Central Neuromodulators in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Why, How, and When.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is responsive to treatments using central neuromodulators. Central neuromodulators work by enhancing the synaptic transmission of 5-hydroxytryptamine, noradrenalin, and dopamine, achieving a slower regulation or desensitization of their postsynaptic receptors. Central neuromodulators act on receptors along the brain-gut axis, so they are useful in treating psychiatric comorbidities, modifying gut motility, improving central downregulation of visceral signals, and enhancing neurogenesis in patients with IBS. Choosing a central neuromodulator for treating IBS should be according to the pharmacological properties and predominant symptoms. The first-line treatment for pain management in IBS is using tricyclic antidepressants. An alternative for pain management is the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are useful when symptoms of anxiety and hypervigilance are dominant but are not helpful for treating abdominal pain. The predominant bowel habit is helpful when choosing a neuromodulator to treat IBS; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors help constipation, not pain, but may cause diarrhea; tricyclic antidepressants help diarrhea but may cause constipation. A clinical response may occur in 6-8 weeks, but long-term treatment (usually 6-12 months) is required after the initial response to prevent relapse. Augmentation therapy may be beneficial when the therapeutic effect of the first agent is incomplete or associated with side effects. It is recommended to reduce the dose of the first agent and add a second complementary treatment. This may include an atypical antipsychotic or brain-gut behavioral treatment. When tapering central neuromodulators, the dose should be reduced slowly over 4 weeks but may take longer when discontinuation effects occur.

Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Painful peripheral neuropathy is a common and challenging complication of diabetes mellitus. Combination therapy is used widely by clinicians, although strong evidence for efficacy and safety is lacking. The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of combination versus monotherapy of first-line medications for peripheral diabetic neuropathy. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched on December 5, 2022, for randomized clinical trials comparing combined therapy with gabapentinoids and either tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) versus monotherapy with any of these drugs. Pooled mean differences (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for pain outcomes, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale averaging pain scores in the last 7 days. Risk ratios (RRs) were computed for binary endpoints. Risk assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. RESULTS: A total of five randomized studies and 916 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 12 weeks. Mean pain reduction was greater for combination therapy than monotherapy (MD - 0.39; 95% CI - 0.67 to - 0.12; p = 0.005). Similarly, there was an improvement in ≥ 30% reduction in average pain (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.07-1.26; p < 0.01) with combination therapy. In contrast, there was no significant difference between groups in ≥ 50% reduction in average pain (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.99-1.49; p = 0.06). When comparing combination therapy versus gabapentinoid monotherapy, there was also a significant reduction in average pain (MD - 0.61; 95% CI - 0.85 to - 0.37; p < 0.01) with combination therapy. CONCLUSION: In patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the combination of gabapentinoids with TCAs or SNRIs is associated with a greater reduction in pain as compared with monotherapy, although this difference may not translate into a clinically important difference.

An update on the pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of dysthymic disorder: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Longer treatment times, more comorbidity, more severe impairments in social, psychological, and emotional functioning, increased healthcare use, and more hospitalizations are all factors that are related to dysthymia. Given the significant prevalence of dysthymia (including persistent depressive disorder) worldwide, its comorbidity with several mental disorders, and the detrimental effects of these comorbidities, it is important to conduct a systematic review to compare the effects of pharmacological acute and maintenance treatments for dysthymia with placebo and standard care in the last 10 years, based on the publication of DSM5. AREAS COVERED: This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to assess the effects of pharmacological acute and maintenance treatments for dysthymia in comparison with placebo and treatment as usual. EXPERT OPINION: Our review shows that SSRIs and SNRIs present efficacy for dysthymia treatment, and L-Acetylcarnitine should be investigated further for this condition in elderly patients. The comparison of antidepressant medication versus placebo showed coherent results based on three studies favoring pharmacotherapy as an effective treatment for participants with dysthymia. However, the scarcity of research on continuation and maintenance therapy in people with dysthymia highlights the need for more primary research.

Incidence of adverse events and comparative tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) show similar efficacy as treatments for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress-related disorders. Hence, comparisons of adverse event rates across medications are an essential component of clinical decision-making. We aimed to compare patterns of adverse events associated with SSRIs and SNRIs in the treatment of children and adults diagnosed with these disorders through a network meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane, websites of regulatory agencies, and international registers from inception to 09 September 2022, for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of SSRIs or SNRIs. We analyzed the proportion of participants experiencing at least one adverse event and incidence rates of 17 specific adverse events. We estimated incidence rates and odds ratios through network meta-analysis with random effects and three-level models. We analyzed 799 outcome measures from 80 studies (n = 21 338). Participants in medication groups presented higher rates of adverse events (80.22%, 95% CI 76.13-83.76) when compared to placebo groups (71.21%, 67.00-75.09). Nausea was the most common adverse event (25.71%, CI 23.96-27.54), while weight change was the least common (3.56%, 1.68-7.37). We found higher rates of adverse events of medications over placebo for most medications, except sertraline and fluoxetine. We found significant differences between medications for overall tolerability and for autonomic, gastrointestinal, and sleep-related symptoms. Adverse events are a common reason that patients discontinue SSRIs and SNRIs. Results presented here guide clinical decision-making when clinicians weigh one medication over another. This might improve treatment acceptability and compliance.

Monitoramento do horizonte tecnológico: Medicamentos para o tratamento do transtorno depressivo maior / Monitoring the technological horizon: Drugs for the treatment of major depressive disorder

A DOENÇA: O transtorno depressivo maior (TDM) é considerado um grave problema de saúde pública que afeta mais de 264 milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo (1). No Brasil, a prevalência nacional da depressão estimada pelo Global Burden of Disease 2017 foi de 3,3% e esta condição está entre as quatro principais causas de invalidez, afetando a produtividade e qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Nas populações vulneráveis como os idosos, esse número é significativamente maior, uma revisão sistemática publicada em 2019 estimou uma prevalência de 21,9% em idosos brasileiros residentes na comunidade. Segundo projeções da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) para 2030, a depressão ocuparia o primeiro lugar entre as principais doenças incapacitantes. TRATAMENTO RECOMENDADO: Atualmente não existem Protocolos Clínicos e Diretrizes Terapêuticas (PCDT) do Ministério da Saúde, bem como avaliações da Conitec sobre esse tema. O tratamento da TDM depende da gravidade da doença, nos indivíduos com depressão grave, em que há risco de suicídio, o encaminhamento para o especialista deve ser imediato e a hospitalização pode ser um recurso necessário. Nos casos moderados, em geral, se sugere a combinação de psicoterapia e medicamentos antidepressivos, sendo que diversas classes são consideradas opções terapêuticas, como Inibidores seletivos da recaptação da serotonina; Inibidores seletivos da recaptação da noradrenalina; Antidepressivos atípicos; Moduladores da serotonina; Antidepressivos tricíclicos; Inibidores da monoaminoxidase. ESTRATÉGIA DE BUSCA: Uma busca no repositório de protocolos de estudos clínicos ClinicalTrials.gov foi realizada com o objetivo de localizar os medicamentos em fase de pesquisa clínica e/ou recentemente aprovados para TDM. Foram excluídos medicamentos com registro na Anvisa superior a dois anos para a indicação de depressão maior, assim como procedimentos, produtos da medicina tradicional chinesa, vitaminas e testes diagnósticos. MEDICAMENTOS APROVADOS RECENTEMENTE: ESCETAMINA SPRAY NASAL: A escetamina, o enantiômero "S" da cetamina racêmica, é um antagonista não seletivo, não competitivo do receptor N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA), que atua como um modulador do receptor de glutamato, o que parece aumentar a sinalização entre as células, restaurando a função normal nas regiões cerebrais. Embora a ligação da escetamina ao receptor NMDA aumente o glutamato do sistema nervoso central (SNC), o mecanismo de ação exato como antidepressivo permanece incerto. Esse medicamento possui registro nas agências norte-americana e europeia (FDA e EMA) e, em dezembro de 2020, foi aprovado pela Anvisa para tratamento do TDM em pacientes com ideação suicida e de depressão resistente ao tratamento. Depressão resistente ao tratamento: MEDICAMENTOS EM FASE DE PESQUISA CLÍNICA: RAPASTINEL: O rapastinel (GLYX-13) é um anticorpo monoclonal com apresentação para administração endovenosa, que atua como agonista parcial funcional do receptor de N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA) com ação no sistema glutamatérgico. INFORMAÇÕES ADICIONAIS: Atualmente existem diferentes tecnologias sendo estudadas para o tratamento de TDM, sendo que neste informe, foram descritas as tecnologias que estão em um horizonte mais próximo para aprovação por agências regulatórias ou foram aprovadas pela Anvisa recentemente. A escetamina spray nasal e brexpiprazol foram aprovados pela Anvisa em 2020, com o objetivo de avaliar a incorporação dessas tecnologias no mundo, uma busca foi realizada em novembro de 2021 nos websites das agências de ATS do Reino Unido, Canadá e Austrália. CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS O TDM: é um grave problema de saúde pública por afetar milhões de pessoas em todo o mundo. Apesar de haver muitos estudos em andamento para o tratamento dessa condição clínica, em geral os resultados dos estudos demonstraram que não há diferença significativa na eficácia dos medicamentos quando comparados ao placebo. O rapastinel, que recebeu designação Breakthough Therapy pela FDA em 2016, caracterizando-o como medicamento inovador para uma necessidade médica não atendida e que teria prioridade para avaliação na FDA, apresentou resultados promissores para estudo de fase 2, entretanto eles não foram confirmados nos ECR fase 3, duplo-cego, controlados por placebo, tanto em monoterapia como tratamento adjuvante para TDM. O medicamento REL-1017 (ou d-metadona), também é um inibidor do receptor NMDA e recebeu designação FastTrack pela FDA em 2017 para o tratamento adjuvante de TDM. Apesar dos dados do estudo de fase 2 mostrarem resultados promissores, o estudo de fase 3 ainda está em andamento. Também, esperam-se os dados das diversas pesquisas fase 3, realizadas em diferentes cenários (adjuvante ou monoterapia, por exemplo), e que avaliaram o medicamento SAGE-217, um modulador do receptor GABA que mostrou resultados positivos no estudo fase 2. O brexpiprazol foi aprovado pela Anvisa em 2020, indicado para o tratamento de depressão maior em adultos em associação a um antidepressivo, em caso de inefetividade da monoterapia com antidepressivo anterior. Os ensaios clínicos randomizados fase 3 avaliaram que o uso do medicamento reduziu o escore basal de MADRS na semana 6. O brexipiprazol para tratamento de depressão não foi avaliado por nenhuma agência de ATS até o momento. A escetamina spray nasal teve registro sanitário aprovado pela Anvisa em novembro de 2020 para pacientes com ideação suicida e de depressão resistente ao tratamento - a partir da avaliação da redução do escore basal de MADRS em 24h e após 28 dias. Mas esse medicamento não foi recomendado para incorporação pelas agências de ATS do Reino Unido e Canadá. Os medicamentos em desenvolvimento para depressão incluem populações específicas e frequentemente são usados em associação a outros antidepressivos. O tratamento da depressão grave e não responsiva a tratamentos prévios ainda é uma necessidade médica não atendida, assim como tratamentos específicos para populações vulneráveis como idosos. Também é importante destacar que todos os resultados descritos neste documento são dados precoces e devem ser avaliados com cautela. Dessa maneira, considerando os estudos de fase 3 citados neste documento, conclui-se que ainda são poucas as opções promissoras em estudo para um horizonte de curto a médio prazo.

Drug-induced tremor, clinical features, diagnostic approach and management.

Tremor is the most common movement disorder and there are numerous causes of tremor. In many individuals, tremor can be due to drugs. The most common drugs associated with tremor include amiodarone, selective serotonin (and norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs), amitriptyline, lithium, valproate, ß-adrenoceptor agonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, VMAT2 inhibitors, or drugs of abuse: ethanol, cocaine, etc. Drug-induced tremor usually resembles essential or parkinsonian tremor, depending on the offending drug; however, features such as unilateral, task-specific, position-dependent tremor or sudden onset, distractibility, entrainment and arrest with contralateral movements suggest etiologies such as dystonic or functional (psychogenic) tremor. Risk factors for drug-induced tremor include polypharmacy, male gender, older age, high doses and immediate-release preparations or reaching toxic levels of the offending drugs. Drug-induced tremor usually resolves once the offending medication is discontinued, however, persistent tremor may be observed in some cases (tardive tremor). In this manuscript, we discuss the most common causes of drug-induced tremor. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: A 3-level network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress-related disorders frequently co-occur, and patients often present symptoms of several domains. Treatment involves the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), but data on comparative efficacy and acceptability are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy of SSRIs, SNRIs, and placebo in multiple symptom domains in patients with these diagnoses over the lifespan through a 3-level network meta-analysis. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We searched for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials that aimed to assess the efficacy of SSRIs or SNRIs in participants (adults and children) with diagnosis of any anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, or stress-related disorder in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 23 April 2015, with an update on 11 November 2020. We supplemented electronic database searches with manual searches for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials registered in publicly accessible clinical trial registries and pharmaceutical companies' databases. No restriction was made regarding comorbidities with any other mental disorder, participants' age and sex, blinding of participants and researchers, date of publication, or study language. The primary outcome was the aggregate measure of internalizing symptoms of these disorders. Secondary outcomes included specific symptom domains and treatment discontinuation rate. We estimated standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 3-level network meta-analysis with random slopes by study for medication and assessment instrument. Risk of bias appraisal was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017069090). We analyzed 469 outcome measures from 135 studies (n = 30,245). All medications were more effective than placebo for the aggregate measure of internalizing symptoms (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.51, p < 0.001), for all symptom domains, and in patients from all diagnostic categories. We also found significant results when restricting to the most used assessment instrument for each diagnosis; nevertheless, this restriction led to exclusion of 72.71% of outcome measures. Pairwise comparisons revealed only small differences between medications in efficacy and acceptability. Limitations include the moderate heterogeneity found in most outcomes and the moderate risk of bias identified in most of the trials. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that all SSRIs and SNRIs were effective for multiple symptom domains, and in patients from all included diagnostic categories. We found minimal differences between medications concerning efficacy and acceptability. This three-level network meta-analysis contributes to an ongoing discussion about the true benefit of antidepressants with robust evidence, considering the significantly larger quantity of data and higher statistical power when compared to previous studies. The 3-level approach allowed us to properly assess the efficacy of these medications on internalizing psychopathology, avoiding potential biases related to the exclusion of information due to distinct assessment instruments, and to explore the multilevel structure of transdiagnostic efficacy.

Venlafaxine-induced damage to seminiferous epithelium, spermiation, and sperm parameters in rats: A correlation with high estrogen levels.

BACKGROUND: Venlafaxine (selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) use has increased worldwide. However, the impact of venlafaxine on testes and sperm parameters has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated venlafaxine impact on testicular and sperm parameters and verified whether the changes are reversible. METHODS: Animals from venlafaxine-35 days and venlafaxine-65 days groups received 30 mg/kg of venlafaxine for 35 days. Control-35 days and control-65 days received distilled water. In control-65 days and venlafaxine-65 days, the treatment was interrupted for 30 days. Sperm concentration, morphology, motility, and mitochondrial activity were analyzed. Number of step 19 spermatids (NLS), frequency of tubules with spermiation failure, Sertoli cells number, and TUNEL-positive germ cells were quantified. Testicular aromatase, connexin 43 (Cx43) immunoexpression, Cx43 protein levels, and Cx43 expression were evaluated. Either intratesticular testosterone or estrogen levels were measured. RESULTS: Venlafaxine impaired sperm morphology, reduced sperm concentration, mitochondrial activity, and sperm motility. The frequency of tubules with spermiation failure and NLS increased in parallel to increased Cx43 immunoexpression; mRNA and protein levels; and aromatase, testosterone, and estrogen levels. An increase in germ cell death and decreased Sertoli cells number were observed. In venlafaxine-65 days, except for sperm motility, mitochondrial activity, Sertoli cells number, and germ cell death, all other parameters were partially or totally recovered. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine increases testosterone aromatization and Cx43. This drug, via high estrogen levels, disturbs Sertoli cells, induces germ cell death, and impairs spermiation and sperm parameters. The restoration of spermiation associated with the decreased Cx43 and hormonal levels in venlafaxine-65 days reinforces that high estrogen levels are related to venlafaxine-induced changes. The presence of damaged Sertoli cells, germ cell death, and low sperm motility in venlafaxine-65 days indicates that interruption of treatment for 30 days was insufficient for testicular recovery and points to a long-term estrogen impact on the seminiferous epithelium.

Spontaneous Ejaculation Due to Duloxetine: A Case Report

ABSTRACT Ejaculation is controlled by both the sympathetic and parasympathetic system and consists of an emission and expulsion phase. Ejaculation latency time is regulated by the sympathetic system. Hypothetically, by reducing ejaculatory latency time, spontaneous ejaculation can occur. Extending the duration of ejaculation is a well-known side effect of antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors. Adrenergic drugs are sometimes used as treatment for delayed ejaculation. A spontaneous ejaculation due to the use of these drugs has rarely been reported. Although most reports of spontaneous ejaculations are related to the use of venlafaxine and reboxetine, this study is based on a case of the side effect of duloxetine.

In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation for Desvenlafaxine Succinate Monohydrate Extended Release Tablets.

The objective of this study was to develop a dissolution test in order to establish an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) model for desvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate (DVSM) extended release (ER) tablets. The in vitro release characteristics of the drug were determined using USP apparatus 1 at 75 rpm, with volume of HCl pH 1.2, acetate buffer solution (ABS) pH 4.5, or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) pH 6.8. In vivo plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy volunteers were obtained from a bioequivalence study. The similarity factors f1 and f2 were used to compare the dissolution data. The IVIVC model was developed using fraction dissolved and fraction absorbed of the reference product. For predictability, the results showed that the percentage prediction error (%PE) value of Cmax was 7.63%. The observed low prediction error for Cmax demonstrated that the IVIVC model was valid for this parameter.

Adjunctive vortioxetine for SSRI-resistant major depressive disorder: a real-world chart review study

Objective: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the cornerstone of treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, non-response is common, often necessitating combination strategies. The present study assessed the efficacy of vortioxetine as an add-on therapy in patients with SSRI-resistant MDD. Methods: The charts of 36 adult outpatients with DSM-IV-TR MDD who had not achieved a response after at least 8 weeks of treatment with an SSRI were reviewed retrospectively. Subjects were treated with vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day) for 8 weeks added to the current SSRI. The main outcome measures were change from baseline in total Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score and the rate of response (a 50% or greater reduction in HAM-D score and a Clinical Global Impression ‐ Improvement module [CGI-I] score of 1 or 2 at endpoint). HAM-D scores ≤ 7 were considered as remission. Additional outcome measures included the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and the Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). Results: 32 patients completed the 8 weeks of treatment. At 8 weeks, a significant reduction in HAM-D score was observed (p ≤ 0.001), with response obtained by 41.7% and remission by 33.3% of patients. Significant reductions in SHAPS and SSI were also observed (p ≤ 0.001 for both scales). Conclusions: Adjunctive vortioxetine may be useful and well-tolerated in stage I treatment-resistant depression. However, the limitations of this study (such as small sample size, absence of randomization and control group, retrospective design, etc.) must be considered.

Adjunctive vortioxetine for SSRI-resistant major depressive disorder: a "real-world" chart review study.

OBJECTIVE: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the cornerstone of treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, non-response is common, often necessitating combination strategies. The present study assessed the efficacy of vortioxetine as an add-on therapy in patients with SSRI-resistant MDD. METHODS: The charts of 36 adult outpatients with DSM-IV-TR MDD who had not achieved a response after at least 8 weeks of treatment with an SSRI were reviewed retrospectively. Subjects were treated with vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day) for 8 weeks added to the current SSRI. The main outcome measures were change from baseline in total Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score and the rate of response (a 50% or greater reduction in HAM-D score and a Clinical Global Impression - Improvement module [CGI-I] score of 1 or 2 at endpoint). HAM-D scores ≤ 7 were considered as remission. Additional outcome measures included the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and the Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). RESULTS: 32 patients completed the 8 weeks of treatment. At 8 weeks, a significant reduction in HAM-D score was observed (p ≤ 0.001), with response obtained by 41.7% and remission by 33.3% of patients. Significant reductions in SHAPS and SSI were also observed (p ≤ 0.001 for both scales). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive vortioxetine may be useful and well-tolerated in stage I treatment-resistant depression. However, the limitations of this study (such as small sample size, absence of randomization and control group, retrospective design, etc.) must be considered.

Sibutramina para o tratamento dos pacientes com obesidade / Sibutramine for the treatment of patients with obesity

DEMANDANTE:Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde (SCTIE/MS) e Associação Brasileira para o Estudo da Obesidade e Síndrome Metabólica (Abeso) Pergunta - A sibutramina é eficaz e segura no tratamento de pacientes adultos com obesidade, refratária ao tratamento não farmacológico e que não apresentem doença cardiovascular? TECNOLOGIA : Cloridrato de sibutramina monoidratado. EVIDÊNCIAS CIENTÍFICAS: No relatório elaborado pela SCTIE/MS foram incluídos 14 estudos, sendo três revisões sistemáticas, dez ensaios clínicos randomizados e uma coorte. As três revisões sistemáticas foram avaliadas como alto risco de viés. Os ensaios clínicos incluídos foram avaliados pela ferramenta do risco de viés da Cochrane, sendo a maioria classificados como alto risco ou risco incerto, enquanto a coorte teve baixo risco, de acordo com as respectivas ferramentas de avaliação. Na análise crítica do Dossiê Técnico elaborado pela Abeso foram incluídas 14 publicações, sendo dez ensaios clínicos randomizados e três estudos de coorte. De toda a evidência apresentada por ambos os demandantes, a sibutramina se mostrou eficaz na redução do peso com significância clínica, do índice de massa corporal e da circunferência abdominal, principalmente frente ao placebo e a curto e médio prazo. A longo prazo, há evidências que apontam para um reganho de peso e uma baixa persistência. Na maioria dos estudos, a sibutramina foi utilizada concomitantemente à recomendação de mudança de hábitos alimentares e comportamentais. Os principais eventos adversos relacionados com o uso da sibutramina foram boca seca, constipação e insônia. Aumento da pressão arterial e de batimentos cardíacos também foram relatados, mas em um quantitativo menor. Tanto os ensaios clínicos randomizados quanto os estudos de coorte incluídos na análise crítica apresentaram alto risco ou risco incerto de viés. AVALIAÇÃO ECONÔMICA: No relatório elaborado pela SCTIE/MS, a ACE foi construída utilizando dados do SIGTAP referentes aos custos estimados com tratamento convencional oferecido aos pacientes adultos obesos. O custo anual da sibutramina por paciente foi calculado considerando a média do custo dos tratamentos nas diferentes posologias, totalizando um custo médio anual de R$ 532,10. Não foram encontrados no SIGTAP procedimentos relacionados ao tratamento convencional, dieta e exercício físico, assim, estes custos foram considerados como nulos. O desfecho de efetividade considerado na avaliação foi a proporção de pacientes que alcançou a perda de pelo menos 10% do peso corpóreo (perda de peso clinicamente significante), obtida por meio da meta-análise de proporção dos estudos incluídos na revisão de Rucker et al., 2007 e no estudo de Halpern et al., 2002. Assim, a razão de custo-efetividade incremental foi de R$ R$ 3.130,00 para que um paciente alcance uma redução de pelo menos 10% no peso corpóreo, em relação ao tratamento convencional. No Dossiê Técnico elaborado pela Abeso, a razão de custo-efetividade incremental se mostrou favorável ao uso da sibutramina frente ao tratamento não farmacológico disponível no SUS (uma economia de R$ 602,35). Após a análise de sensibilidade, o tratamento da obesidade com sibutramina durante 12 meses permaneceu sendo uma estratégia dominante em 44,97% das simulações (menor custo e maior efetividade). Porém, no Dossiê Técnico, as incertezas e as limitações nos parâmetros e premissas adotados nestas avaliações, somados a impossibilidade de conferência e a reprodução dos cálculos utilizados, podem estar sub ou superestimando a estimativa obtida. AVALIAÇÃO DE IMPACTO ORÇAMENTÁRIO: No relatório elaborado pela SCTIE/MS, para estimar o custo do tratamento foram consideradas as apresentações farmacêuticas registradas na ANVISA, cápsulas de 10 e 15 mg. Os custos assumidos nessa análise foram restritos aos de aquisição do medicamento. Como não foram encontrados dados na literatura sobre a porcentagem de indivíduos que utilizam a posologia de 10 e 15 mg por dia, optou-se por fazer seis cenários, um no qual todos os indivíduos utilizavam a posologia de 10 mg por dia, outro em que todos os participantes utilizavam 15 mg/dia e mais um em que metade dos participantes utilizava a posologia de 10 mg. Finalmente, outros três, nos quais cada um excluía algum tipo de população com contraindicação (pacientes com doenças cardiovasculares, com diabetes e hipertensão arterial e com hipertensão descontrolada). A análise foi realizada para um horizonte temporal de cinco anos, assumindo-se um market share inicial de 30% para a sibutramina, com incrementos anuais no mesmo valor, chegando a 50% no quinto ano. Com isso, nestes seis cenários, a estimativa de impacto orçamentário decorrente da incorporação da sibutramina estaria entre R$ 3,3 a R$ 4,3 bilhões no primeiro ano de incorporação e de R$ 22,7 a R$ 29,6 bilhões em cinco anos de incorporação. Após a utilização do menor preço de compra pública praticado em um período de seis meses no ano corrente, de dados mais recentes da população elegível e mantendo as demais premissas dos cenários anteriores, a estimativa de impacto orçamentário decorrente da incorporação da sibutramina estaria entre R$ 1,4 a R$ 1,7 bilhões no primeiro ano de incorporação e de R$ 9,3 a R$ 11,8 bilhões em cinco anos. Outros três cenários propostos, mantendo o preço e a população total atualizada, excluindo os pacientes que realizaram cirurgias de redução de estômago, pacientes sem perda de peso significativa, taxa de persistência e difusão de mercado de 100%, além de considerar somente pacientes sem doenças cardiovasculares (exceto hipertensão) ou pacientes sem diabetes e hipertensão arterial ou pacientes sem hipertensão arterial descontrolada, os valores foram: R$ 6,4, R$ 5,6 e R$ 5,8 bilhões, respectivamente. No Dossiê Técnico elaborado pela Abeso, o impacto orçamentário em cinco anos variou de R$ 542,3 a R$ 902,5 milhões, considerando diferentes valores de efetividade. Variando a taxa de difusão e o maior e o menor valor de efetividade, os valores podem chegar a R$ 1,8 bilhões. Considerando os valores de eficácia da sibutramina, a redução na incidência dos casos de diabetes e descontando o valor da sibutramina, o impacto orçamentário variou de uma economia de R$ 769,5 milhões a R$ 2,9 bilhões. Contudo, no Dossiê Técnico da Abeso, as incertezas e as limitações nos parâmetros e premissas adotados na avaliação de impacto orçamentário, somados à impossibilidade de conferência e reprodução de alguns cálculos utilizados em sua elaboração, também podem estar sub ou superestimando a estimativa obtida, comprometendo a compreensão das consequências financeiras oriundas de uma provável incorporação da sibutramina no SUS. CONSIDERAÇÕES GERAIS: As evidências disponíveis sugerem que o tratamento com sibutramina para a redução do peso representa ganhos clinicamente relevantes para pacientes com obesidade. No entanto, fatores como a baixa qualidade metodológica dos estudos, a tendência de reganho de peso ao longo do tempo e de publicação de resultados positivos, um número considerável de eventos adversos e a persistência de uso que ainda gera dúvidas, agregam incertezas quanto ao benefício atribuído à sibutramina. Embora disponível no Brasil, a sibutramina não possui mais autorização para comercialização em muitos países. CONSULTA PÚBLICA: Foram recebidas 1421 contribuições, sendo 38 técnico-científicas e 1383 contribuições de experiência e opinião. A maioria discordou totalmente com a recomendação da Conitec, sendo os principais argumentos a eficácia e a segurança da sibutramina, a condição incapacitante da obesidade e que agrega riscos para outras comorbidades e a ausência de alternativas no SUS para o tratamento farmacológico destes pacientes. A Abeso e a Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia (SBEM) participaram da consulta pública e as suas considerações foram devidamente apreciadas e comentadas. RECOMENDAÇÃO FINAL: Os membros da Conitec presentes na 86ª reunião ordinária, deliberaram por recomendar a não incorporação da sibutramina para o tratamento dos pacientes com obesidade. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação nº 513/2020. DECISÃO: não incorporar a sibutramina para o tratamento dos pacientes com obesidade, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, conforme a Portaria nº 15, publicada no Diário Oficial da União nº 78, seção 1, página 221, em 24 de abril de 2020.

Assessment of sleep quality of patients with panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder during remission: a case-control study

Abstract Background Sleep disorders are common in psychiatric diseases. Panic disorder (PD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are two major anxiety disorders that are associated with sleep disorders. Objective We hypothesized that poor sleep quality continues in PD and GAD during remission. Therefore, in this study we aimed to compare the sleep quality of patients with PD and GAD to that of healthy controls. Methods The study included patients with PD (n = 42) and GAD (n = 40) who had been in remission for at least 3 months and healthy control volunteers (n = 45). The patients were administered the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Results The total PSQI scores of the GAD group were significantly increased in comparison to those of the PD (p = 0.009) and control (p < 0.001) groups. The rate of poor sleep quality in GAD during remission (77.5%) was greater than that of the PD (47.6%) and control (51.1%) groups (p = 0.011). Discussion GAD is a chronic and recurrent disease. In this study, it was found that the deterioration in sleep quality of patients with GAD may continue during remission. In the follow-up and treatment of patients, it is appropriate to question about sleep symptoms and to plan interventions according to these symptoms.

The Effect of Second-Generation Antidepressant Treatment on the Memory of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-analysis Study With Structural Equation Models.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been linked to episodic memory deficits that may be improved after pharmacological treatment, but it is unclear whether there is a class of antidepressants that is more effective than others to ameliorate these deficits in MDD. In addition, the possible effects of clinical and sociodemographic variables on the improvement of MDD memory deficits after pharmacological treatment are currently unknown. Our aims are to study the possible neuropsychological effects of second-generation antidepressant classes on the episodic memory of MDD patients and to study the potential effects of clinical and demographic variables as moderators of the effects of antidepressants on the memory of depressed patients through a meta-analysis approach. PROCEDURES: Nine articles were included in our study. A structural equation model meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Our results suggest that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonine-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors would bring about a substantial improvement in the memory of depressed patients, whereas other antidepressant classes would cause rather modest effects. Our results also suggest that clinical and demographic variables play a very important role as mediators of memory improvement after MDD treatment. Thus, a relatively low level of symptom severity, a high degree of clinical improvement, a younger age, and more years of education were positively related to memory improvement after MDD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although antidepressant class is an important variable linked to memory improvement in MDD, overall, the degree of memory amelioration in depression is very closely related to clinical and demographic variables of patients with depression.

La depresión: un desafío en la práctica médica general / La depresión: un desafío en la práctica médica general

Asociada o no a una enfermedad orgánica, la depresión tiene gran prevalencia en la práctica médica pero es subdiagnosticada. El trastorno del ánimo suele coexistir con variadas quejas somáticas y dolores crónicos, configurando síndromes mixtos con un diagnóstico diferencial complejo. En este artículo se describen distintas presentaciones clínicas de la depresión en medicina general, con énfasis en los estados depresivos atípicos, depresiones enmascaradas muy relevantes por su frecuencia y consecuencias: depresión posquirúrgica, cuadros dolorosos crónicos como cefaleas o lumbago, la fatiga crónica y la fibromialgia. Solo el reconocimiento y diagnóstico de la depresión subyacente posibilitará la implementación de las adecuadas intervenciones terapéuticas. Se revisan también algunas recomendaciones para el uso de antidepresivos en atención primaria y la eventual consulta psiquiátrica. (AU)

Associated or not with an organic disease, depression has a high prevalence in medical practice but is underdiagnosed. The mood disorder usually coexists with varied somatic complaints and chronic pain, forming mixed syndromes with a complex differential diagnosis. This article describes different clinical presentations of depression in general medicine, with emphasis on atypical depressive states, masked depressions very relevant for their frequency and consequences: post-surgical depression, chronic painful conditions such as headaches or lumbago, chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia. Only the recognition and diagnosis of the underlying depression will enable the implementation of appropriate therapeutic interventions. Some recommendations for the use of antidepressant drugs in primary care and the eventual psychiatric consultation are also reviewed. (AU)

Tumor growth activity of duloxetine in Ehrlich carcinoma in mice.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze whether duloxetine influences tumor growth in Ehrlich carcinoma. The mice were administered 5 or 30 mg/kg of duloxetine or saline solution. All animals were inoculated with tumor cells. The tumor progression was evaluated by body weight, abdominal circumference, ascites volume and tumor cell count. The effect of duloxetine on immune response was evaluated by lymphoid cells, nitric oxide (NO) production, arginase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and the spleen immunophenotyping. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups regarding weight, abdominal circumference, ascites volume and number of tumor cells. Duloxetine increased the cells of the inguinal lymph node. There was no difference in the number of cells in the bone marrow and spleen. Ascites SOD activity was greater in Duloxetine groups. There were no differences in the levels of NO, nitrite, and arginase. The number of antibody for CD3 (CD3+), CD4+, CD8+ and CD28+ cells was lower in the duloxetine groups. In conclusion, duloxetine has no direct effect on tumor growth and does not alter immunity. The drug increased the SOD that fights free radicals and led the migration of lymphocytes, suggesting that duloxetine could be used in tumor-bearing individuals.

Impact of CYP2D6 on venlafaxine metabolism in Trinidadian patients with major depressive disorder.

AIM: This study aimed to assess the impact of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 variation on venlafaxine (VEN) at steady state in patients from Trinidad and Tobago of Indian and African descent with major depressive disorder. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan, genotyped for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, and metabolic ratios for VEN obtained at 2-week intervals. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, 55 were genotyped and phenotyped and 47 completed 8 weeks of VEN treatment. The majority of patients had metabolic ratios for VEN that were consistent with those for dextromethorphan and genotype-predicted phenotype using activity scores. One subject presented with a novel no-function allele, CYP2D6*99. No correlations were observed with CYP2C19 genotype. CONCLUSION: CYP2D6 genotype analysis provides valuable information to individualize drug therapy with VEN.

Eficacia y seguridad de tapentadol en comparación con terapia de soporte en pacientes con dolor neuropático crónico severo, refractario o intolerante a tratamiento convencional físico y farmacológico / Efficacy and safety of tapentadol compared to supportive therapy in patients with chronic severe neuropathic pain, refractory or intolerant to conventional physical and pharmacological treatment

El dolor neuropático puede definirse como un dolor que aparece debido a uma lesión o enfermedad del sistema somatosensorial, por lo que, consiste en um conjunto de síntomas y no en un diagnóstico per se. La prevalencia de dolor neuropático se encuentra entre 7 % y 10 % a nivel global. Las personas manifiestan presentar alodinia, hiperalgesia, anestesia dolorosa y alteración positiva o negativa de la sensibilidad. Para el tratamiento del dolor neuropático crónico severo, refractario o intolerante a tratamiento convencional físico y farmacológico, incluyendo opioides débiles (tramadol) y fuertes (oxicodona y morfina), EsSalud sólo cuenta con terapias de soporte invasivas, como las infiltraciones locales, bloqueos nerviosos, estimulaciones eléctricas, entre otras opciones. Sin embargo, dada la poca evidencia de su eficacia y su agresividad, las terapias de soporte invasivas se consideran el último escalón (cuarto escalón) en el manejo del dolor según la escalera analgésica de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), por lo que, se plantea el uso de tapentadol como una alternativa farmacológica, más