An Augmented Vision of Our Medical and Surgical Future, Today?

Incorporating consumer electronics into the operating room, we evaluated the Apple Vision Pro (AVP) during limb preservation surgeries, just as we evaluated Google Glass and FaceTime more than a decade ago. Although AVP's real-time mixed-reality data overlay and controls offer potential enhancements to surgical precision and team communication, our assessment recognized limitations in adapting consumer technology to clinical environments. The initial use facilitated intraoperative decision-making and educational interactions with trainees. The current mixed-reality pass-through resolution allows for input but not for highly dexterous surgical interactions. These early observations indicate that while AVP may soon improve aspects of surgical performance and education, further iteration, evaluation, and experience are needed to fully understand its impact on patient outcomes and to refine its integration into clinical practice.

A Brief Insight on Magnetic Resonance Conditional Neurosurgery Robots.

The brain is a delicate organ in the human body that requires extreme care. Brain-related diseases are unavoidable. Perse, neurosurgery is a complicated procedure that demands high precision and accuracy. Developing a surgical robot is a complex task. To date, there are only a handful of neurosurgery robots in the market that distinctly undergo clinical procedures. These robots have exorbitant cost that hinders the utmost care progress in the area as they are unaffordable. This paper looked at the historical perspective and presented insight literature of the magnetic resonance conditional stereotactic neurosurgery robots that find their ways in clinics, abandoning research projects and promising research yet to undergo clinical use. In addition, the study also gives a thorough insight into the advantage of magnetic resonance imaging modalities and magnetic resonance conditional robots and the future challenges in automation use. Image compatibility test data and accuracy results are also examined because they guarantee that these systems work correctly in particular imaging settings. The primary differences between these systems include actuation and control technologies, construction materials, and the degree of freedom. Thus, one system has an advantage over the other.

Neurologic Complications in Monitored versus Unmonitored Image-Guidance Assisted Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) has been used clinically since the 1970s and is a reliable tool for detecting impending neurologic compromise. However, there are mixed data as to whether long-term neurologic outcomes are improved with its use. We investigated whether IOM used in conjunction with image guidance produces different patient outcomes than with image guidance alone. METHODS: We reviewed 163 consecutive cases between January 2015 and December 2018 and compared patients undergoing posterior lumbar instrumentation with image guidance using and not using multimodal IOM. Monitored and unmonitored surgeries were performed by the same surgeons, ruling out variability in intersurgeon technique. Surgical and neurologic complication rates were compared between these 2 cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were selected (110 in the nonmonitored cohort vs. 53 in the IOM cohort). Nineteen signal changes were noted. Only 3 of the 19 patients with signal changes had associated neurologic deficits postoperatively (positive predictive value 15.7%). There were 5 neurologic deficits that were observed in the nonmonitored cohort and 8 deficits observed in the monitored cohort. Transient neurologic deficit was significantly higher in the monitored cohort per case (P < 0.0198) and per screw (P < 0.0238); however, there was no difference observed between the 2 cohorts when considering permanent neurologic morbidity per case (P < 0.441) and per screw (P < 0.459). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IOM to cases using image guidance does not appear to decrease long-term postoperative neurologic morbidity and may have a reduced diagnostic role given availability of intraoperative image-guidance systems.

Automated neurosurgical stereotactic planning for intraoperative use: a comprehensive review of the literature and perspectives.

The creation of intracranial stereotactic trajectories, from entry point to target point, is still mostly done manually by the neurosurgeon. The development of automated stereotactic planning tools has been described in the literature. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of stereotactic planning procedure automation and develop tools for patients undergoing neurosurgical stereotactic procedures. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to September 1, 2019, at the exception of Google Scholar (from 1 January 2010 to September 1, 2019) in French and English. Eligible studies included all studies proposing automated stereotactic planning. A total of 1543 studies were screened. Forty-two studies were included in the systematic review, including 18 (42.9%) conference papers. The surgical procedures planned automatically were mainly deep brain stimulation (n = 14, 33.3%), stereoelectroencephalography (n = 12, 28.6%), and not specified (n = 10, 23.8%). The most frequently used surgical constraints to plan the trajectory were blood vessels (n = 32, 76.2%), cerebral sulci (n = 27, 64.3%), and cerebral ventricles (n = 23, 54.8%). The distance from blood vessels ranged from 1.96 to 4.78 mm for manual trajectories and from 2.47 to 7.0 mm for automated trajectories. At least one neurosurgeon was involved in 36 studies (85.7%). The automated stereotactic trajectory was preferred in 75.4% of the studied cases (range 30-92.9). Only 3 (7.1%) studies were multicentric. No study reported prospective use of the planning software. Stereotactic planning automation is a promising tool to provide valuable stereotactic trajectories for clinical applications.

What Is Your Reality? Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Plastic Surgery Training, Education, and Practice.

SUMMARY: Virtual reality and other technological advancements both inside and outside the operating room have shown an exponential increase in the past two decades. Surgical technique and finesse in delicate procedures have become ever more important, and the onus is on plastic surgeons and plastic surgery residents to meet these needs to provide the best outcomes possible to patients. The ability to learn, simulate, and practice operating in a fashion that poses no harm to any patient is truly a gift from technology to surgery that any surgeon could benefit from, whether trainee or attending. This application of technology and simulation has been demonstrated in other fields such as in the airline industry with flight simulation. The ability to learn, synthesize, and incorporate learned materials and ideas through virtual, augmented, and mixed reality tools offers a great opportunity to put our field at the forefront of a paradigm shift in surgical education. The critical utility of digital education could not be further emphasized any more than in the unfortunate and infrequent situation of a worldwide pandemic. This article reviews some of the important recent technologies that have developed and their applications in plastic surgery education and offers a look into what we can expect in the future.

Considerations in Access Cannulation: Traditional and Evolving Approaches.

Needle cannulation of hemodialysis access is the soft underbelly of hemodialysis access care that has remained unchanged for a long time. Cannulation error results in complications such as infiltration, hematoma, subsequent revision procedures, and potential loss of hard-earned access. The "best" cannulation method is contingent upon access type and characteristics along with local expertise. The rope ladder technique of cannulation, characterized by successive rotation of puncture sites with each hemodialysis session, permits sufficient time for healing of prior cannulation sites, and reduction in complications such as bleeding, infection, and aneurysm development. A steeper needle angle, higher blood flow rates, and deep needle tip can lead to wall stress on the posterior wall and up to 10 cm from the needle cannulation site. Plastic cannulas provide a viable alternative to metallic needles; they have lower complications and a favorable cost-benefit ratio. There is lack of evidence to support an optimal arterial needle direction configuration. Needle injury may promote intimal thickening, but its effect on access outcomes is currently unknown. Percutaneous creation of arteriovenous fistula presents new challenges in dialysis access cannulation. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided cannulation will likely lead to a paradigm shift in access cannulation. Novel care delivery using cannulation stations is a promising development.

Innovations in Congenital Interventional Cardiology.

This article aims to summarize some of the key advances in congenital interventional cardiology over the past few years, from novel imaging technologies, such as virtual reality, fusion imaging, and 3-dimensional printed models, to newly available devices and techniques to facilitate complex procedures including percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement and hybrid procedures. It is an exciting time for the field, with rapid development of techniques, devices, and imaging tools that allow a minimally invasive approach for many congenital cardiac defects with progressively less radiation and contrast doses.

State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.

Trends in Musculoskeletal Ablation: Emerging Indications and Techniques.

Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation plays an increasingly important role in the multidisciplinary management of musculoskeletal lesions. Established indications for ablation in this setting include the treatment of osteoid osteomas, palliation of painful skeletal metastases, local control of oligometastatic disease, and consolidation of bone tumors at risk for fracture. Emerging indications include the treatment of symptomatic soft tissue masses such as extra-abdominal desmoid tumors and abdominal wall endometriosis. This review will discuss considerations in patient selection and preprocedural workup, ablation technology and techniques, strategies to avoid complications, and expected outcomes of ablation in the musculoskeletal system.

Role of Robotics in Improving Surgical Outcome in Spinal Pathologies.

BACKGROUND: The desire to improve accuracy and safety and to favor minimally invasive techniques has given rise to spinal robotic surgery, which has seen a steady increase in utilization in the past 2 decades. However, spinal surgery encompasses a large spectrum of operative techniques, and robotic surgery currently remains confined to assistance with the trajectory of pedicle screw insertion, which has been shown to be accurate and safe based on class II and III evidence. The role of robotics in improving surgical outcomes in spinal pathologies is less clear, however. METHODS: This comprehensive review of the literature addresses the role of robotics in surgical outcomes in spinal pathologies with a focus on the various meta-analysis and prospective randomized trials published within the past 10 years in the field. RESULTS: It appears that robotic spinal surgery might be useful for increasing accuracy and safety in spinal instrumentation and allows for a reduction in surgical time and radiation exposure for the patient, medical staff, and operator. CONCLUSION: Robotic assisted surgery may thus open the door to minimally invasive surgery with greater security and confidence. In addition, the use of robotics facilitates tireless repeated movements with higher precision compared with humans. Nevertheless, it is clear that further studies are now necessary to demonstrate the role of this modern tool in cost-effectiveness and in improving clinical outcomes, such as reoperation rates for screw malpositioning.

Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with the conventional instrumentation (CI). METHODS: RCTs were selected in PubMed and Embase from 2012 to 2018. Key data extracted included malalignment of mechanical axis, blood loss, surgical time, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), length of stay, and complications. Subgroup analysis was also performed regarding different PSI systems and different image processing methods. RESULTS: 29 RCTs with 2487 knees were eligible for the meta-analysis. Results showed that PSI did not improve the alignment of the mechanical axis compared with CI, but MRI-based PSI and Visionaire-specific PSI decrease the risk of malalignment significantly (P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and P = 0.04 and. CONCLUSION: PSI reduced the blood loss and improved KSS. MRI-based PSI reduced operative time and risk of malalignment of mechanical axis compared with CT-based PSI. Moreover, Visionaire-specific PSI achieves better alignment result of the mechanical axis than other systems.

Wearable Augmented Reality Platform for Aiding Complex 3D Trajectory Tracing.

Augmented reality (AR) Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) are emerging as the most efficient output medium to support manual tasks performed under direct vision. Despite that, technological and human-factor limitations still hinder their routine use for aiding high-precision manual tasks in the peripersonal space. To overcome such limitations, in this work, we show the results of a user study aimed to validate qualitatively and quantitatively a recently developed AR platform specifically conceived for guiding complex 3D trajectory tracing tasks. The AR platform comprises a new-concept AR video see-through (VST) HMD and a dedicated software framework for the effective deployment of the AR application. In the experiments, the subjects were asked to perform 3D trajectory tracing tasks on 3D-printed replica of planar structures or more elaborated bony anatomies. The accuracy of the trajectories traced by the subjects was evaluated by using templates designed ad hoc to match the surface of the phantoms. The quantitative results suggest that the AR platform could be used to guide high-precision tasks: on average more than 94% of the traced trajectories stayed within an error margin lower than 1 mm. The results confirm that the proposed AR platform will boost the profitable adoption of AR HMDs to guide high precision manual tasks in the peripersonal space.

New perspectives on surgical accuracy analysis of image-guided bone tumour resection surgery.

PURPOSE: Image-guided bone tumour resection surgery has been proved in previous literatures to be more accurate than those conventional freehand ones (p < 0.001). However, in this kind of surgery, there are still many procedures depending on manual operations, which will inevitably introduce surgical errors into the surgery. In particular, the negative surgical errors (i.e., errors toward tumour) would increase the risk of tumor recurrence and metastasis. Thus, the first purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the negative surgical errors of image-guided bone tumour resection surgery were statistically significantly great, the second purpose is to evaluate whether the negative surgical errors of image-guided long-bone tumour resection surgery were statistically equivalent to those of pelvis surgery, and the last purpose is to recommend a solution for suppressing these errors when using a navigation system. METHODS: Negative surgical errors of 24 osteotomies in ten pelvis tumour resection operations and 16 osteotomies in ten long-bone surgeries under the image guidance of a navigation system were statistically evaluated and compared with - 2.0 mm. The equivalence of negative surgical errors of pelvis group and those of long-bone group was statistically tested. To suppress these negative surgical errors when using a navigation system, we recommend, based on the obtained statistics, to increase the margins between cut planes and tumour boundary during pre-operatively planning cut planes, by adding an extra margin with the empirical safe margin according to the absolute lower bound of 95% CI of negative surgical errors. RESULTS: Negative surgical errors of the pelvis group and the long-bone group were both significantly less than - 2.0 mm (p < 0.001), but not statistically equivalent (Rg > 1 mm). 95% CI of negative surgical errors were from - 3.95 to - 3.27 mm for the pelvis group, and from - 2.69 to - 2.34 mm for the long-bone group. So, the extra margin added for image-guided pelvis tumour resection surgery should be set as 3.95 mm, and the extra margin added for image-guided long-bone surgery should be set as 2.69 mm. CONCLUSION: The negative surgical errors of image-guided bone resection surgery were statistically significantly less than - 2.0 mm (p < 0.001), thus these errors cannot be safely ignored. Moreover, the negative surgical errors of the pelvis group were not equivalent to those of the long-bone group (Rg > 1.0 mm), thus the solution for image-guided pelvis tumour resection surgery and that for image-guided long-bone tumour resection surgery should be separately determined. In order to suppress these negative surgical errors when using a navigation system, we recommend to add extra 3.95 mm margin with the empirical safe margin for image-guided pelvis tumour resection surgery and to add extra 2.69 mm margin for image-guided long-bone tumour resection surgery during pre-operatively planning cut planes.

Trends and Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown to improve outcomes in randomized controlled trials. However, there are little real-world data about intravascular imaging utilization during PCI and its outcomes in the United States. METHODS: We conducted an observational analysis on the use of intravascular imaging (Intravascular Ultrasound or Optical Coherence Tomography)-guided PCI in 2,425,036 patients undergoing PCI between January 2010 and December 2014 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Utilizing propensity score matching, 83,988 matched pairs were identified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included cardiogenic shock and acute kidney injury. RESULTS: Among the 2,425,036 patients, 161,808 (6.7%) underwent imaging-guided PCI. Use of imaging-guidance increased from 6% in 2010 to 6.6% in 2014 (Ptrend < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality was significantly different between imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI [1.0% vs. 1.5%; adjusted OR: 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-0.83, P < 0.001]. The rates of cardiogenic shock (2.5% vs. 3.1%; adjusted OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93; P = 0.005) were significantly lower in imaging-guided PCI group and acute kidney injury rates (7.0% vs. 7.1%; adjusted OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89-1.12; P = 0.919) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-guided PCI is associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Yet, a small proportion of patients undergoing PCI have imaging-guidance.

Image-guidance, Robotics, and the Future of Spine Surgery.

Spine surgery has seen considerable advancements over the last 2 decades, particularly in the fields of image-guidance and robotics. These technologies offer the potential to overcome the various technical challenges in spinal surgery, such as physical and mental fatigue, hand tremor, difficulties with manual dexterity, and surgical precision. This review provides an overview of the image-guidance and robotics systems currently available. It will also provide an insight into the emerging technologies in development in the field of spine surgery. Image-guided and robotic-assisted surgical systems have been demonstrated to be safe, accurate, and time-efficient. Future advancements in the field include "augmented reality" systems, which build on these navigation platforms, but are yet to come to market. These developing technologies have considerable potential to improve the field of spine surgery. Further research is required in this area to determine superiority of these developing technologies over conventional techniques before widespread use should be adapted.