Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neuromuscul Dis ; 7(2): 175-181, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31929118

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic feet are at very high risk for infection and amputation. The slipping slipper sign (SSS) is elicited by a simple questionnaire test reported to detect the presence of severe diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This test can be administered by non-medical staff. In this study, subjects with and without the SSS were evaluated by nerve conduction studies (NCS) and ultrasound measurements of the right sural nerve diameters as well as with traditional scoring systems for peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the Slipping Slipper Sign can be used as an index of severe diabetic peripheral neuropathyMethod:This was a prospective cross sectional study in which 74 patients with diabetes (38 positive and 36 negative for SSS) underwent ultrasonography and NCS of the right sural nerve by an examiner blinded to SSS status. Findings were evaluated against demography, clinical history, anthropometry as well as traditional clinical and autonomic neuropathic scores. RESULTS: Patients without the SSS [median (IQR) = 10.0 years (4.0-20.3)] had a significantly shorter duration of diabetes compared with those with the SSS [median (IQR) = 15.0 years (8.5-25.0)], p = 0.028. The frequencies of retinopathy (36.8% vs 2.8%, p <  0.05) and cerebrovascular accidents (18.4% vs 13.9 %, p <  0.05) were higher among those with SSS compared with those without. Differences in nerve conduction characteristics were markedly significant. The amplitude of the sural sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) was ([median (IQR)] 0 microvolts vs 4.0 microvolts (0.0-10.8) p <  0.002) between those with and without SSS, respectively whilst none of patients with SSS had a recordable SNAP vs 78% without a SSS. Similarly, maximal thickness of the right sural nerve at the ankle 3.0 mm (2.3-3.4) vs 3.5 mm (3.0-3.9), and leg 3.4 mm (2.7-3.8) vs 3.9 mm (3.3-4.2) was reduced, p <  0.01 in patients with the SSS compared with those with a negative SSS. CONCLUSION: The SSS identifies feet with objective neurophysiological and imaging characteristics of severe neuropathy.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Neuropathies/diagnostic imaging , Diabetic Neuropathies/diagnosis , Diabetic Neuropathies/physiopathology , Sural Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Sural Nerve/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neural Conduction/physiology , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Single-Blind Method , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL