Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 539
Filter
3.
Rev Mal Respir ; 41(5): 331-342, 2024 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609767

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The second COPD Biennial organized by the COPD working group of the French Society of Respiratory Diseases took place in Paris (Cochin) on 13th December 2023. STATE OF THE ART: Major trends in 2023 were discussed; they encompassed concepts, definitions, biologics, care pathways, pulmonary rehabilitation and complex situations entailed by respiratory infections, cardiovascular comorbidities and pulmonary hypertension, and modalities of oxygen therapy and ventilation. PERSPECTIVES: The different talks underlined major changes in COPD including the concepts of pre-COPD, etiotypes, health trajectories and new definitions of exacerbation. Recent results in biologics for COPD open the door to new pharmacological options. Assessment of current care pathways in France highlighted some causes for concern. For example, pulmonary rehabilitation is a key but insufficiently practiced element. Respiratory infections require careful assessment and treatments. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities and pulmonary hypertension are of paramount importance. As of late, oxygen therapy and ventilation modalities have evolved, and are beginning to afford more personalized options. CONCLUSIONS: As regards COPD, a personalized approach is crucial, placing the patient at the center of the care pathway and facilitating coordination between healthcare providers.


Subject(s)
Critical Pathways , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Societies, Medical , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , France/epidemiology , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Critical Pathways/standards , Critical Pathways/trends , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/standards , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/trends , Patient-Centered Care/standards , Pulmonary Medicine/organization & administration , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Pulmonary Medicine/methods , Pulmonary Medicine/standards , Congresses as Topic
5.
Rev Med Suisse ; 19(850): 2135-2136, 2023 Nov 15.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37966143
8.
Chest ; 160(5): e377-e387, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34339686

ABSTRACT

The existing coverage criteria for home noninvasive ventilation (NIV) do not recognize the diversity of hypoventilation syndromes and advances in technologies. This document summarizes the work of the hypoventilation syndromes Technical Expert Panel working group. The most pressing current coverage barriers identified were: (1) overreliance on arterial blood gases (particularly during sleep); (2) need to perform testing on prescribed oxygen; (3) requiring a sleep study to rule out OSA as the cause of sustained hypoxemia; (4) need for spirometry; (5) need to show bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) without a backup rate failure to qualify for BPAP spontaneous/timed; and (6) qualifying hospitalized patients for home NIV therapy at the time of discharge. Critical evidence support for changes to current policies includes randomized controlled trial evidence and clinical practice guidelines. To decrease morbidity and mortality by achieving timely access to NIV for patients with hypoventilation, particularly those with obesity hypoventilation syndrome, we make the following key suggestions: (1) given the significant technological advances, we advise acceptance of surrogate noninvasive end-tidal and transcutaneous Pco2 and venous blood gases in lieu of arterial blood gases; (2) not requiring Pco2 measures while on prescribed oxygen; (3) not requiring a sleep study to avoid delays in care in patients being discharged from the hospital; (4) remove spirometry as a requirement; and (5) not requiring BPAP without a backup rate failure to approve BPAP spontaneous/timed. The overarching goal of the Technical Expert Panel is to establish pathways that improve clinicians' management capability to provide Medicare beneficiaries access to appropriate home NIV therapy. Adoption of these proposed suggestions would result in the right device, for the right type of patient with hypoventilation syndromes, at the right time.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Hypoventilation , Medicare , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiration Disorders , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , Hypoventilation/etiology , Hypoventilation/therapy , Medicare/organization & administration , Medicare/standards , Noninvasive Ventilation/instrumentation , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Noninvasive Ventilation/standards , Oxygen/analysis , Oxygen/blood , Patient Discharge/standards , Polysomnography/methods , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Respiration Disorders/classification , Respiration Disorders/complications , Respiration Disorders/diagnosis , Spirometry/methods , United States
11.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(6): e26956, 2021 06 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33974550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of rapid dissemination of scientific and medical discoveries. Current platforms available for the distribution of scientific and clinical research data and information include preprint repositories and traditional peer-reviewed journals. In recent times, social media has emerged as a helpful platform to share scientific and medical discoveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to comparatively analyze activity on social media (specifically, Twitter) and that related to publications in the form of preprint and peer-reviewed journal articles in the context of COVID-19 and gastroenterology during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: COVID-19-related data from Twitter (tweets and user data) and articles published in preprint servers (bioRxiv and medRxiv) as well as in the PubMed database were collected and analyzed during the first 6 months of the pandemic, from December 2019 through May 2020. Global and regional geographic and gastrointestinal organ-specific social media trends were compared to preprint and publication activity. Any relationship between Twitter activity and preprint articles published and that between Twitter activity and PubMed articles published overall, by organ system, and by geographic location were identified using Spearman's rank-order correlation. RESULTS: Over the 6-month period, 73,079 tweets from 44,609 users, 7164 journal publications, and 4702 preprint publications were retrieved. Twitter activity (ie, number of tweets) peaked in March 2020, whereas preprint and publication activity (ie, number of articles published) peaked in April 2020. Overall, strong correlations were identified between trends in Twitter activity and preprint and publication activity (P<.001 for both). COVID-19 data across the three platforms mainly concentrated on pulmonology or critical care, but when analyzing the field of gastroenterology specifically, most tweets pertained to pancreatology, most publications focused on hepatology, and most preprints covered hepatology and luminal gastroenterology. Furthermore, there were significant positive associations between trends in Twitter and publication activity for all gastroenterology topics (luminal gastroenterology: P=.009; hepatology and inflammatory bowel disease: P=.006; gastrointestinal endoscopy: P=.007), except pancreatology (P=.20), suggesting that Twitter activity did not correlate with publication activity for this topic. Finally, Twitter activity was the highest in the United States (7331 tweets), whereas PubMed activity was the highest in China (1768 publications). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential of social media as a vehicle for disseminating scientific information during a public health crisis. Sharing and spreading information on COVID-19 in a timely manner during the pandemic has been paramount; this was achieved at a much faster pace on social media, particularly on Twitter. Future investigation could demonstrate how social media can be used to augment and promote scholarly activity, especially as the world begins to increasingly rely on digital or virtual platforms. Scientists and clinicians should consider the use of social media in augmenting public awareness regarding their scholarly pursuits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Information Dissemination , Pandemics , Research/statistics & numerical data , Research/trends , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Social Media/trends , China/epidemiology , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care/trends , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , PubMed/statistics & numerical data , Public Health , Pulmonary Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
12.
Thorac Surg Clin ; 31(2): 119-128, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926666

ABSTRACT

Publication of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) in 2003 established lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) as a viable treatment of select patients with moderate to severe emphysema, and the only intervention since the availability of ambulatory supplemental oxygen to improve survival. Despite these findings, surgical treatment has been underused in part because of concern for high morbidity and mortality. This article reviews recent literature generated since the original NETT publication, focusing on physiologic implications of LVRS, recent data regarding the safety and durability of LVRS, and patient selection and extension of NETT criteria to other patient populations.


Subject(s)
Inflammation/metabolism , Pneumonectomy/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/surgery , Pulmonary Emphysema/surgery , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Patient Safety , Patient Selection , Pulmonary Emphysema/mortality , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Quality of Life , Risk , Treatment Outcome , United States
13.
Am J Ther ; 28(2): e217-e223, 2021 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590991

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a significant strain on medical resources throughout the world. A major shift to telemedicine and mobile health technologies has now taken on an immediate urgency. Newly developed devices designed for home use have facilitated remote monitoring of various physiologic parameters relevant to pulmonary diseases. These devices have also enabled home-based pulmonary rehabilitation programs. In addition, telemedicine and home care services have been leveraged to rapidly develop acute care hospital-at-home programs for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 illness. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The benefit of remote monitoring technologies on patient outcomes has not been established in robust trials. Furthermore, the use of these devices, which can increase the burden of care, has not been integrated into current clinical workflows and electronic medical records. Finally, reimbursement for these telemedicine and remote monitoring services is variable. DATA SOURCES: Literature review. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Advances in digital technology have improved remote monitoring of physiologic parameters relevant to pulmonary medicine. In addition, telemedicine services for the provision of pulmonary rehabilitation and novel hospital-at-home programs have been developed. These new home-based programs have been adapted for COVID-19 and may also be relevant for the management of acute and chronic pulmonary diseases after the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Digital remote monitoring of physiologic parameters relevant to pulmonary medicine and novel hospital-at-home programs are feasible and may improve care for patients with acute and chronic respiratory-related disorders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases , Telemedicine , Biomedical Technology/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/rehabilitation , Lung Diseases/therapy , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration
15.
Front Immunol ; 11: 606333, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33324422

ABSTRACT

Background: Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a rare, potentially severe pulmonary complication of common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID). Informative clinical trials and consensus on management are lacking. Aims: The European GLILD network (e-GLILDnet) aims to describe how GLILD is currently managed in clinical practice and to determine the main uncertainties and unmet needs regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Methods: The e-GLILDnet collaborators developed and conducted an online survey facilitated by the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) between February-April 2020. Results were analyzed using SPSS. Results: One hundred and sixty-one responses from adult and pediatric pulmonologists and immunologists from 47 countries were analyzed. Respondents treated a median of 27 (interquartile range, IQR 82-maximum 500) CVID patients, of which a median of 5 (IQR 8-max 200) had GLILD. Most respondents experienced difficulties in establishing the diagnosis of GLILD and only 31 (19%) had access to a standardized protocol. There was little uniformity in diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. Fewer than 40% of respondents saw a definite need for biopsy in all cases or performed bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnostics. Sixty-six percent used glucocorticosteroids for remission-induction and 47% for maintenance therapy; azathioprine, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil were the most frequently prescribed steroid-sparing agents. Pulmonary function tests were the preferred modality for monitoring patients during follow-up. Conclusions: These data demonstrate an urgent need for clinical studies to provide more evidence for an international consensus regarding management of GLILD. These studies will need to address optimal procedures for definite diagnosis and a better understanding of the pathogenesis of GLILD in order to provide individualized treatment options. Non-availability of well-established standardized protocols risks endangering patients.


Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology/trends , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/drug therapy , Granuloma, Respiratory Tract/drug therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Pediatrics/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/diagnosis , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/immunology , Europe , Granuloma, Respiratory Tract/diagnosis , Granuloma, Respiratory Tract/immunology , Health Care Surveys , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Internet , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/immunology , Pediatricians/trends , Prognosis , Pulmonologists/trends , Steroids/therapeutic use , United States
18.
Chest ; 158(6): 2517-2523, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32882245

ABSTRACT

There is an evolution of pleural procedures that involve broadened clinical indication and expanded scope that include advanced diagnostic, therapeutic, and palliative procedures. Finance and clinical professionals have been challenged to understand the indication and coding complexities that accompany these procedures. This article describes the utility of pleural procedures, the appropriate current procedural terminology coding, and necessary modifiers. Coding pearls that help close the knowledge gap between basic and advanced procedures aim to address coding confusion that is prevalent with pleural procedures and the risk of payment denials, potential underpayment, and documentation audits.


Subject(s)
Current Procedural Terminology , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Pleural Diseases , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/classification , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures/economics , Humans , Pleural Diseases/diagnosis , Pleural Diseases/economics , Pleural Diseases/therapy , Pulmonary Medicine/economics , Pulmonary Medicine/methods , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Relative Value Scales , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/economics , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/methods
19.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 20(6): 549-556, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941317

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To consider recent developments in respiratory medicine that are of relevance to clinicians caring for adults affected by primary immunodeficiency disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: We consider impulse oscillometry, new bronchoscopic techniques for sampling, MRI and PET, the concept of the human airway microbiome, and new treatment approaches for bronchiectasis and interstitial lung disease to better understand the future of respiratory care for people with PID. SUMMARY: New approaches to the diagnosis and management of respiratory manifestations of PID have been driven by better understanding of the lung in health and disease, progress in imaging and sampling modalities, and new therapeutics.


Subject(s)
Bronchiectasis/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung/physiology , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/diagnosis , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Bronchiectasis/therapy , Bronchoscopy , Diagnostic Imaging , Humans , Lung/microbiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Microbiota , Oscillometry , Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases/therapy
20.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 132(Suppl 3): 89-113, 2020 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990821

ABSTRACT

Scientific Members of the Austrian Society of Pneumology describe the expected development in respiratory health and provide guidance towards patient-oriented and cost-efficient respiratory care in Austria.Methods: In November 2017, respiratory care providers (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists) together with patient's advocacy groups and experts in health development, collaborated in workshops on: respiratory health and the environment, bronchial asthma and allergy, COPD, pediatric respiratory disease, respiratory infections, sleep disorders, interventional pneumology, thoracic oncology and orphan diseases.Results: Respiratory disease is extremely prevalent and driven by ill-health behavior, i.e. cigarette smoking, over-eating and physical inactivity. For the majority of respiratory diseases increased prevalence, but decreased hospitalizations are expected.The following measures should be implemented to deal with future challenges:1. Screening and case-finding should be implemented for lung cancer and COPD.2. E-health solutions (telemedicine, personal apps) should be used to facilitate patient management.3. Regional differences in respiratory care should be reduced through E­health and harmonization of health insurance benefits across Austria.4. Patient education and awareness, to reduce respiratory health illiteracy should be increased, which is essential for sleep disorders but relevant also for other respiratory diseases.5. Respiratory care should be inter-professional, provided via disease-specific boards beyond lung cancer (for ILDs, sleep, allergy)6. Programs for outpatient's pulmonary rehabilitation can have a major impact on respiratory health.7. Increased understanding of molecular pathways will drive personalized medicine, targeted therapy (for asthma, lung cancer) and subsequently health care costs.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Obstructive , Pulmonary Medicine , Respiration Disorders , Asthma/therapy , Austria , Child , Cost of Illness , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Pulmonary Medicine/standards , Pulmonary Medicine/trends , Respiration Disorders/therapy , Societies, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...