ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are commonly performed for postoperative analgesia in elective cesarean section. Ropivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for TAP blocks. Currently, the concentration of ropivacaine for TAP blocks is various, and increasing number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effects of different concentration of ropivacaine for TAP blocks in cesarean section. This protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify the optimal concentration of ropivacaine for TAP blocks in elective cesarean section. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases including PubMed, Web of science, the Cochrane library, and EMBASE will be searched from their inception to May 1, 2024. RCTs that investigated the analgesia of different concentrations of ropivacaine for TAP blocks in elective cesarean section will be identified. The analgesia duration will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include the analgesics consumption over postoperative 24 hours, postoperative pain scores at rest and movement, and the incidence of adverse effects. RevMan 5.4 software will used for statistical analysis. The evidence quality of synthesized results will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not applicable. The results of this study will be published on completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024496907.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles , Anesthetics, Local , Cesarean Section , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Ropivacaine , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Humans , Cesarean Section/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Abdominal Muscles/innervation , Abdominal Muscles/drug effects , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Female , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pregnancy , Elective Surgical Procedures , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Selective posterior rhizotomy (SPR) is a preferred procedure for relieving spastic children with cerebral palsy, but it is associated with severe pain and significant emergence agitation (EA). The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block provides an effective blockade to the dorsal branch of the spinal nerve. We hypothesise that the TLIP block may be an effective tool to alleviate EA and postoperative pain scores in children with cerebral palsy undergoing SPR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-centre, randomised, parallel-controlled trial being conducted in Beijing, China. A total of 50 paediatric patients with cerebral palsy scheduled for SPR are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive bilateral TLIP block with 0.2% ropivacaine 0.5 mL/kg or control. Patients in the TLIP group receive general anaesthesia combined with TLIP block, while patients in the control group receive only general anaesthesia, without a TLIP block. The primary outcome is the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium Score. The secondary outcomes are the incidence of EA, the Wong-Baker Faces Pain-rating Scale, the perioperative haemodynamics, the intraoperative remifentanil and propofol dosage, the extubation time and recovery time, and adverse reactions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine on 21 September 2023 (2023DZMEC-379-02). Written informed consent is obtained from the legal guardian of each patient. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300076397.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Cerebral Palsy , Emergence Delirium , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Rhizotomy , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Cerebral Palsy/complications , Cerebral Palsy/surgery , Anesthesia, General/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Child , Rhizotomy/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Male , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/therapeutic use , Female , Child, Preschool , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , China , AdolescentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant treatment to ropivacaine in children undergoing upper limb surgeries under ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks and general anesthesia. METHODS: We enrolled 90 children (aged 1-8 years; ASA I-II) undergoing closed reduction and internal fixation for upper extremity fractures at the Xiamen Children's Hospital and randomly assigned them to one of two groups: L (injection with 0.25% ropivacaine) or D (injection with 0.25% ropivacaine containing 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine) using the random number table method. The main outcome indicators recorded were the facial expression, leg activity, position, crying, and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale scores of children after surgery and the duration of block and analgesia maintenance. The secondary outcome indicators were vital sign data at the time of ultrasound probe placement (T1), at the time of block completion (T2), prior to the beginning of surgery (T3), 5 min after the beginning of surgery (T4), and at the end of surgery (T5), as well as the time of postoperative recovery, the number of cases of remedial analgesia, and complications. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of general data, block completion time, postoperative recovery time, and complications (P > 0.05). Compared to the L group, the D group had significantly lower FLACC scores at 6 h after surgery, as well as significantly lower systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate values at T4 and T5, and significantly longer duration of postoperative analgesia maintenance (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) as a local anesthetic adjuvant to ropivacaine can alleviate pain at 6 h postoperatively, prolong analgesia maintenance, and reduce intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate in pediatric patients undergoing closed reduction and internal fixation for upper extremity fractures, with no obvious complications or delayed recovery. CLINICAL REGISTRY NUMBER: Registration website: www.chictr.org.cn, Registration number: ChiCTR2200065163, Registration date: October, 30, 2022.
Subject(s)
Brachial Plexus Block , Dexmedetomidine , Ropivacaine , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Brachial Plexus Block/methods , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Infant , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Brachial Plexus/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Plexus/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and reliability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior open lumbar spine surgery has been demonstrated; however, few randomized controlled trials of lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) in lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic (UBE) surgery have been reported. METHODS: A total of 120 patients, aged 18 to 65 (who underwent elective lumbar UBE surgery under general anesthesia and exhibited an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I to III) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ESPB group and the Control group. Ultrasound(US)-guided unilateral single-shot 0.25% ropivacaine L-ESPB was performed in the ESPB group, but not in the control group. Postoperative analgesic strategy for all patients: patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA, diluted and dosed with fentanyl alone) was initiated immediately after surgery combined with oral compound codeine phosphate and ibuprofen sustained release tablets (1 tablet containing ibuprofen 200 mg and codeine 13 mg, 1 tablet/q12h) commenced 6 h postoperatively. We collected and compared patient-centred correlates intraoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. RESULTS: Compared to the control group (n = 56), the ESPB group (n = 58) significantly reduced intraoperative remifentanil consumption (estimated median difference - 280 mcg, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 360 to - 200, p < 0.001, power = 100%); significantly reduced fentanyl consumption at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference - 80mcg, 95%[CI] - 128 to - 32, p = 0.001, power = 90%); and significantly enhanced the QoR-15 score at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference 11, 95%[CI] 8 to 14, p < 0.001, power = 100%). Compared to the control group, the ESPB group enhanced the resting numeric rating scale (NRS) score up to 8 h postoperatively, and the active movement NRS score up to 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (p = 0.015, power = 70%), abdominal distension (p = 0.024, power = 64%), and muscular calf vein thrombosis (MCVT) (p = 0.033, power = 58%) was lower in the ESPB group than in the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of L-ESPB related adverse reactions was not found herein. CONCLUSION: US-guided L-ESPB reduces intraoperative and 24 h postoperative opioid consumption and improves patients' QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively. L-ESPB can be safely and effectively utilized in lumbar UBE surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061908 , date of registration: 10/07/2022. Registry URL.
Subject(s)
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Analgesics, Opioid , Lumbar Vertebrae , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Ropivacaine , Humans , Male , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Female , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/methods , Adult , Prospective Studies , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Endoscopy/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Paraspinal MusclesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the optimal concentration of ropivacaine epidural anesthesia for clinical use in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) by comparing the effects of different concentrations. METHODS: Seventy patients scheduled for their first PTED procedure were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive ropivacaine at varying concentrations (0.3% or 0.4%). Primary outcome measures included the numeric rating scale (NRS) and hip extension level (HEL). Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative fentanyl dosage and postoperative complications. RESULTS: One patient withdrew due to severe postoperative complications. The remaining 69 patients were allocated to the 0.3% (n = 34) and 0.4% (n = 35) groups, respectively. Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The NRS score was significantly lower in the 0.4% group than in the 0.3% group (P < 0.01), whereas the HEL score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). The average fentanyl dose in the 0.4% group was significantly lower than that in the 0.3% group (P < 0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in five and two patients in the 0.3% and 0.4% groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although 0.4% ropivacaine (20 mL) impacts muscle strength, it does not impede PTED surgery. Given its effective analgesic properties and few postoperative complications, 0.4% ropivacaine can be considered a preferred dose for PTED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2200060364; Registration Date: 29/5/2022) and on chictr.org.cn ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=171002 ).
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Epidural , Anesthetics, Local , Ropivacaine , Humans , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Diskectomy, Percutaneous/methods , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Endoscopy/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Managing postoperative pain effectively with an opioid-free regimen following laparoscopic surgery (LS) remains a significant challenge. Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine has been explored for its potential to reduce acute postoperative pain, but its efficacy and safety are still under debate. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine for acute pain management following laparoscopic digestive surgery. METHODS: We used PRISMA 2020 and a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 guidelines to conduct this review. The random-effects model was adopted using Review Manager Version 5.4 for pooled estimates. RESULTS: We retained 24 eligible RCTs involving 1705 patients (862 patients in the intraperitoneal instillation group and 843 patients in the control group). The intraperitoneal instillation group reduced total opioid consumption during the first 24 hours postoperatively (MDâ =â -21.93 95% CI [-27.64, -16.23], Pâ <â .01), decreased pain scores at different time (4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours), shorter the hospital stay (MDâ =â -0.20 95% CI [-0.36, -0.05], Pâ <â .01), reduced the postoperative shoulder pain (MDâ =â 0.18 95% CI [0.07, 0.44], Pâ <â .01), and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (MDâ =â 0.47 95% CI [0.29, 0.77], Pâ <â .01). CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine appears to be an effective component of multimodal pain management strategies following laparoscopic digestive surgery, significantly reducing opioid consumption and improving postoperative recovery markers. Despite these promising results, additional high-quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach. REGISTRATION: The registration number at PROSPERO was CRD42021279238.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Laparoscopy , Pain Management , Pain, Postoperative , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ropivacaine , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/therapeutic use , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Pain Management/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and magnesium sulfate added to ropivacaine on the onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks in lower abdominal surgery. This double-blind randomized clinical trial included 90 patients scheduled for lower abdominal surgery at Vali-Asr Hospital in Arak, Iran. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into three equal groups and then underwent spinal anesthesia. The first group received 10 µg of dexmedetomidine, the second group received 50 µg of fentanyl, and the third group received 200 mg of 20% magnesium sulfate intrathecally in addition to 15 mg of 0.5% ropivacaine. In the dexmedetomidine group, the mean arterial blood pressure was lower than the other two groups (P = 0.001). Moreover, the time to onset of sensory block (P = 0.001) and the mean duration of sensory block (P = 0.001) were shorter and longer, respectively, in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. In the dexmedetomidine group, the mean time to onset of motor block (P = 0.001) and the mean duration of motor block (P = 0.001) were lower and higher than in the other two groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in visual analog scale score, heart rate, administered opioid, and drug side effects among the three groups. Dexmedetomidine caused early sensory and motor blocks while prolonging the duration of sensory and motor blocks compared with the other two groups. In addition, dexmedetomidine reduced mean arterial blood pressure in patients. Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that dexmedetomidine can be used in order to enhance the quality of sensory and motor block in patients.
Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine , Fentanyl , Magnesium Sulfate , Ropivacaine , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Male , Magnesium Sulfate/pharmacology , Magnesium Sulfate/administration & dosage , Female , Ropivacaine/pharmacology , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Abdomen/surgery , Amides/administration & dosage , Amides/pharmacologyABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a constant rate infusion of dexmedetomidine could prolong the analgesic effect of peripheral nerve blocks. Twenty client-owned dogs were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups. The DEX group received dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 mcg kg-1 h-1, and the NaCl group received an equivalent volume infusion of saline. Infusions were started after securing vascular access and continued for 10 min, after which intravenous (IV) methadone at 0.2 mg kg-1 and propofol to effect were administered. All animals were maintained with isoflurane in 70% oxygen. Sciatic, saphenous and obturator nerve blocks were performed using 0.1 mL kg-1 0.5% ropivacaine/block. Intraoperative fentanyl was administered if the heart rate and/or mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased > 15% from the previous measurement, and vasopressors were administered if MAP was ≤ 70 mmHg. Postoperative pain was assessed every hour using the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (GCPS) until the first rescue analgesia administration. Postoperative rescue analgesia (methadone (0.2 mg kg-1 IV) and carprofen (2 mg kg-1 IV)) was administered if the pain score was higher than 6/24 or 5/20. Duration of analgesia was defined as the time between the nerve block procedure and initial postoperative rescue analgesia. Ambulation, proprioception, and skin sensitivity were evaluated to assess the duration of the motor and sensory block. A Student T and chi-square test were used to compare groups for duration of postoperative analgesia and intraoperative fentanyl and vasopressor use, respectively (p values ≤ 0.5 considered significant). A greater number of dogs in the NaCl group required fentanyl (5/10 p = 0.03) and vasopressors (8/10, p = 0.02) than did those in the DEX group (0/10 and 2/10, respectively). The duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly longer (604 ± 130 min) in the DEX group than in the NaCl group (400 ± 81 min, p = 0.0005).Dexmedetomidine infusion at 1 mcg kg-1 h-1 delays the time to first administration of rescue analgesia and reduces intraoperative analgesic and vasopressor requirements during Tibial Tuberosity Advancement surgery.
Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Animals , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Dogs , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Male , Female , Peripheral Nerves/drug effects , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/pharmacology , Analgesia/methods , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of lesser occipital nerve combined with great auricular nerve block (LOGAB) for craniotomy via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. METHODS: Patients underwent vestibular schwannoma resection via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided unilateral LOGAB with 5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (LOGAB group) or normal saline (NSB group). Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and motion were recorded within 48 h after surgery. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), opioid consumption and other variables were measured secondly. RESULTS: Among 59 patients who were randomized, 30 patients received ropivacaine, and 29 patients received saline. NRS scores at rest (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.2 ± 0.8, P = 0.002) and at motion (2.2 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 0.6, P = 0.013) of LOGAB group were lower than those of NSB group within 48 h after surgery. NRS scores of motion were comparable except for 6th and 12th hour (P < 0.05) in the LOGAB group. In LOGAB group, MAP decreased significantly during incision of skin and dura (P < 0.05) and intraoperative opoid consumption was remarkably reduced (P < 0.01). Postoperative remedial analgesia was earlier in the NSB group (P < 0.001). No patients reported any adverse events. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing craniotomy for vestibular schwannoma via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach, LOGAB may be a promising treatment for perioperative analgesia and has the potential to maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2000038798.
Subject(s)
Craniotomy , Nerve Block , Neuroma, Acoustic , Ropivacaine , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Double-Blind Method , Female , Male , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Middle Aged , Craniotomy/methods , Prospective Studies , Nerve Block/methods , Neuroma, Acoustic/surgery , Adult , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosageSubject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Paraspinal Muscles , Ropivacaine , Humans , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Nerve Block/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Female , Paraspinal Muscles/innervation , Male , Middle Aged , Thoracoscopy/methods , Aged , Pneumonectomy/methods , AdultABSTRACT
The ineffectiveness of cisplatin therapy in treating colorectal cancer (CRC) is attributed to an increase of resistance. It's necessary to investigate adjunctive agents capable of enhancing drug efficacy. Previous studies have shown that ropivacaine inhibit the growth of various cancer cells, but its impact on cisplatin resistance in tumors is not well understood. This study was to illustrate the impact and mechanism of ropivacaine enhanced cisplatin-sensitivity of CRC. Cisplatin alone treatment resulted in the elevation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and intracellular Fe2+ levels, as well as a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in cisplatin-sensitive LOVO cells, while these effects were mitigated in the cisplatin-resistant LOVO/DDP cells. The co-administration of ropivacaine with cisplatin inhibited cell viability and cell migration, decreased MMP, and promoted ROS accumulation and apoptosis in both LOVO cells and LOVO/DDP cells. And they upregulated the levels of ferroptosis makers and downregulated the expression of anti-ferroptosis proteins. However, this effect was reversed by ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 or liproxstatin-1. Furthermore, we o demonstrated that the co-administration of ropivacaine and cisplatin resulted in a decrease in SIRT1 expression, and SIRT1 knockdown in LOVO/DDP cells enhanced the ferroptosis and the anti-tumor properties of ropivacaine, while also inhibiting the activation of the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway. The above results suggested that ropivacaine increased the sensitivity of CRC cells to cisplatin by promoting ferroptosis through the inhibition of SIRT1 expression, which proposes a therapeutic approach for overcoming cisplatin resistance in CRC.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cisplatin , Colorectal Neoplasms , Ferroptosis , NF-E2-Related Factor 2 , Reactive Oxygen Species , Ropivacaine , Signal Transduction , Sirtuin 1 , Humans , Ropivacaine/pharmacology , Ferroptosis/drug effects , Cisplatin/pharmacology , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/metabolism , Sirtuin 1/metabolism , Sirtuin 1/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial/drug effects , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Apoptosis/drug effectsABSTRACT
The study aimed to compare the quality of perioperative analgesia, the motor block duration, and the effects on main cardiovascular parameters of dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg/nerve block) or magnesium sulphate (2 mg/kg/nerve block) as adjuvants to 0.3% ropivacaine for sciatic and saphenous nerves block in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). Dogs randomly received perineural dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine (D group), magnesium sulphate-ropivacaine (M group), or ropivacaine (C group). Fentanyl was administered in case of intraoperative nociception. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Short Form-Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (SF-GCMPS) and VAS scale. The duration of motor blockade and intra- and postoperative cardiovascular parameters were also recorded. Group M required significantly more fentanyl than D group (p = 0.04). Group M had a significantly higher SF-GCMPS score than group C at 4 (p = 0.002) and 5 h after extubation (p = 0.01), and a significantly higher VAS score than group D at 3 h after extubation (p = 0.03), and at 4 h if compared to group C (p = 0.009). No significant differences regarding the duration of motor blockade were detected between groups (p = 0.07). The heart rate was significantly lower in group D than in M and C groups intraoperatively and during the first 1.5 h post extubation. The addition of dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to perineural ropivacaine did not improve the quality of perioperative analgesia and did not prolong the motor blockade in dogs undergoing sciatic and saphenous nerves block for TPLO surgery.
Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine , Magnesium Sulfate , Nerve Block , Osteotomy , Pain, Postoperative , Ropivacaine , Animals , Dogs , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/pharmacology , Magnesium Sulfate/pharmacology , Magnesium Sulfate/administration & dosage , Osteotomy/veterinary , Pain, Postoperative/veterinary , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Male , Female , Nerve Block/veterinary , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Tibia/surgeryABSTRACT
Background: During electrochemotherapy (ECT), a chemotherapeutic drug is injected into the tumor and then an electroporation is provided. In horses, ear manipulation may be very painful, and combining a loco-regional technique with sedation might be a good option to avoid anesthesia-related risks. A two-injection-point block of the internal and external pinna and acoustic meatus was described in horse cadavers, and it permitted complete stain of all three branches of the great auricular nerve (GAN), internal auricular nerve branch (IAB), lateral auricular branch (LAB), and caudal auricular nerve (CAN), suggesting a lower risk of intra-parotid injection during the IAB and LAB block. Case Description: An 8-year-old Italian jumping gelding presented for ECT to treat a fibroblastic sarcoid in the left medial pinna. After intravenous sedation with acepromazine, romifidine, and butorphanol, a two-injection-point block was provided as previously described. The block of the GAN was blind, whereas an electrical nerve locator was used for the IAB, LAB, and CAN. A total of 12 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected. The ECT was safely performed without any difficulties. The horse well tolerated the procedure and completely recovered 75 minutes after sedation. No complications were detected. Conclusion: The described approach seems feasible and suitable for the blockade of the sensory innervation of the equine ear in the case of ECT.
Subject(s)
Horse Diseases , Horses , Animals , Horse Diseases/therapy , Male , Electrochemotherapy/veterinary , Pain/veterinary , Pain/etiology , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Nerve Block/veterinaryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: 3% chloroprocaine (CP) has been reported as the common local anesthetic used in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. However, 0.75% ropivacaine is considered a promising and effective alternative. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of 0.75% ropivacaine with 3% chloroprocaine for extended epidural anesthesia in pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center study from November 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. We selected forty-five pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period and randomized them to receive either 0.75% ropivacaine or 3% chloroprocaine in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the time to loss of cold sensation at the T4 level. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups in the time to achieve loss of cold sensation (303, 95%CI 255 to 402 S vs. 372, 95%CI 297 to 630 S, p = 0.024). There was no significant difference the degree of motor block (p = 0.185) at the Th4 level. Fewer pregnant women required additional local anesthetics in the ropivacaine group compared to the chloroprocaine group (4.5% VS. 34.8%, p = 0.011). The ropivacaine group had lower intraoperative VAS scores (p = 0.023) and higher patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.040) than the chloroprocaine group. The incidence of intraoperative complications was similar between the two groups, and no serious complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that 0.75% ropivacaine was associated with less intraoperative pain treatment, higher patient satisfaction and reduced the onset time compared to 3% chloroprocaine in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. Therefore, 0.75% ropivacaine may be a suitable drug in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL: The registration number: ChiCTR2200065201; http://www.chictr.org.cn , Principal investigator: MEN, Date of registration: 31/10/2022.
Subject(s)
Analgesia, Obstetrical , Anesthetics, Local , Cesarean Section , Procaine , Ropivacaine , Humans , Female , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Double-Blind Method , Cesarean Section/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Adult , Analgesia, Obstetrical/methods , Procaine/analogs & derivatives , Procaine/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Ropivacaine hydrochloride (RPL) is a local anesthetic agent that has been widely used for the treatment of pain during or after surgery. However, this drug is only available in parenteral dosage form and may contribute to the infiltration of RPL into the plasma, causing some undesirable side effects. Intradermal delivery of RPL using dissolving microneedles may become a promising strategy to deliver such drugs into the skin. This research aimed to develop RPL-loaded dissolving microneedles (DMN-RPLs) as a proof of the concept of intradermal delivery of a local anesthetic. The DMN-RPLs were fabricated using either centrifugation or air-pressurized chamber methods. Several polymers, such as poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and sodium hyaluronate (SH), were utilized for manufacturing the DMN-RPLs. The prepared DMN-RPLs were assessed for their thermal properties, chemical bonds, mechanical strength, insertion ability, skin-dissolution study, and drug content. Furthermore, in-skin deposition and dermatokinetic studies were also performed. The results showed that F9 (30 % w/w PVP-4 % w/w SH) and F10 (30 % w/w PVP-5 % w/w PVA) containing 5 % w/w of RPL were the most promising formulations, as shown by their needle height reduction (<10 %) and insertion depth (â¼400 µm). Both formulations were also able to deliver more than 60 % of the RPL contained in the DMNs into the epidermis, dermis, and receiver compartment. This study, for the first time, has provided a proof concept to deliver RPL as a local anesthetic using DMNs and the intradermal route, aiming to minimize pain and discomfort during administration and improve the patient's experience.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Drug Delivery Systems , Needles , Ropivacaine , Skin , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/pharmacokinetics , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacokinetics , Anesthetics, Local/chemistry , Animals , Skin/metabolism , Administration, Cutaneous , Drug Liberation , Skin Absorption , Povidone/chemistry , Proof of Concept Study , Solubility , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Microinjections/methods , Male , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Polyvinyl Alcohol/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores. METHODS: The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes: the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Ropivacaine , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Female , Male , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement/methods , Rectus Abdominis/innervation , Rectus Abdominis/diagnostic imaging , Patient Satisfaction , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , AgedABSTRACT
Purpose: To compare the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) on the quality of postoperative recovery (QoR) of patients following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods: A total of 110 patients who underwent elective LSG under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB or PVB at T8 levels. Before anesthesia induction, 40 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine was administered. The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score at 24 hours postoperatively. Results: At 24 hours postoperatively, the QoR-15 score was comparable between the ESPB and PVB groups (131 (112-140) vs. 124 (111-142.5), P = 0.525). Consistently, there was no significant difference in QoR-15 scores at 48 hours postoperatively, numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at any postoperative time points, time to first ambulation, time to first anal exhaust, postoperative cumulative oxycodone consumption, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between the two groups (all P > 0.05). No nerve block-related complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: In patients undergoing LSG, preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB yields comparable postoperative recovery to preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided PVB.
Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Laparoscopy , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Female , Nerve Block/methods , Male , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Adult , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/therapeutic use , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Pain Measurement , Paraspinal Muscles/innervation , Paraspinal Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/epidemiology , Anesthesia, General/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this study, we analyzed whether scalp nerve block with ropivacaine can improve the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection. METHODS: We included 150 patients who were undergoing craniotomy in our hospital and categorized them into 2 groups - observation group (patients received an additional regional scalp nerve block anesthesia) and control group (patients underwent intravenous general anesthesia for surgery), using the random number table method approach (75 patients in each group). The main indicator of the study was the Karnofsky Performance Scale scores of patients at 3 days postoperatively, and the secondary indicator was the anesthesia satisfaction scores of patients after awakening from anesthesia. The application value of different anesthesia modes was studied and compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients in the observation group showed better anesthesia effects than those in the control group, with significantly higher Karnofsky Performance Scale scores at 3 days postoperatively (75.02 vs 66.43, Pâ <â .05) and anesthesia satisfaction scores. Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the observation group had lower pain degrees at different times after the surgery, markedly lower dose of propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia, and lower incidence of adverse reactions and postoperative complications. In addition, the satisfaction score of the patients and their families for the treatment was higher and the results of all the indicators were better in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant differences (Pâ <â .05). CONCLUSION: Scalp nerve block with ropivacaine significantly improves the quality of short-term postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for meningioma resection. This is presumably related to the improvements in intraoperative hemodynamics, relief from postoperative pain, and reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Meningioma , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Ropivacaine , Scalp , Humans , Nerve Block/methods , Meningioma/surgery , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Adult , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Craniotomy/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Aged , Karnofsky Performance StatusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Combining hydromorphone with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks enhances postoperative analgesia and reduces interleukin-6 expression in breast surgery patients. METHODS: In this study, breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomized into 3 groups for anesthesia (30 patients in each group): standard general (group C), Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with ropivacaine (group R), and ESPB with ropivacaine plus hydromorphone (group HR). Diagnosis: Breast cancer patients. Postsurgery, pain levels, IL-6, anesthetic doses, additional analgesia needs, and recovery milestones were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the ESPB enhancements. RESULTS: The 3 groups were not significantly different in baseline characteristics, operation time, number of cases with postoperative nausea, and serum IL-6 concentrations at T1 (the time of being returned to the ward after surgery). At T2 (at 6:00 in the next morning after surgery), the serum IL-6 concentration in group HR was significantly lower than that in groups R and C (Pâ <â .05); the intraoperative doses of remifentanil, sufentanil, and propofol were significantly lower in groups HR and R than those in group C (Pâ <â .05); Groups HR and R had significantly lower visual analog scale scores at T3 (4 hours postoperatively), T4 (12 hours postoperatively), and T5 (24 hours postoperatively) than those in group C (Pâ <â .05); the proportions of patients receiving postoperative remedial analgesia were significantly lower in groups HR and R than in group C (Pâ <â .05); groups HR and R had significantly lower proportions of patients with postoperative nausea than group C (Pâ <â .05); the time to the first anal exhaust and the time to the first ambulation after surgery were significantly shorter in groups HR and R than those in group C (Pâ <â .05). CONCLUSION: Hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine for ESPB achieved a greater postoperative analgesic effect for patients receiving MRM under general anesthesia. The combined analgesia caused fewer adverse reactions and inhibited the expression level of the inflammatory factor IL-6 more effectively, thereby facilitating postoperative recovery. ESPB using hydromorphone with ropivacaine improved pain control post-MRM, reduced adverse effects, and more effectively suppressed IL-6, enhancing recovery.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Anesthetics, Local , Breast Neoplasms , Hydromorphone , Mastectomy, Modified Radical , Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Ropivacaine , Humans , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Ropivacaine/therapeutic use , Female , Hydromorphone/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Modified Radical/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Adult , Interleukin-6/blood , Paraspinal Muscles/drug effects , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
Currently, to overcome the short half-life of the local anesthetic ropivacaine, drug delivery systems such as nanoparticles and liposomes have been used to prolong the analgesic effect, but they are prone to abrupt release from the site of administration or have poor slow-release effects, which increases the risk of cardiotoxicity. In this study, injectable lipid suspensions based on ropivacaine-docusate sodium hydrophobic ion pairing (HIP) were designed to significantly prolong the duration of analgesia. The resulting ion-paired lipid suspension (HIP/LIPO) had a micrometer scale and a high zeta potential, which facilitates stable in situ retention. The strong interaction between docusate sodium and ropivacaine was verified using thermal and spectroscopic analyses, and the formation of micron-sized polymorphic vesicles was attributed to the mutual stabilizing interactions between ropivacaine-docusate sodium HIP, docusate sodium and lecithin. The HIP/LIPO delivery system could maintain drug release for more than 5 days in vitro and achieve high analgesic efficacy for more than 10 days in vivo, reducing the side effects associated with high drug doses. The stable HIP/LIPO delivery system is a promising strategy that offers a clinically beneficial alternative for postoperative pain management and other diseases.