ABSTRACT
Seismocardiographic (SCG) signals are chest wall vibrations induced by cardiac activity and are potentially useful for cardiac monitoring and diagnosis. SCG waveform is observed to vary with respiration, but the mechanism of these changes is poorly understood as alterations in autonomic tone, lung volume, heart location and intrathoracic pressure are all varying during the respiratory cycle. Understanding SCG variability and its sources may help reduce variability and increase SCG clinical utility. This study investigated SCG variability during breath holding (BH) at two different lung volumes (i.e., end inspiration and end expiration) and five airway pressures (i.e., 0, ± 2-4, and ± 15-20 cm H2O). Variability during normal breathing was also studied with and without grouping SCG beats into two clusters of similar waveform morphologies (performed using the K-medoid algorithm in an unsupervised machine learning fashion). The study included 15 healthy subjects (11 Females and 4 males, Age: 21 ± 2 y) where SCG, ECG, and spirometry were simultaneously acquired. SCG waveform variability was calculated at each experimental state (i.e., lung volume and airway pressure). Results showed that breath holding was more effective in reducing the intra-state variability of SCG than clustering normal breathing data. For the BH states, the intra-state variability increased as the airway pressure deviated from zero. The subaudible-to-audible energy ratio of the BH states increased as the airway pressure decreased below zero which may be related to the effect of the intrathoracic pressure on cardiac afterload and blood ejection. When combining the BH waveforms at end inspiration and end expiration states (at the same airway pressures) into one group, the intra-state variability increased, which suggests that the lung volume and associated change in heart location were a significant source of variability. The linear trend between airway pressure and waveform changes was found to be statistically significant for BH at end expiration. To confirm these findings, more studies are needed with a larger number of airway pressure levels and larger number of subjects.
Subject(s)
Breath Holding , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Lung/physiology , Respiration , Electrocardiography , Adult , Lung Volume Measurements , Spirometry/methods , AlgorithmsABSTRACT
Background: The quality of the spirometry is estimated with criteria of acceptability and repeatability. The repeatability criteria accepted by consensus is < 0.150 L. Objective: To know the repeatability in quality A spirometry. Material and methods: Analytical cross-sectional design. The demographic variables and the 3 best spirometry curves with normal, suggestive of restriction and bronchial obstruction profiles were obtained from consecutive subjects of both genders from 18 to 80 years of age. The repeatability was analyzed with the mean difference (bias) and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: 630 curves from 210 subjects were accepted. Group age 60 ± 15 years. Female predominance 113 (53.8%), occupation: domestic services 61 (29%), and diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 70 (33.4%). The differences in the curves were < 0.150 L. The mean difference (bias) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval, 95% CI) of the forced expiratory volume in the first second were 1 vs. 2 maneuver: -0.01 (0.13, -0.14), 0.997 (95% CI 0.996, 0.998); 2 vs. 3 maneuver: 0.00 (0.13, -0.13), 0.997 (95% CI 0.996, 0.998), and maneuver 1 vs. 3: -0.00 (0.16, -0.17), 0.995 (95% CI 0.994, 0.996). Forced vital capacity: 1 vs. 2 maneuver: -0.01 (0.17, -0.18), 0.996 (95% CI 0.995, 0.997); 2 vs. 3 maneuver: 0.01 (0.17, -0.16), 0.997 (95% CI 0.0.996, 0.998), and maneuver 1 vs. 3: -0.00 (0.18, -0.19), 0.996 (95% CI 0.995, 0.997). Conclusion: The repeatability obtained in spirometry with quality A validates the use of the repeatability criterion of 0.150 L.
Introducción: la calidad de la espirometría se estima con criterios de aceptabilidad y repetitividad. La repetitividad aceptada por consenso es < 0.150 L. Objetivo: conocer la repetitividad en espirometrías de calidad A. Material y métodos: diseño transversal analítico. Se obtuvieron las variables demográficas y las 3 mejores curvas de espirometría con perfil normal, que sugiriera restricción y obstrucción bronquial de sujetos consecutivos de ambos géneros de 18 a 80 años. La repetitividad se analizó con la diferencia de medias (sesgo) y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Resultados: se aceptaron 630 curvas de 210 sujetos. Edad grupal 60 ± 15 años. Predominio femenino 113 (53.8%), ocupación: servicios domésticos 61 (29%) y con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica 70 (33.4%). Las diferencias en las curvas fueron < 0.150 L. Las diferencias medias (sesgo) y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (intervalo de confianza al 95%, IC 95%) del volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo fueron: maniobra 1 frente a 2: −0.01 (0.13, −0.14), 0.997 (IC 95% 0.996, 0.998); maniobra 2 frente a 3: 0.00 (0.13, −0.13), 0.997 (IC 95% 0.996, 0.998), y maniobra 1 frente a 3: −0.00 (0.16, −0.17), 0.995 (IC 95% 0.994, 0.996). La capacidad vital forzada: maniobra 1 frente a 2: −0.01 (0.17, −0.18), 0.996 (IC 95% 0.995, 0.997); maniobra 2 frente a 3: 0.01 (0.17, −0.16), 0.997 (IC 95% 0.0.996, 0.998), y maniobra 1 frente a 3: −0.00 (0.18, −0.19), 0.996 (IC 95% 0.995, 0.997). Conclusión: la repetitividad obtenida en espirometrías con calidad A valida el uso del criterio de repetitividad de 0.150 L.
Subject(s)
Spirometry , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Spirometry/standards , Spirometry/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Forced Expiratory Volume , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathologyABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Area under expiratory flow-volume curve (AEX) has been shown to be a valuable functional measurement in respiratory physiology. Area under inspiratory flow-volume loop (AIN) also shows promise in characterizing upper and/or lower airflow obstruction. OBJECTIVES: we aimed here to develop normative reference values for AIN, able to ascertain deviations from normal. METHODS: We analyzed AIN in 4,980 spirometry tests recorded in non-smoking, healthy individuals in the Pulmonary Function Testing Laboratory. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval, CI), standard deviation and median (25th-75th interquartile range) AIN were 16.05 (15.79-16.31), 9.08 and 14.72 (9.12-21.42) L2·sec-1, respectively. The mean (95% CI) and standard deviation of the best-trial measurements for square root of AIN (Sqrt AIN) were 3.84 (3.81-3.87) and 1.14; 4.15 (4.12-4.18) and 1.03 in men, and 2.68 (2.63-2.72) and 0.72 L·sec-1/2 in women. The mean (standard deviation) of pre- and post-bronchodilator Sqrt AIN were 3.71 (1.17) and 3.81 (1.19) L·sec-1/2, respectively. The mean (95% CI), standard deviation and lowest 5th percentile (lower limit of normal, LLN) of Sqrt AIN/Sqrt AEX (%) were 101.3 (100.82-101.88), 18.7, and 71.8%; stratified by gender, it was 102.2 (101.6-102.8), 18.6, and 72.8% in men, and 98 (96.9-99.2), 18.8, and 68.6% in women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of area under the inspiratory flow-volume curve (AIN) and the derived indices offers a promising opportunity to assess upper airway disease (e.g., involvement of larynx, trachea or major bronchi), especially because some of these measurements appear to be independent of age, race, height, and weight.
Subject(s)
Spirometry , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Spirometry/methods , Spirometry/standards , Reference Values , Aged , Young Adult , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Respiratory Function Tests/standards , Inhalation/physiology , Adolescent , Area Under CurveABSTRACT
The respiratory rate is an important factor for assessing patient status and detecting changes in the severity of illness. Real-time determination of the respiratory rate will enable early responses to changes in the patient condition. Several methods of wearable devices have enabled remote respiratory rate monitoring. However, gaps persist in large-scale validation, patient-specific calibration, standardization and their usefulness in clinical practice has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2 wearable stretch sensors, C-STRECH® which is used in clinical practice and a novel stretchable capacitor in measuring the respiratory rate. The respiratory rate of 20 healthy subjects was measured by a spirometer with the stretch sensor applied to 1 of 5 locations (umbilicus, lateral abdomen, epigastrium, lateral chest, or chest) of their body at rest while they were in a sitting or supine position before or after exercise. The sensors detected the largest amplitudes at the epigastrium and umbilicus compared to other sites of measurement for the sitting and supine positions, respectively. At rest, the respiratory rate of the sensors had an error of 0.06 to 2.39 breaths/minute, whereas after exercise, an error of 1.57 to 3.72 breaths/minute was observed compared to the spirometer. The sensors were able to detect the respiratory rate of healthy volunteers in the sitting and supine positions, but there was a need for improvement in detection after exercise.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Rate , Wearable Electronic Devices , Humans , Respiratory Rate/physiology , Male , Female , Adult , Prospective Studies , Spirometry/instrumentation , Spirometry/methods , Young Adult , Healthy Volunteers , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Monitoring, Physiologic/methodsABSTRACT
For decades spirometry has been the benchmark test for capturing lung function in children but its recognized limitations required the development of other techniques. This article introduces novel techniques in lung function assessment for pediatric patients, including multiple breath washout, impulse oscillometry, structured light plethysmography, and electrical impedance tomography, and common themes in interpreting the results. Challenges include standardization, reference data, and clinical integration of these innovative tools. Further research is ongoing to optimize these tests for clinical use, especially in diverse populations and pediatric settings.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Function Tests , Humans , Child , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Plethysmography/methods , Electric Impedance , Spirometry/methods , Lung/physiology , Lung/physiopathology , Lung/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: In adults, 150 to 300 min a week of moderate-intensity physical activity is the recommended daily level to maintain or improve fitness. In subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), reductions in daily physical activity (DPA) amounts are related to clinically significant outcomes. In this study, we ascertain whether or not COPD patients, when clustered into active (DPA ≥ 30 min a day, 5 days a week) and inactive (DPA < 30 min a day, 5 days a week), may differ in exercise capacity, as assessed by a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Materials and Methods: A large sample of clinically stable COPD patients was retrospectively recruited and then underwent spirometry and an incremental ramp protocol 5-15 watts/min CPET. DPA was assessed by a questionnaire. Results: A total of 83 (female 25%, age range 41-85 y) active and 131 (female 31%, age range 49-83 y) inactive participants were enrolled. They were similar in age, sex distribution, body mass index (BMI) and in spirometry. The two groups were significantly different in dyspnea on exertion, as assessed by the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), and in cardio-metabolic parameters, but not in ventilatory ones, as confirmed by the CPET. Conclusions: COPD patients experiencing physical activity of at least 30 min a day, 5 days a week, showed a greater exercise capacity and an improved cardiovascular response to exercise, when compared to inactive ones. Active and inactive participants did not differ in terms of airflow obstruction severity as well as in dynamic hyperinflation and ventilatory inefficiency during exercise. This study further suggests the benefits of regular physical activity in COPD.
Subject(s)
Exercise Tolerance , Exercise , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Exercise/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Exercise Test/methods , Exercise Test/statistics & numerical data , Spirometry/methods , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: One of the members of the neurotrophin (NT) family is the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In addition to its role in the nerve system, it has been found to play a role in lung health and diseases. Materials and Methods: The serum concentrations of BDNF were assessed in 57 patients with COPD and in 19 control individuals and the possible associations of BDNF with the spirometric indexes and disease stages were explored. Results: We did not find a significant difference between the serum concentrations of BDNF of patients and controls (p = 0.521). A significant negative correlation of the serum BDNF levels with the age of the patients (Rho = -0.279, p = 0.036) was observed. In addition, a borderline negative correlation with the age of disease onset (Rho= -0.244, p = 0.063) was also found. When analyzing these correlations in different genders, we found stronger statistical significance in male patients (Rho = -0.398, p = 0.009; and Rho = -0.419, p = 0.006), while no such significance was found in females (p = 0.574 and p = 0.342). The analyses of the possible relations of serum BDNF concentration with the spirometric parameters in the whole group of patients did not reveal any significance (p = 0.231 for FEV1%pr. and p = 0.271 for FEV1/FVC%). However, when the patients were dichotomized on the basis of smoking habits, we obtained a strong positive correlation between BDNF and FEV1%pr. (Rho = 0.501, p = 0.048) in non-smokers, but strong negative correlations with FEV1%pr. (Rho = -0.468, p = 0.003) and with FEV1/FVC% (Rho = -0.331, p = 0.040) in ex/current smokers. Non-smokers with moderate disease (GOLD II) had higher BDNF serum concentrations than patients with GOLD stage III/IV (p = 0.031). In ex/current smokers, there was an opposite association (p = 0.045). Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that the expression and secretion of BDNF are changed in COPD, but its effects and functions may differ according to the smoking history of the patients.
Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Smoking , Humans , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/blood , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Smoking/blood , Smoking/adverse effects , Aged , Respiratory Function Tests , Spirometry/methods , Case-Control StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chest x-ray is a basic, cost-effective, and widely available imaging method that is used for static assessments of organic diseases and anatomical abnormalities, but its ability to estimate dynamic measurements such as pulmonary function is unknown. We aimed to estimate two major pulmonary functions from chest x-rays. METHODS: In this retrospective model development and validation study, we trained, validated, and externally tested a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model to estimate forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from chest x-rays. We included consecutively collected results of spirometry and any associated chest x-rays that had been obtained between July 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2021, from five institutions in Japan (labelled institutions A-E). Eligible x-rays had been acquired within 14 days of spirometry and were labelled with the FVC and FEV1. X-rays from three institutions (A-C) were used for training, validation, and internal testing, with the testing dataset being independent of the training and validation datasets, and then x-rays from the two other institutions (D and E) were used for independent external testing. Performance for estimating FVC and FEV1 was evaluated by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) compared with the results of spirometry. FINDINGS: We included 141 734 x-ray and spirometry pairs from 81 902 patients from the five institutions. The training, validation, and internal test datasets included 134 307 x-rays from 75 768 patients (37 718 [50%] female, 38 050 [50%] male; mean age 56 years [SD 18]), and the external test datasets included 2137 x-rays from 1861 patients (742 [40%] female, 1119 [60%] male; mean age 65 years [SD 17]) from institution D and 5290 x-rays from 4273 patients (1972 [46%] female, 2301 [54%] male; mean age 63 years [SD 17]) from institution E. External testing for FVC yielded r values of 0·91 (99% CI 0·90-0·92) for institution D and 0·90 (0·89-0·91) for institution E, ICC of 0·91 (99% CI 0·90-0·92) and 0·89 (0·88-0·90), MSE of 0·17 L2 (99% CI 0·15-0·19) and 0·17 L2 (0·16-0·19), RMSE of 0·41 L (99% CI 0·39-0·43) and 0·41 L (0·39-0·43), and MAE of 0·31 L (99% CI 0·29-0·32) and 0·31 L (0·30-0·32). External testing for FEV1 yielded r values of 0·91 (99% CI 0·90-0·92) for institution D and 0·91 (0·90-0·91) for institution E, ICC of 0·90 (99% CI 0·89-0·91) and 0·90 (0·90-0·91), MSE of 0·13 L2 (99% CI 0·12-0·15) and 0·11 L2 (0·10-0·12), RMSE of 0·37 L (99% CI 0·35-0·38) and 0·33 L (0·32-0·35), and MAE of 0·28 L (99% CI 0·27-0·29) and 0·25 L (0·25-0·26). INTERPRETATION: This deep learning model allowed estimation of FVC and FEV1 from chest x-rays, showing high agreement with spirometry. The model offers an alternative to spirometry for assessing pulmonary function, which is especially useful for patients who are unable to undergo spirometry, and might enhance the customisation of CT imaging protocols based on insights gained from chest x-rays, improving the diagnosis and management of lung diseases. Future studies should investigate the performance of this AI model in combination with clinical information to enable more appropriate and targeted use. FUNDING: None.
Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Humans , Japan , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Vital Capacity , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/physiology , Forced Expiratory Volume , Radiography, Thoracic , Spirometry/methods , Adult , Respiratory Function Tests/methodsABSTRACT
Background/aim: There is limited information on the pathologic changes in the small airways among obese and nonobese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) measures airway resistance and reactance independently of patient effort. This study aimed to compare airway resistance in small airways using IOS between obese and nonobese patients with OSAS. Materials and methods: In this real-life cross-sectional study, demographic information was collected from obese and nonobese subjects diagnosed with moderate and severe OSAS without any other underlying diseases. Spirometry and IOS measurements were conducted, and the values of both groups were statistically analyzed. Results: The nonobese group had a mean age of 45.6 ± 11.7 years (median 45), while the obese group had a mean age of 48.4 ± 9.5 years (median 47.5). The mean body mass index (BMI) for the nonobese group was 26.2 ± 2.1 kg/m2 (median 27 kg/m2), and for the obese group, it was 35.6 ± 6.4 kg/m2 (median 33 kg/m2). Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in R5 - R20 percentage, reactance area (AX), and resonant frequency (Fres) values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Among obese OSAS patients, there is an increase in resistance in small airways as indicated by IOS values. IOS shows promise as a potential screening tool for diagnosing OSAS.
Subject(s)
Airway Resistance , Obesity , Oscillometry , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/complications , Airway Resistance/physiology , Oscillometry/methods , Female , Adult , Spirometry/methods , Body Mass IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prediction of postoperative functional status in non-small cell lung cancer patients based on preoperative assessment of physical and respiratory capacity is inadequate based on recent RCTs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospectively collected spirometry data and the six-minute walk test results of 57 patients treated with lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed. The tests were performed before surgery, and 30 and 90 days after lobectomy. All patients underwent a respiratory functional and physical capacity assessment. RESULTS: All 57 patients underwent lobectomy. Before surgery, mean FEV1 was 2.4 ± 0.7 L, corresponding to %FEV1 of 88.3 ± 17.3%. The mean absolute and expected 6MWT distance was 548 ± 74.6 m and 108.9 ± 14.5%, respectively. At the first postoperative evaluation 30 days after surgery, FEV1 and %FEV1 decreased significantly by an average of 0.5 ± 0.3 L and 15.1 ± 10.7%, while 6MWT and expected 6MWT decreased minimally by an average of 1.0 m and 0.8%, respectively. Three months after lobectomy, FEV1 and %FEV1, compared with the initial assessment, decreased by an average of 0.3 ± 0.3 l and 7.8 ± 10.0%, while 6MWT and its expected score increased to 564.6 ± 84.6 m and 112.8 ± 15.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After lobectomy, FEV1 decreased slightly and less than expected, while 6MWT increased proportionally compared to the preoperative evaluation.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Spirometry , Humans , Spirometry/methods , Female , Male , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Prospective Studies , Forced Expiratory VolumeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of machine learning(ML) methods would improve the diagnosis of small airway dysfunction(SAD) in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and preserved pulmonary function(PPF). This paper evaluated the performance of several ML algorithms associated with the impulse oscillometry(IOS) analysis to aid in the diagnostic of respiratory changes in SAD. We also find out the best configuration for this task. METHODS: IOS and spirometry were measured in 280 subjects, including a healthy control group (n = 78), a group with normal spirometry (n = 158) and a group with abnormal spirometry (n = 44). Various supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms and feature selection strategies were examined, such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), Adaptive Boosting (ADABOOST), Navie Bayesian (BAYES), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). RESULTS: The first experiment of this study demonstrated that the best oscillometric parameter (BOP) was R5, with an AUC value of 0.642, when comparing a healthy control group(CG) with patients in the group without lung volume-defined SAD(PPFN). The AUC value of BOP in the control group was 0.769 compared with patients with spirometry defined SAD(PPFA) in the PPF population. In the second experiment, the ML technique was used. In CGvsPPFN, RF and ADABOOST had the best diagnostic results (AUC = 0.914, 0.915), with significantly higher accuracy compared to BOP (p < 0.01). In CGvsPPFA, RF and ADABOOST had the best diagnostic results (AUC = 0.951, 0.971) and significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.01). In the third, fourth and fifth experiments, different feature selection techniques allowed us to find the best IOS parameters (R5, (R5-R20)/R5 and Fres). The results demonstrate that the performance of ADABOOST remained essentially unaltered following the application of the feature selector, whereas the diagnostic accuracy of the remaining four classifiers (RF, SVM, BAYES, and KNN) is marginally enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: IOS combined with ML algorithms provide a new method for diagnosing SAD in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and PPF. The present study's findings provide evidence that this combination may help in the early diagnosis of respiratory changes in these patients.
Subject(s)
Machine Learning , Spirometry , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Spirometry/methods , Aged , Oscillometry/methods , Support Vector Machine , Lung/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Understanding willingness to undergo pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and the factors associated with poor uptake of PFTs is crucial for improving early detection and treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to understand willingness to undergo PFTs among high-risk populations and identify any barriers that may contribute to low uptake of PFTs. METHODS: We collected data from participants in the "Happy Breathing Program" in China. Participants who did not follow physicians' recommendations to undergo PFTs were invited to complete a survey regarding their willingness to undergo PFTs and their reasons for not undergoing PFTs. We estimated the proportion of participants who were willing to undergo PFTs and examined the various reasons for participants to not undergo PFTs. We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regressions to analyze the impact of individual-level factors on willingness to undergo PFTs. RESULTS: A total of 8475 participants who had completed the survey on willingness to undergo PFTs were included in this study. Out of these participants, 7660 (90.4%) were willing to undergo PFTs. Among those who were willing to undergo PFTs but actually did not, the main reasons for not doing so were geographical inaccessibility ( n = 3304, 43.1%) and a lack of trust in primary healthcare institutions ( n = 2809, 36.7%). Among the 815 participants who were unwilling to undergo PFTs, over half ( n = 447, 54.8%) believed that they did not have health problems and would only consider PFTs when they felt unwell. In the multivariable regression, individuals who were ≤54 years old, residing in rural townships, with a secondary educational level, with medical reimbursement, still working, with occupational exposure to dust, and aware of the abbreviation "COPD" were more willing to undergo PFTs. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to undergo PFTs was high among high-risk populations. Policymakers may consider implementing strategies such as providing financial incentives, promoting education, and establishing community-based programs to enhance the utilization of PFTs.
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Respiratory Function Tests , Spirometry , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , China , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Spirometry/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Spirometry is a point-of-care lung function test that helps support the diagnosis and monitoring of chronic lung disease. The quality and interpretation accuracy of spirometry is variable in primary care. This study aims to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) decision support software improves the performance of primary care clinicians in the interpretation of spirometry, against reference standard (expert interpretation). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A parallel, two-group, statistician-blinded, randomised controlled trial of primary care clinicians in the UK, who refer for, or interpret, spirometry. People with specialist training in respiratory medicine to consultant level were excluded. A minimum target of 228 primary care clinician participants will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation to assess fifty de-identified, real-world patient spirometry sessions through an online platform either with (intervention group) or without (control group) AI decision support software report. Outcomes will cover primary care clinicians' spirometry interpretation performance including measures of technical quality assessment, spirometry pattern recognition and diagnostic prediction, compared with reference standard. Clinicians' self-rated confidence in spirometry interpretation will also be evaluated. The primary outcome is the proportion of the 50 spirometry sessions where the participant's preferred diagnosis matches the reference diagnosis. Unpaired t-tests and analysis of covariance will be used to estimate the difference in primary outcome between intervention and control groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and given favourable opinion by Health Research Authority Wales (reference: 22/HRA/5023). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at relevant national and international conferences, disseminated through social media, patient and public routes and directly shared with stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05933694.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Primary Health Care , Spirometry , Humans , Spirometry/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Software , United Kingdom , Decision Support Systems, ClinicalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The effects of cigarette smoking on the health of active smokers and passive smokers have long been known, in contrast to the effects of alternative forms of nicotine intake that are gaining popularity. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of smoking traditional cigarettes and alternative forms of nicotine intake on the functional state of the respiratory system of smokers and non-smokers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Study participants (n=60) were divided into 3 groups: non-smokers (control group), cigarette smokers, and nicotine alternative users. Respiratory function testing (spirometry), forced oscillation technique, and measurement of respiratory muscle strength (PImax, PEmax) were performed. All of the above respiratory function tests were performed in accordance with European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society recommendations. RESULTS Smokers and those using alternative forms of nicotine intake had significantly higher values, including resistance at 5 Hz% and 11 Hz%, among others. CONCLUSIONS Smokers and users of alternative forms of nicotine are characterized by reduced flow through the small bronchioles, as evidenced by a reduction in maximal expiratory flow at 25% of vital capacity. Smokers and users of alternative forms of nicotine have higher resistance values at the height of small and medium bronchioles. Assessment method of technical forced oscillation parameters is simple to perform to detect early airway changes and is an important element in the early diagnosis of changes in smokers. The correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between age of smoking initiation/use of alternative forms of nicotine and changes in mid bronchial resistance.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Function Tests , Smoking , Tobacco Products , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Smoking/adverse effects , Nicotine/adverse effects , Nicotine/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Smokers , Spirometry/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Phase III slope from a single breath nitrogen washout test provides information about ventilation heterogeneity (VH) in the lungs. PURPOSE: To determine if the Phase III slope from the exhaled tracer gas concentration during a standard, single breath DLCO test using rapid gas analysis provides similar information about VH. BASIC PROCEDURES: Retrospective analysis of clinical pulmonary function laboratory data including spirometry, lung volumes, and DLCO. The normalized Phase III slope from the exhaled CH4 concentration (SnCH4) was compared among different patterns of physiologic abnormality and with VA/TLC as an indicator of VH. MAIN FINDINGS: SnCH4 was the steepest in the group with "Obstruction and Low DLCO", with significant differences between this group and the "Normal", "Obstruction with Normal DLCO", "Mixed Obstruction and Restriction" and "Isolated Low DLCO" groups. SnCH4 was steeper in current and former smokers compared to non-smokers. Among the entire study sample, SnCH4 correlated with VA/TLC (Spearman rho = -0.56, p < 0.01) and remained a significant determinant of VA/TLC by regression modeling. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: The SnCH4 derived from a standard, single breath DLCO test using rapid gas analysis varied among distinct patterns of physiologic abnormalities and was associated with VA/TLC as a measure of VH.
Subject(s)
Breath Tests , Exhalation , Methane , Humans , Breath Tests/methods , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Exhalation/physiology , Methane/analysis , Methane/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Spirometry/methods , Lung/metabolism , Lung/physiopathology , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity/physiology , Smoking/metabolism , Smoking/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Understanding the prevalence of abnormal lung function and its associated factors among patients recovering from COVID-19 is crucial for enhancing post-COVID care strategies. This study primarily aimed to determine the prevalence and types of spirometry abnormalities among post-COVID-19 patients in Malaysia, with a secondary objective of identifying its associated factors. Conducted at the COVID-19 Research Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University Technology MARA, from March 2021 to December 2022, this study included patients at least three months post-discharge from hospitals following moderate-to-critical COVID-19. Of 408 patients studied, abnormal spirometry was found in 46.8%, with 28.4% exhibiting a restrictive pattern, 17.4% showing preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), and 1.0% displaying an obstructive pattern. Factors independently associated with abnormal spirometry included consolidation on chest X-ray (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.75-37.42, p = 0.008), underlying cardiovascular disease (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.19-10.47, p = 0.023), ground-glass opacity on chest X-ray (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.52-4.30, p < 0.001), and oxygen desaturation during the 6-min walk test (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.20-3.06, p = 0.007). This study highlights that patients recovering from moderate-to-critical COVID-19 often exhibit abnormal spirometry, notably a restrictive pattern and PRISm. Routine spirometry screening for high-risk patients is recommended.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Patient Discharge , Spirometry , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/physiopathology , Spirometry/methods , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Malaysia/epidemiology , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Aged , Lung/physiopathology , Lung/diagnostic imaging , PrevalenceABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of manual therapy (MT) on the respiratory functions of healthy young individuals. The study included 104 participants, consisting of university students (87 females, 17 males, mean age 20.1 ± 2.2). Participants were randomly assigned to the MT (experimental; n = 52) and sham-MT (control; n = 52) groups. The experimental group underwent thoracic manipulations and mobilizations along with diaphragm mobilization. In the control group, the hands were placed on the same regions, but no specific intervention was applied. All participants underwent respiratory function testing before and after the intervention using a portable spirometer (PEF- Peak expiratory flow; FEV 1- Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC- Forced vital capacity and FEV1/FVC- Tiffeneau index). In the experimental group, there was a significant increase in the mean PEF value following MT application from 296.3 ± 110.8 to 316.1 ± 119.1 (p = 0.018). Conversely, the mean PEF value in the control group showed a slight decrease from 337.1 ± 93.3 to 324.5 ± 89.2 (p = 0.002). No significant changes were observed in FVC, FEV1, or FEV1/FVC values pre- and post-intervention in either groups. A single MT session led to a significant improvement in PEF in healthy young individuals. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of MT on respiratory functions and its potential implications in clinical practice.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05934240 (06/07/2023).
Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Manipulations , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Musculoskeletal Manipulations/methods , Respiratory Function Tests , Forced Expiratory Volume , Vital Capacity , Adult , Healthy Volunteers , Adolescent , Spirometry/methods , RespirationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Spirometry is used extensively, but airway oscillometry is gaining acceptance for evaluating obstructive airway disorders. Moderate persistent asthma requires daily treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We aimed to examine the relationship between airway oscillometry and lung volumes, which are the markers of lung physiology in obstructive airway disease and spirometry in the real-world clinical setting. A total of 72 adults with moderate persistent asthma followed up in our outpatient department from November 2021 to August 2022, and their clinical details and tests of spirometry, forced oscillation technique (FOT), and lung volumes by body plethysmography (BP) performed before and after bronchodilator administration were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 40 years, and the majority (57%) were females. FOT detected airflow limitation in 12 of the 31 patients with normal spirometry. BP detected abnormalities in more patients than both spirometry and FOT (91.6 vs 73.6%, p < 0.001). Respiratory resistance 5 (R5) had a negative correlation with functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC). Reactance 5 (X5) correlated positively with inspiratory capacity (IC) and TLC and negatively with reserve volume (RV)/TLC ratio. A positive correlation was found between IC/TLC% and postbronchodilator X5 and between R5 and 19 and RV/TLC. R5 had a negative and X5 had a positive correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, and maximal mid expiratory flow rates (MMEF). ∇X5 had a negative correlation with FEV1, MMEF, and FEV1/FVC. Spirometry detected postbronchodilator responsiveness in more patients than FOT when only the R5 criterion was used and in a comparable number when the X5 criterion was added. ∇X5 and R5-R19/R5 declined significantly after bronchodilators. CONCLUSION: We concluded that there is a moderate correlation between FOT and spirometry and lung volumes by BP. FOT and spirometry should be used together to identify airflow obstruction and postbronchodilator responsiveness in asthma. Lung volumes by BP identify more abnormalities in adults with asthma than both spirometry and FOT. Thresholds to define postbronchodilator responsiveness (PBDR) for ∇X5 and R5-R19 need to be defined.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Plethysmography, Whole Body , Spirometry , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/diagnosis , Female , Adult , Male , Spirometry/methods , Middle Aged , Plethysmography, Whole Body/methods , Oscillometry/methods , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Lung Volume Measurements/methods , Lung/physiopathologySubject(s)
Spirometry , Humans , Spirometry/methods , Spirometry/standards , Spirometry/statistics & numerical data , FemaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of bronchodilator on the respiratory mechanics and pulmonary function of children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: Cross-sectional study on clinically stable children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis aged from six to 15 years. Participants underwent impulse oscillometry and spirometry evaluations before and 15 minutes after bronchodilator inhalation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to verify the sample distribution, and the Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the data before and after bronchodilator inhalation. RESULTS: The study included 54 individuals with a mean age of 9.7±2.8 years. The analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in impulse oscillometry and spirometry parameters after bronchodilator inhalation. However, according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommendations (2020 and 2021), this improvement was not sufficient to classify it as a bronchodilator response. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bronchodilator medication improved respiratory mechanics and pulmonary function parameters of children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis; however, most patients did not show bronchodilator response according to ATS/ERS recommendations.