Failure patterns and individualized treatment plans of reirradiation for inoperable locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Re-irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) remains the primary treatment modality for inoperable locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the rate of radiation-related late adverse effects is often substantially high. Therefore, we aimed to explore failure patterns and individualized treatment plans of re-irradiation for inoperable locally recurrent NPC. Ninety-seven patients who underwent IMRT were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-two patients had clinical target volume of recurrence (rCTV) delineated, and thirty-five patients had only gross tumor volume of recurrence (rGTV) delineated. Twenty-nine patients developed second local failures after re-irradiation with IMRT (28 cases available). Among those patients, 64.3% (18/28) of patients and 35.7% (10/28) developed in-field or out-field, respectively. No statistical correlation was observed between target volume (rGTV or rCTV) and the local recurrence rate, local failure patterns, grade ≥ 3 toxicity, and survival. Multivariate analysis showed that recurrent T (rT) stage (HR 2.62, P = 0.019) and rGTV volume (HR 1.73, P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Risk stratification based on rT stage and rGTV volume revealed that low risk group had a longer 3-year OS rate (66.7% vs. 23.4%), lower total grade ≥ 3 toxicity (P = 0.004), and lower re-radiation associated mortality rates (HR 0.45, P = 0.03) than high risk group. This study demonstrates that the delineation of rCTV may not be beneficial for re-irradiation using IMRT in locally recurrent NPC. Patients with low risk were most suitable for re-irradiation, with maximizing local salvage and minimizing radiation-related toxicities. More precise and individualized plans of re-irradiation are warranted.

Dosimetric evaluation of intensity modulated photon versus proton reirradiation of head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Reirradiation of head and neck cancer (HNC) became more accessible in the last decade, owing to modern irradiation techniques which offer a reduction in treatment related toxicities. The aim of this paper was to comparatively evaluate the dosimetric aspects derived from intensity modulated photon vs. proton treatment planning in reirradiated HNC patients. METHODS: Six recurrent HNC patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. For each patient two treatment plans were created: one IMRT/VMAT and one IMPT plan. The prescribed dose for the second irradiation was between 50 and 70 Gy RBE. The study comparatively analyzed the CTV coverage, doses to organs at risk (OARs) and low doses received by the healthy tissue (other than OAR). RESULTS: Similar CTV coverage was achieved for photon vs proton plans, with the latter presenting better homogeneity in four cases. Maximum dose to CTV was generally higher for photon plans, with differences ranging from 0.3 to 1.9%. For parotid glands and body, the mean dose was lower for proton plans. A notable reduction of low dose to healthy tissue (other than OARs) could be achieved with protons, with an average of 60% and 64% for D10% and Dmean, respectively. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric comparison between photon and proton reirradiation of HNC showed a great need for treatment individualization, concluding that protons should be considered for reirradiation on an individual basis.

Comparison between Reirradiation by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Combination with Temozolomide for Treatment of Recurrent High Grade Glioma.

OBJECTIVE: High grade glioma (HGG) is considered a lethal disease with a high recurrence rate. There is no standard of care in recurrent HGG. Many treatment options are present, such as resurgery, systemic therapy, and re-irradiation. Re-irradiation seems to be a promising option. In this study, we aimed at comparing the efficacy and toxicity of two re-irradiation protocols. METHODS: Forty patients with recurrent HGG were randomized equally into two arms. Arm A received 30 Gy/10f/2w, and arm B received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) 30 Gy/5f/1w. Concurrent temozolamide (TMZ) was given in both arms. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, and brain MRI was done after 2 months of radiotherapy and then every 2 months, with documented toxicity using the Common Terminology of Adverse Events version 5 (CTCAE). RESULTS: The median follow-up time after the re-irradiation course was 11 months (range 8-15 months). The median PFS after recurrence was 6.4 months (95% CI 5.3-7.4), the median OS after recurrence was 8.6 months (95% CI 7.5-8.7), and the median total OS form date of diagnosis was 18.5 months (95% CI 17.3-19.8) among the included patients. There was a statistically significant difference in PFS favoring arm B, with a median PFS of 7.3 versus 6.2 months in arm A, with p values of 0.004. There was no statistically significant difference in in median OS (9.3 months in arm B versus 8.4 months in arm A) with p values of 0.088. All patients tolerated their treatment well, and acute and subacute G1-G2 toxicity, consisting of headache, malaise, and nausea, were recorded during and shortly after the end of the re-irradiation course. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation in recurrent HGG by both protocols is safe and effective, with a significant improvement in PFS in SBRT arm but no significant improvement in OS.

Re-re-irradiation for palliation: knowns, unknowns, and next steps.

With improving rates of survival among patients with metastatic malignancies, the request for palliative re-irradiation and re-re-irradiation continues to grow despite an absence of standardized guidelines. With only limited data regarding extra-cranial third-course palliative radiation, many radiation oncologists may feel uncomfortable proceeding with third-course irradiation of the same site. The review explores the available modern data regarding re-re-irradiation. A literature review identified four modern peer-reviewed studies investigating palliative, extra-cranial third-course irradiation with external beam radiation. These studies were retrospective, small, and heterogenous. While they reported comparable rates of pain palliation to first course irradiation and low rates of acute toxicity, interpretation is complicated by heterogeneous treatment parameters and insufficient reporting of cumulative dose equivalents and time intervals. With limited data available, it is critical to prioritize patient safety and quality of life in palliative radiotherapy. Patient selection should be meticulous, considering factors such as initial treatment response and predicted life expectancy. Conformal radiation techniques, strict immobilization, and daily image guidance should be employed to minimize toxicity to organs at risk (OARs). Long-term follow-up is essential for identifying and managing late toxicities effectively. Despite the scarcity of data, retrospective series suggest that extra-cranial third course irradiation can provide effective pain palliation comparable to first-course irradiation with tolerable rates of toxicity. However, careful consideration of patient prognosis and adherence to established principles of palliative radiotherapy are essential in decision-making. Further research and long-term follow-up are needed to refine treatment strategies and ensure safe and efficacious care delivery in this complex clinical scenario.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Reirradiation Is Safe in Patients With Lung Cancer With In-Field Enlarged Tumor Recurrence.

Introduction: Recurrence after stage III lung cancer treatment usually appears with a poor prognosis, and salvage therapy for these patients is challenging, with limited data for reirradiation. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with recurrent stage III lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SABR) between October 2013 and December 2017 were retrospectively evaluated for local control as a first endpoint; overall survival, disease-free survival, and treatment-related toxicity were secondary endpoints. Results: The median age was 68 (IQR: 50-71) years, and the median tumor size was 3.3 cm (IQR: 3.0-4.5). The radiation field was all within the previous radiation (previous 80%-90% isodose line), and the median dose was 66 Gy/(2 Gy × 33 standard fractionation). For SABR, the median biologically effective dose at an α/ß ratio of 10 (BED10) was 60.0 Gy (IQR: 39.38-85.0) and given in 3 to 5 fractions. Three patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity but none experienced grade 5. The median follow-up period was 14 (IQR: 10-23) months. The local control rate was found as 86.7% in the first year, 80% in the second year, and 80% in the third year. The median disease-free survival was 8 (IQR: 6-20) months and the median overall survival was 14 (IQR: 10-23) months. The rate of overall survival was 66.6% for the first year and 33.3% for the second and third years. The disease-free survival rate was 46.6% for the first year and 40% for the second and third years. Nine patients who received doses of BED10 ≥ 50 Gy developed no local recurrence (P = .044). Discussion: In local local-regional recurrence of lung cancer, radiosurgery as reirradiation can be used at doses of BED10 ≥ 50 Gy and above to provide local control for radical or palliative purposes. SABR is an important and relatively safe treatment option in such recurrences.

Survival and toxicity after breast-conserving surgery and external beam reirradiation for localized ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence: A population-based study.

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse may increase the radiation dose delivered to the heart and result in a greater risk of cardiac adverse events. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiac mortality in patients treated for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse, either with breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation or with total mastectomy between 2000 and 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients treated for a primary non-metastatic breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database, and those who subsequently experienced a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse treated with breast-conserving surgery and reirradiation ("BCS+ReRT" group, n=239) or with total mastectomy ("TM" group, n=3127) were included. The primary objective was to compare the cardiac mortality rate between the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation and total mastectomy. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and cancer specific survival. RESULTS: Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.40, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.19-4.86, P=0.006) in univariate analysis; non-statistically significant differences were observed after adjusting for age, laterality and chemotherapy on multivariate analysis (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.96-3.94, P=0.067), age being the only confounding factor. A non-statistically significant difference towards lower overall survival was observed in patients who had breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation compared with those who underwent total mastectomy (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.98-1.90, P=0.066), and no differences were observed in terms of cancer specific survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.56-1.82, P=0.965). CONCLUSION: In this study, the incidence of cardiac mortality was low, and breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation did not independently increased the risk of cardiac mortality for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse.

Proton therapy re-irradiation outcomes and genomic landscape of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Re-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) is challenging. We describe clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for recurrent HNC, and report genomic alterations associated with patterns of failure. MATERIALS & METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of rHNC patients treated with PT. Outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed to assess multiple patient factors. Next-generation sequencing and genomic analyses were performed on available samples. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients treated with PBS-PT for rHNC with a median follow-up of 12 mo (0-71 mo) were included. The 1- and 2-y local control (LC) rates were 80.8 % (95 % CI: 70.8-90.8) and 66.2 % (95 % CI: 50.7-81.7), and 1- and 2-y distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 41.0 % (95 % CI: 30.0-52.0) and 26.3 % (95 % CI: 15.7-36.9). The median overall survival (OS) was 13 mo (95 % CI: 9.3-16.7). On UVA and MVA, smaller gross tumor volume (GTV) was associated with improved OS (HR 1.002, P = 0.004), DMFS (HR 1.002, P = 0.004), and PFS (HR 1.002, P = 0.014). There were 35 late Gr3 + toxicity events (30.3 %). Patients with higher candidate gene-specific mutation burden (genes with [OR] > 2, P < 0.05) had inferior PFS. TP53, NOTCH4, and ARID1B mutations were associated with inferior DMFS (OR > 2, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PBS-PT is effective at achieving LC for rHNC with favorable toxicity. Distant metastases are common, and associated with TP53, NOTCH4, and ARID1B mutations. Inclusion of genomic alterations in the clinical decision process may be warranted.

Re-irradiation practice and ESTRO/EORTC consensus recommendations: 2023 ASTRO education panel.

Indications for re-irradiation are increasing both for palliation and potentially curative attempts to achieve durable local control. This has been in part driven by the technological advances in the last decade including image-guided brachytherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy. These enable high dose focal irradiation to be delivered to a limited target volume with minimal normal tissue re-irradiation. The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) have collaboratively developed a comprehensive consensus on re-irradiation practices, aiming to standardise definitions, reporting, and clinical decision-making processes. The document introduces a universally applicable definition for re-irradiation, categorised into two primary types based on the presence of geometric overlap of irradiated volumes and concerns for cumulative dose toxicity. It also identifies "repeat organ irradiation" and "repeat irradiation" for cases without such overlap, emphasising the need to consider toxicity risks associated with cumulative doses. Additionally, the document presents detailed reporting guidelines for re-irradiation studies, specifying essential patient and tumour characteristics, treatment planning and delivery details, and follow-up protocols. These guidelines are designed to improve the quality and reproducibility of clinical research, thus fostering a more robust evidence base for future re-irradiation practices. The consensus underscores the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration and shared decision-making, highlighting performance status, patient survival estimates, and response to initial radiotherapy as critical factors in determining eligibility for re-irradiation. It advocates for a patient-centric approach, with transparent communication about treatment intent and potential risks. Radiobiological considerations, including the application of the linear-quadratic model, are recommended for assessing cumulative doses and guiding re-irradiation strategies. By providing these comprehensive recommendations, the ESTRO-EORTC consensus aims to enhance the safety, efficacy, and quality of life for patients undergoing re-irradiation, while paving the way for future research and refinement of treatment protocols in the field of oncology.

Re-treatment of bone metastases for pain control: 2023 ASTRO education panel.

Bone metastases are a common and debilitating consequence of advanced cancer, often necessitating palliative radiation therapy (RT) for pain relief. Reirradiation (reRT) of bone metastases is often considered after lack of pain relief following an initial course of RT, after a partial but unsatisfying pain response to an initial course of radiotherapy, or after pain recurrence following a complete or partial pain response to an initial course of RT. The NCIC CTG SC.20 trial, a landmark multicenter, randomized, non-blinded, controlled non-inferiority trial, addressed the critical question of optimal dose fractionation for reRT in this patient population. This trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of a single 8 Gy fraction to multiple fractions totaling 20 Gy in 850 patients with painful bone metastases requiring reRT. The primary endpoint was overall pain response at 2 months, with secondary endpoints of quality of life (QoL) measures, functional interference, and toxicity profiles assessed using patient-reported questionnaires and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. The intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in pain response between the two arms, meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. The per-protocol analysis suggested a potential benefit for a subset of patients receiving multiple fractions, although this was not statistically robust. Acute toxicities were more prevalent in the multiple fractions arm, with implications for patient comfort and healthcare utilization. Importantly, responders to reRT reported significant improvements in functional interference and QoL. The trial's findings support the use of a patient-centric approach to palliative RT, highlighting the viability of a single 8 Gy fraction as a less toxic and more convenient treatment option, albeit with consideration for individual patient circumstances. These results have significant implications for clinical practice, potentially reducing healthcare burdens while optimizing patient convenience during palliative care for painful bone metastases.

Intensity-Modulated Reirradiation Therapy With Nivolumab in Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reirradiation of nonmetastatic recurrent or second primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Objective: To investigate the tolerability, PFS, OS, and patient-reported outcomes with nivolumab (approved standard of care for patients with HNSCC) during and after IMRT reirradiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter nonrandomized phase 2 single-arm trial, the treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent or second primary HNSCC who satisfied recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 definitions were evaluated. Between July 11, 2018, and August 12, 2021, 62 patients were consented and screened. Data were evaluated between June and December 2023. Intervention: Sixty- to 66-Gy IMRT in 30 to 33 daily fractions over 6 to 6.5 weeks with nivolumab, 240 mg, intravenously 2 weeks prior and every 2 weeks for 5 cycles during IMRT, then nivolumab, 480 mg, intravenously every 4 weeks for a total nivolumab duration of 52 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points included OS, incidence, and types of toxic effects, including long-term treatment-related toxic effects, patient-reported outcomes, and correlatives of tissue and blood biomarkers. Results: A total of 62 patients were screened, and 51 were evaluable (median [range] age was 62 [56-67] years; 42 [82%] were male; 6 [12%] had p16+ disease; 38 [75%] had salvage surgery; and 36 [71%.] had neck dissection). With a median follow-up of 24.5 months (95% CI, 19.0-25.0), the estimated 1-year PFS was 61.7% (95% CI, 49.2%-77.4%), rejecting the null hypothesis of 1-year PFS rate of less than 43.8% with 1-arm log-rank test P = .002 within a 1-year timeframe. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse event (6 [12%]) was lymphopenia with 2 patients (4%) and 1 patient each (2%) exhibiting colitis, diarrhea, myositis, nausea, mucositis, and myasthenia gravis. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Questionnaire quality of life scores remained stable and consistent across all time points. A hypothesis-generating trend favoring worsening PFS and OS in patients with an increase in blood PD1+, KI67+, and CD4+ T cells was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This multicenter nonrandomized phase 2 trial of IMRT reirradiation therapy and nivolumab suggested a promising improvement in PFS over historical controls. The treatment was well tolerated and deserves further evaluation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03521570.

Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck malignancies: oncologic outcomes and morbidity.

Objective: Management of recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) is challenging. One option in previously irradiated patients is re-irradiation using interventional radiotherapy (IRT), the modern form of brachytherapy. Re-irradiation using IRT can be delivered as an exclusive strategy for salvage or through a postoperative or perioperative approach after salvage surgery. The aim of the present study is to analyse a bicentric Italian series focusing on the use of IRT as a re-irradiation modality and assess the resulting evidence concerning oncologic outcomes and morbidity. Methods: This is a retrospective study performed in two referral centres in Italy: Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli in Rome and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria in Sassari. All patients who had previously received a full course of external beam RT and have been re-irradiated using high-dose-rate IRT between December 2010 and June 2023 were included. Patients were retreated either by a combination of surgery and perioperative (either endocavitary or interstitial) IRT or by exclusive interstitial IRT. Results: Thirty-four patients were included in the present series, 2 of whom underwent more than one IRT re-irradiation. Notably, no patient reported specific IRT-related toxicities. Median follow-up, excluding patients who died of HNC, was 24.5 months. Two-year local relapse-free survival was 26%, disease-specific survival 39.1%, and overall survival 36.6%. Conclusions: The present series is the largest reported experience of re-irradiation by IRT for HNC in Italy. The very low rate of toxicity confirms IRT as the safest re-irradiation modality. It is noteworthy to underline that IRT is a multidisciplinary strategy based on the close cooperation between surgeons and radiation oncologists during every phase, from the recommendation of treatment and implantation in the operating theatre, to its prescription and dose painting.

Reirradiation for recurrent gynecologic cancer using high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan: A multicenter survey on practice patterns and outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to examine the present status of reirradiation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer in Japan and to determine the role of this therapy in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed for reirradiation for gynecologic cancer using HDR brachytherapy. Each center provided information on patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: The study included 165 patients treated at 9 facilities from 2000 to 2018. The analysis of outcomes included 142 patients treated with curative intent. The median follow-up time for survivors was 30 months (range 1-130 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 53 % (95 %CI: 42-63 %), 44 % (35-53 %), and 61 % (50-70 %) for cervical cancer; 100 % (NA), 64 % (30-85 %), and 70 % (32-89 %) for endometrial cancer; and 54 % (13-83 %), 38 % (6-72 %), and 43 % (6-78 %) for vulvar and vaginal cancer, respectively. In multivariate analysis, interval to reirradiation (<1 year) was a significant risk factor for OS, PFS and LC; Gross Tumor Volume (≥25 cm3) was a significant risk factor for OS. Toxicities were analyzed in all enrolled patients (n = 165). Grade ≥ 3 late toxicities occurred in 49 patients (30 %). A higher cumulative EQD2 (α/ß = 3) was significantly associated with severe complications. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation with HDR brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer is effective, especially in cases with a long interval before reirradiation.

Re-irradiation for recurrent intracranial meningiomas: Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: Re-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent intracranial meningiomas is hindered by the limited radiation tolerance of surrounding tissue and the risk of side effects. This study aimed at assessing outcomes, toxicities and prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with recurrent meningiomas re-treated with different RT modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional database from 8 Italian centers including intracranial recurrent meningioma (RM) patients who underwent re-RT with different modalities (SRS, SRT, PT, EBRT) was collected. Biologically Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy-fractions (EQD2) and Biological Effective Dose (BED) for normal tissue and tumor were estimated for each RT course (α/ß = 2 for brain tissue and α/ß = 4 for meningioma). Primary outcome was second progression-free survival (s-PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2021 181 patients (pts) were included. Median age at re-irradiation was 62 (range 20-89) and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90 (range 60-100). 78 pts were identified with WHO grade 1 disease, 65 pts had grade 2 disease and 10 pts had grade 3 disease. 28 pts who had no histologic sampling were grouped with grade 1 patients for further analysis. Seventy-five (41.4 %) patients received SRS, 63 (34.8 %) patients SRT, 31 (17.1 %) PT and 12 (6.7 %) EBRT. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (interquartile range 1.7-6.8), 3-year s-PFS was 51.6 % and 3-year OS 72.5 %. At univariate analysis, SRT (HR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.19-0.55, p < 0.001), longer interval between the two courses of irradiation (HR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.21-0.67, p = 0.001), and higher tumor BED (HR 0.45 95 % CI 0.27-0.76, p = 0.003) were associated with longer s-PFS; in contrast, Ki67 > 5 % (HR 2.81, 95 % CI 1.48-5.34, p = 0.002) and WHO grade > 2 (HR 3.08, 95 % CI 1.80-5.28, p < 0.001) were negatively correlated with s-PFS. At multivariate analysis, SRT, time to re-RT and tumor BED maintained their statistically significant prognostic impact on s-PFS (HR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.21-0.64, p < 0.001; HR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.20-0.72, p = 0.003 and HR 0.31 95 % CI 0.13-0.76, p = 0.01, respectively). Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were reported in 38 (20.9 %) and 29 (16 %) patients. Larger tumor GTV (≥10 cc) was significantly associated with acute and late toxicity (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent meningiomas, reirradiation is a feasible treatment option associated with acceptable toxicity profile. Prognostic factors in the decision-making process have been identified and should be incorporated in daily practice.

Re-irradiation versus systemic therapy for the management of local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal management of local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer that is not amenable to surgical resection is uncertain. We sought to compare outcomes among patients treated with and without re-irradiation in this setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of institutional registries identified 65 patients with local-regionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who were ineligible for surgery. Forty patients (62 %) opted for re-irradiation with the remaining 25 patients (38 %) undergoing initial systemic therapy alone. All patients had measurable disease. Forty-three patients (66 %) were male and twenty-two (33 %) were female. The median age at the time of recurrence was 59 years (range, 39-84 years). The most common primary sites of disease were the oropharynx, (n = 25), oral cavity (N = 19), and nasopharynx (n = 11). The median interval from completion of prior radiation to the diagnosis of recurrent disease was 35 months (range, 2-102 months). RESULTS: Re-irradiation improved 2-year overall survival, (32 % versus 11 %), progression-free survival (31 % versus 7 %), and local-regional control (39 % versus 3 %) compared to systemic therapy alone (p < 0.05, for both). The likelihood of developing any new grade 3+ toxicity was significantly higher among patients treated by re-irradiation compared to those treated by systemic therapy (53 % vs. 28 %, p < 0.001). There were 3 treatment-related fatalities, all of which occurred in the re-irradiation group. The incidence of grade 3+ late toxicity was 48 % and 12 % for patients in the re-irradiation and systemic therapy cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although re-irradiation improved overall survival compared to systemic therapy for appropriately selected patients with local-regionally recurrent head and neck cancer, the relatively high risk of toxicity must be considered.

Salvage Reirradiation for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results From a Prospective Study With 7.2 Years of Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: There are no well-established re-treatment options for local recurrence after primary curative radiation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), as prospective studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. Here, we present results from a prospective study on focal salvage reirradiation with external-beam radiation therapy with a median follow-up of 7.2 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2017, 38 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent PCa >2 years after previous treatment and absence of grade 2-3 toxicity from the first course of radiation were included. The treatment was 35 Gy in five fractions to the MRI-based target volume and 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy starting 3 months before radiation. The Phoenix criteria defined biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), and toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. RESULTS: Median age was 70 years, and median time from primary radiation to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence was 83 months. The actuarial 2-year and 5-year bRFS were 81% (95% CI, 69 to 94) and 58% (95% CI, 49 to 74), respectively. The actuarial 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 93% (95% CI, 82 to 100), metastasis-free survival was 82% (95% CI, 69 to 95), and overall survival was 87% (95% CI, 76 to 98). Two patients (5%) had durable grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, one combined with GI grade 3 toxicity. A PSA doubling time ≤6 months at salvage, a Gleason score >7, and a PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/mL predicted a worse outcome. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation with EBRT for locally recurrent PCa after primary curative radiation therapy is clinically feasible and demonstrated a favorable outcome with acceptable toxicity in this prospective study with long-term follow-up.

Reirradiation of metastases of the central nervous system: part 2-metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

An increasing number of patients irradiated for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) experience an in-field recurrence and require a second course of radiotherapy. Reirradiation can be performed with conventional radiotherapy or highly-conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). When using conventional radiotherapy, a cumulative biologically effective dose (BED) ≤120 calculated with an α/ß value of 2 Gy (Gy2) was not associated with radiation myelopathy in a retrospective study of 124 patients and is considered safe. In that study, conventional reirradiation led to improvements of motor deficits in 36% of patients and stopped further symptomatic progression in another 50% (overall response 86%). In four other studies, overall response rates were 82-89%. In addition to the cumulative BED or equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), the interval between both radiotherapy courses <6 months and a BED per course ≥102 Gy2 (corresponding to an EQD2 ≥51 Gy2) were identified as risk factors for radiation myelopathy. Without these risk factors, a BED >120 Gy2 may be possible. Scoring tools have been developed that can assist physicians in estimating the risk of radiation myelopathy and selecting the appropriate dose-fractionation regimen of re-treatment. Reirradiation of MESCC may also be performed with highly-conformal radiotherapy. With IMRT or VMAT, rates of pain relief and improvement of neurologic symptoms of 60-93.5% and 42-73%, respectively, were achieved. One-year local control rates ranged between 55% and 88%. Rates of myelopathy or radiculopathy and vertebral compression fractures were 0% and 0-9.3%, respectively. With SBRT, rates of pain relief were 65-86%. Two studies reported improvements in neurologic symptoms of 0% and 82%, respectively. One-year local control rates were 74-83%. Rates of myelopathy or radiculopathy and vertebral compression fractures were 0-4.5% and 4.5-13.8%, respectively. For SBRT, a cumulative maximum EQD2 to thecal sac ≤70 Gy2, a maximum EQD2 of SBRT ≤25 Gy2, a ratio ≤0.5 of thecal sac maximum EQD2 of SBRT to maximum cumulative EQD2, and an interval between both courses ≥5 months were associated with a lower risk of myelopathy. Additional prospective trials are required to better define the options of reirradiation of MESCC.