The therapeutic effect of levosimendan in patients with prolonged ventilator weaning and cardiac dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the therapeutic effect of levosimendan in patients with prolonged ventilator weaning and cardiac dysfunction. METHOD: Patients with prolonged ventilator weaning and cardiac dysfunction were randomly allocated to receive conventional treatment (control group) or intravenous infusion of levosimendan for 24 h based on conventional treatment (levosimendan group). Weaning success rates were then compared between the two groups. The study was retrospectively registered with Research Registry (ID No. researchregistry10304). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included (20 per group). Within 3 days after initiation of treatment, significantly more cases were successfully weaned in the levosimendan group versus control group (eight versus four cases, respectively). Among the eight patients who underwent pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring in the levosimendan group, the global ejection fraction increased 24 h after treatment, and the cardiac function index and cardiac index increased 72 h after treatment. CONCLUSION: For patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation who have concomitant cardiac dysfunction, levosimendan may be considered to increase the probability of weaning success.

Levosimendan Ameliorates Hypoxia-Induced Brain Injury in Rats by Modulating PTEN/Akt Signaling Pathway-Mediated Ferroptosis.

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan (Levo) is a drug commonly used to treat heart failure. Recent studies have suggested that Levo may have neuroprotective effects, but it is still unknown how exactly it contributes to hypoxia-induced brain damage. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate how Levo affects hypoxia-induced brain damage and to clarify any possible underlying mechanisms. METHODS: One group of rats (Levo group) was pretreated with Levo via oral force-feeding for four weeks. Another group (Ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) group) was pretreated with intraperitoneal injections of Fer-1 for four weeks. A rat model of chronic hypoxia was created by treating rats with 13% O2 for 14 days in a closed hypoxia chamber. For each group (Control, Model, Levo, Fer-1), we evaluated learning and memory capacity and the morphology and structure of neurons in the rats' brain tissue. Other measurements included tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß), and interleukin-6 (IL-6); malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px); Fe2+; apoptosis; cleaved caspase-3, caspase-3; phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), protein kinase B (Akt), phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt); and ferroptosis-related proteins Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11). RESULTS: The Model group rats had considerably fewer neurons than the Control group, with loosely arranged cells, and markedly impaired learning and memory abilities (p < 0.05). Oxidative damage and inflammation in brain tissues of the Model group were significantly intensified, accompanied by a substantial increase in neuronal apoptosis (p < 0.05). PTEN protein, Fe2+ concentration, and cleaved caspase-3 expression were all significantly upregulated, whereas p-Akt, Nrf2, GPX4, and SLC7A11 proteins were dramatically downregulated (p < 0.05). Both the Levo and Fer-1 groups demonstrated significantly more neurons and closely arranged cells than the Model group, along with a notable improvement in learning and memory abilities (p < 0.05). Oxidative damage and inflammation in brain tissues of the Levo and Fer-1 groups were markedly alleviated, and neuronal apoptosis was suppressed (p < 0.05). p-Akt, Nrf2, GPX4, and SLC7A11 proteins were dramatically upregulated, whereas the expression of cleaved caspase-3, PTEN protein, and Fe2+ content was considerably downregulated (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Levo effectively mitigates brain injury in rats with chronic hypoxia, likely by regulating ferroptosis via the PTEN/Akt signaling pathway.

Levosimendan: efficacy and safety in pediatric heart failure treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of levosimendan as an alternative treatment for pediatric patients with decompensated heart failure unresponsive to conventional inotropes and to emphasize its role in enhancing cardiovascular stability. METHODS: A total of 15 pediatric patients with decompensated heart failure, stemming from acute fulminant myocarditis (53.3%) and post-congenital heart disease surgery complications (46.7%), received levosimendan. The evaluation focused on adverse effects, respiratory support requirements, and concurrent inotropic medication use during levosimendan treatment. Key cardiovascular parameters were assessed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h post-levosimendan infusion. RESULTS: Levosimendan administration significantly improved key cardiovascular metrics. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased notably from 45±14.8% to 58±15.6% at 24 h (p<0.001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures rose significantly, with systolic increasing from 79 (68-90) to 98 (89-109) mmHg and diastolic from 47 (40-57) to 66 (54-76) mmHg by 24 h (p<0.001). Heart rate decreased from 162 (111-175) to 132 (99-148) bpm (p=0.02), and lactate levels significantly decreased from 4.15 (2.3-6.5) to 1.85 (0.8-2.6) mmol/L within 6 h (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Levosimendan demonstrates its significance in managing pediatric heart failure, indicating its safety and potential to enhance cardiac outcomes by reducing reliance on traditional inotropes.

Novel inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common cause of postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery that is commonly treated with conventional inhaled therapies, specifically nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Alternative therapies include inhaled milrinone and levosimendan, which are receiving more research interest and are increasing in clinical use as they may cut costs while allowing for easier administration. We sought to conduct a scoping review to appraise the evidence base for the use of these two novel inhaled vasodilators as an intervention for PH in cardiac surgery. SOURCE: We searched Embase and MEDLINE for relevant articles from 1947 to 2022. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 17 studies including 969 patients. The included studies show that inhaled milrinone and levosimendan are selective pulmonary vasodilators with potential benefits ranging from ease of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass to reduction in ventricular dysfunction. Nevertheless, high-quality data are limited, and study design and comparators are extremely heterogeneous, limiting the potential validity and generalizability of findings. CONCLUSION: The findings of this scoping review suggest that milrinone and levosimendan may be effective alternatives to current inhaled therapies for cardiac dysfunction in the setting of PH. Nevertheless, randomized trials have focused on specific agents and consistent outcome measures are needed to better validate the early-stage promise of these agents. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ ); first posted 21 July 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'hypertension pulmonaire (HTP) est une cause fréquente de mortalité postopératoire en chirurgie cardiaque généralement traitée par des thérapies inhalées conventionnelles, en particulier le monoxyde d'azote et la prostacycline. Les thérapies alternatives comprennent la milrinone et le lévosimendan inhalés, qui suscitent de plus en plus d'intérêt dans la recherche et sont de plus en plus utilisés en clinique car ils peuvent réduire les coûts tout en permettant une administration plus facile. Nous avons cherché à réaliser une étude de portée afin d'évaluer la base de données probantes concernant l'utilisation de ces deux nouveaux vasodilatateurs inhalés comme intervention pour l'HTP en chirurgie cardiaque. SOURCES: Nous avons cherché des articles pertinents dans Embase et MEDLINE de 1947 à 2022. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Nous avons identifié 17 études incluant 969 patient·es. Les études incluses montrent que la milrinone et le lévosimendan inhalés sont des vasodilatateurs pulmonaires sélectifs possédant des avantages potentiels allant de la facilité de sevrage de la circulation extracorporelle à la réduction de la dysfonction ventriculaire. Néanmoins, les données de haute qualité sont limitées, et la conception des études et les comparateurs sont extrêmement hétérogènes, ce qui limite la validité potentielle et la généralisabilité des résultats. CONCLUSION: Les résultats de cette étude de portée suggèrent que la milrinone et le lévosimendan pourraient être des solutions de rechange efficaces aux traitements inhalés actuels pour le dysfonctionnement cardiaque dans un contexte d'HTP. Néanmoins, les études randomisées se sont concentrées sur des agents spécifiques et des mesures cohérentes des résultats sont nécessaires pour mieux valider les promesses de ces agents à un stade précoce. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ ); première publication le 21 juillet 2022.

EFFECTS OF LEVOSIMENDAN ON DIAPHRAGMATIC DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS.

ABSTRACT: Objective: In this study, our aim was to examine the effects of levosimendan on diaphragmatic dysfunction in patients with sepsis, as well as assess its impact on respiratory muscle contractility and the outcome of weaning. Methods: This was a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with diaphragmatic dysfunction and failure of spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) were randomly and equally assigned to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received levosimendan at a loading dose of 6 µg/kg for 10 min, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.2 µg/kg/min. The control group received an equivalent dose of a placebo. The preadministration and postadministration respiratory mechanics parameters of the patients were recorded. Evaluation of the effect of levosimendan on patients with sepsis-induced diaphragm dysfunction comprised arterial blood gas analysis as well as ultrasound measurements of diaphragm excursion (DE), diaphragm thickness (DT), diaphragm thickening fraction (TFdi), and diaphragm-rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI). Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study. We found that postadministration of levosimendan, the patients' tidal volume (GCSMV) increased, whereas the D-RSBI decreased, and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PACO 2 ) decreased when compared to the preadministration levels. Additionally, following levosimendan administration, patients showed increased DE and pressure support (PS) when compared to before administration (1.14 ± 0.177 vs. 1.22 ± 0.170 cm and 0.248 ± 0.03 vs. 0.284 ± 0.06, respectively) and decreased D-RSBI (22.76 ± 6.14 vs. 20.06 ± 6.04, respectively), all of which were statistically significant ( P < 0.05). In contrast, in the control group of patients, there were no statistically significant differences in the postadministration levels of DE, TFdi, and D-RSBI as compared to the preadministration period ( P > 0.05). Furthermore, in terms of weaning outcomes, we did not find any statistically significant difference in the number of patients in the two groups who eventually underwent weaning ( P = 0.545). Conclusion: In this study, we found that levosimendan enhanced diaphragm contractile function. However, further investigations are required to explore its effect on weaning outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intermittent, Repeated, or Continuous Use of Levosimendan, Milrinone, or Dobutamine in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: A Network and Single-Arm Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence regarding differences in the long-term safety and efficacy of intermittent, repeated, or continuous palliative inotropic therapy among patients with advanced heart failure. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases, with a cutoff date of November 23, 2023, for studies reporting outcomes in adult patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent, repeated, or continuous levosimendan, milrinone, or dobutamine. Forty-one studies (18 randomized controlled trials and 23 cohort studies) comprising 5137 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that levosimendan had significant advantages over milrinone or dobutamine in reducing mortality and improving left ventricular ejection fraction. A single-arm meta-analysis also indicated that levosimendan had the lowest mortality and significantly improved B-type brain natriuretic peptide and left ventricular ejection fraction. Regarding safety, hypotension events were observed more frequently in the levosimendan and milrinone groups. However, the current evidence is limited by the heterogeneity and relatively small sample size of the studies.

Safety and efficacy of levosimendan in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) often experience heart failure (HF) episodes. No evidence is available on inotropic therapy. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the safety and efficacy of levosimendan. METHODS: We retrieved all HF patients receiving ≥1 levosimendan infusion from 2013 to 2023. CA patients were matched with HF patients without CA (controls) based on sex, age, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The response to levosimendan was measured as changes in daily urinary output, body weight, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: CA patients (median age 77 years, 73% men, 59% with ATTR-CA) and controls were compared. Levosimendan infusion was stopped because of hypotension in 2 cases with CA and (in 1 case) worsening renal function, and in 2 controls because of ventricular tachycardia episodes and (in 1 case) hypotension. CA patients showed a trend toward increased daily urinary output (p = 0.078) and a significant decrease in body weight (p < 0.001), without significant changes in NT-proBNP (p = 0.497) and eGFR (p = 0.732). Both CA patients and controls displayed similar changes in urinary output, weight, and eGFR, but NT-proBNP decreased more significantly among controls (p < 0.001). No differences were noted in rehospitalization rates, but CA patients experienced higher mortality at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan appears safe for CA patients needing inotropic support. The diuretic response and weight decrease during hospitalization were comparable between CA patients and matched HF patients, despite the greater mortality of CA patients after discharge.

In silico study of the mechanisms of hypoxia and contractile dysfunction during ischemia and reperfusion of hiPSC cardiomyocytes.

Interconnected mechanisms of ischemia and reperfusion (IR) has increased the interest in IR in vitro experiments using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). We developed a whole-cell computational model of hiPSC-CMs including the electromechanics, a metabolite-sensitive sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) and an oxygen dynamics formulation to investigate IR mechanisms. Moreover, we simulated the effect and action mechanism of levosimendan, which recently showed promising anti-arrhythmic effects in hiPSC-CMs in hypoxia. The model was validated using hiPSC-CM and in vitro animal data. The role of SERCA in causing relaxation dysfunction in IR was anticipated to be comparable to its function in sepsis-induced heart failure. Drug simulations showed that levosimendan counteracts the relaxation dysfunction by utilizing a particular Ca2+-sensitizing mechanism involving Ca2+-bound troponin C and Ca2+ flux to the myofilament, rather than inhibiting SERCA phosphorylation. The model demonstrates extensive characterization and promise for drug development, making it suitable for evaluating IR therapy strategies based on the changing levels of cardiac metabolites, oxygen and molecular pathways.

Effect of levosimendan on ventricular remodelling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

Heart failure is the final stage of several cardiovascular diseases, and the key to effectively treating heart failure is to reverse or delay ventricular remodelling. Levosimendan is a novel inotropic and vasodilator agent used in heart failure, whereas the impact of levosimendan on ventricular remodelling is still unclear. This study aims to investigate the impact of levosimendan on ventricular remodelling in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. A total of 66 randomized controlled trials involving 7968 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that levosimendan increased left ventricular ejection fraction [mean difference (MD) = 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.88, 4.35), P < 0.00001] and stroke volume [MD = 6.59, 95% CI (3.22, 9.96), P = 0.0001] and significantly reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume [standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.52, 95% CI (-0.67, -0.37), P < 0.00001], left ventricular end-diastolic volume index [SMD = -1.24, 95% CI (-1.61, -0.86), P < 0.00001], and left ventricular end-systolic volume index [SMD = -1.06, 95% CI (-1.43, -0.70), P < 0.00001]. In terms of biomarkers, levosimendan significantly reduced the level of brain natriuretic peptide [SMD = -1.08, 95% CI (-1.60, -0.56), P < 0.0001], N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [SMD = -0.99, 95% CI (-1.41, -0.56), P < 0.00001], and interleukin-6 [SMD = -0.61, 95% CI (-0.86, -0.35), P < 0.00001]. Meanwhile, levosimendan may increase the incidence of hypotension [risk ratio (RR) = 1.24, 95% CI (1.12, 1.39), P < 0.0001], hypokalaemia [RR = 1.57, 95% CI (1.08, 2.28), P = 0.02], headache [RR = 1.89, 95% CI (1.50, 2.39), P < 0.00001], atrial fibrillation [RR = 1.31, 95% CI (1.12, 1.52), P = 0.0005], and premature ventricular complexes [RR = 1.86, 95% CI (1.27, 2.72), P = 0.001]. In addition, levosimendan reduced all-cause mortality [RR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.74, 0.94), P = 0.002]. In conclusion, our study found that levosimendan might reverse ventricular remodelling when applied in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, especially in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, decompensated heart failure, and septic shock.

Impact of Levosimendan and Its Metabolites on Platelet Activation Mechanisms in Patients during Antiplatelet Therapy-Pilot Study.

Levosimendan is used for the short-term treatment of severe heart failure or other cardiac conditions. The area of existing clinical applications for levosimendan has increased significantly. This study aimed to assess whether levosimendan and its metabolites impact the mechanisms related to platelet activation. In this study, we included patients with coronary artery disease receiving antiplatelet therapy. We analyzed the pharmacodynamic profile using three independent methods to assess platelet activity. The results of the conducted studies indicate a mechanism of levosimendan that affects the function of platelets, causing higher inhibition of platelet receptors and, thus, their aggregation. It is essential to clarify whether levosimendan may affect platelets due to the need to maintain a balance between bleeding and thrombosis in patients treated with levosimendan. This is especially important in the case of perioperative bleeding. This study was conducted in vitro; the research should be continued and carried out in patients to check the complete pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.

Preoperative Levosimendan in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the impact of preoperative levosimendan on patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <35%) undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN: A meta-analysis. SETTING: Hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: The authors included 1,225 patients from 6 randomized controlled trials. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors performed a meta-analysis of trials that compared preoperative levosimendan with placebo or no therapy, reporting efficacy and safety endpoints. Statistical analyses used mean differences and risk ratios (RR), with a random effects model. Six studies were included, comprising 1,225 patients, of whom 615 (50.2%) received preoperative levosimendan, and 610 (49.8%) received placebo/no therapy. Preoperative levosimendan showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16-0.60; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), postoperative acute kidney injury (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25-0.77; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), low-cardiac-output syndrome (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30-0.66; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and postoperative atrial fibrillation (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.25-0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 85%) compared to control. Moreover, levosimendan significantly reduced the need for postoperative inotropes and increased the cardiac index at 24 hours postoperatively. There were no differences between groups for perioperative myocardial infarction, hypotension, or any adverse events. CONCLUSION: Preoperative levosimendan in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, low-cardiac-output syndrome, acute kidney injury, postoperative atrial fibrillation, and the need for circulatory support without compromising safety.

The association between levosimendan and mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is increasingly being used in patients with sepsis or septic shock because of its potential to improve organ function and reduce mortality. We aimed to determine if levosimendan can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock via meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through 1 October 2022. Literature evaluating the efficacy of levosimendan in patients with sepsis or septic shock was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate an odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P -values for 28-day mortality (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included changes in indexes reflecting cardiac function before and after treatment, changes in serum lactate levels in the first 24 h of treatment, and the mean SOFA score during the study period. Safety outcomes included rates of tachyarrhythmias and total adverse reactions encountered with levosimendan. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials were identified, encompassing a total of 1044 patients. After using levosimendan, there was no statistical difference between groups for 28-day mortality (34.9% and 36.2%; OR: 0.93; 95% CI [0.72-1.2]; P  = 0.57; I 2  = 0%; trial sequential analysis-adjusted CI [0.6-1.42]) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and more adverse reactions seemed to occur in the levosimendan group, although the septic shock patient's heart function and serum lactate level improved. CONCLUSION: There was no association between the use of levosimendan and 28-day mortality and SOFA scores in patients with septic shock, though there was statistically significant improvement in cardiac function and serum lactate.

Repeated Levosimendan Infusions in the Management of Advanced Heart Failure: Review of the Evidence and Meta-analysis of the Effect on Mortality.

ABSTRACT: In the latest years, several studies described the impact of repetitive/intermittent i.v. levosimendan treatment in the management of advanced heart failure. For this updated review, we systematically searched the literature for clinical trials, registries , and real-world data and identified 31 studies that we commented in a narrative review: 3814 patients were described, of whom 1744 were treated repetitively with levosimendan. On the basis of the nature of the study protocols and of the end points, out of those studies, we further selected 9 that had characteristics, making them suitable for a meta-analysis on mortality. This short list describes data from 680 patients (of whom 399 received repeated doses of levosimendan) and 110 death events (of which 50 occurred in the levosimendan cohort). In the meta-analysis, repetitive/intermittent therapy with i.v. levosimendan was associated with a significant reduction in mortality at the longest time point available: 50 of 399 (12.5%) versus 60 of 281 (21.4%) in the control arms, with a risk ratio of 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.90; P < 0.01). In a sensitivity analysis, removing each trial and reanalyzing the remaining data set did not change the trend, magnitude, or significance of the results. A visual inspection of the funnel plot did not suggest publication bias. The results provide a very strong rationale for continuing to investigate the repetitive use of levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure by properly powered regulatory clinical trials. Meanwhile, it seems that the use of repetitive/intermittent i.v. levosimendan infusions has become one of the few effective options for preserving the hemodynamic and symptomatic balance in such patients.

Repetitive ambulatory levosimendan as a bridge to heart transplantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Repetitive ambulatory doses of levosimendan are an option as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT), but evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment is scarce. The objective of the LEVO-T Registry is to describe the profile of patients on the HT list receiving levosimendan, prescription patterns, and clinical outcomes compared with patients not on levosimendan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients listed for elective HT from 2015 to 2020 from 14 centers in Spain. RESULTS: A total of 1015 consecutive patients were included, of whom 238 patients (23.4%) received levosimendan. Patients treated with levosimendan had more heart failure (HF) admissions in the previous year and a worse clinical profile. The most frequent prescription pattern were fixed doses triggered by the patients' clinical needs. Nonfatal ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 2 patients (0.8%). No differences in HF hospitalizations were found between patients who started levosimendan in the first 30 days after listing and those who did not (33.6% vs 34.5%; P=.848). Among those who did not, 102 patients (32.9%) crossed over to levosimendan after an HF admission. These patients had a rate of 0.57 HF admissions per month before starting levosimendan and 0.21 afterwards. Propensity score matching analysis showed no differences in survival at 1 year after listing between patients receiving levosimendan and those who did not (HR, 1.03; 95%CI, 0.36-2.97; P=.958) or in survival after HT (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.60-1.56; P=.958). CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive levosimendan in an ambulatory setting as a bridge to heart transplantation is commonly used, is safe, and may reduce HF hospitalizations.

Effects of levosimendan on the outcome of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: For patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure, such as cardiogenic shock, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is primarily utilized to preserve their life by providing continuous extracorporeal respiration and circulation. However, because of the complexity of patients' underlying diseases and serious complications, successful weaning from ECMO is often difficult. At present, there have been limited studies on ECMO weaning strategies, so the principal purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine how levosimendan contributes to the weaning of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed were browsed for all potentially related research about clinical benefits of levosimendan in weaning patients receiving VA-ECMO and included 15 of them. The main outcome is success of weaning from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, with the secondary outcomes of 1-month mortality (28 or 30 days), ECMO duration, hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and use of vasoactive drugs. RESULTS: 1772 patients altogether from 15 publications were incorporated in our meta-analysis. We used fixed and random-effect models to combine odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes. The weaning success rate in the levosimendan group was considerably higher in contrast to the comparison (OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.80-4.30; P < 0.00001; I2 = 65%), and subgroup analysis showed that there was less heterogeneity in patients after cardiac surgery (OR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.35-3.12; P = 0.0007; I2 = 17%). In addition, the effect of levosimendan on improving weaning success rate was statistically significant only at 0.2 mcg/kg/min (OR = 2.45, 95% CI, 1.11-5.40; P = 0.03; I2 = 38%). At the same time, the 28-day or 30-day proportion of deaths in the sample receiving levosimendan also decreased (OR = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = 0.004; I2 = 73%), and the difference was statistically significant. In terms of secondary outcomes, we found that individuals undergoing levosimendan treatment had a longer duration of VA-ECMO support. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving VA-ECMO, levosimendan treatment considerably raised the weaning success rate and helped lower mortality. Since most of the evidence comes from retrospective studies, more randomized multicenter trials are required to verify the conclusion.