[Three Cases of Bilateral Metachronous Testicular Tumors].

We present three cases of bilateral metachronous testicular tumors. The patient in case 1 had a history of left orchiectomy for undescended testis at the age of 19. The pathological findings revealed germ cell neoplasia in situ. Twenty-four years later (age＝43), he was diagnosed with right testicular tumor with lymph node and lung metastasis (stage IIIc). Right orchiectomy was performed, and the pathological finding showed nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. He underwent chemotherapy, followed by lymph node dissection and lung metastasectomy. The patient in case 2 had a history of left orchiectomy for testicular tumor at the age of 41. The pathological finding of the left testis revealed seminoma (stage IA). Nineteen years later (age＝60), he was diagnosed with right testicular tumor and underwent right orchiectomy. Herein, the pathological finding showed seminoma (stage IA). The patient in case 3 had a history of right orchiectomy for testicular tumor at the age of 25. The pathological findings revealed seminoma (stage IS), and he underwent adjuvant radiation of the para-aortic field without subsequent recurrence. Fourteen years later (age＝39), he was diagnosed with left testicular tumor and underwent left orchiectomy. The pathological finding revealed seminoma (stage IB). The patient underwent adjuvant carboplatin monotherapy to prevent recurrence. Due to the long interval between the occurrence of bilateral metachronous testicular tumors (mean＝19 years ; three cases), long-term observation is necessary to detect the possible occurrence of contralateral testicular tumors. Contralateral testicular biopsy might be considered at the time of orchiectomy for unilateral testicular tumor if associated with testicular atrophy and/or a history of undescended testis.

Simultaneous granular cell tumor and seminoma in the descended testis of a cryptorchid rabbit.

Testicular tumors are rarely reported in rabbits. In this case study, a 4-year-old Holland lop rabbit, previously diagnosed with unilateral cryptorchidism, was presented because of enlargement of the descended testis. The rabbit was clinically normal. Following unilateral orchiectomy and scrotal ablation, histopathological analysis revealed 2 distinct types of testicular tumor in the descended testis: a granular cell tumor and a seminoma. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first documented report of simultaneous testicular tumors in the testis of a rabbit with unilateral cryptorchidism.

Tumeur à cellules granulaires et séminome simultanés dans le testicule descendu d'un lapin cryptorchideLes tumeurs testiculaires sont rarement rapportées chez le lapin. Dans cette étude de cas, un lapin Holland Lop de 4 ans, précédemment diagnostiqué avec une cryptorchidie unilatérale, a été présenté en raison d'une hypertrophie du testicule descendu. Le lapin était cliniquement normal. Après orchidectomie unilatérale et ablation scrotale, l'analyse histopathologique a révélé 2 types distincts de tumeur testiculaire dans le testicule descendu : une tumeur à cellules granuleuses et un séminome. À la connaissance de l'auteur, il s'agit du premier rapport documenté de tumeurs testiculaires simultanées dans le testicule d'un lapin atteint de cryptorchidie unilatérale.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Seminoma-associated orbitopathy mimicking thyroid-associated orbitopathy: report of a case and literature review.

The authors describe a case of bilateral diffuse paraneoplastic orbital myositis induced by a stage IA left testicular pure seminoma. The patient presented with findings typical of thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO) and was thought to have TAO until discovery of the malignancy. Treatment included an urgent orchiectomy, as well as 7 weeks of therapeutic plasma exchange. This is the fifth reported case of seminoma-associated orbitopathy, and the second to occur while cancer was in the occult phase. Although seminoma-associated orbitopathy is exceedingly rare, it can masquerade as TAO and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any young male with atypical TAO findings.

Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II A/B Seminomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are considered standard treatments for stage II seminoma patients; however, these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has emerged as an alternative strategy, and the first three phase II trials were published in 2023 with promising results. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this surgery as an alternative treatment for stage IIA/B seminoma patients. PURPOSE: Seminomas are the most common testicular tumors, often affecting young adult males. Standard treatments for stage II seminomas include chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Thus, identifying alternative strategies is paramount. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for treating this condition. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating RPLND as a primary treatment for stage II A/B seminomas. Using a random-effects model, single proportion and means and pooled 2-year recurrence-free survival rates with hazard rates and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising 331 males with stage II seminomas. In the pooled analysis, the recurrence rate was 17.69% (95% CI 12.31-24.75), and the 2-year RFS rate was 81% (95% CI 0.77-0.86). The complication rate was 9.16% (95% CI 6.16-13.42), the Clavien-Dindo > 2 complication rate was 8.83% (95% CI 5.76-13.31), and the retrograde ejaculation rate was 7.01% (95% CI 3.54-13.40). The median operative time was 174.68 min (95% CI 122.17-249.76 min), median blood loss was 105.91 mL (95% CI 46.89-239.22 mL), and patients with no evidence of lymph node involvement ranged from 0-16%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary RPLNDs for treating stage IIA/B seminomas have favorable RFS rates, with low complication and recurrence rates. These findings provide evidence that this surgery is a viable alternative therapy for these patients.

Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular non-seminoma: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients with clinical stage I non-seminoma (CSI-NS) relapse. Current risk stratification is based on lymphovascular invasion (LVI) alone. The extent to which additional tumor characteristics can improve risk prediction remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI-NS patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based cohort study including all patients with CSI-NS diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 with follow-up until 2022. Patients were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histological slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Histological slides were reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. The association between prespecified potential prognostic factors and relapse was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration. RESULTS: Of 453 patients included, 139 patients (30.6%) relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Tumor invasion into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum, tumor size, LVI and embryonal carcinoma were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from < 5% to > 85%, depending on the number of risk factors. After internal model validation, the model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.75. Model calibration was excellent. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The identified prognostic factors provide a much more accurate risk stratification than current clinical practice, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage II seminoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and oncological effectiveness.

To evaluate the oncological outcomes and safety of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with clinical stage (CS) II seminomatous testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT). A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on July 2023 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The pooled recurrence rate and treatment-related complications were calculated using a random effects model. Overall 8 studies published between 1997 and 2023 including a total of 355 patients were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis with the overall median follow-up of 38 months. The overall and infield recurrence rate were 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.22) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.11), respectively. The overall pooled rate of ≥ Clavien Dindo grade III complications was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01-0.10); there was no significant heterogeneity (I^2 = 35.10%, P = 0.19). Antegrade ejaculation was preserved with the overall pooled rate of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00); there was no significant heterogeneity on Chi-square and I2 tests (I^2 = 0.00%, P = 0.58). Primary RPLND is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with CS II seminomatous TGCT resulting highly promising cure rates combined with low treatment-associated adverse events, at medium-term follow-up. However, owing to the lack of comparative studies to the current standard of care and the limited follow-up, individual decision must be made with the informed patient in a shared decision process together with a multidisciplinary team.

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as primary treatment for stage II seminoma germ cell tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, therapeutic avenues for patients with clinical stage II seminoma germ cell tumors (SGCT) were confined to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. While survival rates with these modalities are commendable, both entail substantial long-term morbidities. Furthermore, this youthful patient cohort exhibits elevated rates of secondary malignancies, surfacing decades post-successful primary cancer treatment (1). Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has emerged as a primary treatment consideration for individuals with low-volume metastatic seminoma (2-4). However, there is a dearth of video documentation illustrating the robotic assisted (RA) bilateral approach (5- 7). METHODS: We present the case of a 24-year-old male who underwent prior left orchiectomy for seminoma (pT1b). Despite negative serum tumor markers, a 1.7 x 1.4cm lymph node enlargement was identified in the aortic bifurcation after 4 months, classifying the patient as stage IIA per the IGCCCG risk classification. Subsequently, a RA bilateral template RPLND was performed due to the patient's refusal of chemotherapy, citing concerns about offspring. RESULTS: The surgery was performed, incorporating nerve sparing techniques, lasting 4h13minutes, an estimated bleeding rate of 400ml, without intraoperative complications. The patient was discharged within 24 hours of the procedure, following a prescribed low-fat diet. CONCLUSION: The patient experienced postoperative well-being, painlessness, and resumed work three weeks post-procedure. Preserved ejaculation was noted, and adjuvant therapy was performed with 2 cycles of EP due to the anatomopathological result. The feasibility of robotic primary RPLND for SGCT was demonstrated, showing reduced postoperative pain and early hospital discharge. Further studies are necessary to validate our findings regarding oncological, safety, and functional outcomes.

Ex-vivo microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction: step-by-step surgical technique at time of radical orchiectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the intraoperative surgical techniques required for simultaneous radical orchiectomy and microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction (m-OncoTESE) in a step-by-step fashion. DESIGN: Video presentation. SETTING: University Hospital (University of Chicago). PATIENTS: A 37-year-old man (status after right orchiectomy at another institution for stage II-C testicular seminoma with positive preoperative tumor markers) was referred for contralateral orchiectomy of multifocal left testis mass and fertility preservation. Semen analysis before, microscopic testicular sperm extraction during, and semen or testicular specimen analysis after the first orchiectomy were unable to identify any sperm. A postoperative analysis of the m-OncoTESE performed on the left testis resulted in the cryopreservation of 200,000 motile sperm for future assisted reproductive technology (i.e., in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection). INTERVENTIONS: Left radical orchiectomy and left m-OncoTESE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive visual documentation of m-OncoTESE surgical techniques with concurrent commentary detailing the reasons behind each surgical step. A brief discussion on the background of m-OncoTESE and alternative fertility preservation methods accompanies the procedure. RESULTS: This video provides a step-by-step guide to performing an m-OncoTESE (proceeding a radical orchiectomy in a patient with testicular cancer) as a means of fertility preservation in an azoospermic patient. Successful extraction and cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa were achieved after targeted ex-vivo testicular microdissection. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm extraction via m-OncoTESE is a viable option for azoospermic patients with testicular cancer undergoing radical orchiectomies. The use of preoperative imaging and microsurgical techniques facilitates and optimizes surgical dissection and sperm recovery.

Prognostic Factors for Relapse in Patients With Clinical Stage I Testicular Seminoma: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Approximately 20% of patients with clinical stage I seminoma relapse. Tumor size and rete testis invasion have been identified as risk factors for relapse. However, the level of evidence supporting the use of these risk factors in clinical decision making is low. Previous studies have been hampered by selection bias and variable pathology reporting that limit interpretation and generalization of results. We assessed prognostic factors for relapse in an unselected nationwide population-based setting with centralized pathology review. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage I seminoma diagnosed from January 2013 to December 2018 were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histologic slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved and reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records with follow-up until July 2022. The association between prespecified potential clinical and histopathologic prognostic factors and relapse was assessed by the use of Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 924 patients included, 148 (16%) patients relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Invasion of the testicular hilum (rete testis and hilar soft tissue), lymphovascular invasion, and elevated preorchiectomy levels of ß-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from 6% in patients with no risk factors to 62% in patients with all four risk factors with tumor extension into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum. After internal model validation, the prognostic model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.70. CONCLUSION: The provided prognostic factors could replace current risk factors in guidelines and be used in future studies investigating risk-adapted follow-up and treatment strategies.

Comparative cost-effectiveness of contemporary treatment strategies for stage IIA seminoma.

BACKGROUND: The Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma (SEMS) trial examined retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as first-line treatment for patients with isolated 1-3 cm retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. To date, the standard of care for these patients has been either chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the relative cost-effectiveness of these management strategies. METHODS: A microsimulation model assessed the cost-effectiveness of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage IIA seminoma. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection recurrence probabilities were obtained from the SEMS trial. All other probability and utility values were obtained from published literature. Primary outcomes included costs from a commercial insurer's perspective, effectiveness (quality adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. RESULTS: At a lifetime horizon, the mean costs per patient for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were $58 469, $98 783, and $104 096, and the mean QALYs were 40.61, 40.70, and 39.15, respectively. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was found to be the most cost-effective approach because of high costs and accrued disutility of chronic toxicities associated with radiotherapy (cost-effectiveness ratios = $433 845/QALY) and chemotherapy (dominated). On 1-way sensitivity analyses, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was no longer cost-effective if the probabilities of infertility and cardiovascular toxicity after radiotherapy were less than 13% and 16%, respectively, or if the 2-year probability of progression after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was more than 26%. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was the most cost-effective treatment approach for stage IIA seminoma. These findings support clinical guideline consideration of including retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a treatment option for well-selected patients with stage IIA seminoma.

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IIA/B Metastatic Seminoma: Results of the COlogne Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy In Metastatic Seminoma (COTRIMS).

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy are recommended treatment options in marker-negative clinical stage (CS) IIA/B seminoma. Despite high cure rates of 82-94%, both therapeutic options are associated with significant long-term toxicities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, oncological efficacy, and treatment-associated morbidity of primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) in CS IIA/B seminoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, single-arm, clinical phase 2 trial including CS IIA/B seminoma patients was conducted. INTERVENTION: Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relapse-free and overall survival, surgery-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and Kaplan-Meier methods for survival calculation were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty patients at a mean age of 39.1 (34-52) yr with marker-negative CS IIA and IIB seminomas were recruited. The median follow-up was 22 (8-30) mo. Nineteen (63%) and 11 (36%) patients were diagnosed with stages IIA and B, respectively, at the time of primary diagnosis. Fourteen (47%) and 16 (53%) patients were diagnosed with CS IIA and IIB, respectively, at the time of nsRPLND. Twenty-seven and three patients underwent open and robot-assisted nsRPLND, respectively. The median operating room time was 125 (115-145) min, median blood loss was <150 ml, and median time of hospitalization was 4.5 (3-9) d. Four (13%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 3a complications. Lymph node histology revealed seminoma in 25 (80%) patients; two and three patients demonstrated embryonal carcinoma and benign disease, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent a serum analysis of miR371 preoperatively, which predicted metastatic disease in 12/13 and benign histology in 3/3 patients. Three of 30 (10%) patients developed an outfield relapse 4, 6, and 9 mo postoperatively and were salvaged by systemic chemotherapy. Limitations are the low patient number and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The nsRPLND approach results in a high cure rate at midterm follow-up and is associated with a low frequency of treatment-associated morbidities, making this approach a feasible alternative to radiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: The standard treatment of clinical stage IIA/B seminomas is radiation therapy or chemotherapy, which results in a significantly increased frequency of long-term toxicity and secondary neoplasms. In this trial, we demonstrate that nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a feasible therapeutic approach with low morbidity and high oncological efficacy.

Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Seminoma Metastatic to the Retroperitoneum.

PURPOSE: Primary surgical treatment with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection aims to accurately stage and treat patients with node-positive pure seminoma while avoiding long-term risks of chemotherapy or radiation, traditional standard-of-care treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reported the pathologic and oncologic outcomes of patients with pure seminoma treated with primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a retrospective, single-institution case series over 10 years. The primary outcome was 2-year recurrence-free survival stratified by adjuvant management strategy (surveillance vs adjuvant chemotherapy). RESULTS: Forty-five patients treated with primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for pure testicular seminoma metastatic to the retroperitoneum were identified. Median size of largest lymph node before surgery was 1.8 cm. Viable germ cell tumor, all of which was pure seminoma, was found in 96% (n=43) of patients. The median number of positive nodes and nodes removed was 2 and 54, respectively. Median positive pathologic node size was 2 cm (IQR 1.4-2.5 cm, range 0.1-5 cm). Four of 29 patients managed with postoperative surveillance experienced relapse; 2-year recurrence-free survival was 81%. Median follow-up for those managed with surveillance who did not relapse was 18.5 months. There were no relapses in the retroperitoneum, visceral recurrences, or deaths. Among the 16 patients who received adjuvant treatment, 1 patient experienced relapse in the pelvis at 19 months. CONCLUSIONS: Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for pure seminoma with low-volume metastases to the retroperitoneum is safe and effective, allowing most patients to avoid long-term toxicities from chemotherapy or radiation.

Outcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients: an analysis of the IGCCCG Update database.

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance after orchiectomy is the preferred management in clinical stage I (CSI) germ-cell tumours (GCT) associated with a 15 to 30% relapse rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IGCCCG Update database, we compared the outcomes of gonadal disseminated GCT relapsing from initial CSI to outcomes of patients with de novo metastatic GCT. RESULTS: A total of 1014 seminoma (Sem) [298 (29.4%) relapsed from CSI, 716 (70.6%) de novo] and 3103 non-seminoma (NSem) [626 (20.2%) relapsed from CSI, 2477 (79.8%) de novo] were identified. Among Sem, no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients relapsing from CSI and de novo metastatic disease [5-year progression-free survival (5y-PFS) 87.6% versus 88.5%; 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) 93.2% versus 96.1%). Among NSem, PFS and OS were higher overall in relapsing CSI patients (5y-PFS 84.6% versus 80.0%; 5y-OS 93.3% versus 88.7%), but there were no differences within the same IGCCCG prognostic groups (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.70-1.12). Relapses in the intermediate or poor prognostic groups occurred in 11/298 (4%) Sem and 112/626 (18%) NSem. CONCLUSION: Relapsing CSI GCT patients expect similar survival compared to de novo metastatic patients of the same ICCCCG prognostic group. Intermediate and poor prognosis relapses from initial CSI expose patients to unnecessary toxicity from more intensive treatments.

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for seminoma: Limitations of surgical intervention after first-line chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Patients with relapsed seminoma after first-line chemotherapy can be treated with salvage chemotherapy or postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND). Based on prior experience, surgical management can have worse efficacy and increased morbidity compared to nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Our aim was to characterize the surgical efficacy and difficulty in highly selected patients with residual disease after first-line chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Indiana University testis cancer database was queried to identify men who underwent PC-RPLND for seminoma between January 2011 and December 2021. Included patients underwent first-line chemotherapy and had evidence of retroperitoneal disease progression. RESULTS: We identified 889 patients that underwent PC-RPLND, of which only 14 patients were operated on for seminoma. One patient was excluded for lack of follow-up. Out of 13 patients, only 3 patients were disease free with surgery only. Median follow up time was 29.9 months (interquartile ranges : 22.6-53.7). Two patients died of disease. The remaining 8 patients were treated successfully with salvage chemotherapy. During PC-RPLND, 4 patients required nephrectomy, 1 patient required an aortic graft, 2 patients required a partial ureterectomy, and 3 patients required partial or complete caval resection. CONCLUSION: The decision between salvage chemotherapy and PC-RPLND as second-line therapy can be challenging. Salvage chemotherapy is effective but is associated with short and long-term morbidity. Surgical efficacy in this setting seems to be limited, but careful selection of patients may lead to surgical success without affecting the ability to receive any systemic salvage therapies if necessary or causing life-threating morbidity.

The role of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage II seminoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stage II seminoma is responsive to chemo- or radiotherapy with a progression-free survival of 87-95% at 5 years but at the cost of short- and long-term toxicity. After evidence about these long-term morbidities emerged, four surgical cohorts investigating the role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for stage II disease were initiated. RECENT FINDINGS: Currently, two RPLND series have been published as a complete report, while data from other series have only been published as congress abstracts. In series without adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence rates ranged from 13% to 30% after follow-ups of 21-32 months. In those receiving RPLND and adjuvant chemotherapy, the recurrence rate was 6% after a mean follow-up of 51 months. Across all trials, recurrent disease was treated with systemic chemotherapy (22/25), surgery (2/25), and radiotherapy (1/25). The rate of pN0 disease after RPLND varied between 4% and 19%. Postoperative complications were reported in 2-12%, while antegrade ejaculation was maintained in 88-95% of patients. Median length of stay ranged from 1 to 6 days. SUMMARY: In men with clinical stage II seminoma, RPLND is a safe and promising treatment option. Further research is needed to determine the risk of relapse and to personalize treatment options based on patient-specific risk factors.