ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: How to manage patients with severe kidney disease in pregnancy is still a matter of discussion, and deciding if and when to start dialysis is based on the specialist's experience and dialysis availability. The effect of toxic substances usually cleared by the kidney may be more severe and readily evident. The review, and related case, underlines the importance of considering the presence of additives in food in delicate conditions, such as CKD pregnancy. The Case: A 39-year-old indigenous woman from a low-resourced area in Mexico was referred to the obstetric nephrology at 25 gestational weeks because of serum creatinine at 3.6 mg/dL, hypertension on low-dose alpha-methyl-dopa, and nephrotic-range proteinuria. Kidney ultrasounds showed small poorly differentiated kidneys; foetal ultrasounds detected a female foetus, normal for gestational age. The patient's baseline protein intake, which was estimated at 1.2-1.3 g/kg/day, was mostly of animal-origin (>70%) poor-quality food ("junk food"). In the proposed diet, protein intake was only slightly reduced (1.0-1.2 g/kg/day), but the source of proteins was changed (only 30% of animal origin) with attention to food quality. A remarkable decrease in BUN was observed, in concomitance with adequate dietary follow-up, with rapid rise of BUN when the patient switched temporarily back to previous habits. A healthy female baby weighing 2,460 g (11th centile for gestational age) was delivered at 37 gestational weeks. Discussion and Literature Review: While data on patients with chronic kidney disease are scant, the long list of contaminants present in food, especially if of low quality, should lead us to reflect on their potential negative effect on kidney function and make us realize that eating healthy, unprocessed "organic" food should be encouraged, in delicate conditions such as pregnancy and breastfeeding and for young children, in particular when kidney function is failing. The case herein described gave us the opportunity to reflect on the importance of diet quality and on the potential risks linked to food additives, many of which, including phosphates and potassium, are not declared on food labels, while others, including dyes, antioxidants, thickeners, emulsifiers, and preservatives, are qualitatively, but not quantitatively, reported.
Subject(s)
Animal Proteins, Dietary , Diet, Healthy , Plant Proteins, Dietary , Pregnancy Complications/diet therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diet therapy , Adult , Animal Proteins, Dietary/metabolism , Animals , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Plant Proteins, Dietary/metabolism , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/metabolism , Pregnancy Complications/physiopathology , Pregnancy, High-Risk , Proteinuria/complications , Proteinuria/diet therapy , Proteinuria/metabolism , Proteinuria/physiopathology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/metabolism , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that soy protein can slow renal disease progression by decreasing plasma cholesterol and proteinuria in patients with nephropathies. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of soy protein on proteinuria and dyslipidemia, in patients with proteinuric glomerulopathies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups: Control Group (n = 9) received diet with 0.8 g/kg/day of animal protein; Study Group 1 (n = 9), 0.8 g/kg/day of soy protein; and Group 2 (n = 9), 0.8 g/kg/day of soy protein plus fibers. The study period corresponded to eight weeks. During the baseline period and by the end of the study, patients were submitted to laboratorial and anthropometric evaluation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between baseline and post-diet periods among the three groups in anthropometric parameters or body composition, neither in proteinuria levels (Control: 0.7 ± 0.6 versus 0.8 ± 0.6; Group 1: 2.0 ± 1.7 versus 1.9 ± 1.8; Group 2: 2.0 ± 1.4 versus 2.1 ± 2.0). However, a slight decrease in triglycerides (244.8 ± 275.9 versus 200.5 ± 34.0), total (234.0 ± 59.4 versus 181.2 ± 110.3) and LDL (136.0 ± 59.1 versus 104.1 ± 39.4) cholesterol in Group 1 was observed, although not significant. CONCLUSION: We have not observed beneficial effects when using soy protein instead of animal protein with the aim of attenuating proteinuria and hyperlipidemia, but we have shown that soy protein has not caused deleterious changes in body composition, ensuring an adequate nutritional state.
Subject(s)
Diet , Glomerulonephritis/diet therapy , Hyperlipidemias/diet therapy , Proteinuria/diet therapy , Soybean Proteins , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
El sindrome Urémico Hemolítico D+ (SUH) es la segunda causa de insuficiencia renal crónica terminal (IRCT) en edad pediátrica. La proteinuria es el principal modulador de la evolución a la cronicidad. En un grupo de pacientes tratados con dieta controlada en proteínas e inhibidores de la enzima de conversión de la Angiotensina II se demostró un enlentecimiento significativo en la progresión de la nefropatía a la IRCT. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar, en una primera etapa, el impacto de la dieta normoproteica y normosódica sobre la proteinuria en pacientes con nefropatía secuelar por SUH y función renal normal (CI Cr >80ml/min/1.73m2). Métodos: como parte de un estudio de fase III longitudinal, multicéntrico, aleatorizado, doble ciego, de grupos paralelos (placebo y activo controlado con enalpril y losartan), se evaluó la diferencia entre la proteinuria antes y después de una dieta normósódica y mormoprotica, indicada según RDA. La ingesta proteica fue estimada mediante recordtorio de 72 horas y el cálculo de excreción de urea en orina de 24 horas. La proteinuria se dosó en orina de 24 hs. al comienzo del estudio, a los 30 y 60 días. Resultados: se incluyeron 102 pacientes cuyo rango de proteinuria fue entre 5.3 y 40.0 mg/kg/día de los cuales negativizaron 65 (63.7 por ciento) y no respondieron 37 (36,3 por ciento ). La mediana de edad del comienzo de la enfermedad fue de 16,5 meses (rango: 7.0-85.0 meses). El tiempo de evolución post SUG fue de 4.0 a 155.0 meses (mediana 48.0 meses) El valor de la proteinuria inicial en los 65 niños que respondieron fue de x 9.83 mg/kg/día (ES 0 o,34) y post dieta de de x =2,44 (ES 0 0,12) P < 0.0001. La media de las diferencias entre la natriuresis pre y post dieta no fue estadísticamente diferente de 0; t = 0,97 (x /ES). Conclusión: la dieta normoproteica es capaz de normalizar la proteinuria en el 63.7 por ciento de los pacientes con proteinuria significativa secundaria a SUH y función renal normal.