiome (bacteriome, virome, and mycobiome) through the dietary intake of phytochemicals positively influences physical and emotional health, preventing and delaying diseases caused by microbiota. In this review, we discuss the wealth of knowledge about the GI tract and factors associated with dysbiosis-mediated compromised gut immunity. This review also focuses on the relationship of dysbiosis to prostate cancer, the impact of microbial metabolites short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) on host health, and the phytochemicals improving health while inhibiting prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Dysbiosis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Dysbiosis/immunology , Male , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Animals , Immune System/immunology , Immune System/metabolism , Disease Susceptibility , Fatty Acids, Volatile/metabolism
7.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 127, 2024 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460021

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It is still unclear whether kidney transplantation can be safely performed in patients with prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent. METHODS: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO. We systematically searched Google, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the ICTRP for studies, official standards, clinical practice guidelines and organ transplant laws. Two review authors independently examined the full-text reports and identified relevant studies and one review author extracted the data. We assessed the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 1346 references through electronic database searching and finally included 6 references for official standards, clinical practice guidelines, and organ transplant laws, and 6 references for retrospective studies with very low certainty of evidence. We identified no prospective or ongoing studies and reported all results narratively. CONCLUSION: We recommend that decisions on kidney transplantation in patients with prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent should be made on a case-by-case basis. It is indispensable to consult with health care professionals or specialists at transplant centers to obtain individualized information regarding the waiting time requirements for renal transplantation in prostate cancer patients after local therapy with curative intent. No recommendation can be made regarding the waiting times after prostate cancer therapy with curative intent.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology
8.
Cir Cir ; 92(1): 82-87, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537231

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Radical prostatectomy is a therapeutic option in organ-confined prostate cancer. As the development of robotic systems progresses, the approach with this technology has begun to impact the functional and oncological outcomes of urological patients. The objective is to report the rate of pentafecta in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) stratified by risk groups. METHOD: Retrospective, observational, descriptive study from 2013 to 2020 that included 112 patients undergoing RARP. RESULTS: A rate of pentafecta at 12 months of follow-up of 35.7% (n = 40) was obtained. In the subanalysis by risk groups, at 1-year follow-up, was obtained an index of 43% (n = 26), 26% (n = 9) and 22% (n = 4) in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatectomy showed functional and oncological results similar to those reported in the literature with robotic approach, regardless of the risk group for prostate cancer.


OBJETIVO: La prostatectomía radical es la alternativa terapéutica de elección en el cáncer de próstata confinado al órgano. Conforme avanza el desarrollo de los sistemas robóticos, el abordaje con esta tecnología ha comenzado a impactar en los desenlaces funcionales y oncológicos de los pacientes urológicos. El objetivo es reportar el índice de pentafecta en pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot (PRRA) estratificados por grupos de riesgo. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, descriptivo, de 2013 a 2020, que incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a PRAR. RESULTADOS: Se obtuvo un índice de pentafecta a 12 meses de seguimiento del 35.7% (n = 40). En el subanálisis por grupos de riesgo, al año de seguimiento, se obtuvieron unos índices del 43% (n = 26), el 26% (n = 9) y el 22% (n = 4) en los pacientes de bajo, intermedio y alto riesgo, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía demostró resultados funcionales y oncológicos similares a lo reportado en la literatura con abordaje robótico independientemente del grupo de riesgo del cáncer de próstata.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Male , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Treatment Outcome
9.
Nutrients ; 16(6)2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38542712

ABSTRACT

Cancer has become a serious problem worldwide, as it represents the main cause of death, and its incidence has increased over the years. A potential strategy to counter the growing spread of various forms of cancer is the adoption of prevention strategies, in particular, the use of healthy lifestyles, such as maintaining a healthy weight, following a healthy diet; being physically active; avoiding smoking, alcohol consumption, and sun exposure; and vitamin D supplementation. These modifiable risk factors are associated with this disease, contributing to its development, progression, and severity. This review evaluates the relationship between potentially modifiable risk factors and overall cancer development, specifically breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, and highlights updated recommendations on cancer prevention. The results of numerous clinical and epidemiological studies clearly show the influence of lifestyles on the development and prevention of cancer. An incorrect diet, composed mainly of saturated fats and processed products, resulting in increased body weight, combined with physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, and smoking, has induced an increase in the incidence of all three types of cancer under study. Given the importance of adopting correct and healthy lifestyles to prevent cancer, global institutions should develop strategies and environments that encourage individuals to adopt healthy and regular behaviors.


Subject(s)
Diet , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Risk Factors , Healthy Lifestyle , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Life Style , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/prevention & control
10.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 33(6): 857-860, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497801

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Greenspace is hypothesized as being protective against cancer, whereas noise pollution and fine particulate matter (<2.5 µm in diameter, PM2.5) are both potential risk factors. Findings from recent studies of greenspace and PM2.5 with prostate cancer are not conclusive and the association between noise exposure and cancer has not been evaluated in a U.S. study. METHODS: We assessed PM2.5, noise, and greenspace exposure using spatiotemporal models and satellite-based estimates at enrollment addresses for N = 43,184 male participants of the prospective Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial cohort (enrolled 1994-2001). We used Cox regression models adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, study center, family history of prostate cancer, and Area Deprivation Index to estimate associations between ambient PM2.5 (µg/m3), greenspace (index range from -1 to 1), and noise pollution (loudest 10% of total existing sound, decibels) and incident prostate cancer risk through December 2017. RESULTS: A total of 6,327 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed among male participants during follow-up. PM2.5 and noise exposures were moderately positively correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.46), and PM2.5 and greenspace were not correlated (ρ = 0.10); greenspace and noise were inversely correlated (ρ = -0.32). In single-pollutant and multipollutant models mutually adjusted for coexposures, we found no associations with prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence that PM2.5, greenspace, and noise pollution were associated with prostate cancer risk in this large, geographically spread cohort. IMPACT: This study contributes to a small body of existing literature investigating these biologically plausible associations.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Particulate Matter , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Noise/adverse effects , Female , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cohort Studies
11.
Semin Nephrol ; 44(1): 151494, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538455

ABSTRACT

Kidney transplantation is the ideal treatment modality for patients with end-stage kidney disease, with excellent outcomes post-transplant compared with dialysis. However, kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of infections and cancer because of the need for immunosuppression. Kidney transplant recipients have approximately two to three times greater risk of developing cancer than the general population, and cancer is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Most of the increased risk is driven by viral-mediated cancers such as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, anogenital cancers, and Kaposi sarcoma. Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in kidney transplant recipients, likely due to an interaction between ultraviolet radiation exposure and decreased immune surveillance. Occurrence of the more common types of solid organ cancers seen in the general population, such as breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancers, is not, or is only mildly, increased post-transplant. Clinical care and future research should focus on prevention and on improving outcomes for important immunosuppression-related malignancies, and treatment options for other cancers occurring in the transplant setting.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Sarcoma, Kaposi/epidemiology , Sarcoma, Kaposi/etiology , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/epidemiology , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Transplant Recipients
12.
Carcinogenesis ; 45(6): 378-386, 2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375679

ABSTRACT

Estrogen plays a crucial role in ovarian tumorigenesis. Phytoestrogens (PEs) are a type of daily dietary nutrient for humans and possess a mild estrogenic characteristic. This study aimed to assess the correlation of the consumption of dietary PEs with ovarian cancer risk using data in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Participants were enrolled in PLCO from 1993 to 2001. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized to determine the association between the intake of PEs and ovarian cancer occurrence, which were calculated by the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. In total, 24 875 participants were identified upon completion of the initial dietary questionnaire (DQX). Furthermore, the analysis also included a total of 45 472 women who filled out the diet history questionnaire (DHQ). Overall, after adjustment for confounders, the dietary intake of total PEs was significantly associated with the risk of ovarian cancer in the DHQ group (HRQ4vsQ1 = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.95; P for trend = 0.066). Especially, individuals who consumed the highest quartile of isoflavones were found to have a decreased risk of ovarian cancer in the DHQ group (HRQ4vsQ1 = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.94; P for trend = 0.032). However, no such significant associations were observed for the DQX group. In summary, this study suggests that increased dietary intake of total PEs especially isoflavones was linked with a lower risk for developing ovarian cancer. More research is necessary to validate the findings and explore the potential mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Diet , Ovarian Neoplasms , Phytoestrogens , Humans , Female , Phytoestrogens/administration & dosage , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Male , Aged , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Isoflavones/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology
13.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 97(2): 207-215, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38175230

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the association between night work and the development of prostate cancer. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Studies were included based on a PECOS; the population included men in/above the working age, exposure defined as night work, outcome defined as prostate cancer, and study design restricted to cohort studies. The exclusion of articles, risk-of-bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, including a sensitivity analysis stratified based on the risk-of-bias assessment. We evaluated publication bias using a funnel plot and Egger´s test, and the level of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: A total of 528 articles were identified, and eight cohort studies were included. Three studies had a moderate risk of bias, while five studies had a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.7). In the sensitivity analysis, moderate vs. high risk-of-bias studies showed a pooled HR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.3-4.1) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.6-1.3), respectively. Based on GRADE, the level of evidence was rated low. CONCLUSION: We found no association between night work and the development of prostate cancer. The evidence was assessed as limited and inconsistent. Future studies encompassing consistent definitions of night work, including objective exposure data, are highly warranted.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Shift Work Schedule , Humans , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Male , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Work Schedule Tolerance , Risk Factors
14.
Cancer Med ; 13(1): e6841, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38174802

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is by far the most common type of cancer among men in western countries. However, relatively little is known about its etiology despite the high morbidity and mortality. It has been suggested that chronic inflammation may be involved in prostate carcinogenesis. We investigated the role of sexually and non-sexually transmitted infections in prostate cancer risk with a specific interest in the aggressive types. METHODS: We used data from epidemiological study of prostate cancer (EPICAP), a population-based case-control study. A total of 819 incident cases and 879 controls were interviewed face-to-face using a standardized questionnaire gathering information on known or suspected risk factors of prostate cancer and personal history of specific sexually and non-sexually transmitted infections: gonorrhea, syphilis, trichomonas, herpes, mononucleosis, Epstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster, and dengue. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval were estimated using multivariate unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: There was no significant association between gonorrhea (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.61-1.33), trichomonas (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.27-2.07), genital herpes (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.38-1.27), and the risk of prostate cancer. No association emerged for overall sexually transmitted bacterial and viral infections (OR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.86-1.29) and overall non-sexually transmitted viral infections (OR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.90-1.35) and the risk of prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that sexually or non-sexually transmitted infections, either bacterial or viral, were not associated to prostate cancer. Therefore, further investigation is needed to help advance our understanding of the role of chronic inflammation in the etiology of prostate cancer, with a particular focus on its most aggressive types.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , Risk Factors , Aged , Odds Ratio , Adult
15.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 27(1): 116-121, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37660219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Senhance® Robotic System is a new laparoscopy-based platform that has been increasingly used in radical prostatectomy (RP) procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of Senhance RP (SRP) with da Vinci RP (DRP) cases. METHODS: From August 2019 to April 2022, we prospectively recruited 63 cases of SRP. We compared the perioperative data, postoperative complication rates, short-term surgical outcomes (3-month postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and incontinence rates), learning curves, and cost analysis with data from 63 matched da Vinci Xi RP cases. RESULTS: There was no difference in BL (180 versus 180 ml, p = 0.86) and postoperative surgical complication rate (Clavient -Dindo grade I-IV, 25.3 versus 22.2%, p = 0.21) between the SRP cases and the DRP. Regarding the oncologic and continence function, there was no difference between positive margin rate (36.5% versus 41.3%, p = 0.58), rate of undetectable PSA level at postoperative 3 months (68.3 versus 66.7%, p = 0.85), and incontinence rate (14.3 versus 15.9%, p = 1.0) at postoperative 3 months between the two cohorts. The learning curve showed a quick downward slope for laparoscopic experienced surgeons. The median pocket cost for SRP patients in our hospital was $4170, which was lower than $7675 for the DRP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and short-term outcomes are comparable between SRP and DRP. For experienced LRP surgeons, using the Senhance system to perform RP is straightforward. With a more affordable price as its biggest advantage, the Senhance system may serve as a safe and effective alternative for robotic RP.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Urinary Incontinence , Male , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Learning Curve , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatectomy/methods , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Treatment Outcome
16.
BJU Int ; 133(2): 197-205, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604773

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of the first series of patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with the use of the Versius® Surgical System (CMR Surgical Ltd., Cambridge, UK). RARP has demonstrated better perioperative outcomes compared to open RP. However, RARP remains limited by platform availability and cost-effectiveness issues. The increasing competition from new robotic surgical platforms may further drive utilisation of the robotic approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for our first 18 consecutive patients with localised prostate cancer who underwent RARP at our centre over a 3-month period. We recorded parameters, including patient demographics and perioperative outcomes. We also report our optimised set-up with regard to trocar placement, bedside unit placement, and overall composition of the operating room for this procedure. Describing the incremental modifications carried out to achieve reductions in set-up and operating times to optimise utilisation of the Versius system. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) set-up time was 8.5 (7-10) min. The median (IQR) console time was 201 (170-242) min. The median (IQR) operative time was 213 (186-266) min. The median (IQR) total surgery time was 226 (201-277) min. Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy median (IQR) time was 19 (17-20) min. There were no complications and/or limitations related to the use of the Versius system including need for conversion. There were no relevant intra- or postoperative complications at the 1-month follow-up related to the use of the Versius system. Patients were discharged after a median (IQR) of 4 (3.75-5) days, and the transurethral catheter was removed after a mean (range) of 8 (7-14) days. Continence at 2 months was achieved in 72.2% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Performing RARP using the Versius system is feasible, safe, and easily reproducible. Our set-up enables a rapid docking approach and efficient completion of the surgery.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Male , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Prostate/surgery , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(2): 281-290.e1, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065717

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the prediction of the likelihood of PSMs in patients undergoing similar surgical procedures remains a challenge. We aim to develop a predictive model for PSMs in patients undergoing non-nerve-sparing RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from PCa patients who underwent minimally invasive non-nerve-sparing RP at our hospital between June 2017 and June 2021. We identified independent risk factors associated with PSMs using clinical and MRI-based parameters in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzes. These factors were then used to develop a nomogram for predicting the probability of PSMs. The predictive performance was validated using calibration and receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve ,and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate analyzes revealed prostate-specific antigen density, tumor size, tumor location at the apex, tumor contact length, extracapsular extension (ECE) level, and apparent diffusion coefficient value as independent risk factors. A nomogram was developed and validated with high accuracy (C-index = 0.78). Furthermore, we found that 44.2% of patients diagnosed with organ-confined disease had ECE after surgery, and 29.1% of patients with Gleason scores ≤7 had higher pathological scores. Interestingly, the tumor burden calculated from PCa biopsy cores was overestimated when compared to postoperative PCa specimens. CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable nomogram for predicting the risk of PSMs in PCa patients undergoing non-nerve-sparing RP. The study highlights the importance of incorporating these parameters in personalized surgical management.


Subject(s)
Margins of Excision , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Risk Factors , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
18.
Adv Nutr ; 15(1): 100124, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940476

ABSTRACT

A meta-analysis published in 2018 indicated a significant association between the dietary inflammatory index (DII) and risk of urologic cancers (UC). The number of included studies was limited, and more research has been published on this topic since then. The current study aimed to find a more precise estimate of the association between dietary inflammatory potential and risk of UC by updating the previous meta-analysis. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched between January 2015 and April 2023 to identify eligible articles. Combined relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by random-effects model to assess the association between dietary inflammatory potential and risk of UC by comparison of the highest versus the lowest category of the DII/empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) or by using the continuous DII/EDIP score. The analysis, including 23 studies with 557,576 subjects, showed different results for UC. There was a significant association for prostate cancer among case-control studies (RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.34-2.28), whereas among cohort studies a null association was found (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.08). For bladder cancer, a nonsignificant association was observed in both case-control (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.95-2.64) and cohort studies (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.86-1.24). Pooled RR from 3 case-control studies displayed a statistically significant association between the DII and risk of kidney cancer (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56). Although DII was positively associated with all types of UC, no association was found for EDIP. The present meta-analysis confirmed that an inflammatory diet has a direct effect on the development of prostate cancer and kidney cancer. Large-scale studies are needed to demonstrate the association between dietary inflammatory potential and risk of UC and provide effective nutritional advice for UC prevention. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023391204).


Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Risk Factors , Inflammation/complications , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Diet/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/etiology , Kidney Neoplasms/etiology , Kidney Neoplasms/complications
19.
Int J Vitam Nutr Res ; 94(2): 133-142, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36755523

ABSTRACT

Results regarding the epidemiological association of vitamin D with lung (LCA) and prostate cancer (PCA) are controversial. This study tested whether serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations have interactive epidemiological associations with smoking, the number-one risk factor for LCA, and age, the number-one risk factor for PCA. Also, this study investigated whether the associations of 25(OH)D, smoking, age, alcohol consumption, body mass index, diet (the healthy Nordic diet score), and physical activity with incident LCA and PCA are multiplicative or additive. The study of association types makes it easier to select appropriate statistical methods. The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study provided the data of 2578 men with 112 LCA and 300 PCA cases over 35 years by the end of 2019. Serum 25(OH)D did not associate with LCA and PCA or interact with smoking and age. The association of smoking with LCA was additive; 13 extra cases per 1000 men every 10 years. Age and alcohol consumption multiplicatively increased the hazard of LCA (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval for age >50: 3.56, 1.82-6.17; drink per week: 1.01, 1.00-1.03), whereas adherence to healthy Nordic diet decreased it (per score point: 0.95, 0.89-1.00). The association of age >50 with PCA was additive; 2.5 extra cases per 1000 men every 10 years. To conclude, there was no epidemiological relationship of pre-diagnostic 25(OH)D concentrations with the incidence of LCA and PCA. The respective associations of smoking and age >50 with LCA and PCA were additive rather than multiplicative.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Male , Humans , Risk Factors , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Lung
20.
J Epidemiol ; 34(3): 144-153, 2024 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37150608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have investigated dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins in relation to prostate cancer risk in Western countries, but the results are inconsistent. However, few studies have reported this relationship in Asian countries. METHODS: We investigated the association between intake of vitamins, including lycopene, α-carotene, ß-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E, with prostate cancer risk in the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective (JPHC) study. 40,720 men without history of cancer finished the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and were included in the study. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of prostate cancer risk were calculated according to the quintiles of energy-adjusted intake of vitamins using Cox models. RESULTS: After an average of 15.2 years (617,599 person-years in total) of follow-up, 1,386 cases of prostate cancer were identified, including 944 localized cases and 340 advanced cases. No associations were observed in consumption of antioxidant vitamins, including α-carotene, ß-carotene, vitamin C, and vitamin E, and prostate cancer risk. Although higher lycopene intake was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer (highest vs lowest quintile, HR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47; P for trend = 0.01), there was a null association of lycopene intake with risk of prostate cancer detected by subjective symptoms (HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.79-1.58; P for trend = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Our study suggested no association between antioxidant intake of vitamins and prostate cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants , Carotenoids , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Vitamins , Prospective Studies , Japan/epidemiology , beta Carotene , Lycopene , Public Health , Cohort Studies , Risk Factors , Vitamin A , Ascorbic Acid , Vitamin E , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Vitamin K
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL