Development and evaluation of nanostructured systems for cutaneous delivery of H2S-releasing corticosteroids for skin inflammatory diseases.

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease that causes major psychosocial impact. Topical corticosteroids represent the standard pharmacological treatment for mild-to-moderate disease, but their local and systemic adverse effects reinforce the need for treatment innovations. Here we developed lamellar phase-based formulations for topical delivery of a hybrid dexamethasone and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor molecule (Dexa-TBZ), aiming to potentiate the effects of the glucocorticoid with H2S. They offer the possibility to obtain precursor formulations free of water that originate lamellar phases upon water addition, preventing drug hydrolysis during storage. Two groups of formulations were developed varying the surfactants and oil phase types and content. Systems containing 20 and 70 % of water formed, respectively, bulk lamellar phase and a more fluid formulation consisting of dispersed droplets (< 1000 nm) stabilized by lamellar phase. Both presented pseudoplastic behavior. Dexa-TBZ was incorporated at 1 %, remaining stable for 8 h. Drug content decreased to ∼80 % after 1 week in precursor formulations free of water, but remained stable after that. Without causing changes to the cutaneous barrier function ex vivo or to the histological structure of the skin in vivo, the formulation containing phosphatidylcholine as surfactant and 70 % of water promoted 1.8- and 2.7-fold increases in Dexa-TBZ penetration in the stratum corneum and epidermis+dermis, respectively, compared to a control solution, demonstrating their potential applicability as topical delivery systems.

Current treatment of Psoriasis triggered by Cytokine Storm and future immunomodulation strategies.

Psoriasis is a chronic condition caused by an inflammation mediated mainly by cytokines and T cells. In COVID-19, the same type of imbalance is common, generating the Cytokine Storm and promoting a worsening in the skin conditions of patients with autoimmune disorders, such as Psoriasis. In this context, one of the main mediators of immune responses presented by SARS-CoV-2 infected patients is the Purinergic System. This immunological resource is capable of stimulating the hyperinflammatory state presented by infected individuals, mainly by the activity of the P2X7 receptor, culminating in the Cytokine Storm and consequently in the Psoriasis crisis. Currently, different drugs are used for patients with Psoriasis, such as immunosuppressants and small molecules; however, the safety of these drugs in infected patients has not been analyzed yet. In this context, studies are being developed to evaluate the possible administration of these traditional drugs to COVID-19 patients with Psoriasis crisis. Along with that, researchers must evaluate the potential of administrating P2X7 antagonists to these patients as well, improving both the systemic and the dermatological prognostics of patients, by reducing the Cytokine Storm and its general effects, but also avoiding the provocation of Psoriasis crisis.

Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in psoriasis: five-year real life experience.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of secukinumab in psoriasis patients has been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in plaque psoriasis patients followed in our clinic. METHODS: Data from 101 plaque psoriasis patients who received at least 16 weeks of secukinumab treatment between June 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three (53%) of the patients were bionaive. PASI-75, -90, -100 response rates were 72%, 50%, 30% respectively at week 16 in all patients. PASI-75 and -90 responses were higher in naive patients at weeks 16 and 28 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p = 0.01, respectively). The percentage of patients with PASI ≤ 1, ≤ 3, ≤ 5 were 50%, 77%, and 92%, respectively at week 16. They were higher in the naive group than in nonnaive group at weeks 16 and 28 (p = 0.02, p < 0.01, p = 0.05, p = 0.07, p < 0.01, p = 0.03, respectively). At week 52, PASI-75, -90, -100 responses were significantly lower in smoking patients (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p < 0.01, respectively). The mean duration of secukinumab treatment was 19.80 ±â€¯12.76 months. Secukinumab was discontinued 14 (26.4%) naive patients and 28 (58.3%) nonnaive patients at one occasion during treatment (p < 0.001). The most common adverse event in patients was mucocutaneous candida infection (8%). No hepatitis B or C reactivation and no active or reactivation tuberculosis were observed in any of the patients during the follow-up period. STUDY LIMITATIONS: This is a single-center retrospective study with relatively few patients including only the Turkish population. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab seems to be effective in plaque psoriasis, particularly in bionaive and non-smokers. Moreover, it is safe in patients with inactive hepatitis or tuberculosis.

Frequency of use and annual costs of biological therapy for psoriasis in Colombia in 2019.

BACKGROUND: Evidence describing the types and annual costs of biological treatments for psoriasis in Latin America is scarce. This study aimed to estimate the frequency of use and costs of biologic therapy for psoriasis in Colombia in 2019. METHODS: This secondary data analysis uses the International Classification of Diseases terms associated with psoriasis, excluding those related to psoriatic arthritis, based on data from the registry of the Colombian Ministry of Health. We estimated the prevalence of psoriasis per 100,000 inhabitants; then, we retrieved the frequency of use of biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis and estimated the cost per year of each and overall therapies in 2019 in US dollars (USD). RESULTS: There were 100,823 patients with psoriasis in Colombia in 2019, which amounts to a prevalence of 0.2% in the general population. Of those patients, 4.9% received biologic therapy, most frequently males (60%). The most commonly used biological therapies for psoriasis in Colombia in 2019 were ustekinumab (35.2%), with an annual cost per patient of $12,880 USD; adalimumab (26%), with a yearly cost per patient of $7130 USD; and secukinumab (19.8%), with an annual cost per patient of $6825 USD. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe the use and cost of biological therapy for psoriasis in Colombia. It provides valuable cost-awareness information for the Colombian health system.

Unmet need for and impact of adopting immunobiological drugs for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a pediatric population.

Palhano et al. demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating secukinumab and ustekinumab into the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for moderate to severe psoriasis in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of secukinumab and ustekinumab against moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a Brazilian pediatric population with access to public healthcare. METHODS: A survey of immunobiological treatments registered for use against pediatric psoriasis at the National Health Surveillance Agency was conducted. These treatments were compared to the list available in the same treatment category in the public health system through the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for psoriasis. A quantitative analysis of the data of patients treated with immunobiological drugs the previous year in accordance with the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines was performed using data available in the DATASUS portal. RESULTS: The public budget impact scenarios analyzed were comparable to the investment already planned for acquiring the only available drug option. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of two therapeutic options in the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines list for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis was feasible in a horizon of 5 years compared to the investment into the single option available to pediatric patients. These findings can facilitate the local analysis of budgetary impact and discussions on the feasibility of this therapeutic incorporation at the state level. Incorporation of secukinumab and ustekinumab was economically feasible. These drugs are options for those who do not respond to or have contraindications to etanercept.

Long-term therapy with itolizumab is safe and effective for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Results from an expanded-access program.

Itolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the CD6-ALCAM pathway. This article reports on the safety and efficacy of itolizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a clinical study conducted in Cuba in the setting of an expanded-access program (EAP). The study included 84 patients who had previously received conventional anti-psoriatic systemic therapies but were either intolerant, had an inadequate response, or had contraindications to these therapies. It consisted of multiple phases, including a 12-week induction phase, a 40-week maintenance phase, and a 24-week off-treatment follow-up phase, using either a 0.4 or 1.6 mg/Kg dose. The results showed that itolizumab monotherapy was safe and effective during 52 weeks of continuous treatment and the subsequent 24 follow-up weeks. Itolizumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement (PASI 75) in 80 % of patients at the end of the induction phase, and this effect was sustained till week 52 during the maintenance phase. Moreover, 24 weeks after treatment stopped nearly two-thirds of patients still showed a PASI ≥ 75. The observed effects were dose-dependent, with 1.6 mg/kg being the most convenient dose. This study further supports the strategy of targeting the CD6-ALCAM signaling pathway for the treatment of psoriasis and the use of itolizumab as a valuable asset in the armamentarium of anti-psoriasis drugs.

Psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors.

PD-1 (programmed Death-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have provided significant benefits to tumor patients. However, a considerable proportion of the patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), of which cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs, e.g., psoriasis) occur relatively early. This review provides an overview of the current progress in psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. It not only describes the relevant influencing factors but also theoretically analyzes the immunological mechanisms that lead to the onset or exacerbation of psoriasis. Finally, the authors present guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. The review is intended to assist dermatologists in the early recognition and effective individualized management of such cirAE, which is helpful to continue or adjust the tumor-targeted immunotherapy on the basis of ensuring the quality of life of tumor patients.

Infections in the era of immunobiologicals.

Immunobiologicals represent an innovative therapeutic option in dermatology. They are indicated in severe and refractory cases of different diseases when there is contraindication, intolerance, or failure of conventional systemic therapy and in cases with significant impairment of patient quality of life. The main immunobiologicals used in dermatology basically include inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF), inhibitors of interleukin-12 and -23 (anti-IL12/23), inhibitors of interleukin-17 and its receptor (anti-IL17), inhibitors of interleukin-23 (anti-IL23), rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody), dupilumab (anti-IL4/IL13) and intravenous immunoglobulin. Their immunomodulatory action may be associated with an increase in the risk of infections in the short and long term, and each case must be assessed individually, according to the risk inherent to the drug, the patient general condition, and the need for precautions. This article will discuss the main risks of infection associated with the use of immunobiologicals, addressing the risk in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients, vaccination, fungal infections, tuberculosis, leprosy, and viral hepatitis, and how to manage the patient in the most diverse scenarios.

Psoríase e tratamento homeopático / Psoriasis and homeopathic treatment

A psoríase é uma doença inflamatória sistêmica que afeta 125 milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo e mais antigos relatos datam de Hipócrates (470 -377 AC).( A Systemic Review on Efficacy of Homeopathic Medicines on the Patients of Psoriasis), sendo acompanhada de comorbidades graves e comprometimento da qualidade de vida. A medicação alopática trata a doença de forma generalizada, suprimindo as lesões e muitas vezes resultando em complicações do próprio tratamento. A homeopatia mostra-se como uma opção terapêutica baseada em um tratamento individualizado, holístico, de baixo custo e com resultados promissores na abordagem dos pacientes psoráticos.

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease that affects 125 million people worldwide, with the earliest reports dating back to Hippocrates (470-377 BC). It is accompanied by severe comorbidities and compromises quality of life. Allopathic medication treats the disease in a generalized manner, suppressing the lesions and often resulting in treatment-related complications. Homeopathy emerges as a therapeutic option based on individualized, holistic treatment, at low cost, and with promising results in addressing psoriatic patients.

[Recommendations for psoriasis treatment in Pediatrics]. / Recomendaciones para el tratamiento de la psoriasis en Pediatría.

Introduction: in one third of patients with psoriasis, symptoms start during childhood and adolescence, with a strong emotional and psychosocial impact. Objective: to develop a guideline for the systemic treatment of psoriasis in pediatric patients by means of recommendations based on the best available evidence. Materials and methods: Sources: articles indexed in PubMed, Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and Scielo, published between January 2010 and May 2022, in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Study selection: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled studies, observational studies (case-control, cohort studies, real-life registries) and evaluations of biosimilar drugs in patients up to and including 17 years of age were considered. The keywords "psoriasis" and "treatment" were used in all three languages. Data extraction: the literature was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) recommendations. Data synthesis: evidence tables were developed and analyzed by the expert committee. The questions for the development of recommendations were based on the PICO system (population, intervention, comparison, outcome). Results: A total of 8 recommendations and 7 points of good practice were developed. The direction and strength of the recommendations were expressed according to the GRADE system. Conclusions: the final decision on a specific therapy should be based on the best opinion of the treating physician, the individual characteristics, and the values and preferences of the patients and their caregivers.

Introducción: un tercio de los pacientes con psoriasis comienzan con sus síntomas en la niñez y la adolescencia, con fuerte impacto emocional y psicosocial. Objetivo: elaborar una guía de tratamiento sistémico de la psoriasis en pacientes pediátricos mediante recomendaciones fundamentadas en la mejor evidencia disponible. Materiales y métodos: Fuentes: artículos indexados en PubMed, Epistemonikos, Google Académico, Cochrane Library y Scielo, publicados entre enero de 2010 y mayo de 2022, en inglés, castellano y portugués. Selección de estudios: se consideraron guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia, revisiones sistemáticas, metanálisis, estudios controlados y aleatorizados, estudios observacionales (casos y controles, estudios de cohortes, registros de la vida real) y evaluaciones de medicamentos biosimilares en pacientes de hasta 17 años de edad inclusive. Se utilizaron las palabras clave "psoriasis" y "tratamiento" en los tres idiomas. Extracción de datos: la bibliografía fue evaluada mediante las recomendaciones del sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Síntesis de datos: elaboración de tablas de evidencia que fueron analizadas por el comité de expertos. Las preguntas para el desarrollo de recomendaciones se fundamentaron en el sistema PICO (población, intervención, comparación, outcome [desenlace]). Resultados: se elaboraron un total de 8 recomendaciones y 7 puntos de buena práctica. La dirección y fuerza de las recomendaciones se expresaron de acuerdo con lo sugerido por el sistema GRADE. Conclusiones: la decisión final de una terapia específica se fundamentará en la mejor opinión del médico tratante, las características individuales, y los valores y preferencias de los pacientes y sus cuidadores.

New Non-Steroidal Topical Therapies for Inflammatory Dermatoses-Part 3: Roflumilast.

Topical corticosteroids have remained the initial and long-term topical treatment option for inflammatory dermatitis conditions since the 1950s. A number of non-steroidal topicals for treatment of inflammatory dermatoses have been developed in the recent decades, such as topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream), vitamin D analogues, and phophodiesterase-4 inhibitors (crisaborole), but none had the combination of broad therapeutic range, relatively rapid onset of action, tolerability, and wide-spread clinical success that allowed topical glucocorticosteroids to remain the mainstay of therapy. This situation has shifted dramatically with three non-steroidal new molecular entities, each with completely different mechanisms of action, receiving approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the past year. Topical ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, was the first to receive FDA approval, specifically for treating atopic dermatitis, and was the subject of the first report in this series. Subsequently, topical tapinarof, an aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulating agent, was approved by the FDA for treating plaque psoriasis in May 2022 and was the focus of the second report in this series. Finally, and most recently in July 2022, topical roflumilast, a highly potent phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has received FDA approval for treating plaque psoriasis, and is the subject of the third and final report in this series. In addition to their unique mechanisms of action and spectra of activity, each of these agents has unique clinical characteristics, including degree of efficacy, rapidity of onset of efficacy, potential remittive effects, and safety and tolerability profiles. In this three-part series, we reviewed and summarized the data surrounding each agent, providing a comprehensive overview that would allow dermatologists to integrate them confidently and appropriately into treatment paradigms. Part three focuses on topical roflumilast, a highly potent phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor.

Can Early Aggressive Treatment of Psoriasis Prevent Psoriatic Arthritis? A Debate at the GRAPPA Annual Meeting.

In recent years, a number of studies have examined risk factors for development of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among patients with PsO. Most recently, 5 studies have examined the effect of biologic therapy on the development of PsA. However, the results have been mixed, with 3 studies suggesting a lower risk for PsA among those using a biologic therapy and 2 suggesting a higher risk for PsA. At the 2022 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) meeting, Drs. Enrique Soriano and Alexis Ogdie conducted a debate to discuss the arguments for and against the use of biologic therapies in PsO for the purpose of preventing PsA.