Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 1.238
1.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 82(2): 139-149, 2024 06 05.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702888

Azoospermia, defined as the absence of sperm in the semen, is found in 10-15 % of infertile patients. Two-thirds of these cases are caused by impaired spermatogenesis, known as non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). In this context, surgical sperm extraction using testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is the best option and can be offered to patients as part of fertility preservation, or to benefit from in vitro fertilization. The aim of the preoperative assessment is to identify the cause of NOA and evaluate the status of spermatogenesis. Its capacity to predict TESE success remains limited. As a result, no objective and reliable criteria are currently available to guide professionals on the chances of success and enable them to correctly assess the benefit-risk balance of this procedure. Artificial intelligence (AI), a field of research that has been rapidly expanding in recent years, has the potential to revolutionize medicine by making it more predictive and personalized. The aim of this review is to introduce AI and its key concepts, and then to examine the current state of research into predicting the success of TESE.


Artificial Intelligence , Azoospermia , Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/surgery , Male , Treatment Outcome , Prognosis , Predictive Value of Tests , Testis/pathology , Testis/surgery
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1349000, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689732

Recent advancements in reproductive medicine have guided novel strategies for addressing male infertility, particularly in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Two prominent invasive interventions, namely testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), have emerged as key techniques to retrieve gametes for assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Both heterogeneity and complexity of NOA pose a multifaceted challenge to clinicians, as the invasiveness of these procedures and their unpredictable success underscore the need for more precise guidance. Seminal plasma can be aptly regarded as a liquid biopsy of the male reproductive tract, encompassing secretions from the testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands, and prostate. This fluid harbors a variety of cell-free nucleic acids, microvesicles, proteins, and metabolites intricately linked to gonadal activity. However, despite numerous investigations exploring potential biomarkers from seminal fluid, their widespread inclusion into the clinical practice remains limited. This could be partially due to the complex interplay of diverse clinical and genetic factors inherent to NOA that likely contributes to the absence of definitive biomarkers for residual spermatogenesis. It is conceivable that the integration of clinical data with biomarkers could increase the potential in predicting surgical procedure outcomes and their choice in NOA cases. This comprehensive review addresses the challenge of sperm retrieval in NOA through non-invasive biomarkers. Moreover, we delve into promising perspectives, elucidating innovative approaches grounded in multi-omics methodologies, including genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. These cutting-edge techniques, combined with the clinical and genetics features of patients, could improve the use of biomarkers in personalized medical approaches, patient counseling, and the decision-making continuum. Finally, Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in the realm of combining biomarkers and clinical data, also in the context of identifying non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval.


Azoospermia , Biomarkers , Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/metabolism , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biomarkers/analysis , Infertility, Male/metabolism , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/therapy , Semen/metabolism , Spermatogenesis/physiology
3.
Rev Int Androl ; 22(1): 17-22, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735873

Obtaining sperm from the testis surgically and using these sperm with the intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique, has opened the way for the possibility of biological fathering in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We aimed to evaluate our sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in NOA patients with solitary testis. In this retrospective case-control study, fortyfive patients with NOA who had a congenital or acquired solitary testis were included, between September 2003 and January 2022. These patients were randomly matched with patients with NOA who had bilateral testes, using a 1:3 matching ratio. We found that SRR by micro-TESE in patients with solitary testis was similar to NOA patients with bilateral testis (51.1% vs. 50.4%). Age, infertility period, ejaculate volume, serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone, history of varicocelectomy, history of orchiopexy, testicular stimulation therapy before micro-TESE, testicular volume, genetic status, TESE side, micro-TESE success, complications and histopathological evaluation results of both groups were evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference in only serum FSH and LH levels. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications and hormonal effects in the early postoperative period. Micro-TESE in NOA patients with solitary testis has similar sperm retrieval and complication rates as NOA patients with bilateral testis.


Azoospermia , Microdissection , Sperm Retrieval , Testis , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Microdissection/methods , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Testis/surgery , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood
4.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1364285, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812814

Introduction: Although the effectiveness of pentoxifylline (PF) as a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase to enhance sperm motility through increasing cyclic nucleotide in cases of absolute asthenozoospermia has been demonstrated for ICSI, data related to babies born from the PF-ICSI are still severely lacking. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential embryotoxicity of PF due to the controversial results obtained from the analysis of this compound on animal embryo development. This study aimed to determine whether the application of PF to trigger frozen-thawed TESA (testicular sperm aspiration) spermatozoa increases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with non-PF frozen-thawed TESA ICSI and conventional ICSI using fresh ejaculation. Materials and methods: A total of 5438 patients were analyzed in this study, including 240 patients underwent PF-TESA ICSI (ICSI using PF triggered frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa), 101 patients underwent non-PF TESA ICSI (ICSI using frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa) and 5097 patients underwent conventional ICSI using fresh ejaculation. Propensity score matching was executed to control the various characteristics of patients. Results: No significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were observed among the three groups (PF-TESA ICSI, non-PF TESA ICSI and conventional ICSI), including biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, and live birth, following propensity score matching. Additionally, neonatal outcomes were found to be similar among the three groups, with no statistical differences observed in the birth defect, birth weight, gestational age, preterm birth, and early-neonatal death. Discussion and conclusion: PF-ICSI may be an alternative treatment in patients using frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa, resulting in comparable pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.


Cryopreservation , Pentoxifylline , Pregnancy Outcome , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Spermatozoa , Humans , Pentoxifylline/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Female , Male , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Adult , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Cryopreservation/methods , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Rate , Sperm Retrieval , Retrospective Studies , Semen Preservation/methods
5.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1327800, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654926

Introduction: Azoospermia, characterized by an absence of sperm in the ejaculate, represents the most severe form of male infertility. While surgical sperm retrieval in obstructive azoospermia (OA) is successful in the majority of cases, patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) show retrieval rates of only about 50% and thus frequently have unnecessary surgery. Surgical intervention could be avoided if patients without preserved spermatogenesis are identified preoperatively. This prospective study aimed to discover biomarkers in seminal plasma that could be employed for a non-invasive differential diagnosis of OA/NOA in order to rationalize surgery recommendations and improve success rates. Methods: All patients signed written informed consent, underwent comprehensive andrological evaluation, received human genetics to exclude relevant pathologies, and patients with azoospermia underwent surgical sperm retrieval. Using label-free LC-MS/MS, we compared the proteomes of seminal plasma samples from fertile men (healthy controls (HC), n=8) and infertile men diagnosed with 1) OA (n=7), 2) NOA with successful sperm retrieval (mixed testicular atrophy (MTA), n=8), and 3) NOA without sperm retrieval (Sertoli cell-only phenotype (SCO), n=7). Relative abundance changes of two candidate markers of sperm retrieval, HSPA2 and LDHC, were confirmed by Western Blot. Results: We found the protein expression levels of 42 proteins to be significantly down-regulated (p ≤ 0.05) in seminal plasma from SCO NOA patients relative to HC whereas only one protein was down-regulated in seminal plasma from MTA patients. Analysis of tissue and cell expression suggested that the testis-specific proteins LDHC, PGK2, DPEP3, and germ-cell enriched heat-shock proteins HSPA2 and HSPA4L are promising biomarkers of spermatogenic function. Western blotting revealed a significantly lower abundance of LDHC and HSPA2 in the seminal plasma of men with NOA (SCO and MTA) compared to controls. Discussion: The results indicate that certain testis-specific proteins when measured in seminal plasma, could serve as indicators of the presence of sperm in the testis and predict the success of sperm retrieval. Used in conjunction with conventional clinical assessments, these proteomic biomarkers may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of idiopathic male infertility.


Azoospermia , Biomarkers , Proteomics , Semen , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/metabolism , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Semen/metabolism , Semen/chemistry , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biomarkers/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Adult , Proteomics/methods , Prospective Studies , Sperm Retrieval , Case-Control Studies , Spermatogenesis/physiology
6.
Soc Sci Med ; 349: 116870, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631234

Terror Management Theory (Tmt, solomon et al., 1991) claims that individuals use three anxiety buffer mechanisms to regulate their death awareness - cultural worldviews, self-esteem, and proximity seeking. In this article, we use these three TMT anxiety buffers to explain the phenomenon of posthumous sperm retrieval, requested by spouses or parents, usually of young soldiers who died during their military service. Whereas this phenomenon has been known for some time, it increased dramatically in the initial days following the massacre conducted by the Hamas terrorist organization in Israel on October 7, 2023. We claim that this was an immediate reaction to this terror event, which posed a direct, existential threat to those who were exposed to the massacre and the soldiers who defended the country, but also to the entire Israeli society, as well as for Jews around the globe. We use interpretive phenomenology to qualitatively examine the phenomenon of retrieving sperm from dead young men, analyzing the requests to retrieve sperm posthumously as a sign of the need to provide these young men with symbolic immortality, on both personal and national levels. We integrate this explanation with the military ethos and the tendency of Israeli society to endorse familyist and pronatalist values to expand our understanding of this contemporary phenomenon in Israel.


Military Personnel , Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Israel , Military Personnel/psychology , Sperm Retrieval/psychology , Posthumous Conception/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Young Adult , Warfare/psychology , Attitude to Death , Terrorism/psychology , Qualitative Research
7.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(5): 1307-1317, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430325

PURPOSE: To identify the genetic cause of a cryptorchidism patient carrying a non-canonical splicing variant highlighted by SPCards platform in RXFP2 and to provide a comprehensive overview of RXFP2 variants with cryptorchidism correlation. METHODS: We identified a homozygous non-canonical splicing variant by whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing in a case with cryptorchidism and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). As the pathogenicity of this non-canonical splicing variant remained unclear, we initially utilized the SPCards platform to predict its pathogenicity. Subsequently, we employed a minigene splicing assay to further evaluate the influence of the identified splicing variant. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. PubMed and Human Genome Variant Database (HGMD) were queried to search for RXFP2 variants. RESULTS: We identified a homozygous non-canonical splicing variant (NM_130806: c.1376-12A > G) in RXFP2, and confirmed this variant caused aberrant splicing of exons 15 and 16 of the RXFP2 gene: 11 bases were added in front of exon 16, leading to an abnormal transcript initiation and a frameshift. Fortunately, the patient successfully obtained his biological offspring through micro-TESE combined with ICSI. Four cryptorchidism-associated variants in RXFP2 from 90 patients with cryptorchidism were identified through a literature search in PubMed and HGMD, with different inheritance patterns. CONCLUSION: This is the first cryptorchidism case carrying a novel causative non-canonical splicing RXFP2 variant. The combined approach of micro-TESE and ICSI contributed to an optimal pregnancy outcome. Our literature review demonstrated that RXFP2 variants caused cryptorchidism in a recessive inheritance pattern, rather than a dominant pattern.


Cryptorchidism , Pregnancy Outcome , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Humans , Cryptorchidism/genetics , Cryptorchidism/pathology , Male , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Pregnancy , Female , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Pregnancy Outcome/genetics , Adult , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/pathology , Sperm Retrieval , Exome Sequencing , RNA Splicing/genetics
8.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 28(2): 349-352, 2024 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530764

This comprehensive review delves into the moral and ethical dilemmas surrounding post-mortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) and its implications for creating new individuals. The paper examines the challenges posed by unusual requests for sperm retrieval from the deceased's widow and parents, as well as the broader socio-ethical considerations associated with PMSR. These requests have often been denied due to the absence of established laws and guidelines governing posthumous sperm retrieval and subsequent births, which were once deemed impossible. While some countries have implemented institutional policies to regulate its use to some extent, there remains a lack of standardized rules and procedures for the collection and retrieval of sperm after death. It is essential to introduce institutional guidelines to facilitate requests for assisted reproductive technology (ART) following successful sperm retrieval. Additionally, the development of PMSR legislation is necessary to ensure a proper balance between the moral rights and fundamental rights of the deceased, their family, and any current or future offspring, while providing adequate protection for all parties involved.


Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Sperm Retrieval/ethics , Sperm Retrieval/legislation & jurisprudence , Posthumous Conception/ethics , Posthumous Conception/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
11.
J Urol ; 211(5): 678-686, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375822

PURPOSE: We evaluate microscopic (micro) testicular sperm extraction (TESE) timing relative to oocyte retrieval on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Couples with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved spermatozoa were analyzed based on whether micro-TESE was performed at least 1 day prior to oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-before group) or on the day of oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-of group). Embryology and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who underwent a successful testicular sperm retrieval was significantly lower in the TESE-day-before cohort (62%) than in the TESE-day-of cohort (69%; odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI [1.1, 1.7], P < .001). The fertilization rate was also found to be significantly lower in the TESE-day-before group (45%) than in the TESE-day-of group (53%; OR 1.4, 95% CI [1.2, 1.7], P = .01). Although the association between the cleavage rate and TESE timing was not statistically significant, the implantation rate was found to be significantly higher in the day-before cohort (28%) than in the day-of cohort (22%; OR 0.7, 95% CI [0.6, 0.9], P = .01). Nevertheless, it was found that the clinical pregnancy and delivery rates were not statistically significantly associated with the TESE timing. CONCLUSIONS: Although sperm retrieval and fertilization rates were lower in the TESE-day-before cohort, the 2 cohorts showed comparable embryologic and clinical outcomes. Micro-TESE can be performed before oocyte harvesting to provide physicians ample time to decide between cancelling oocyte retrieval or retrieving oocytes for cryopreservation.


Azoospermia , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Oocyte Retrieval , Testis/pathology , Semen , Azoospermia/therapy , Azoospermia/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Sperm Retrieval , Biopsy , Retrospective Studies
12.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(4): 1111-1124, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403804

PURPOSE: To identify germline mutations related to azoospermia etiology and reproductive potential of surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and to investigate the feasibility of predicting seminiferous tubule function of nonobstructive azoospermic men by transcriptomic profiling of ejaculates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sperm specimens were obtained from 30 men (38.4 ± 6 years) undergoing epididymal sperm aspiration for obstructive azoospermia (OA, n = 19) acquired by vasectomy, or testicular biopsy for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA, n = 11). To evaluate for a correlation with azoospermia etiology, DNAseq was performed on surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and cell-free RNAseq on seminal fluid (n = 23) was performed to predict spermatogenesis in the seminiferous tubule. RESULTS: Overall, surgically retrieved sperm aneuploidy rates were 1.7% and 1.8% among OA and NOA cohorts, respectively. OA men carried housekeeping-related gene mutations, while NOA men displayed mutations on genes involved in crucial spermiogenic functions (AP1S2, AP1G2, APOE). We categorized couples within each cohort according to ICSI clinical outcomes to investigate genetic causes that may affect reproductive potential. All OA-fertile men (n = 9) carried mutations in ZNF749 (sperm production), whereas OA-infertile men (n = 10) harbored mutations in PRB1, which is essential for DNA replication. NOA-fertile men (n = 8) carried mutations in MPIG6B (stem cell lineage differentiation), whereas NOA-infertile individuals (n = 3) harbored mutations in genes involved in spermato/spermio-genesis (ADAM29, SPATA31E1, MAK, POLG, IFT43, ATG9B) and early embryonic development (MBD5, CCAR1, PMEPA1, POLK, REC8, REPIN1, MAPRE3, ARL4C). Transcriptomic assessment of cell-free RNAs in seminal fluid from NOA men allowed the prediction of residual spermatogenic foci. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm genome profiling provides invaluable information on azoospermia etiology and identifies gene-related mechanistic links to reproductive performance. Moreover, RNAseq assessment of seminal fluid from NOA men can help predict sperm retrieval during testicular biopsies.


Azoospermia , Sperm Retrieval , Spermatogenesis , Spermatozoa , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/pathology , Adult , Spermatozoa/pathology , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Infertility, Male/pathology , Testis/pathology , Mutation/genetics , Middle Aged , Genetic Profile
13.
Fertil Steril ; 121(6): 1069-1071, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403108

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the intraoperative surgical techniques required for simultaneous radical orchiectomy and microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction (m-OncoTESE) in a step-by-step fashion. DESIGN: Video presentation. SETTING: University Hospital (University of Chicago). PATIENTS: A 37-year-old man (status after right orchiectomy at another institution for stage II-C testicular seminoma with positive preoperative tumor markers) was referred for contralateral orchiectomy of multifocal left testis mass and fertility preservation. Semen analysis before, microscopic testicular sperm extraction during, and semen or testicular specimen analysis after the first orchiectomy were unable to identify any sperm. A postoperative analysis of the m-OncoTESE performed on the left testis resulted in the cryopreservation of 200,000 motile sperm for future assisted reproductive technology (i.e., in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection). INTERVENTIONS: Left radical orchiectomy and left m-OncoTESE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive visual documentation of m-OncoTESE surgical techniques with concurrent commentary detailing the reasons behind each surgical step. A brief discussion on the background of m-OncoTESE and alternative fertility preservation methods accompanies the procedure. RESULTS: This video provides a step-by-step guide to performing an m-OncoTESE (proceeding a radical orchiectomy in a patient with testicular cancer) as a means of fertility preservation in an azoospermic patient. Successful extraction and cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa were achieved after targeted ex-vivo testicular microdissection. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm extraction via m-OncoTESE is a viable option for azoospermic patients with testicular cancer undergoing radical orchiectomies. The use of preoperative imaging and microsurgical techniques facilitates and optimizes surgical dissection and sperm recovery.


Fertility Preservation , Orchiectomy , Sperm Retrieval , Testicular Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Orchiectomy/methods , Adult , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Fertility Preservation/methods , Seminoma/surgery , Seminoma/pathology , Cryopreservation , Treatment Outcome
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(8): e37201, 2024 Feb 23.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394502

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer (TC) mostly occurs in men aged 14 to 44. Studies have shown that TC seriously damages male fertility, and 6% to 24% of patients with TC were even found to suffer from azoospermia when they are diagnosed. At present, some studies have pointed out that onco-microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) can extract sperm from tumor testicles. However, there are almost no reports on remedial measures after onco-mTESE failure. Given the valuable opportunity for fertility preservation in patients with TC and azoospermia, it is necessary to provide effective remedial methods for patients with failed onco-mTESE. METHODS: Two young men, who were diagnosed with TC and also found to have azoospermia, tried onco-mTESE while undergoing radical orchiectomy for fertility preservation. However, sperm extraction failed in both patients. Subsequently, the isolated testicular tissue of the patient in case 1 suffered from TC again, and the patient in case 2 was scheduled to receive multiple cycles of gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Because both had a plan to have a birth in the future, we performed remedial mTESE. RESULTS: Sperm was successfully extracted from both patients. The patient recovered well, without complications. The patient couple in case 1 underwent 1 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle but did not achieve clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There is still an opportunity to extract sperm successfully using onco-mTESE, despite the difficulty of fertility preservation in TC patients with azoospermia. If sperm extraction from the tumor testis fails, implementing remedial mTESE as early as possible would likely preserve the last chance of fertility for these patients.


Azoospermia , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Testicular Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/therapy , Azoospermia/complications , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/complications , Microdissection/methods , Sperm Retrieval , Semen , Spermatozoa/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Testis/surgery , Testis/pathology
15.
Andrology ; 12(2): 422-428, 2024 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377245

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most financially optimal surgical approach for testicular sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia. DESIGN: A decision tree was created examining five potential surgical approaches for men with non-obstructive azoospermia pursuing one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. An expected financial net loss was determined for each surgical option based on couples' willingness to pay for one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection resulting in pregnancy. The branch with the lowest expected net loss was defined as the most optimal financial decision (minimizing loss to a couple). Fresh testicular sperm extraction implied testicular sperm extraction was performed in conjunction with programmed ovulation induction. Frozen testicular sperm extraction implied testicular sperm extraction was performed initially, and ovulation induction/intracytoplasmic sperm injection was canceled if sperm retrieval failed.  The surgical options included fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction, with and without "back-up" sperm cryopreservation, fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, with and without "back-up" sperm cryopreservation, and frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction. Success was defined as pregnancy after one intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Probabilities of successful sperm retrieval with conventional testicular sperm extraction/microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, post-thaw sperm cellular loss following frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, ovulation induction/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle out-of-pocket costs, intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy rates for men with non-obstructive azoospermia, standard conventional testicular sperm extraction cost and average willingness to pay for intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle were gathered from the systematic literature review. Costs were in USD and adjusted to inflation (as of April 2020). Two-way sensitivity analysis was performed on varying couples' willingness to pay for one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and varying microsurgical testicular sperm extraction out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: According to our decision tree analysis (assuming minimum microsurgical testicular sperm extraction cost of $1,000 and willingness to pay of $8,000), the expected net loss for each branch was as follows: -$17,545 for fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction, -$17,523 for fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, -$9,624 for frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, -$17,991 for fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction with "backup", and -$18,210 for fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction with "backup". Two-way sensitivity analysis with a variable willingness to pay values and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and in-vitro fertilization costs confirmed that frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction consistently presented the lowest net loss compared to other options. Interestingly, when directly comparing fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and conventional testicular sperm extraction with "back-up", scenarios with decreasing willingness to pay and lower microsurgical testicular sperm extraction costs demonstrated fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction with "back-up" as more optimal than fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction with "back-up". CONCLUSIONS: For those couples who must pay out of pocket, our study suggests that frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the most financially optimal decision for the surgical management of non-obstructive azoospermia, regardless of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction cost and the couple's willingness to pay.


Azoospermia , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , United States , Azoospermia/surgery , Sperm Retrieval , Testis , Retrospective Studies , Semen , Spermatozoa , Decision Support Techniques
16.
Andrology ; 12(1): 137-156, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245055

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive molecular biomarkers for classifying azoospermia by origin into either obstructive or non-obstructive/secretory azoospermia, as well as for inferring the spermatogenic reserve of the testis of non-obstructive/secretory azoospermia patients, are of great interest for testicular sperm retrieval outcome prediction for assisted reproduction. Prior analyses of semen small non-coding RNA expression in azoospermia have focused on microRNAs, but there has been a lack of attention on other regulatory small RNA species. In this regard, studying more in-depth expression changes of small non-coding RNA subtypes in small extracellular vesicles from semen of azoospermic individuals could be useful to select additional non-invasive biomarkers with diagnostic/prognostic purposes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A high-throughput small RNA profiling analysis to determine the expression pattern of seminal small extracellular vesicle microRNAs (analyzed at the isomiR level), PIWI-interacting RNAs, and transfer RNA-derived small RNAs in normozoospermic (n = 4) and azoospermic (obstructive azoospermia because of pathological occurring obstruction in the genital tract, n = 4; secretory azoospermic individuals with positive testicular sperm extraction value, n = 5; secretory azoospermic individuals with negative testicular sperm extraction value, n = 4) individuals was carried out. Reverse transcriptase-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction validation analysis of selected microRNAs was additionally performed in a larger number of individuals. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clinically relevant quantitative changes in the small non-coding RNA levels contained in semen small extracellular vesicles can be used as biomarkers for the origin of azoospermia and for predicting the presence of residual spermatogenesis. In this regard, canonical isoform microRNAs (n = 185) but also other isomiR variants (n = 238) stand out in terms of numbers and fold-change differences in expression, underlining the need to consider isomiRs when investigating microRNA-based regulation. Conversely, although transfer RNA-derived small RNAs are shown in our study to represent a high proportion of small non-coding RNA sequences in seminal small extracellular vesicle samples, they are not able to discriminate the origin of azoospermia. PIWI-interacting RNA cluster profiles and individual PIWI-interacting RNAs with significant differential expression were also not able to discriminate. Our study demonstrated that expression values of individual and/or combined canonical isoform microRNAs (miR-10a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-31-5p, miR-181b-5p; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.8) in small extracellular vesicles provide considerable clinical value in identifying samples with a high likelihood of sperm retrieval while discriminating azoospermia by origin. Although no individual microRNA showed sufficient discriminating power on its own to identify severe spermatogenic disorders with focal spermatogenesis, multivariate microRNA models in semen small extracellular vesicles have the potential to identify those individuals with residual spermatogenesis. Availability and adoption of such non-invasive molecular biomarkers would represent a great improvement in reproductive treatment decision protocols for azoospermia in clinical practice.


Azoospermia , Extracellular Vesicles , MicroRNAs , RNA, Small Untranslated , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/metabolism , Semen/metabolism , Sperm Retrieval , Testis/metabolism , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Biomarkers/metabolism , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , RNA, Transfer/metabolism , Protein Isoforms
17.
Andrology ; 12(1): 30-44, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37172416

BACKGROUND: There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited. CONCLUSION: We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.


Azoospermia , Oligospermia , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/surgery , Azoospermia/pathology , Oligospermia/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Microdissection/methods , Sperm Retrieval , Semen , Testis/surgery , Testis/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Luteinizing Hormone , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
20.
Reprod Biol ; 24(1): 100825, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38000348

We conducted a case-controlled single-center cohort study to evaluate the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome in severe male infertility with different methods of sperm obtention. The data was compiled from a tertiary university hospital. The micro-TESE procedures were performed from 2008 to 2023, with a sperm recovery rate (SRR) of 45 %. The ICSI treatments were carried out between 2011 and 2023. The aim of the study was to compare the ICSI outcome using sperm obtained by microdissection testicular extraction (micro-TESE), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), and ejaculated sperm with sperm concentration less than 15 million per milliliter. We included a total of 462 ICSI cycles, of which 340 ICSIs with ejaculated sperm of men with oligozoospermia, with or without asthenozoospermia or teratozoospermia (OAT group), 51 ICSIs with TESA sperm of men with obstructive azoospermia (OA, TESA group), and 71 ICSIs with micro-TESE sperm of men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA, micro-TESE group). The patient characteristics, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate, and pregnancy outcome data were similar between the groups. The fertilization rates were 66.0 % in the OAT group, 68.3 % in the TESA group and 62.8 % in the micro-TESE group and live birth rate per embryo transfer were 23.7 %, 28.9 %, and 25.0 %, respectively, without statistical difference. The obstetrical outcome was similar in all the groups. The overall clinical results in all ICSI cycles performed for treating severe male factor infertility were similar, independent of the method of collection of spermatozoa. The results also confirm the efficacy of micro-TESE in the treatment of severe male factor infertility.


Azoospermia , Infertility, Male , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Azoospermia/therapy , Sperm Retrieval , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Microdissection/methods , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Semen , Spermatozoa , Testis
...