[Therapeutic vignette : treatment of pulmonary embolism]. / Vignette thérapeutique de l'étudiant. Traitement de l'embolie pulmonaire.

Pulmonary embolism is a manifestation of venous thromboembolic disease, characterized by thrombus formation within the pulmonary arteries. Symptoms and clinical signs are numerous and nonspecific. Diagnosis relies on medical imaging (thoracic CT angiography or ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy). This disease requires prompt management to reduce morbidity and mortality. Treatment strategies include anticoagulation, systemic or catheter-guided thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy or surgery. In our institution, we have a multidisciplinary team, called PERT (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team), responsible for guiding the management of pulmonary embolism and for facilitating the access to those emerging endovascular techniques.

L'embolie pulmonaire est une manifestation de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse, caractérisée par la formation d'un ou plusieurs thrombi au sein des artères pulmonaires. Les symptômes et signes cliniques sont nombreux et non spécifiques. Le diagnostic repose sur l'imagerie médicale (angioscanner thoracique ou scintigraphie de ventilation/perfusion). Cette pathologie nécessite une prise en charge rapide pour en réduire la morbidité et la mortalité. Les stratégies de traitement incluent l'anticoagulation, la thrombolyse systémique ou guidée par cathéter, la thrombectomie mécanique ou la chirurgie. Au sein de notre institution, nous disposons d'une équipe multidisciplinaire, appelée PERT («Pulmonary Embolism Response Team¼), chargée d'orienter la prise en charge thérapeutique de l'embolie pulmonaire et de faciliter le recours aux nouvelles techniques endovasculaires disponibles.

Interventional Treatment of Pediatric Venous Thromboembolic Disease.

This review explores the clinical presentation of lower extremity DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE), treatment strategies, and outcomes for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the pediatric population. Traditional therapy for pediatric VTE was anticoagulation alone with thrombolysis and surgery reserved only in life or limb-threatening cases. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have emerged as effective and safe treatment options for VTE management. Although most data are from adult studies, early pediatric studies suggest that these interventional procedures can be effective in children. The significant clinical impact of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is also discussed, as PTS can lead to lifelong physical symptoms and psychosocial damage.

Utilization of a Novel Scoring System in Predicting 30-day Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism, the CLOT-5 Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: To construct a new scoring system utilizing biomarkers, vitals, and imaging data to predict 30-day mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). BACKGROUND: Acute PE, a well-known manifestation of venous thromboembolic disease, is responsible for over 100,000 deaths worldwide yearly. Contemporary management algorithms rely on a multidisciplinary approach to care via PE response teams (PERT) in the identification of low, intermediate, and high-risk patients. The PESI and sPESI scores have been used as cornerstones of the triage process in assigning risk of 30-day mortality for patients presenting with acute PE; however, the specificity of these scoring systems has often come into question. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 488 patients with acute PE who were managed at a tertiary care institution with either conservative therapy consisting of low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin, advanced therapies consisting of catheter directed therapies, aspiration thrombectomy, or a combination of these therapies, or surgical embolectomy. The CLOT-5 score was designed to include vital signs, biomarkers, and imaging data to predict 30-day mortality in patients presenting with acute PE. RESULTS: The CLOT-5 score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.901 with a standard error of 0.29, while the PESI and sPESI scores had an AUC and standard errors of 0.793 ±- 0.43 and 0.728 ± 0.55, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When incorporated into the management algorithms of national PERT programs, the CLOT-5 score may allow for rapid and comprehensive assessment of patients with acute PE at high risk for clinical decompensation, leading to early escalation of care where appropriate.

The Attend-PE model: A feasibility study of a structured follow-up care model for patients with pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism may have both physical and psychological consequences for the affected person. Guidelines recommend structured follow-up care, yet this is still not widely practised. Therefore, a national research project was initiated in Denmark in 2021, with the aim of developing, testing, implementing, and evaluating a structured post-pulmonary embolism follow-up care model, 'Attend-PE'. The objective of this feasibility study was to examine the fidelity, acceptability, and appropriateness of the Attend-PE model in a Danish hospital setting. METHODS: This feasibility study was conducted in two Danish hospitals, using a prospective study design with six months' follow-up. The fidelity, acceptability, and appropriateness of the Attend-PE model's components were evaluated using surveys, registrations sheets, and interviews with two physicians, three nurses, and 29 patients. Qualitative data were analysed using a deductive content analysis, while quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fidelity with the Attend-PE model was good, with a high participation rate of patients in all components of the model. Acceptability was likewise good, as both patients and health care professionals expressed a high level of satisfaction with the model. The health care professionals considered the model to be relevant and suitable in a Danish hospital setting, confirming appropriateness of the model. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the Attend-PE model for patients with pulmonary embolism is feasible and acceptable in a Danish hospital setting.

Post-pulmonary embolism syndrome: A reminder for clinicians.

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular emergencies and the third leading cause of death. Although efforts focus on treating the acute event, patients who survive APE may develop long-term sequelae. Research reveals that approximately half of patients who have suffered an APE do not regain their previous level of function and experience a reduction in their quality of life for several years after the episode. Acute pulmonary embolism can be classified according to the risk of short-term mortality, with most mortality and morbidity concentrated in high-risk and intermediate-risk cases. The first-line treatment for APE is systemic anticoagulation. However, identifying and more aggressively treating people with intermediate to high risk, who have a more favorable risk profile for reperfusion treatments, could reduce short-term mortality and mitigate post-pulmonary embolism syndrome (PPES). Post-pulmonary embolism syndrome refers to a variety of persistent symptoms and functional limitations that occur after an APE. The presence of persistent dyspnea, functional limitations, and/or decreased quality of life after an APE has been recently termed "PPES," although this entity encompasses different manifestations. The most severe cause of persistent dyspnea is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, where increased pulmonary artery pressure is due to the fibrotic organization of unresolved APE. Post-PE Syndrome is not always systematically addressed in management guidelines, and its prevalence may be underestimated. More research is needed to fully understand its causes and risk factors. Interventions such as cardiopulmonary rehabilitation have been suggested to improve the quality of life of patients with PPES. A comprehensive, evidence-based approach is essential to effectively prevent and manage PPES and improve the long-term outcomes and well-being of affected patients.

Large-bore Aspiration Thrombectomy with the FlowTriever System for the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: A Large Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing large-bore aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of pulmonary embolism at a large university medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated for pulmonary embolism with the FlowTriever System (Inari Medical, Irvine, CA) between September 2019 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary safety and effectiveness outcomes included 7- and 30-day all-cause mortality, major bleeding, procedure-associated clinical decompensation, pulmonary vascular or cardiac injury, and pulmonary artery pressure reduction. Additional outcomes included technical success (completing thrombectomy with the device as intended), changes in hemodynamics and supplemental oxygen requirements, and postprocedural intensive care unit stay. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients were identified. The mean age was 60.5 years, and 90.9% of patients presented with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. Technical success was achieved in 96.9% (n = 277) of cases. The average reduction in mean pulmonary arterial pressure was 6.8 mmHg, from 28.7 ± 9.0 to 21.9 ± 8.0 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Two major bleeds (0.7%), 2 pulmonary vascular injuries (0.7%), and 4 (1.4%) procedure-associated decompensations were reported, but no device-related deaths occurred. The mean post-procedure intensive care unit stay was 2.0 ± 4.1 days, and 49.3% of patients had no postprocedural intensive care unit admittance. The overall 7-day and 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 2.4% and 6.7%, respectively, with a 30-day pulmonary embolism-related mortality rate of 3.5%. CONCLUSION: This non-industry-sponsored single-center analysis of large-bore aspiration thrombectomy in a large population corroborates the findings of other studies and confirms that this approach is safe and effective for the treatment high- and intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Retrospective observational study.

[An infarction, but not a myocardial infarction!] / Un infarctus, mais pas du myocarde!

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and serious cardiovascular disease. The management of PE patients with myocardial damage but without hemodynamic instability (intermediate/high risk) has long remained limited to anticoagulant therapy with no demonstrated positive effect of thrombolysis. In this specific population, percutaneous techniques have been developed and appear as interesting alternative in patients with clinical, biological and morphological severity criteria to reduce the evolutive risk to a more severe form and improve patients' prognosis. We report here the case of a 49-year-old patient treated for a massive bilateral and proximal PE revealed by syncope with right ventricular impact in whom percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy was proposed in the absence of clinical improvement after the initiation of anticoagulant therapy. The precise indications for percutaneous techniques need to be clarified in patients with intermediate/high risk PE and ongoing randomized studies should provide additional results to better identify their place in the therapeutic arsenal.

Differential effects of balloon pulmonary angioplasty on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Decreased diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) is associated with microvascular damage in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an effective treatment for CTEPH, but the efficacy of BPA in patients with CTEPH with low DLco remains unclear because BPA does not directly address microvascular damage. This study investigates the influence of microvasculopathy on BPA in CTEPH according to DLco. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from patients with inoperable CTEPH who underwent BPA at the University of Tokyo Hospital from July 2011 to August 2023. The patients were classified into two groups based on their preprocedural DLco (normal DLco (ND) and low DLco (LD) groups), with a DLco cut-off value of 80%. We compared the patient characteristics and effectiveness of BPA between the groups. RESULTS: Among the 75 patients, 36 were in the LD group. The LD group had a shorter 6-minute walking distance (324±91 vs 427±114 m) than the ND group but the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was similar (38.9±7.3 vs 41.1±9.2 mm Hg) before BPA. BPA improved the haemodynamic status and exercise tolerance in both groups. The LD group exhibited a higher mPAP (25.1±7.4 vs 21.5±5.6 mm Hg) and required more sessions of BPA (median 6 vs 4). Based on the analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values, low DLco significantly correlated with mPAP (sß=-0.304, 95% CI -7.015 to -1.132, p=0.007) and pulmonary vascular resistance (sß=-0.324, 95% CI -141.0 to -29.81, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: BPA was associated with an improvement in the haemodynamic status and exercise tolerance in patients with CTEPH even with low DLco. However, low DLco may attenuate the effect of BPA on mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance and require more treatment sessions.

Percutaneous pulmonary aspiration thrombectomy in an adolescent fontan patient using a large-bore system.

We describe the safe and effective percutaneous pulmonary thrombectomy in an 18-year-old female with a Fontan circulation using the FlowTriever® device (Inari Medical®, Irvine, US). Aspiration thrombectomy of both pulmonary arteries was performed using 24 and 16 F FlowTriever® catheters retrieving large amounts of thrombus material resulting in near total angiographic recanalization.

[Catheter-assisted local lysis therapy for submassive pulmonary embolism]. / Kathetergestützte lokale Lysetherapie bei submassiven Lungenembolien.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cardiovascular disease. Interventional treatment options as an alternative to systemic lysis therapy of hemodynamically stable, submassive pulmonary embolisms have received an unprecedented boost in innovation in recent years. The treatment options are heterogeneous and can be roughly divided into local thrombolysis and local thrombectomy. For years in our center we have been carrying out catheter-assisted, locoregional lysis therapy with side-hole lysis catheters and a cumulative dose per pulmonary branch of 10 mg alteplase over 15 h for hemodynamically stable, submassive pulmonary emboli. AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to review this therapeutic concept and to collect data on clinical endpoints and possible complications. METHODS: The study included data from 01/2018-03/2023. For this purpose, the patients were selected based on the OPS codes (8.838.60 and 1­276.0), and the data was collected using the medical records. Biometric data, data on previous illnesses and vital parameters, laboratory chemistry data, CT diagnostic data, echocardiographic data, data on drug treatment and data on complications were collected anonymously. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the strain on the right heart. Peripheral oxygen saturation also improved significantly and heart rate decreased significantly. The complication rate remained low and was almost exclusively limited to access-related problems. CONCLUSION: Catheter-assisted, locoregional lysis therapy is a safe and effective treatment method for submassive pulmonary embolism.

Ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis versus surgical pulmonary embolectomy for intermediate-high or high-risk pulmonary embolism: a randomized phase II non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) is non-inferior to surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) to improve right ventricular (RV) function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: In a single-centre, non-inferiority trial, we randomly assigned 27 patients with intermediate-high or high-risk acute PE to undergo either USAT or SPE stratified by PE risk. Primary and secondary outcomes were the baseline-to-72-h difference in right-to-left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio and the Qanadli pulmonary occlusion score, respectively, by contrast-enhanced chest-computed tomography assessed by a blinded CoreLab. RESULTS: The trial was prematurely terminated due to slow enrolment. Mean age was 62.6 (SD 12.4) years, 26% were women, and 15% had high-risk PE. Mean change in RV/LV ratio was -0.34 (95% CI -0.50 to -0.18) in the USAT and -0.53 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.38) in the SPE group (mean difference: 0.152; 95% CI 0.032-0.271; Pnon-inferiority = 0.80; Psuperiority = 0.013). Mean change in Qanadli pulmonary occlusion score was -7.23 (95% CI -9.58 to -4.88) in the USAT and -11.36 (95% CI -15.27 to -7.44) in the SPE group (mean difference: 5.00; 95% CI 0.44-9.56, P = 0.032). Clinical and functional outcomes were similar between the 2 groups up to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with intermediate-high and high-risk acute PE, USAT was not non-inferior when compared with SPE in reducing RV/LV ratio within the first 72 h. In a post hoc superiority analysis, SPE resulted in greater improvement of RV overload and reduction of thrombus burden.

Mechanical chest compressions as a last-ditch attempt to salvage a profoundly hypoxic but normotensive patient with a massive pulmonary embolism.

Massive pulmonary embolism is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. For patients presenting with massive pulmonary embolism, severe hypoxia is usually associated with severe hypotension. These patients should be considered for thrombectomy should thrombolysis and respiratory support fail to improve their condition. Should thrombectomy not be available or suitable, consideration should be given to offering mechanical chest compressions to 'break up the clot'. We describe a case in which this seemingly led to survival and full recovery.

[Effects of pulmonary embolism response team on the quality of care and clinical outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism].

Objective: To evaluate the effects of pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) on the quality of care and clinical outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated in Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from July 5, 2016 to July 4, 2018 were enrolled. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism who had traditional care from July 5, 2016 to July 4, 2017 (before the implementation of PERT) were classified as PERT pre-intervention group. Patients with acute pulmonary embolism who started PERT care from July 5, 2017 to July 4, 2018 were divided into the PERT intervention group. The diagnosis and treatment information of patients was collected through the electronic medical record system, and the quality of care (time from visit to hospitalization, time from hospitalization to anticoagulation initiation, time from visit to definitive diagnosis, total hospital stay, time in intensive care unit (ICU), hospitalization cost) and clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality and incidence of bleeding) were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 210 patients with acute pulmonary embolism, aged (63.3±13.7) years old, with 102 (48.6%) female patients were included. There were 108 cases in PERT pre-intervention group and 102 cases in PERT intervention group. (1) Quality of diagnosis and treatment: there was a statistical significance between the two groups in the distribution of time from diagnosis to definitive diagnosis (P=0.002). Among them, the rate of completion of diagnosis within 24 hours after PERT intervention was higher than that before PERT intervention (80.4% (45/56) vs. 50.0% (34/68), P<0.001). The time from treatment to hospitalization was shorter than that before PERT intervention (180.0 (60.0, 645.0) min vs. 900.0 (298.0, 1 806.5) min, P<0.001). The total length of hospital stay was less than that before PERT intervention (12 (10, 14) d vs. 14 (11, 16) d, P=0.001). There was no statistical significance in the time from hospitalization to anticoagulant therapy, the length of ICU stay and hospitalization cost between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) Clinical outcomes during hospitalization: There was no statistical significance in the incidence of hemorrhage and mortality between the two groups during hospitalization (both P>0.05). Conclusion: PERT has improved the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and significantly shortened the total hospital stay, but its impact on clinical outcomes still needs further study.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Pulmonary Embolism and the Role of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular death and morbidity, and presents a major burden to healthcare systems. The field has seen rapid growth with development of innovative clot reduction technologies, as well as ongoing multicenter trials that may completely revolutionize care of PE patients. However, current paucity of robust clinical trials and guidelines often leave individual physicians managing patients with acute PE in a dilemma. RECENT FINDINGS: The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) was developed as a platform to rapidly engage multiple specialists to deliver evidence-based, organized and efficient care and help address some of the gaps in knowledge. Several centers investigating outcomes following implementation of PERT have demonstrated shorter hospital and intensive-care unit stays, lower use of inferior vena cava filters, and in some instances improved mortality. Since the advent of PERT, early findings demonstrate promise with improved outcomes after implementation of PERT. Incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into PERT has also shown promise with more streamlined care and reducing response times. Further clinical trials are needed to examine the impact of PERT model on care delivery and clinical outcomes.