ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Rehabilitation is a set of services designed to increase functioning and improve wellbeing across the life course. Despite being a core part of Universal Health Coverage, rehabilitation services often receive limited public expenditure, especially in lower income countries. This leads to limited service availability and high out of pocket payments for populations in need of care. The purpose of this research was to assess the association between macroeconomic conditions and rehabilitation expenditures across low-, middle-, and high-income countries and to understand its implications for overall rehabilitation expenditure trajectory across countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized a panel data set from the World Health Organization's Global Health Expenditure Database comprising the total rehabilitation expenditure for 88 countries from 2016 to 2018. Basic macroeconomic and population data served as control variables. Multiple regression models were implemented to measure the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and rehabilitation expenditures. We used four different model specifications to check the robustness of our estimates: pooled data models (or naïve model) without control, pooled data models with controls (or expanded naïve model), fixed effect models with all controls, and lag models with all controls. Log-log specifications using fixed effects and lag-dependent variable models were deemed the most appropriate and controlled for time-invariant differences. RESULTS: Our regression models indicate that, with a 1% increase in economic growth, rehabilitation expenditure would be associated with a 0.9% and 1.3% increase in expenditure. Given low baseline levels of existing rehabilitation expenditure, we anticipate that predicted increases in rehabilitation expenditure due to economic growth may be insufficient to meet the growing demand for rehabilitation services. Existing expenditures may also be vulnerable during periods of economic recession. CONCLUSION: This is the first known estimation of the association between rehabilitation expenditure and macroeconomic conditions. Our findings demonstrate that rehabilitation is sensitive to macroeconomic fluctuations and the path dependency of past expenditures. This would suggest the importance of increased financial prioritization of rehabilitation services and improved institutional strengthening to expand access to rehabilitation services for populations.
Subject(s)
Economic Development , Health Expenditures , Humans , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Economic Development/statistics & numerical data , Rehabilitation/economics , Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Global Health , Developing Countries , Developed Countries , Empirical ResearchABSTRACT
Aim: This study aimed to explore the utilization of rehabilitation services and associated socioeconomic position (SEP) factors among Chinese older adults disabled by injury. Methods: Data from the second China National Sample Survey on Disability (CSSD) were used in this study. Chi-square test was used to analyze the significant differences between groups, and binary logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for socioeconomic factors associated with utilization of rehabilitation services among Chinese older adults disabled by injury. Results: Among the older adults disabled by injury in the CSSD, the gap between demand and utilization of medical treatment, assistive devices and rehabilitation training were around 38, 75, and 64%, respectively. This study revealed two relationship patterns ("high-low-high" and "low-high-low") among SEP, prevalence of injury-caused disability and odds of utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury, that is, the older adult with higher SEP have a lower prevalence of injury-caused disability, but a higher odds of utilization of rehabilitation services; conversely, the older adults with lower SEP have a relatively higher prevalence but a lower odds of utilization of rehabilitation services. Conclusion: There is a large gap between the high demand and low utilization of rehabilitation services among the Chinese older adults disabled by injury, especially for those living in the central or western regions or rural areas, without insurance or disability certificate, having the annual household per capita income lower than the national average or lower educational level. Strategies to improve the disability manage system, to strengthen the chain of "information discovery-information transmission-rehabilitation services supply-continuous health monitoring and management" for the older adults disabled by injury are warranted. In view of the poor and illiterate groups among the disabled older adults, to enhance medical aids and popularize the scientific information to compensate for the lack of affordability and awareness of rehabilitation services utilization is essential. In addition, it is necessary to further expand the coverage and improve the payment system of medical insurance for rehabilitation services.
Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Rehabilitation , Socioeconomic Factors , Wounds and Injuries , Aged , Humans , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , East Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Educational Status , Income/statistics & numerical data , Social Class , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation/economics , Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , China/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a major global public health problem and source of disability. A major contributor to disability after severe ABI is limited access to multidisciplinary rehabilitation, despite evidence of sustained functional gains, improved quality of life, increased return-to-work, and reduced need for long-term care. A societal model of value in rehabilitation matches patient and family expectations of outcomes and system expectations of value for money. A policy analysis of seven studies (2009-2019) exploring outcomes and cost-savings from access to multi-disciplinary rehabilitation identified average lifetime savings of $1.50M per person, with costs recouped within 18 months. Recommendations: Increase access to multi-disciplinary rehabilitation following severe ABI; strengthen prevention focus; increase access to case management; support return-to-work; and systematically collect outcome and cost data.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , Rehabilitation , Cost Savings , Humans , Quality of Life , Rehabilitation/economics , Return to WorkABSTRACT
The current policy environment for rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is complex and dynamic, and SNFs are facing the dual challenges of recent Medicare payment policy change that disproportionately impacts rehabilitation for older adults and the COVID-19 pandemic. This article introduces an adapted framework based on Donabedian's model for evaluating quality of care and applies it to decades of Medicare payment policy to provide a historical view of how payment policy changes have impacted rehabilitation processes and patient outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries in SNFs. This review demonstrates how SNF responses to Medicare payment policy have historically varied based on organizational factors, highlighting the importance of considering such organizational factors in monitoring policy response and patient outcomes. This historical perspective underscores the mixed success of previous Medicare policies impacting rehabilitation and patient outcomes for older adults receiving care in SNFs and can help in predicting SNF industry response to current and future Medicare policy changes.
Subject(s)
Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Payment System/legislation & jurisprudence , Rehabilitation/economics , Skilled Nursing Facilities/economics , Skilled Nursing Facilities/organization & administration , Aged , COVID-19 , Humans , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: At 3 months after the intervention, this study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with asthma compared with usual care alongside the single-center randomized controlled trial-Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Asthma. METHODS: Adopting a societal perspective, direct medical costs and productivity loss were assessed using the Questionnaire for Health-Related Resource Use-Lung, a modification of the FIM in an Elderly Population. The effect side was operationalized as minimal important differences (MIDs) of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and through quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Adjusted mean differences in costs (gamma-distributed model) and each effect parameter (Gaussian-distributed model) were simultaneously calculated within 1000 bootstrap replications to determine incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and to subsequently delineate cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: PR caused mean costs per capita of 3544. Three months after PR, we observed higher mean costs (Δ3673; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2854-4783) and improved mean effects (ACT Δ1.59 MIDs, 95% CI 1.37-1.81; AQLQ Δ1.76 MIDs, 95% CI 1.46-2.08; QALYs gained Δ0.01, 95% CI 0.01-0.02) in the intervention group. The ICER was 2278 (95% CI 1653-3181) per ACT-MID, 1983 (95% CI 1430-2830) per AQLQ-MID, and 312 401 (95% CI 209 206-504 562) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Contrasting of PR expenditures with ICERs suggests that the intervention, which achieves clinically relevant changes in asthma-relevant parameters, has a high probability to be already cost-effective in the short term. However, in terms of QALYs, extended follow-up periods are likely required to comprehensively judge the added value of a one-time initial investment in PR.
Subject(s)
Asthma/rehabilitation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rehabilitation/economics , Aged , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Importance: Delirium is a common, serious, and potentially preventable problem for older adults, associated with adverse outcomes. Coupled with its preventable nature, these adverse sequelae make delirium a significant public health concern; understanding its economic costs is important for policy makers and health care leaders to prioritize care. Objective: To evaluate current 1-year health care costs attributable to postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing elective surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 497 patients from the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) study, an ongoing cohort study of older adults undergoing major elective surgery. Patients were enrolled from June 18, 2010, to August 8, 2013. Eligible patients were 70 years or older, English-speaking, able to communicate verbally, and scheduled to undergo major surgery at 1 of 2 Harvard-affiliated hospitals with an anticipated length of stay of at least 3 days. Eligible surgical procedures included total hip or knee replacement; lumbar, cervical, or sacral laminectomy; lower extremity arterial bypass surgery; open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; and open or laparoscopic colectomy. Data were analyzed from October 15, 2019, to September 15, 2020. Exposures: Major elective surgery and hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cumulative and period-specific costs (index hospitalization, 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year follow-up) were examined using Medicare claims and extensive clinical data. Total inflation-adjusted health care costs were determined using data from Medicare administrative claims files for the 2010 to 2014 period. Delirium was rated using the Confusion Assessment Method. We also examined whether increasing delirium severity was associated with higher cumulative and period-specific costs. Delirium severity was measured with the Confusion Assessment Method-Severity long form. Regression models were used to determine costs associated with delirium after adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Of the 566 patients who were eligible for the study, a total of 497 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.8 [5.1] years; 281 women [57%]; 461 White participants [93%]) were enrolled after exclusion criteria were applied. During the index hospitalization, 122 patients (25%) developed postoperative delirium, whereas 375 (75%) did not. Patients with delirium had significantly higher unadjusted health care costs than patients without delirium (mean [SD] cost, $146â¯358 [$140â¯469] vs $94â¯609 [$80â¯648]). After adjusting for relevant confounders, the cumulative health care costs attributable to delirium were $44â¯291 (95% CI, $34â¯554-$56â¯673) per patient per year, with the majority of costs coming from the first 90 days: index hospitalization ($20 327), subsequent rehospitalizations ($27 797), and postacute rehabilitation stays ($2803). Health care costs increased directly and significantly with level of delirium severity (none-mild, $83 534; moderate, $99 756; severe, $140 008), suggesting an exposure-response relationship. The adjusted mean cumulative costs attributable to severe delirium were $56â¯474 (95% CI, $40â¯927-$77â¯440) per patient per year. Extrapolating nationally, the health care costs attributable to postoperative delirium were estimated at $32.9 billion (95% CI, $25.7 billion-$42.2 billion) per year. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the economic outcomes of delirium and severe delirium after elective surgery are substantial, rivaling costs associated with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. These results highlight the need for policy imperatives to address delirium as a large-scale public health issue.
Subject(s)
Delirium/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Delirium/etiology , Elective Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Rehabilitation/economics , Severity of Illness Index , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of rehabilitation interventions for management of posterior teeth (molar) with extensive coronary destruction. METHODOLOGY: An economic model by Markov simulated a hypothetical 10-year cohort with 1,000 patients requiring treatment for a molar tooth with pulp necrosis and extensive coronary destruction. This study adopted the perspective of a local manager from Specialized Center in Dentistry, based on the transfer from the Ministry of Health. Treatments were proposed: Tooth Extraction + Removable Partial Denture (TE+RPD); Root Canal Treatment + Intra-Radicular Restoration + Single Crown (RCT+RIR+SC); and Tooth Extraction + Dental Implant + Single Crown (TE+DI+SC). The costs were obtained from the SUS Integrated System of Procedures, Medicines and orthoses; prostheses and special materials table management (SIGTAP). Failure and survival rates were obtained from systematic reviews. The variable "years of survival" was an outcome of effectiveness. The probabilistic simulation considered the confidence interval of 95%, variation of parameters by 5% and annual discount rate of 5%. RESULTS: TE+RPD intervention presented lower cost and effectiveness. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of RCT+IRR+SC and TE+DI+SC interventions compared to TE+RPD were $13.06 and $9.92 per year of survival. Compared to RCT+IRR+SC, the TE+DI+SC intervention had an ICER=$26.90 per year of survival. The acceptability curve indicates that the choice of intervention depends on the willingness to pay. CONCLUSION: The RCT+IRR+SC intervention presented a balance of cost-effectiveness. Rehabilitation with implants can be considered in view of the higher expectation of longevity and, especially, greater willingness to pay.
Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/complications , Dental Care/economics , Rehabilitation/economics , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Dental Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Rehabilitation/standards , Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Identifying and treating co-existing diseases are essential in healthcare for the elderly, while physical rehabilitation care teams can provide interdisciplinary geriatric care for the elderly. To evaluate the appropriateness of demand and supply between the population at demand and physical rehabilitation resources, a comparative analysis was carried out in this study. Our study applied seven statistical indices to assess five proposed methods those considered different factors for geographic accessibility analysis. Google ratings were included in the study as a crucial factor of choice probability in the equation for calculating the geographic accessibility scores, because people's behavioral decisions are increasingly dependent on online rating information. The results showed that methods considering distances, the capacity of hospitals, and Google ratings' integrally generated scores, are in better accordance with people's decision-making behavior when they determine which resources of physical rehabilitation to use. It implies that concurrent considerations of non-spatial factors (online ratings and sizes of resource) are important. Our study proposed an integrated assessment method of geographical accessibility scores, which includes the spatial distribution, capacity of resources and online ratings in the mechanism. This research caters to countries that provide citizens with a higher degree of freedom in their medical choices and allows these countries to improve the fairness of resource allocation, raise the geographic accessibilities of physical rehabilitation resources, and promote aging in place.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Geographic Information Systems , Health Resources , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Independent Living , Rehabilitation/economics , Resource Allocation , Aged , Health Facilities , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inadequate financing is one of the major barriers in securing equitable access to high-quality physical rehabilitation services, without imposing financial hardship. Despite this, no sufficient attention has been paid to physical rehabilitation services and no specific financial resources have been allocated to such services in many countries including Iran. Owing to the fact that effective decision- and policy-making requires identifying possible stakeholders and actors and their characteristics, in the current study a stakeholder analysis and also a social network analysis (SNA) was conducted to identify the potential stakeholders and also their characteristics involved in physical rehabilitation financing (PRF)-related policies in Iran. METHODS: The present study was performed in two phases. Firstly, semi-structured interviews and relevant document review were conducted to identify the stakeholders. Then, the position, power, interest, and influence of each stakeholder were determined using a web-based questionnaire. Secondly, SNA approach was utilized to map and visualize the interactions among stakeholders. RESULTS: The findings showed that there are different stakeholders in PRF-related decision- and policy-making processes in Iran. In addition, the position, power, interest, and influence level of the identified stakeholders were varied. Moreover, although some stakeholders, like the Ministry of Health and the parliament have the highest level of power and position, they lack sufficient interest to participate in PRF-policies. Furthermore, SNA demonstrated that social network density was low, which indicates the lack of proper collaboration and interaction among the stakeholders. CONCLUSION: As many powerful and influential stakeholders had low interest levels to warrant participate in the FPR-related decision- and policy-making processes in Iran, employing careful and effective strategies, that is ongoing negotiations, receiving advocacy, and making senior managers and policy-makers aware can be helpful.
Subject(s)
Healthcare Financing , Rehabilitation/economics , Health Policy , Humans , Iran , Policy Making , Social Network Analysis , Stakeholder ParticipationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant motor, cognitive, psychological, neurological and cardiological disabilities in many infected patients. Functional rehabilitation of infectious COVID-19 patients has been implemented in the acute care wards and in appropriate, ad hoc, multidisciplinary COVID-19 rehabilitation units. However, because COVID-19 rehabilitation units are a clinical novelty, clinical and organizational benchmarks are not yet available. The aim of this study is to describe the organizational needs and operational costs of such a unit, by comparing its activity, organization, and costs with 2 other functional rehabilitation units, in San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. METHODS: The 2-month activity of the COVID-19 Rehabilitation Unit at San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, which was created in response to the emergency need for rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients, was compared with the previous year's activity of the Cardiac Rehabilitation and Motor Rehabilitation Units of the same institute. RESULTS: The COVID-19 Rehabilitation Unit had the same number of care beds as the other units, but required twice the amount of staff and instrumental equipment, leading to a deficit in costs. DISCUSSION: The COVID-19 Rehabilitation Unit was twice as expensive as the 2 other units studied. World health systems are organizing to respond to the pandemic by expanding capacity in acute intensive care and sub-intensive care units. This study shows that COVID-19 rehabilitation units must be organized and equiped according to the clinical and rehabilitative needs of patients, following specific measures to prevent the spread of infection amongs patients and workers.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/economics , Coronavirus Infections/rehabilitation , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Hospital Units/economics , Pandemics/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation/economics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Health Services Needs and Demand/organization & administration , Hospital Units/organization & administration , Humans , Italy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Rehabilitation/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background Thoracic aortic dissections (TADs) and thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are resource intensive. We sought to determine economic burden and healthcare resource use to guide health policy. Methods and Results Using universal healthcare coverage data for Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2016, a cost-of-illness analysis was performed. From a single-payer's perspective, direct costs (hospitalization, reinterventions, readmissions, rehabilitation, extended care, home care, prescription drugs, and imaging) were assessed in 2017 Canadian dollars. Controls without TADs or TAAs were matched 10:1 on age, sex, and socioeconomic status to cases with TADs or TAAs to compare posthospital service use to the general population. Linear and spline regression were used for cost trends. Total hospital costs increased from $9 M to $20.7 M for TADs (P<0.0001) and $13 M to $18 M for TAAs (P<0.001). Costs cumulated to $587 M for 17 113 cases. Median hospital costs for TADs were $11 525 ($6102 medical, $26 896 endograft, and $30 372 surgery) with an increase over time (P=0.04). For TAAs, median costs were $16 683 ($7247 medical, $11 679 endograft, and $22 949 surgery) with a decrease over time (P=0.03). Home care was the most used posthospital service (TADs 44%, TAAs 38%), but rehabilitation had the highest median cost (TADs $11.9 M, TAAs $11 M). Men had increased median costs for indexed hospitalizations relative to women, yet women used more posthospital services with higher service costs. Conclusions Total yearly costs have increased for TADs and TAAs. Median hospital costs have increased for TADs yet decreased for TAAs. Women use posthospital healthcare services more often than men.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/economics , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/economics , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/economics , Vascular Surgical Procedures/economics , Age Factors , Aged , Aortic Dissection/epidemiology , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Female , Home Care Services/economics , Hospital Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Rehabilitation/economics , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Universal Health Care , Universal Health Insurance/economicsABSTRACT
SUMMARY: No abstract available.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Expenditures , Rehabilitation/economics , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With the opioid crisis showing no sign of abating, strategies are needed to facilitate postoperative care for endocarditis related to injection drug use (IDU). The current standard, 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, yields frequent reoperation and IDU relapse. We examined the cost-effectiveness of inpatient drug rehabilitation (DR) postoperatively to optimize outcomes and costs. METHODS: Two postoperative strategies were assessed: hospital-only care (HC) vs HC plus inpatient DR. Monte Carlo simulation evaluated effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and cost per patient calculated over a 20-year time horizon in 100,000 iterations. Willingness to pay was set to $100,000/QALY. To determine probabilities of continued postoperative IDU, recurrent infection, and death, best available evidence was combined with institutional data from IDU patients. Baseline probability of postoperative IDU was set to 35% after DR vs 60% after HC, and the cost of inpatient rehabilitation to $30,000. RESULTS: Addition of inpatient DR to standard HC is the favorable strategy, with incremental per-patient cost of $36,920 and 0.93 QALYs gained over 20 years. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates DR is within our willingness-to-pay of $100,000/QALY if postoperative IDU is reduced by at least 7% (from 60% to 53%). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of postoperative inpatient DR for IDU-related endocarditis is cost-effective even if only a modest reduction in IDU is achieved. Collaboration between hospitals and payors to launch pilot programs that provide postoperative addiction treatment and intravenous antibiotics after cardiac operations could dramatically improve endocarditis care.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Endocarditis/surgery , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/economics , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/rehabilitation , Endocarditis/etiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Postoperative Period , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Rehabilitation/economics , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complicationsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the willingness to pay (WTP) for a home-based rehabilitation service and explore the influencing factors of WTP among older adults in Shanghai, China. DESIGN: A cross-sectional design was used. METHODS: A questionnaire survey based on the contingent valuation method was conducted by face-to-face survey over 3 months. FINDINGS: Only 242 (44%) participants were willing to pay for a home-based rehabilitation service. The median amount they were willing to pay was RMB 8 (US$1.15) per visit. Older adults who had higher monthly income, had at least one partner who worked, and had medical insurance were willing to pay more for the service. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults showed low WTP for a home-based rehabilitation service. Economic status and health condition are the significant influencing factors of WTP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Studies on recipients' precise needs and ability to pay are required before home-based services are implemented.
Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services/economics , Rehabilitation/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Rehabilitation/methods , Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early retirements make up a large portion of indirect costs of illness caused by chronic back pain. METHODS: Claims data from statutory health insurance and German Pension Fund provide the basis for analysis. Cox-Regression was performed for duration to early retirement, whereby beside sociodemographic and treatment characteristics, the effect of rehabilitation was considered. RESULTS: Early retirement started on average 7.1 month later through rehabilitation. Therefore, rehabilitants made 8,432.60 higher payments to statutory health insurance and German Pension Fund per rehabilitant. Based on the total number of 21,262 early retirees with orthopedic indications, this can save 180.7 million. The timing of the early retirement was also affected by age and sickness benefits in the previous month. Savings by avoiding entry into early retirement have not yet been taken into account in this model. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitants receive later pensions due to reduced ability, which allow for more contributions to statutory health insurance and German Pension Fund. This indicates that medical rehabilitation is an economic and effective treatment.
Subject(s)
Financial Management , Rehabilitation , Retirement , Germany , Humans , Income , Pensions , Rehabilitation/economicsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with functional impairments or chronic diseases are often in need of assistance in their daily lives. For these individuals it is essential to find novel, cost-effective solutions to meet their needs. Service dogs are dogs that are specially trained to assist individuals with functional impairments and may be able to improve these individuals' quality of life at a reasonable cost, i.e. be cost effective. Cost-effectiveness analyses are used to illustrate the cost of an intervention in relation to its effects and provide important input to decision-makers when setting priorities. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the cost effectiveness of a certified physical service dog and a diabetes alert dog compared to a regular companion dog. METHOD: Costs, life years and quality-adjusted life years were estimated over a 10-year time horizon using a decision-analytic model built upon evidence from the"service and hearing dog project". The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per gained quality-adjusted life year. The analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. Costs and effects were discounted with 3% per annum and reported in USD. RESULTS: Compared to a regular companion dog, a physical service dog is cost saving [-6,000 USD] and gives the dog owner more quality-adjusted life years [0.28]. The diabetes alert dog is also cost effective in comparison with a regular companion dog [-4,500 USD, 0.06 QALYs]. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that a certified service dog is cost saving in comparison with a regular companion dog for individuals with functional impairments or chronic diseases. The uncertainty of the analysis implies that further studies are needed in order to confirm these results. Nevertheless, physical service dogs and diabetes alert dogs show potential to be a valuable support and decision analytic models are useful tools to provide this information.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Rehabilitation , Animals , Chronic Disease , Decision Making , Diabetes Mellitus , Dogs , Markov Chains , Rehabilitation/economics , Rehabilitation/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Physical therapists, as clinical human movement experts, must qualitatively evaluate patients' functional and biomechanical impairments. There are now low-cost 2- and 3-dimensional video measurement systems that can be used to increase the precision and reliability of these qualitative clinical assessments. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review current low-cost video-based methods for motion analysis compared with gold-standard 3-dimensional biomechanical methods. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches were conducted until January 2018 within the following databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, Scopus, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. STUDY SELECTION: Studies designed to evaluate criterion-referenced validity and/or reliability of video-based motion analysis technologies within the last 20 years were included. English-language articles dealing with human rehabilitation were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was independently completed by 3 reviewers, and methodological quality was assessed using the 2018 Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist. Articles were organized for analysis on the basis of type of motion analyzed and category of each low-cost technology used. DATA SYNTHESIS: With 20 articles meeting selection criteria, 10 low-cost motion analysis platforms were presented, each examining different functional movement-dependent variables. Overall article quality was "low" or "very low" on the basis of Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments scoring. Correlations between low-cost and 3-dimensional gold standard systems ranged widely from "poor" agreement (r = 0.025) to "strong" agreement (r = 0.992). Spatiotemporal gait parameters consistently outperformed planar joint angle data. Reliability was better measured than concurrent validity. A summary table was developed to assist clinicians in choosing which motions could potentially be measured accurately by each low-cost platform on the basis of current findings. LIMITATIONS: Databases available to researchers were more clinical/medical in nature, and this review was written from that clinically based perspective. Lack of standardized protocols and methodology within included studies was common, making generalizability difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Research attempting to validate newer low-cost movement analysis systems is limited in quality. Measurement of only certain variables should be considered when these tools are used. Further research is warranted, because these devices still have potential clinical utility for supplementing qualitative movement assessment with objective outcome measures.
Subject(s)
Movement/physiology , Physical Therapists , Rehabilitation , Videotape Recording/economics , Humans , Rehabilitation/economicsABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the incremental cost of TBI during the first year after a traffic accident, compared to other patients with similar non-TBI injuries. Secondly, identification of factors associated with medical costs of TBI is pursued. Analyses were performed on administrative data for traffic victims hospitalised in Belgium between 2009 and 2011. Medical costs attributable to the accident are estimated over one year post-injury. Cases with TBI were matched to controls with similar non-TBI injuries to determine the incremental cost of TBI. Both aims of this research were assessed using regression analysis. The incremental cost of TBI is estimated to range between 10 042 (95%CI [8198; 11 887]) and 21 715 (95%CI [13 5889; 29 540]). Age, problems with self-reliance, survival status, the occurrence of acute events and severity of TBI are significant predictors of medical costs. As to healthcare utilisation, MRI usage, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, nursing homes and readmissions to acute hospital stand out as having most influence on costs. This study reveals a considerable incremental cost of TBI. Policy-making bodies should be made aware of this phenomenon and a diversified policy should be considered when financing programs are discussed.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/economics , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/economics , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Belgium , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Homes/economics , Patient Readmission/economics , Rehabilitation/economics , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
Achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is a World Health Organization (WHO) strategic priority. UHC means "all people receive quality health services that meet their needs without being exposed to financial hardship in paying for the services." Rehabilitation is among the services included in UHC. As part of the WHO Rehabilitation 2030 call for action, WHO is developing its Package of Rehabilitation Interventions (PRI) to support ministries of health in planning, budgeting, and integrating rehabilitation interventions into health systems. The aim of this paper is to introduce and describe the PRI and its methodology. An advisory board composed of members from different WHO departments is overseeing the project, which is led by the WHO Rehabilitation Programme in collaboration with Cochrane Rehabilitation. The development of the PRI is conducted in 6 steps: (1) selection of health conditions (for which rehabilitation interventions will be included in the PRI) based on prevalences, related levels of disability, and expert opinion; (2) identification of rehabilitation interventions and related evidence for the selected health conditions from Clinical Practice Guidelines and Cochrane Reviews; (3) expert agreement on the inclusion of rehabilitation interventions in the PRI; (4) description of resources required for the provision of selected interventions; (5) peer review process, and (6) production of an open source web-based tool. Rehabilitation experts and consumers from all world regions will collaborate in the different steps. In developing the PRI, WHO is taking an important step toward strengthening rehabilitation in health systems, thus enabling more people to benefit from rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Health Planning/organization & administration , Rehabilitation/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rehabilitation/economics , Universal Health Insurance/economics , World Health Organization/organization & administrationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the revenue generated for injury- and noninjury-related services after the initial injury event in an orthopaedic trauma population. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single Level 1 trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred forty adult trauma patients treated operatively for spine, pelvis, and/or upper or lower extremity fractures with ≥1 night stay. INTERVENTION: Operative fracture management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Revenue for follow-up care and for noninjury-related indications for 24 months. RESULTS: Most patients returned for follow-up (92.3%), generating 6704 visits with professional and technical collections of $8,135,022 and $37,292,722, respectively, per 1000 unique patients. The greatest revenue was from rehabilitation services. Patients were less likely to return if they resided outside adjacent counties [odds ratio (OR) = 0.16], experienced a complication (OR = 0.38), or were older (OR per 10-year increase: 0.66) (all P < 0.0001). More than 70% of trauma patients were new to our system, accounting for 33% of all subsequent noninjury-related visits, most for primary care (25.6%). Male patients [OR = 3.28, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-9.93], nonwhites (OR = 3.41; 95% CI, 1.41-8.28), and patients residing near the trauma center (OR = 16.1, 95% CI, 2.13-121) were more likely to return (P < 0.0001). Realized noninjury-related professional and technical revenue was $506 per operative orthopaedic trauma case. CONCLUSIONS: Demographics and outcomes predict likelihood of follow-up. Rehabilitation services account for the greatest revenue per patient. The greatest number of return visits was for primary care services; awareness of such services, especially in men and in those residing near the hospital system, could improve retention.