ABSTRACT
Acoustic hearing aids generate amplified sound in the ear canal, and they are the standard of care for patients with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. However, because of their limited frequency bandwidth, gain, and feedback, there is substantial room for improvement. Active middle ear implants, which directly vibrate the middle ear and cochlea, are an alternative approach to conventional acoustic hearing aids. They provide an opportunity to improve sound quality and speech understanding with amplification rehabilitation. For floating-mass type and direct-rod type (DRT) middle ear transducers, a differential floating-mass transducer (DFMT) and a tri-coil bellows transducer (TCBT), respectively, were fabricated to measure the output characteristics in four human temporal bones. Both were fabricated to have similar output forces per unit input and were placed in four human temporal bones to measure their output performances. The TCBT resulted in higher output than did the DFMT throughout the audible frequency range, and the output was more prominent at lower frequency ranges. In this study, we showed that DRT was a more effective method for round window stimulation. Because of its frequency characteristics and vibration efficiency, this implantation method can be utilized as a driving solution for middle ear implants.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Temporal Bone/physiopathology , HumansABSTRACT
Background: In operations of cochlea implantation (CI), many surgeons choose to drill a window on the bone wall of cochlea basic rotation, when more and more patients receive CI with residual hearing, what damage this step would result in is unclear.Objective: To study the effect to inner ear hair cells which is caused by drilling during CI.Methods: 6 miniature pigs are equally divided into two groups, Round window niche of each pig in the experimental group was milled, while the pigs in control group wasn't. After implanting depth of 6.5, 11.5 and 20 mm, round window electrocochleography was recorded to analyze the change of cochlea microphonic (CM) potentials respectively, histomorphological changes was observed.Results: Thresholds of CM in experimental group were higher than that of control group at different depth, amplitudes were smaller. In further group, cilia of inner hair cells (IHC) at bottom rotation were significantly damaged. After operation, ABR hearing threshold of experimental group was higher, differences at low frequency region were more obvious.Conclusions: Damage caused by mulling round window niche may seriously affect the function of the hair cells. Damage of the IHC is greater than OHC. CI through round window may protect residual hearing.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Microphonic Potentials , Hair Cells, Auditory/physiology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Animals , Ear, Inner , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hair Cells, Auditory/pathology , Models, Animal , Round Window, Ear/injuries , Round Window, Ear/pathology , Swine , Swine, MiniatureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Long-term use of a unilateral cochlear implant (CI) may lead to abnormal development of contralateral auditory pathway. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the usefulness of measuring the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) with the electrical stimulation at the round window membrane and the effect of unilateral CI use on the contralateral auditory pathway functions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to duration of unilateral CI use, 45 children with severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss were divided into sCI (≤12 months), lCI (≥24 months) and nCI (no CI use) groups. Intra-operative eABRs evoked by electrical stimulation at the round window membrane were recorded. RESULTS: The latencies of eIII and eV were significantly longer in lCI group than in sCI group and in nCI group, respectively, but not significantly different between sCI group and nCI group. The eABR thresholds and eIII-eV latency intervals were not significantly different among three groups. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The eABR evoked by the electrical stimulation at the round window membrane is a reliable and effective way of evaluating functions of the auditory pathway in deaf children. Long-term use of a unilateral CI may promote the degenerative process of the contralateral auditory pathway to the level of the brainstem.
Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Cochlear Implants , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Adolescent , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Electric Stimulation , Female , Humans , Infant , MaleABSTRACT
Objective: Subjects implanted with a Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant (DACI) show improvements in their bone conduction (BC) thresholds after surgery. We hypothesised that a new pathway for BC sound is created via the DACI. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of this pathway to the cochlear response via measurements of the promontory and round window membrane (RWM) velocities while stimulating with a conventional bone conductor.Design: This study was a cadaver head study with a repeated measures study design.Study Sample: Eight ears of five fresh-frozen cadaveric whole heads were investigated in this trial.Results: After DACI implantation the promontory and RWM velocities did not change significantly in the frequency range 0.5-2 kHz when the DACI was switched off.Conclusions: No significant changes in the relative vibration magnitude of the RWM after DACI implantation were observed. The improvements in BC thresholds seen in patients implanted with a DACI very likely have their origin in the changed impedance at the oval window after DACI surgery leading to a more efficient contribution from the inner ear components to BC sound.
Subject(s)
Bone Conduction/physiology , Cochlear Implants , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Cadaver , Cochlear Implantation , Ear, Inner/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Period , Round Window, Ear/surgery , VibrationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implantation (CI) has been reported to negatively affect vestibular function. The study of vestibular function has variably been conducted using different types of diagnostic tools. The combined use of modern, rapidly performing diagnostic tools could prove useful for standardization of the evaluation protocol. METHODS: In a group of 28 subjects undergoing CI, the video head impulse test (vHIT), the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and the short form of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire were investigated preoperatively and postoperatively (implant on and off) in both the implanted and the contralateral, nonimplanted ear. All surgeries were performed with a round window approach (RWA), except for 3 otosclerosis cases in which the extended RWA (eRWA) was used. RESULTS: The vHIT of the lateral semicircular canal showed preoperative vestibular involvement in nearly 50% of the cases, while the 3 canals were contemporarily affected in only 14% of the cases. In all the hypofunctional subjects, cVEMP were absent. A low VOR gain in all of the investigated superior semicircular canals was found in 4 subjects (14%). In those subjects (21.7%) in whom cVEMP were preoperatively present and normal on the operated side, the absence of a response was postoperatively recorded. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The vestibular protocol applied in this study was found to be appropriate for distinguishing between the CI-operated ear and the nonoperated ear. In this regard, cVEMP was found to be more sensitive than vHIT for revealing a vestibular sufferance after CI, though without statistical significance. Finally, the use of RWA surgery apparently did not reduce the occurrence of signs of vestibular impairment.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants , Dizziness/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/surgery , Vertigo/diagnosis , Vestibular Function Tests , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dizziness/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Period , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Semicircular Canals/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vertigo/physiopathology , Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thiel conservation is mainly based on a watery solution of salts. We have shown that bone conduction (BC) evokes motion in normal middle ears of Thiel embalmed specimens that is comparable to the motion for other cadaveric models. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether promontory and round window (RW) motion identifies differences in BC transmission for different middle ear conditions. METHODS: We investigated the conditions of mobile ossicle chain, cement-fixed stapes and stapedectomy in seven ears. A retroauricular bone anchored hearing system provided BC stimulation. The motions of the promontory and the RW were measured using single point laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV, HLV1000, Polytec). RESULTS: The averaged differences between the conditions were small for RW motion and for promontory motion. However, for RW motion we found differences of more than one standard deviation at some frequencies. These differences in RW motion were more apparent when we limited the analysis to three selected specimens. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Extracochlear measurement of the RW motion with LDV allowed differentiation between BC for different middle ear conditions. These changes could be detected best in a small frequency range in selected specimens. Promontory motion could not be used to differentiate between different conditions of the middle ear. ABBREVIATIONS: LDV: laser Doppler vibrometry; Prom: cochlear promontory; RW: round window; ST: stapes; TM: tympanic membrane; VProm: velocity of the promontory; VRW: velocity of the round window.
Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Ear Diseases/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Stapes/physiopathology , Embalming , Humans , Stapes SurgeryABSTRACT
Residual hearing loss in cochlear implant users is investigated using the mechanical-human-cochlear model. Hearing loss due to stiffening of the round window increases significantly as input frequencies decrease from 3 kHz to 1 kHz but remains constant at lower frequencies, whereas loss due to the presence of an electrode insert becomes significantly higher at lower frequencies ([Formula: see text] kHz). The latter also shifts the characteristic frequency map toward the basal end of the cochlea. In the region away from the end of the electrode insert, cochlear function recovers, but the user still suffers from hearing loss caused by round window stiffening.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Speech Perception/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/instrumentation , Basilar Membrane/physiopathology , Hearing/physiology , Hearing Disorders/surgery , Humans , Models, Biological , Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedABSTRACT
An active actuator coupled to the round window (RW) can transmit mechanical vibrations into the cochlea and has become a therapeutic option of hearing rehabilitation for patients with stapedial otosclerosis. A finite-element model of the human ear that includes sound transmission effects of the vestibular and cochlear aqueducts of the inner ear is adopted in this study for investigating the cochlear response to RW stimulation under stapes fixation. There are two effects due to otosclerosis of the stapes: the fixation of the stapedial annular ligament (SAL) and the increase of the stapes mass. The frequency responses of the middle ear and cochlea with normal and otosclerotic stapes are calculated under sound and RW stimulations. The results show that changes in the material property of the stapes have different effects on the cochlear responses under sound and RW stimulations. Because of the vestibuli aqueduct, the reduction in the low-frequency magnitude of the pressure difference across the cochlear partition due to SAL fixation is much smaller under RW stimulation than under sound stimulation. The results of this study help understand sound transmission during RW stimulation in patients with stapedial otosclerosis.
Subject(s)
Finite Element Analysis , Otosclerosis/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Stapes/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Cochlea/physiology , Ear, Middle/physiology , Hearing/physiology , Humans , Ossicular Prosthesis , SoundABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Auditory brainstem potentials can be elicited by electrical stimulation of the round window (RW). In this technique, extracochlear stimulation is objectively used in the selection of cochlear implant (CI) candidates to avoid cochlear damage. However, until now, its use is limited due to the large artifacts generated by electrical stimulation. Our objective was to obtain reliable and reproducible electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (eEABRs) using a new method of stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study including subjects who underwent electrical stimulation on RW during CI surgery between 2013 and 2016. A "Stimulator Box," which produces electric stimuli identical to those provided by a CI, and an evoked potential recording equipment were used. The results obtained with monopolar and bipolar electrodes were compared. RESULTS: RW eEABR recordings of 49 subjects (mean age, 34 years) were characterized by their stability and by having wave V between 3 and 5.5 ms. A higher percentage of responses were obtained on increasing the phase duration instead of the pulse amplitude. A significantly greater percentage of positive responses were obtained using bipolar stimulation than using monopolar stimulation (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using extracochlear electrical stimulation technique, described herein, and bipolar electrical stimulation probe allows for reliable and reproducible eEABR recordings in CI candidates.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Adult , Cochlear Implantation , Female , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/surgery , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Cochlear implantation can restore a certain degree of auditory impression of patients suffering from profound hearing loss or deafness. Furthermore, studies have shown that in case of residual hearing, patients benefit from the use of a hearing aid in addition to the cochlear implant. The presented studies aim at the improvement of this electromechanical stimulation (EMS) approach by substituting the external hearing aid by an internal stimulus provided by miniaturized piezoelectric actuators. Finite element analyses are performed in order to derive fundamental guidelines for the actuator layout aiming at maximal mechanical stimuli. Further analyses aim at investigating how the actuator position inside the cochlea influences the basilar membrane oscillation profile. While actuator layout guidelines leading to maximized acoustic stimuli could be derived, some of these guidelines are of complementary nature suggesting that further studies under realistic boundary conditions must be performed. Actuator positioning inside the cochlea is shown to have a significant influence on the resulting auditory impression of the patient. Based on the results, the main differences of external and internal stimulation of the cochlea mechanism are identified. It is shown that if the cochlea tonotopy is considered, the frequency selectivity resulting from the mechanical cochlea stimulus may be improved.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implants , Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted , Basilar Membrane/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Pressure , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , VibrationABSTRACT
Sustained local delivery of drugs to the inner ear may be required for future regenerative and protective strategies. The round window is surgically accessible and a promising delivery route. To be viable, a delivery system should not cause hearing loss. This study determined the effect on hearing of placing a drug-delivery microcatheter on to the round window, and delivering either artificial perilymph (AP) or brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) via this catheter with a mini-osmotic pump. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were monitored for 4 months after surgery, while the AP or BDNF was administered for the first month. The presence of the microcatheter - whether dry or when delivering AP or BDNF for 4 weeks - was associated with an increase in ABR thresholds of up to 15 dB, 16 weeks after implantation. This threshold shift was, in part, delayed by the delivery of BDNF. We conclude that the chronic presence of a microcatheter in the round window niche causes hearing loss, and that this is exacerbated by delivery of AP, and ameliorated temporarily by delivery of BDNF.
Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/administration & dosage , Catheterization/instrumentation , Catheters, Indwelling , Central Venous Catheters , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Hearing Loss/drug therapy , Hearing/drug effects , Round Window, Ear/drug effects , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Fatigue/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/drug effects , Guinea Pigs , Hearing Loss/diagnostic imaging , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Microscopy, Confocal , Perilymph/chemistry , Recovery of Function , Round Window, Ear/diagnostic imaging , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical CoherenceABSTRACT
Piston-stapedotomy is the most common method for hearing restoration in patients with otosclerosis. In this study, we have experimentally examined a prototype of a new chamber stapes prosthesis. The prototype was implanted in a human cadaver temporal bone. The round window vibrations before and after implantation were measured for the acoustic signal (90 dB SPL, 0.8-8 kHz) in the external auditory canal. In comparison with a 0.4-mm piston prosthesis, the chamber prosthesis induced significantly higher vibration of the round window, especially for frequencies above 1.5 kHz. Based on the results, it can be surmised that stapedotomy with a chamber stapes prosthesis could provide better hearing results in comparison with the piston-stapedotomy.
Subject(s)
Ossicular Prosthesis , Acoustic Stimulation , Cadaver , Equipment Design , Humans , Lactones , Otosclerosis/physiopathology , Otosclerosis/surgery , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/surgery , Stapes Surgery/instrumentation , Stapes Surgery/methods , Temporal Bone/physiopathology , Temporal Bone/surgeryABSTRACT
We present two minimally invasive microsurgical techniques in rodents for specific drug delivery into the middle ear so that it may reach the inner ear. The first procedure consists of perforation of the tympanic bulla, termed bullostomy; the second one is a transtympanic injection. Both emulate human clinical intratympanic procedures. Chitosan-glycerophosphate (CGP) and Ringer´s Lactate buffer (RL) were used as biocompatible vehicles for local drug delivery. CGP is a nontoxic biodegradable polymer widely used in pharmaceutical applications. It is a viscous liquid at RT but it congeals to a semi solid phase at body temperature. RL is an isotonic solution used for intravenous administrations in humans. A small volume of this vehicle is precisely placed on the Round Window (RW) niche by means of a bullostomy. A transtympanic injection fills the middle ear and allows less control but broader access to the inner ear. The safety profiles of both techniques were studied and compared by using functional and morphological tests. Hearing was evaluated by registering the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) before and several times after microsurgery. The cytoarchitecture and preservation level of cochlear structures were studied by conventional histological techniques in paraformaldehyde-fixed and decalcified cochlear samples. In parallel, unfixed cochlear samples were taken and immediately frozen to analyze gene expression profiles of inflammatory markers by quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). Both procedures are suitable as drug delivery methods into the mouse middle ear, although transtympanic injection proved to be less invasive compared to bullostomy.
Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Hearing Loss/therapy , Microsurgery/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Otologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Round Window, Ear/surgery , Tympanic Membrane/surgery , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Injections , Mice , Round Window, Ear/drug effects , Round Window, Ear/physiopathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of coupling between the floating mass transducer (FMT) and the round window membrane (RWM) in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss implanted with the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) device. The efficiency of direct and indirect coupling of the FMT to the RWM was compared by measuring differences between the initial prescription targets and the final settings of the VSB audio processor after fine-tuning. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Investigation of a group of subjects with either conductive or mixed hearing loss implanted with the VSB, a device that uses a FMT coupled to the RWM. There were two subgroups: subjects in which coupling was direct (no interposed material) or indirect (interposed material). The functional gain, insertion gain, and compression characteristics of the device were measured to assess the efficiency of coupling and to investigate the proximity of the fitting to prescriptive targets. RESULTS: Coupling for the subgroup with indirect coupling of the RWM was higher (better) than for the subgroup with direct coupling. The gain deviation from prescriptive targets was smaller for the subgroup with indirect coupling. CONCLUSIONS: The coupling method can have an effect on the coupling efficiency and the final electroacoustic settings of the device. The prescription targets were not accurate for the majority of subjects from either subgroup. Indirect coupling appears to provide more effective stimulation of the cochlea. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:2843-2849, 2017.
Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Conductive/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Conductive/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Ossicular Prosthesis , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Stimulation , Retrospective Studies , VibrationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: As a treatment for partial deafness with residual hearing in the lower frequency range, the combined acoustic and electric stimulation of the cochlea has become widespread. Acoustic stimulation is provided by a hearing aid's airborne sound and the electric stimulation by a cochlear implant electrode array, which may be inserted through the round window or a cochleostomy. To take advantage of that concept, it is essential to preserve residual hearing after surgery. Therefore, the intracochlear electrode array should not compromise the middle ear vibration transmission. This study investigates the influence of different electrode types and insertion paths on the middle ear transfer function and the inner ear fluid dynamics. DESIGN: Sound-induced oval and round window net volume velocities were calculated from vibration measurements with laser vibrometers on six nonfixated human temporal bones. After baseline measurements in the "natural" condition, a cochleostomy was drilled and closed with connective tissue. Then, four different electrode arrays were inserted through the cochleostomy. Afterwards, they were inserted through the round window while the cochleostomy was patched again with connective tissue. RESULTS: After having drilled a cochleostomy and electrode insertion, no systematic trends in the changes of oval and round window volume velocities were observed. Nearly all changes of middle ear transfer functions, as well as oval and round window volume velocity ratios, were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Intracochlear electrode arrays do not significantly increase cochlear input impedance immediately after insertion. Any changes that may occur seem to be independent of electrode array type and insertion path.
Subject(s)
Cochlea/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Oval Window, Ear/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Implants , Ear, Middle/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation , Hearing Aids , Humans , Postoperative PeriodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We compared the audiologic benefits of active middle ear implants with those of passive middle ear implants with hearing aids in mixed hearing loss, and also compared the outcomes of stapes vibroplasty with those of round window vibroplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with mixed hearing loss due to chronic otitis media were treated with a middle ear implant. Of these, 15 were treated with a passive middle ear implant (conventional ossiculoplasty with a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis), nine with an active middle ear implant coupling to the stapes, and 10 with an active middle ear implant coupling to the round window. Patients underwent pure-tone/free-field audiograms and speech discrimination tests before surgery and 6 months after surgery, and the results of these tests were compared. RESULTS: The active middle ear implant resulted in better outcomes than the passive middle ear implant with hearing aids at mid to high frequencies (P < .05). Patients who received either a stapes vibroplasty or a round window vibroplasty showed comparable hearing gain except at 8,000 Hz (48.9 dB vs. 31.0 dB, P < .05). Patients who received a stapes vibroplasty showed an improvement even in bone conduction at 1,000 Hz and 2,000 Hz (both P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Active middle ear implantation could be a better option than treatment with passive middle ear implants with hearing aids for achieving rehabilitation in patients with mixed hearing loss. Vibroplasty via either oval window or round window stimulation shares similar good results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 127:1435-1441, 2017.
Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Ossicular Prosthesis , Round Window, Ear/surgery , Stapes Surgery/methods , Adult , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Female , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Speech Discrimination Tests , Stapes/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
HYPOTHESIS: Applying neurotrophins to the round window immediately after a single noise exposure will prevent noise-induced hidden hearing loss. BACKGROUND: Loud noise can eliminate neural connections between inner hair cells and their afferent neurons (thereby diminishing sound perception) without causing a detectable change on audiogram. This phenomenon is termed hidden hearing loss. METHODS: Guinea pigs were exposed for 2âhours to 4 to 8âkHz noise at either 95 or 105âdB SPL. Immediately afterward a 4âµl bolus of neurotrophins (brain-derived neurotrophic factor 1âµg/µl, and neurotrophin-3 1âµg/µl) was delivered to the round window of one ear, and saline to the other. Auditory brainstem responses to pure-tone pips were acquired preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 weeks' postexposure. Cochleae were removed and whole mounted for immunohistochemical analysis, with presynaptic ribbons of inner hair cells and associated postsynaptic glutamatergic AMPA receptors identified using CtBP2 and GluA2 antibodies respectively. RESULTS: After exposure to 105âdB noise, threshold did not change, but the amplitude growth of the auditory brainstem response was significantly reduced in control ears in response to 16 and 32âkHz tones. The amplitude growth was also reduced neurotrophin ears, but to a lesser degree and the reduction was not significant. Similar results were obtained from control ears exposed to 95âdB, but amplitude growth recovered in neurotrophin-treated ears, this reaching statistical significance in response to 16âkHz tones. There were significantly more presynaptic ribbons, postsynaptic glutamate receptors, and colocalized ribbons after neurotrophin treatment. CONCLUSION: A single dose of neurotrophins delivered to the round window reduced synaptopathy and recovered high-frequency hearing in ears exposed to 95âdB noise. These findings suggest that hidden hearing loss may be reduced by providing trophic support to the cochlea after injury.
Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/pharmacology , Hair Cells, Auditory, Inner/pathology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/pathology , Neurotrophin 3/pharmacology , Round Window, Ear/drug effects , Animals , Auditory Threshold/drug effects , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Cochlea/physiopathology , Disease Models, Animal , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/drug effects , Guinea Pigs , Hair Cells, Auditory, Inner/drug effects , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/physiopathology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Current methods used to diagnose cochlear hearing loss are limited in their ability to determine the location and extent of anatomical damage to various cochlear structures. In previous experiments, we have used the electrical potential recorded at the round window -the cochlear response (CR) -to predict the location of damage to outer hair cells in the gerbil. In a follow-up experiment, we applied 10 mM ouabain to the round window niche to reduce neural activity in order to quantify the neural contribution to the CR. We concluded that a significant proportion of the CR to a 762 Hz tone originated from phase-locking activity of basal auditory nerve fibers, which could have contaminated our conclusions regarding outer hair cell health. However, at such high concentrations, ouabain may have also affected the responses from outer hair cells, exaggerating the effect we attributed to the auditory nerve. In this study, we lowered the concentration of ouabain to 1 mM and determined the physiologic effects on outer hair cells using distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. As well as quantifying the effects of 1 mM ouabain on the auditory nerve and outer hair cells, we attempted to reduce the neural contribution to the CR by using near-infrasonic stimulus frequencies of 45 and 85 Hz, and hypothesized that these low-frequency stimuli would generate a cumulative amplitude function (CAF) that could reflect damage to hair cells in the apex more accurately than the 762 stimuli. One hour after application of 1 mM ouabain, CR amplitudes significantly increased, but remained unchanged in the presence of high-pass filtered noise conditions, suggesting that basal auditory nerve fibers have a limited contribution to the CR at such low frequencies.
Subject(s)
Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer/physiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Cochlea/pathology , Cochlea/physiopathology , Cochlear Microphonic Potentials/drug effects , Cochlear Microphonic Potentials/physiology , Cochlear Nerve/drug effects , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Gerbillinae , Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer/drug effects , Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer/pathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/pathology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/drug effects , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Ouabain/administration & dosage , Round Window, Ear/drug effects , Round Window, Ear/physiology , Round Window, Ear/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation is now considered an important goal of surgery. However, studies indicate an average post-operative hearing loss of around 20 dB at low frequencies. One factor which may contribute to post-operative hearing loss, but which has received little attention in the literature to date, is the increased stiffness of the round window, due to the physical presence of the cochlear implant, and to its subsequent thickening or to bone growth around it. A finite element model was used to estimate that there is approximately a 100-fold increase in the round window stiffness due to a cochlear implant passing through it. A lumped element model was then developed to study the effects of this change in stiffness on the acoustic response of the cochlea. As the round window stiffness increases, the effects of the cochlear and vestibular aqueducts become more important. An increase of round window stiffness by a factor of 10 is predicted to have little effect on residual hearing, but increasing this stiffness by a factor of 100 reduces the acoustic sensitivity of the cochlea by about 20 dB, below 1 kHz, in reasonable agreement with the observed loss in residual hearing after implantation. It is also shown that the effect of this stiffening could be reduced by incorporating a small gas bubble within the cochlear implant.
Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Hearing , Round Window, Ear/physiopathology , Cochlea/surgery , Deafness/surgery , Finite Element Analysis , Gases , Hearing Loss/surgery , Hearing Tests , Humans , Round Window, Ear/surgeryABSTRACT
HYPOTHESIS: Round window reinforcement leads to conductive hearing loss. BACKGROUND: The round window is stiffened surgically as therapy for various conditions, including perilymphatic fistula and superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Round window reinforcement reduces symptoms in these patients. However, it also reduces fluid displacement in the cochlea and might therefore increase conductive hearing loss. METHODS: Perichondrium was applied to the round window membrane in nine fresh-frozen, nonpathologic temporal bones. In four temporal bones cartilage was applied subsequently. Acoustic stimuli in the form of frequency sweeps from 250 to 8000âHz were generated at 110âdB sound pressure level. A total of 16 frequencies in a 1/3-octave series were used. Stapes velocities in response to the acoustic stimuli were measured at equally spaced multiple points covering the stapes footplate using a scanning laser Doppler interferometry system. Measurements were made at baseline, after applying perichondrium, and after applying cartilage. RESULTS: At frequencies up to 1000âHz perichondrium reinforcement decreased stapes velocities by 1.5 to 2.9âdB compared with no reinforcement (p valueâ=â0.003). Reinforcement with cartilage led to a further deterioration of stapes velocities by 2.6 to 4.2âdB at frequencies up to 1000âHz (p valueâ=â0.050). The higher frequencies were not affected by perichondrium reinforcement (p valueâ=â0.774) or cartilage reinforcement (p valueâ=â0.644). CONCLUSION: Our results seem to suggest a modest, clinically negligible effect of reinforcement with perichondrium. Placing cartilage on the round window resulted in a graded effect on stapes velocities in keeping with the increased stiffness of cartilage compared with perichondrium. Even so, the effect was relatively small.