Donor complication rates in whole blood, plasma and platelet donors: Age versus experience.

BACKGROUND: Many blood banks use upper age limits for donors out of concern for a higher donor complication rate in older donors. Experienced donors are known to have lower donor complication rates, and older donors are often more experienced, confounding the effect of age on donor complication rate. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied donor complication rates in whole blood, plasma, and plateletpheresis donors from 2012 to 2022. Donor complication rates were compared between age groups in inexperienced (<20th donation) and experienced (≥20th donation) donors. In addition to this direct comparison, we made use of logistic regression with finer-grained experience groups, to further quantify the effects of age, experience and other factors on donor complication rate. RESULTS: While overall rate of vasovagal reaction was lower, rate of moderate/severe vasovagal syncope was highest in 70-79 year donors, however, only reached significance for plasma donors. Furthermore, rates of failed stab were highest in this age group. Hematoma rate showed a U-shaped pattern with regard to age, where the rate was not higher in the 70-79 year age group than in the 18-23 year age group. Pain decreased with age, however, rates were higher in the 70-79 year age group than in the 65-69 year age group. DISCUSSION: When properly accounting for donor experience, donor complication rate profiles clearly change with age. The increased risk for moderate/severe vasovagal syncope in older donors should be clearly communicated. Extra caution is needed if these donors are accepted for first-time donations.

Prevention strategies for vasovagal reaction in whole blood donors: A quadri-armed randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: Vasovagal reaction (VVR) is a frequently encountered generalised donor adverse reaction, associated with donor deterrence towards future donation. Several mitigation strategies for prevention of VVR were tried but still not standardised. This quadri-armed randomised study evaluated the utility of water ingestion, applied muscle tension (AMT) and combination of both in preventing the VVR among blood donors. METHODS: A quadri-armed randomised controlled trial was performed on 4320 whole blood donors. Blood donors of 18-65 years of age were randomised into four groups based on the interventions performed i.e., control with no intervention (Group 1, n = 1081), water ingestion (Group 2, n = 1082), AMT (Group 3, n = 1070) and combined intervention (Group 4, n = 1087). VVR during and immediately after blood donation were observed along with assessment of risk factors in blood donors and the effectiveness of interventions were analysed. RESULTS: The incidence of VVR observed 1.6% in our study, with the highest occurrence in the control group (2.5%) and the lowest in the combined intervention group (0.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the control group donors faced a 1.38-fold greater risk of VVR compared to those receiving interventions (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75). Other risk factors included younger age (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.05-2.17), first-time donation (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 1.66-5.74), prior history of VVR (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 10.4-101.52). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The combined approach of water ingestion and AMT proved significantly more effective in VVR prevention compared to individual interventions.

Development and validation of a scoring system to predict vasovagal reaction upon whole-blood donation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Risk factors for vasovagal reaction (VVR) have been extensively studied. With knowledge of the relative importance of these risk factors for VVR, collection staff could take care of blood donors from the same standpoint, leading to improved donor safety. We therefore developed a scoring system to predict VVR, which incorporates registration information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-syncopal and syncopal symptoms, as well as on- and off-site reactions, are included in this analysis as VVR. We defined the donor status as follows: first-time donors, repeat donors with no history of reaction and repeat donors with a history of reaction. We prepared two datasets: whole-blood donations at a blood donation site in Tokyo between January 2019 and December 2019 were included in training data (n = 361,114), and whole-blood donations between January 2020 and August 2020 were included in testing data (n = 216,211). RESULTS: The most important variable was the donor status, followed by age, estimated blood volume and height. We integrated them into a scoring system. Training and testing datasets were combined (n = 577,325), and VVR rates in groups with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 or more were 0.09% (95% CI: 0.081%-0.10%), 0.33% (95% CI: 0.31%-0.36%), 0.87% (95% CI: 0.78%-0.96%), 1.17% (95% CI: 1.05%-1.30%), 2.15% (95% CI: 1.98%-2.32%) and 3.11% (95% CI: 2.90%-3.34%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The scoring system enables staff to significantly predict VVR and may help them to identify donors at increased risk of experiencing syncope, thereby mitigating the negative impact of VVR on donor safety and return by paying close attention to high-risk donors.

A new risk predictive scoring system of vasovagal reactions in patients with preoperative autologous blood donation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vasovagal response (VVR) is the most common adverse reaction during blood donation and it is the main element for the safety of the patients with preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD). Accurate identification high-risk group is of great significance for PABD. Our study aimed to establish a scoring system based on the nomogram to screen the high-risk population and provide evidence for preventing the occurrence of VVRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A number of 4829 patients underwent PABD between July 2017 and June 2020 in the first medical center of Chinese PLA Hospital were recruited, 3387 of whom were included in the training group (70 %; 108 VVRs patients vs 3279 Non-VVRs patients), 1442 were included in the validation group (30 %; 46 VVRs patients vs 1396 Non-VVRs patients). The data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram of the scoring system was created by using the RMS tool in R software. RESULTS: Seven variables including BMI, hematocrit, pre-phlebotomy heart rate and systolic blood pressure, history of blood donation, age group and primary disease were selected to build the nomogram, which was shown as prediction model. And the score was 0-1 for BMI, 0-2 for hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and no blood donation history, 0-10 for age, 0-3 for primary disease. When the total cutoff score was 11, the predictive system for identifying VVRs displayed higher diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training group were 0.942, 82.41 % and 97.17 %, respectively, whereas those of the validation group were 0.836, 78.26 % and 78.15 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: A risk predictive scoring system was successfully developed to identify high-risk VVRs group form PABD patients that performed well.

[Neurally mediated syncope starting in young or in old age: different prognostic significance?] / La sincope neuromediata ad esordio nel giovane o nell'anziano: diverso significato prognostico?

Neurally mediated syncope (NMS) is the clinical manifestation of the vasovagal reflex activation. Prognosis of this type of syncope is reported as "benign", mainly on the basis of the results of the Framingham study, in which the incidence of mortality, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events did not differ from that of the control population. However, in this study NMS starting in young age and that starting in advanced age were investigated together, but some elements suggest that we are dealing with two different clinical entities, even if the efferent pathways of the reflex circuit appear to be the same. While it is largely accepted that NMS starting in young age is a manifestation of a non-pathological trait, some lines of evidence suggest that NMS starting in old age is the expression of a pathological process of the autonomic nervous system, up to now not well defined from the nosological point of view: (i) onset in old age per se, (ii) absence of triggers, which means "abnormal activation" (pathological) of the vasovagal reflex, (iii) frequent overlap with situational syncope, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, orthostatic or post-prandial hypotension and other dysautonomic symptoms, and (iiii) it appears to be the human homologue of a recently described syncope starting in dogs in advanced age; in other words, humans and dogs seem to suffer from the same disease. On the basis of these considerations, in future studies the prognostic significance of NMS starting in old age should be investigated separately. At present, the prognosis of NMS, in relation to hard events, remains undefined in the elderly.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of vasovagal reactions after plasma donation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are the most common adverse reactions and are frequently associated with serious donor adverse events. Even mild VVRs can lead to a significant reduction in the likelihood of subsequent donations. The purpose of this study is to explore the factors related to the occurrence of VVRs after plasma donation and to construct a nomogram to identify individuals at risk for VVRs to improve the safety of plasma donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected the donation data from July 2019 to June 2020 from a plasma center in Sichuan, China, to explore the independent risk factors for vasovagal reactions. From these data, we constructed and validated a predictive model for vasovagal reactions. RESULTS: VVRs after plasma donation occurred 737 times in 120 448 plasma donations (0.66%). Gender, season, donor status, weight, pulse, duration of donation, and cycle were independent risk factors for VVRs (P< 0.05). The concordance index (C-index) of a logistic model in the derivation cohort was 0.916, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit probability of 0.795. The C-index of a logistic model in the validation cohort was 0.916, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit probability of 0.224. The calibration curve showed that the predicted results were in good agreement with the actual observed results. CONCLUSION: This study preliminarily constructed and verified a prediction model for VVRs after plasma donation. The model nomogram is practical and can identify high-risk donors.

Association between vitamin D deficiency and vasovagal syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most prevalent type of syncope and its management includes pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions. Recently, studies have investigated vitamin D levels in VVS patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to review these studies to find possible associations between vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D levels with VVS. International databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were searched with keywords related to "vasovagal syncope" and "vitamin D." Studies were screened and the data were extracted from them. Random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for vitamin D levels in comparison to VVS patients and controls. Also, VVS occurrence was measured and the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated for comparison of vitamin D deficient cases and nondeficient individuals. Six studies were included with 954 cases investigated. Meta-analysis showed that patients with VVS had significantly lower vitamin D serum levels in comparison to non-VVS cases (SMD -1.05, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.57, p-value < .01). Moreover, VVS occurrence was higher in vitamin D-deficient individuals (OR 5.43, 95% CI 2.40 to 12.27, p-value < .01). Our findings which show lower vitamin D levels in VVS patients can have clinical implications in order for clinicians to pay attention to this when approaching VVS. Further randomized controlled trials are certainly warranted to assess the role of vitamin D supplementation in individuals with VVS.

Prevalence of asystole during tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope may depend on test methodology.

This review addresses tilt-testing methodology by searching the literature which reports timing of asystole and loss of consciousness (LOC). Despite the Italian protocol being the most widely adopted, its stipulations are not always followed to the letter of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The discrepancies permit reassessment of the incidence of asystole when tilt-down is early, impending syncope, compared with late, established LOC. Asystole is uncommon with early tilt down and diminishes with increasing age. However, if LOC is established as test-end, asystole is more common, and it is age-independent. Thus, the implications are that asystole is commonly under-diagnosed by early tilt-down. The prevalence of asystolic responses observed using the Italian protocol with a rigorous tilt down time is numerically close to that observed during spontaneous attacks by electrocardiogram loop recorder. Recently, tilt-testing has been questioned as to its validity but, in selection of pacemaker therapy in older highly symptomatic vasovagal syncope patients, the occurrence of asystole has been shown to be an effective guide for treatment. The use of head-up tilt test as an indication for cardiac pacing therapy requires pursuing the test until complete LOC. This review offers explanations for the findings and their applicability to practice. A novel interpretation is offered to explain why pacing induced earlier may combat vasodepression by raising the heart rate when sufficient blood remains in the heart.

Prevalence and factors associated with vasovagal reaction among whole blood donors in hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Adverse donor reactions (ADR) are common to occur during the blood donation process. The most common is vasovagal reactions (VVR) and it cause negative impact in the donor return rate. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of VVR among blood donors and to study its associated factors, at Hospital University Sains Malaysia (USM). This retrospective case-control study was conducted from June 2018, until June 2021. Data was extracted from the blood bank database system and from donor adverse reaction form. Donors who developed adverse donor reactions were chosen and without VVR were chosen at random as controls. A total of 159 donors, out of 35 134 donors were reported to have VVR which resulted in an overall prevalence of 0.45 %. Dizziness or mild VVR were the most frequently observed adverse reactions, accounting for approximately 87/159 (54.7 %) of all adverse reactions. Multiple logistic regression (MLR) analysis showed VVR were significantly associated with age, female gender, first-time donor, and 450 ml volume of blood collected. The prevalence of vasovagal reactions among blood donors in this study was low which was similar to a few previous studies. Although it was low, still it is very important to reduce risks to a minimum so that the donor return rate could be maintained. The information regarding its associated factors can be used to identify high-risk donors to prevent the incidence in the future.

Clinical Associations of Injuries Caused by Vasovagal Syncope: A Cohort Study From a Tertiary Syncope Unit.

Background Recent research has revealed that vasovagal syncope (VVS) leads to a high incidence of injuries; however, clinical associations of injury are not well-established. We present data from an ongoing VVS cohort and aimed to determine characteristics associated with VVS-related injury. Methods and Results Between 2017 and 2020, consecutive patients ≥18 years of age presenting to a tertiary syncope unit and diagnosed with VVS were included. Clinical characteristics relevant to syncope were obtained for the index episode. The outcome was incidence of injury during VVS, documented by clinical evaluation at the syncope clinic. Among 1115 patients (mean age, 45.9 years; 48% women), 260 injuries (23%) occurred. History of VVS-related injuries (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.42-2.29]), standing position (aRR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.06-1.68]), and female sex (aRR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.06-1.60]) were associated with injury, whereas recurrent VVS (aRR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.81]) and syncope in the noon/afternoon (aRR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.56-0.87]) and evening/night (aRR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.33-0.57]) compared with morning hours were associated with lower risk. There was a trend for higher rates of injury with overweight/obesity (aRR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.99-1.54]) and syncope occurring at home (aRR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.98-1.51]). In a per-syncope analysis considering up to 3 previous episodes (n=2518, 36% traumatic), syncope at home (aRR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.17-1.51]) and absence of prodromes (aRR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.09-1.61]) were associated with injury. Conclusions Patient characteristics, VVS presentations, the circumstances, and surroundings can determine the risk of injury. These associations of VVS-related injury identify at-risk individuals and high-risk situations. Future prospective studies are needed to investigate potential strategies for prevention of post-VVS injury in recurrent cases.

Beyond fear: A longitudinal investigation of emotions and risk of a vasovagal reaction in first-time whole-blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Fear is a recognized predictor of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) in blood donors. However, less is known about the role of other emotions, including positive emotions, that donors might experience. The aim of this study was to identify the emotions experienced in center that predict onsite VVRs, and to determine at what point during the donation appointment, the experience of these emotions is most influential. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A sample of 442 first-time whole-blood donors (57.7% female; mean ± SD age 30.7 ± 11.7 years) completed a survey in the waiting area and before venepuncture in the donation chair to assess their current emotional experience. The survey data were matched with routinely-collected demographic, donation, and donor adverse event information. A generalized estimating equations model was used to identify emotions associated with the occurrence of a VVR. RESULTS: A total of 56 (12.7%) participants experienced a VVR. The occurrence of a VVR was significantly associated with lower love/closeness/trust (OR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.34-0.82) and higher scared/fearful/afraid (OR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.18-3.25) states. Significant interaction effects suggested that the effect of scared/fearful/afraid decreased while stressed/nervous/overwhelmed increased from the waiting area to before venepuncture on the likelihood of a VVR. DISCUSSION: To effectively reduce donor VVR risk, blood collection agencies need to address a broader range of emotions at different points during the donation process.

Pre-donation water and salty snacks to prevent vasovagal reactions among blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Minimizing the risk of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) can prevent donor harms and improve donor return. We report the results of a program to reduce VVR rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The program was implemented on June 11, 2017 and consisted in drinking water and eating a salty snack before donating blood, plasma, or platelets. All donations made during the "pre-program period" (October 11, 2015-June 10, 2017) and "post-program period" (June 11, 2017-May 11, 2019) were included. Study outcomes comprised VVRs (any severity) and syncopal VVRs, whether employee- or donor-reported. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis proxied causality based on the "pre-program trend," the "immediate trend" (i.e., immediately before versus after the program), and the "post-program trend". The relative risk (RR) of VVR (along with confidence intervals [CIs]) was reported, overall and stratified by subgroups based on age, sex, donor type (i.e., first-time versus repeat), and donation type (i.e., whole blood versus apheresis). RESULTS: The monthly VVR rate (any severity) dropped from 4.6% in the pre-program period to 4.3% in the post-program period, and never reached its pre-program level. The ITS analysis revealed a statistically significant and increasing pre-program trend (RR [95% CI] = 1.011 [1.002-1.020]), a statistically significant and decreasing immediate trend (RR [95% CI] = 0.848 [0.743-0.969]), and a non-statistically-significant and stable post-program trend (RR [95% CI] = 0.999 [0.993-1.006]). Similar trends were observed for nearly all high- and low-risk subgroups. No statistically significant trend was observed for syncopal VVRs. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that the herein-described program durably reduced the incidence of VVRs (any severity) by ~15%.

Vasovagal Reactions during Interventional Pain Management Procedures-A Review of Pathophysiology, Incidence, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management.

Vasovagal reactions are a benign but common outcome of interventional pain management procedures that can negatively impact patient care, including aborted procedures and fear of future procedures that would otherwise help the patient. Research has been done on the incidence, risk factors, and management of vasovagal reactions resulting from such procedures, but less is known about how to prevent these reactions from occurring. In this paper, we present a literature review of the pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, prevention, and management of vasovagal reactions during interventional pain management procedures, with an emphasis on the relative lack of research and conflicting advice on preventive measures. We found that moderate sedation and anxiolytics have been used prophylactically to prevent vasovagal reactions, but their side-effect profiles prevent them from being used commonly. Less studied is the prophylactic administration of antimuscarinics and IV fluids, despite the potential benefit of these measures and relatively low side-effect profile. We explore these topics here and offer advice for future research to fill the gaps in our knowledge.

Cardioinhibitory syncope with asystole during nitroglycerin potentiated head up tilt test: prevalence and clinical predictors.

AIMS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical predictors of cardioinhibitory (CI) responses with asystole at the nitroglycerin (NTG)-potentiated head-up tilt test (HUTT) in patients with a history of syncope admitted to a tertiary referral syncope unit. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent NTG-potentiated HUTT for suspected reflex syncope at our institution from March 1 2017 to May 1 2020. The prevalence of HUTT-induced CI syncope was assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the association of asystolic response to HUTT with a set of clinical covariates. RESULTS: We enrolled 1285 patients (45 ± 19.1 years; 49.6% male); 368 (28.6%) showed HUTT-induced CI response with asystole. A multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors were independently associated with HUTT-induced CI syncope: male sex (OR 1.48; ConInt 1.14-1.92; P = 0.003), smoking (OR 2.22; ConInt 1.56-3.115; P < 0.001), traumatic syncope (OR: 2.81; ConInt 1.79-4.42; P < 0.001), situational syncope (OR 0.45; ConInt 0.27-0.73; P = 0.002), and the use of diuretics (OR 9.94; ConInt 3.83-25.76; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The cardioinhibitory syncope with asystole induced by NTG-potentiated HUTT is more frequent than previously reported. The male gender, smoking habit, history of traumatic syncope, and use of diuretics were independent predictors of HUTT-induced CI responses. Conversely, the history of situational syncope seems to reduce this probability.

Early and late-onset syncope: insight into mechanisms.

AIMS: Unexplained syncope is an important clinical challenge. The influence of age at first syncope on the final syncope diagnosis is not well studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive head-up tilt patients (n = 1928) evaluated for unexplained syncope were stratified into age groups <30, 30-59, and ≥60 years based on age at first syncope. Clinical characteristics and final syncope diagnosis were analysed in relation to age at first syncope and age at investigation. The age at first syncope had a bimodal distribution with peaks at 15 and 70 years. Prodromes (64 vs. 26%, P < 0.001) and vasovagal syncope (VVS, 59 vs. 19%, P < 0.001) were more common in early-onset (<30 years) compared with late-onset (≥60 years) syncope. Orthostatic hypotension (OH, 3 vs. 23%, P < 0.001), carotid sinus syndrome (CSS, 0.6 vs. 9%, P < 0.001), and complex syncope (>1 concurrent diagnosis; 14 vs. 26%, P < 0.001) were more common in late-onset syncope. In patients aged ≥60 years, 12% had early-onset and 70% had late-onset syncope; older age at first syncope was associated with higher odds of OH (+31% per 10-year increase, P < 0.001) and CSS (+26%, P = 0.004). Younger age at first syncope was associated with the presence of prodromes (+23%, P < 0.001) and the diagnoses of VVS (+22%, P < 0.001) and complex syncope (+9%, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In patients with unexplained syncope, first-ever syncope incidence has a bimodal lifetime pattern with peaks at 15 and 70 years. The majority of older patients present only recent syncope; OH and CSS are more common in this group. In patients with early-onset syncope, prodromes, VVS, and complex syncope are more common.

Self-ignored onsite adverse donor reaction among whole blood donors: A single center experience from India.

OBJECTIVES: Adverse donor reactions (ADR) may often go unreported due to donor related or blood center related factors. Possible donor related factors are self-ignorance of the adverse reaction, inertia to notify blood centre and non-compliance to follow-up. A better understanding of the self-ignored adverse donor reaction (SIADR) helps in early detection, avoidance of complications, adoption of mitigation strategies, and retention of donors. In the current study, we aim to identify the incidence and reasons for onsite SIADR among whole blood donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective single-center observational study where 501 participants who completed whole blood donation were recruited. They were interviewed twice by an experienced investigator to identify any onsite SIADR occurred. First interview was conducted just before leaving the premise and second two days after donation using a peer reviewed and validated questionnaire. Cross-tabulation and Chi-square test were used for bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Twelve participants out of 501 (2.39%) were found to have onsite SIADR which was twice the frequency of reported onsite ADR (1.20%) during the study period in our center. A majority (75%) of them experienced grade I vaso-vagal reactions (VVR). Around 58.3% of the SIADR donors ignored the reaction as they perceived it as mild, while 25% perceived the symptoms but failed to interpret them as a reaction. CONCLUSION: In our center, incidence of onsite SIADR was double the incidence of ADR and majority were VVR grade I. Commonest reason for SIADR was interpretation of reaction as mild. Blood center team shall be proactive and vigilant to identify and report SIADR.

Sleep syncope: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Sleep syncope is defined as a form of vasovagal syncope which interrupts sleep. Long term follow-up has not been reported. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2013 we diagnosed vasovagal syncope in 1105 patients of whom 69 also had sleep syncope. We compared these 69 patients in the sleep syncope group to 118 patients with classical vasovagal syncope consecutively investigated between 1999 and 2003. We compared baseline demography, syncope history, tilt test results and follow-up findings. RESULTS: At baseline, age and gender distribution (mean ± standard deviation) of the classical VVS and sleep synocope groups were similar: 46 ± 21 vs. 47 ± 15 years (p = 0.53), and 55% versus 66% female (p = 0.28), respectively. Abdominal discomfort and vagotonia were more frequent in sleep syncope patients: 80% versus 8% and 33% versus 2% (p < 0.001). Childhood syncope and blood-needle phobia were also more frequent in sleep syncope patients: 58% versus 15% and 69% versus 19% (p < 0.001). Positive tilt test results were similar for the two groups (93% [classical VVS] vs. 91%; p = 0.56). Blood pressure, heart rate and stroke volume changed in a similar manner from baseline to syncope (p = 0.32, 0.34 and 0.18, respectively). Mean duration of follow-up for the classical VVS and sleep syncope groups, as recorded in the electronic records, were 17 (3-21) and 15 (7-27) years, respectively. Rates of mortality and of permanent pacemaker insertion were similar in the two groups: 16.2% (classical VVS) versus 7.6% (p = 0.09) and 3% (classical VVS) versus 3% (p = 0.9). Incidence of sleep episodes decreased from 1.9 ± 3 to 0.1 ± 0.3 episodes per year (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sleep syncope is a subtype of vasovagal syncope with characteristic symptoms. Despite the severity of the sleep episodes, the prognosis is very good. Very few patients require permanent pacing, and nearly all respond to education and reassurance.

An intervention study for the prevention of vasovagal reactions and evaluating donors' experience: Analysis of donors' return for subsequent donation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The EPISoDe (Experience Success in Donation) study investigated the effect of interventions on self-reported vasovagal reactions (VVRs) in first-time and novice (second to fourth donation) whole blood donors aged ≤30 years, demonstrating a 23% reduction of VVR from water drinking shortly before donation in the novice donors. Because donation experience and complications affect donor retention, we analysed intervention group donors' return for subsequent donation, a predefined secondary outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The interventions were as follows: 330 ml water, 500 ml water, ball squeezing before phlebotomy (placebo) and a control group. All donors received an online questionnaire about their experience within a week after donation. In the Netherlands, eligible donors are invited at least yearly depending on hospitals' needs. We analysed attendances within 421 days through return percentages and binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 8300 EPISoDe participants, 6538 (78.8%) returned within 421 days. Return did not differ between the two water groups, whereas odds for return were significantly higher in both water and placebo intervention donors compared to the control group (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.29 and 1.22, 1.05-1.43, respectively) after adjustment for occurrence of VVR, unsuccessful collection, gender and donation history. Staff-recorded or self-reported VVR at index donation was associated with reduced odds for return (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60 and OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of younger inexperienced blood donors, 78.8% returned for subsequent donation. Donors who received an active study intervention, either water or placebo, were more likely to return than control group donors.

Incidence of vasovagal syncope in Mohs surgery.

Although vasovagal syncopal episodes (VSE) are a well-known complication of dermatologic surgery, there are currently no studies that report an incidence of VSE in Mohs surgery specifically. This study aims to provide data on the incidence of VSE in Mohs surgery by reviewing VSE incident reports from a private, community-based, outpatient Mohs surgery clinic. We report an incidence of VSE of 0.09% in Mohs surgery. This study offers the first data on the incidence of VSE during Mohs surgery and suggests that the incidence of VSE in Mohs surgery may be lower than what has been quoted as the reference standard for dermatologic surgery.