Polar confinement of a macromolecular machine by an SRP-type GTPase.

The basal structure of the bacterial flagellum includes a membrane embedded MS-ring (formed by multiple copies of FliF) and a cytoplasmic C-ring (composed of proteins FliG, FliM and FliN). The SRP-type GTPase FlhF is required for directing the initial flagellar protein FliF to the cell pole, but the mechanisms are unclear. Here, we show that FlhF anchors developing flagellar structures to the polar landmark protein HubP/FimV, thereby restricting their formation to the cell pole. Specifically, the GTPase domain of FlhF interacts with HubP, while a structured domain at the N-terminus of FlhF binds to FliG. FlhF-bound FliG subsequently engages with the MS-ring protein FliF. Thus, the interaction of FlhF with HubP and FliG recruits a FliF-FliG complex to the cell pole. In addition, the modulation of FlhF activity by the MinD-type ATPase FlhG controls the interaction of FliG with FliM-FliN, thereby regulating the progression of flagellar assembly at the pole.

The nucleolar phase of signal recognition particle assembly.

The signal recognition particle is essential for targeting transmembrane and secreted proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Remarkably, because they work together in the cytoplasm, the SRP and ribosomes are assembled in the same biomolecular condensate: the nucleolus. How important is the nucleolus for SRP assembly is not known. Using quantitative proteomics, we have investigated the interactomes of SRP components. We reveal that SRP proteins are associated with scores of nucleolar proteins important for ribosome biogenesis and nucleolar structure. Having monitored the subcellular distribution of SRP proteins upon controlled nucleolar disruption, we conclude that an intact organelle is required for their proper localization. Lastly, we have detected two SRP proteins in Cajal bodies, which indicates that previously undocumented steps of SRP assembly may occur in these bodies. This work highlights the importance of a structurally and functionally intact nucleolus for efficient SRP production and suggests that the biogenesis of SRP and ribosomes may be coordinated in the nucleolus by common assembly factors.

Significance of signal recognition particle 9 nuclear translocation: Implications for pancreatic cancer prognosis and functionality.

Signal recognition particles (SRPs) are essential for regulating intracellular protein transport and secretion. Patients with tumors with high SRP9 expression tend to have a poorer overall survival. However, to the best of our knowledge, no reports have described the relationship between SRP9 localization and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate this relationship. Immunohistochemical staining for SRP9 using excised specimens from pancreatic cancer surgery cases without preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy showed that SRP9 was preferentially expressed in the nucleus of the cancerous regions in some cases, which was hardly detected in other cases, indicating that SRP9 was transported to the nucleus in the former cases. To compare the prognosis of patients with SRP9 nuclear translocation, patients were divided into two groups: Those with a nuclear translocation rate of >50% and those with a nuclear translocation rate of ≤50%. The nuclear translocation rate of >50% group had a significantly better recurrence­free survival than the nuclear translocation rate of ≤50% group (P=0.037). Subsequent in vitro experiments were conducted; notably, the nuclear translocation rate of SRP9 was reduced under amino acid­deficient conditions, suggesting that multiple factors are involved in this phenomenon. To further study the function of SRP9 nuclear translocation, in vitro experiments were performed by introducing SRP9 splicing variants (v1 and v2) and their deletion mutants lacking C­terminal regions into MiaPaCa pancreatic cancer cells. The results demonstrated that both splicing variants showed nuclear translocation regardless of the C­terminal deletions, suggesting the role of the N­terminal regions. Given that SRP9 is an RNA­binding protein, the study of RNA immunoprecipitation revealed that signaling pathways involved in cancer progression and protein translation were downregulated in nuclear­translocated v1 and v2. Undoubtedly, further studies of the nuclear translocation of SRP9 will open an avenue to optimize the precise evaluation and therapeutic control of pancreatic cancer.

Translocational attenuation mediated by the PERK-SRP14 axis is a protective mechanism of unfolded protein response.

The unfolded protein response (UPR) relieves endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress through multiple strategies, including reducing protein synthesis, increasing protein folding capabilities, and enhancing misfolded protein degradation. After a multi-omics analysis, we find that signal recognition particle 14 (SRP14), an essential component of the SRP, is markedly reduced in cells undergoing ER stress. Further experiments indicate that SRP14 reduction requires PRKR-like ER kinase (PERK)-mediated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation but is independent of ATF4 or ATF3 transcription factors. The decrease of SRP14 correlates with reduced translocation of fusion proteins and endogenous cathepsin D. Enforced expression of an SRP14 variant with elongation arrest capability prevents the reduced translocation of cathepsin D in stressed cells, whereas an SRP14 mutant without the activity does not. Finally, overexpression of SRP14 augments the UPR and aggravates ER-stress-induced cell death. These data suggest that translocational attenuation mediated by the PERK-SRP14 axis is a protective measure for the UPR to mitigate ER stress.

The RNA Helicase Ded1 from Yeast Is Associated with the Signal Recognition Particle and Is Regulated by SRP21.

The DEAD-box RNA helicase Ded1 is an essential yeast protein involved in translation initiation that belongs to the DDX3 subfamily. The purified Ded1 protein is an ATP-dependent RNA-binding protein and an RNA-dependent ATPase, but it was previously found to lack substrate specificity and enzymatic regulation. Here we demonstrate through yeast genetics, yeast extract pull-down experiments, in situ localization, and in vitro biochemical approaches that Ded1 is associated with, and regulated by, the signal recognition particle (SRP), which is a universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complex required for the co-translational translocation of polypeptides into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen and membrane. Ded1 is physically associated with SRP components in vivo and in vitro. Ded1 is genetically linked with SRP proteins. Finally, the enzymatic activity of Ded1 is inhibited by SRP21 in the presence of SCR1 RNA. We propose a model where Ded1 actively participates in the translocation of proteins during translation. Our results provide a new understanding of the role of Ded1 during translation.

A Guide to Computational Cotranscriptional Folding Featuring the SRP RNA.

Although RNA molecules are synthesized via transcription, little is known about the general impact of cotranscriptional folding in vivo. We present different computational approaches for the simulation of changing structure ensembles during transcription, including interpretations with respect to experimental data from literature. Specifically, we analyze different mutations of the E. coli SRP RNA, which has been studied comparatively well in previous literature, yet the details of which specific metastable structures form as well as when they form are still under debate. Here, we combine thermodynamic and kinetic, deterministic, and stochastic models with automated and visual inspection of those systems to derive the most likely scenario of which substructures form at which point during transcription. The simulations do not only provide explanations for present experimental observations but also suggest previously unnoticed conformations that may be verified through future experimental studies.

Effects of PNA Sequence and Target Site Selection on Function of a 4.5S Non-Coding RNA.

Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) based antisense strategy is a promising therapeutic approach to specifically inhibit target gene expression. However, unlike protein coding genes, identification of an ideal PNA binding site for non-coding RNA is not straightforward. Here, we compare the inhibitory activities of PNA molecules that bind a non-coding 4.5S RNA called SRP RNA, a key component of the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP). A 9-mer PNA (PNA9) complementary to the tetraloop region of the RNA was more potent in inhibiting its interaction with the SRP protein, compared to an 8-mer PNA (PNA8) targeting a stem-loop. PNA9, which contained a homo-pyrimidine sequence could form a triplex with the complementary stretch of RNA in vitro as confirmed using a fluorescent derivative of PNA9 (F-PNA13). The RNA-PNA complex formation resulted in inhibition of SRP function with PNA9 and F-PNA13, but not PNA8 highlighting the importance of target site selection. Surprisingly, F-PNA13 which was more potent in inhibiting SRP function in vitro, showed weaker antibacterial activity compared to PNA9 likely due to poor cell penetration of the longer PNA. Our results underscore the importance of suitable target site selection and optimum PNA length to develop better antisense molecules against non-coding RNA.

RN7SL1 may be translated under oncogenic conditions.

RN7SL1 (RNA component of signal recognition particle 7SL1), a component of the signal recognition particle, is a non-coding RNA possessing a small ORF (smORF). However, whether it is translated into peptides is unknown. Here, we generated the RN7SL1-Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) gene, in which the smORF of RN7SL1 was replaced by GFP, introduced it into 293T cells, and observed cells emitting GFP fluorescence. Furthermore, RNA-seq of GFP-positive cells revealed that they were in an oncogenic state, suggesting that RN7SL1 smORF may be translated under special conditions.

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay of mRNAs encoding a signal peptide occurs primarily after mRNA targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum.

Translation of messenger ribonucleic acids (mRNAs) encoding integral membrane proteins or secreted proteins occurs on the surface of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). When a nascent signal peptide is synthesized from the mRNAs, the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) is recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and then transported to the surface of the ER. The appropriate targeting of the RNC-SRP complex to the ER is monitored by a quality control pathway, a nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC)-ensured translational repression of RNC-SRP (CENTRE). In this study, using ribosome profiling of CBC-associated and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-associated mRNAs, we reveal that, at the transcriptomic level, CENTRE is in charge of the translational repression of the CBC-RNC-SRP until the complex is specifically transported to the ER. We also find that CENTRE inhibits the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) of mRNAs within the CBC-RNC-SRP. The NMD occurs only after the CBC-RNC-SRP is targeted to the ER and after eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E replaces CBC. Our data indicate dual surveillance for properly targeting mRNAs encoding integral membrane or secretory proteins to the ER. CENTRE blocks gene expression at the translation level before the CBC-RNC-SRP delivery to the ER, and NMD monitors mRNA quality after its delivery to the ER.

Loss of Preproinsulin Interaction with Signal Recognition Particle Activates Protein Quality Control, Decreasing mRNA Stability.

Many insulin gene variants alter the protein sequence and result in monogenic diabetes due to insulin insufficiency. However, the molecular mechanisms of various disease-causing mutations are unknown. Insulin is synthesized as preproinsulin containing a signal peptide (SP). SPs of secreted proteins are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) or by another factor in a SRP-independent pathway. If preproinsulin uses SRP-dependent or independent pathways is still debatable. We demonstrate by the use of site-specific photocrosslinking that the SRP subunit, SRP54, interacts with the preproinsulin SP. Moreover, SRP54 depletion leads to the decrease of insulin mRNA and protein expression, supporting the involvement of the RAPP protein quality control in insulin biogenesis. RAPP regulates the quality of secretory proteins through degradation of their mRNA. We tested five disease-causing mutations in the preproinsulin SP on recognition by SRP and on their effects on mRNA and protein levels. We demonstrate that the effects of mutations are associated with their position in the SP and their severity. The data support diverse molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these mutations. We show for the first time the involvement of the RAPP protein quality control pathway in insulin biogenesis that is implicated in the development of neonatal diabetes caused by the Leu13Arg mutation.

Cryo-EM structure of SRP68/72 reveals an extended dimerization domain with RNA-binding activity.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a critical component in protein sorting pathways in all domains of life. Human SRP contains six proteins bound to the 7S RNA and their structures and functions have been mostly elucidated. The SRP68/72 dimer is the largest SRP component and is essential for SRP function. Although the structures of the SRP68/72 RNA binding and dimerization domains have been previously reported, the structure and function of large portions of the SRP68/72 dimer remain unknown. Here, we analyse full-length SRP68/72 using cryo-EM and report that SRP68/72 depend on each other for stability and form an extended dimerization domain. This newly observed dimerization domain is both a protein- and RNA-binding domain. Comparative analysis with current structural models suggests that this dimerization domain undergoes dramatic translocation upon SRP docking onto SRP receptor and eventually comes close to the Alu domain. We propose that the SRP68/72 dimerization domain functions by binding and detaching the Alu domain and SRP9/14 from the ribosomal surface, thus releasing elongation arrest upon docking onto the ER membrane.

The P124A mutation of SRP14 alters its migration on SDS-PAGE without impacting its function.

SRP14 is a crucial protein subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP), a ribonucleoprotein complex essential for co-translational translocation to the endoplasmic reticulum. During our investigation of SRP14 expression across diverse cell lines, we observe variations in its migration on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), with some cells exhibiting slower migration and others migrating faster. However, the cause of this phenomenon remains elusive. Our research rules out alternative splicing as the cause and, instead, identifies the presence of a P124A mutation in SRP14 (SRP14 P124A) among the faster-migrating variants, while the slower-migrating variants lack this mutation. Subsequent ectopic expression of wild-type SRP14 P124 or SRP14 WT and SRP14 P124A in various cell lines confirms that the P124A mutation indeed leads to faster migration of SRP14. Further mutagenesis analysis shows that the P117A and A121P mutations within the alanine-rich domain at the C-terminus of SRP14 are responsible for migration alterations on SDS-PAGE, whereas mutations outside this domain, such as P39A, Y27F, and T45A, have no such effect. Furthermore, the ectopic expression of SRP14 WT and SRP14 P124A yields similar outcomes in terms of SRP RNA stability, cell morphology, and cell growth, indicating that SRP14 P124A represents a natural variant of SRP14 and retains comparable functionality. In conclusion, the substitution of proline for alanine in the alanine-rich tail of SRP14 results in faster migration on SDS-PAGE, but has little effect on its function.

A signal recognition particle receptor gene from the sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicas.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) system delivers approximately 30% of the proteome to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. SRP receptor alpha (SRα) binds to SRP for targeting nascent secreted proteins to the ER membrane in eukaryotic cells. In this study, the SRα homologous gene was identified in the sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus (AjSRα). AjSRα codes for 641 amino acids and has 54.94% identity with its mammalian homologs. Like mammalian SRα, it is expected to contain the SRP-alpha N domain, SRP54_N domain, and SRP54 domain. In addition, AjSRα is ubiquitously expressed in adult tissues and exhibits a sexually dimorphic expression pattern, with significantly higher expression in ovaries compared to testes. As a maternal factor, AjSRα can be continuously detected during embryonic development. Importantly, we first attempted to investigate its function by using lentiviral vectors for delivering SRα gene-specific shRNA, and we revealed that lentiviral vectors do not induce an upregulation of immune-related enzymes in sea cucumbers. However, compared to the dsRNA-based RNA interference (RNAi) method, lentivirus-mediated RNAi caused dynamic changes in gene expression at a later time. This study supplied the technical support for studying the functional mechanism of SRα in sea cucumbers.

Examining SRP pathway function in mRNA localization to the endoplasmic reticulum.

Signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway function in protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is well established; its role in RNA localization to the ER remains, however, unclear. In current models, mRNAs undergo translation- and SRP-dependent trafficking to the ER, with ER localization mediated via interactions between SRP-bound translating ribosomes and the ER-resident SRP receptor (SR), a heterodimeric complex comprising SRA, the SRP-binding subunit, and SRB, an integral membrane ER protein. To study SRP pathway function in RNA localization, SR knockout (KO) mammalian cell lines were generated and the consequences of SR KO on steady-state and dynamic mRNA localization examined. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SRPRB KO resulted in profound destabilization of SRA. Pairing siRNA silencing of SRPRA in SRPRB KO cells yielded viable SR KO cells. Steady-state mRNA compositions and ER-localization patterns in parental and SR KO cells were determined by cell fractionation and deep sequencing. Notably, steady-state cytosol and ER mRNA compositions and partitioning patterns were largely unaltered by loss of SR expression. To examine SRP pathway function in RNA localization dynamics, the subcellular trafficking itineraries of newly exported mRNAs were determined by 4-thiouridine (4SU) pulse-labeling/4SU-seq/cell fractionation. Newly exported mRNAs were distinguished by high ER enrichment, with ER localization being SR-independent. Intriguingly, under conditions of translation initiation inhibition, the ER was the default localization site for all newly exported mRNAs. These data demonstrate that mRNA localization to the ER can be uncoupled from the SRP pathway function and reopen questions regarding the mechanism of RNA localization to the ER.

Alu RNA fold links splicing with signal recognition particle proteins.

Transcriptomic diversity in primates was considerably expanded by exonizations of intronic Alu elements. To better understand their cellular mechanisms we have used structure-based mutagenesis coupled with functional and proteomic assays to study the impact of successive primate mutations and their combinations on inclusion of a sense-oriented AluJ exon in the human F8 gene. We show that the splicing outcome was better predicted by consecutive RNA conformation changes than by computationally derived splicing regulatory motifs. We also demonstrate an involvement of SRP9/14 (signal recognition particle) heterodimer in splicing regulation of Alu-derived exons. Nucleotide substitutions that accumulated during primate evolution relaxed the conserved left-arm AluJ structure including helix H1 and reduced the capacity of SRP9/14 to stabilize the closed Alu conformation. RNA secondary structure-constrained mutations that promoted open Y-shaped conformations of the Alu made the Alu exon inclusion reliant on DHX9. Finally, we identified additional SRP9/14 sensitive Alu exons and predicted their functional roles in the cell. Together, these results provide unique insights into architectural elements required for sense Alu exonization, identify conserved pre-mRNA structures involved in exon selection and point to a possible chaperone activity of SRP9/14 outside the mammalian signal recognition particle.

Chloroplast SRP43 and SRP54 independently promote thermostability and membrane binding of light-dependent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductases.

Protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR), which converts protochlorophyllide into chlorophyllide, is the only light-dependent enzyme in chlorophyll biosynthesis. While its catalytic reaction and importance for chloroplast development are well understood, little is known about the post-translational control of PORs. Here, we show that cpSRP43 and cpSRP54, two components of the chloroplast signal recognition particle pathway, play distinct roles in optimizing the function of PORB, the predominant POR isoform in Arabidopsis. The chaperone cpSRP43 stabilizes the enzyme and provides appropriate amounts of PORB during leaf greening and heat shock, whereas cpSRP54 enhances its binding to the thylakoid membrane, thereby ensuring adequate levels of metabolic flux in late chlorophyll biosynthesis. Furthermore, cpSRP43 and the DnaJ-like protein CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN of POR1 concurrently act to stabilize PORB. Overall, these findings enhance our understanding of the coordinating role of cpSPR43 and cpSRP54 in the post-translational control of chlorophyll synthesis and assembly of photosynthetic chlorophyll-binding proteins.

Nuclear SRP9/SRP14 heterodimer transcriptionally regulates 7SL and BC200 RNA expression.

The SRP9/SRP14 heterodimer is a central component of signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA (7SL) processing and Alu retrotransposition. In this study, we sought to establish the role of nuclear SRP9/SRP14 in the transcriptional regulation of 7SL and BC200 RNA. 7SL and BC200 RNA steady-state levels, rate of decay, and transcriptional activity were evaluated under SRP9/SRP14 knockdown conditions. Immunofluorescent imaging, and subcellular fractionation of MCF-7 cells, revealed a distinct nuclear localization for SRP9/SRP14. The relationship between this localization and transcriptional activity at 7SL and BC200 genes was also examined. These findings demonstrate a novel nuclear function of SRP9/SRP14 establishing that this heterodimer transcriptionally regulates 7SL and BC200 RNA expression. We describe a model in which SRP9/SRP14 cotranscriptionally regulate 7SL and BC200 RNA expression. Our model is also a plausible pathway for regulating Alu RNA transcription and is consistent with the hypothesized roles of SRP9/SRP14 transporting 7SL RNA into the nucleolus for posttranscriptional processing, and trafficking of Alu RNA for retrotransposition.

Interaction of FlhF, SRP-like GTPase with FliF, MS ring component assembling the initial structure of flagella in marine Vibrio.

Vibrio alginolyticus forms a single flagellum at its cell pole. FlhF and FlhG are known to be the main proteins responsible for the polar formation of single flagellum. MS-ring formation in the flagellar basal body appears to be an initiation step for flagellar assembly. The MS-ring is formed by a single protein, FliF, which has two transmembrane (TM) segments and a large periplasmic region. We had shown that FlhF was required for the polar localization of Vibrio FliF, and FlhF facilitated MS-ring formation when FliF was overexpressed in Escherichia coli cells. These results suggest that FlhF interacts with FliF to facilitate MS-ring formation. Here, we attempted to detect this interaction using Vibrio FliF fragments fused to a tag of Glutathione S-transferase in E. coli. We found that the N-terminal 108 residues of FliF, including the first TM segment and the periplasmic region, could pull FlhF down. In the first step, signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor are involved in the transport of membrane proteins to target them, which delivers them to the translocon. FlhF may have a similar or enhanced function as SRP, which binds to a region rich in hydrophobic residues.

Mechanism of signal-anchor triage during early steps of membrane protein insertion.

Most membrane proteins use their first transmembrane domain, known as a signal anchor (SA), for co-translational targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the signal recognition particle (SRP). The SA then inserts into the membrane using either the Sec61 translocation channel or the ER membrane protein complex (EMC) insertase. How EMC and Sec61 collaborate to ensure SA insertion in the correct topology is not understood. Using site-specific crosslinking, we detect a pre-insertion SA intermediate adjacent to EMC. This intermediate forms after SA release from SRP but before ribosome transfer to Sec61. The polypeptide's N-terminal tail samples a cytosolic vestibule bordered by EMC3, from where it can translocate across the membrane concomitant with SA insertion. The ribosome then docks on Sec61, which has an opportunity to insert those SAs skipped by EMC. These results suggest that EMC acts between SRP and Sec61 to triage SAs for insertion during membrane protein biogenesis.

mRNA targeting eliminates the need for the signal recognition particle during membrane protein insertion in bacteria.

Signal-sequence-dependent protein targeting is essential for the spatiotemporal organization of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells and is facilitated by dedicated protein targeting factors such as the signal recognition particle (SRP). However, targeting signals are not exclusively contained within proteins but can also be present within mRNAs. By in vivo and in vitro assays, we show that mRNA targeting is controlled by the nucleotide content and by secondary structures within mRNAs. mRNA binding to bacterial membranes occurs independently of soluble targeting factors but is dependent on the SecYEG translocon and YidC. Importantly, membrane insertion of proteins translated from membrane-bound mRNAs occurs independently of the SRP pathway, while the latter is strictly required for proteins translated from cytosolic mRNAs. In summary, our data indicate that mRNA targeting acts in parallel to the canonical SRP-dependent protein targeting and serves as an alternative strategy for safeguarding membrane protein insertion when the SRP pathway is compromised.