Diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic chronic inflammatory disease of unclear etiology that is manifested in by a progressive and destructive polyarthritis in association with serological evidence of autoreactivity. Its diagnosis is based on the classification criteria that involve four parameters: joint involvement, serology (rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide--anti-CCP), levels of acute phase reactants and the duration of the symptoms Aletaha, et al. [1]. This classification simplifies the categorization of the patients with early RA; however, the diagnosis requires highly trained specialists who are able to differentiate early symptoms of RA from other pathologies.

Profiling the clinical presentation of diagnostic characteristics of a sample of symptomatic TMD patients.

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients might present a number of concurrent clinical diagnoses that may be clustered according to their similarity. Profiling patients' clinical presentations can be useful for better understanding the behavior of TMD and for providing appropriate treatment planning. The aim of this study was to simultaneously classify symptomatic patients diagnosed with a variety of subtypes of TMD into homogenous groups based on their clinical presentation and occurrence of comorbidities. METHODS: Clinical records of 357 consecutive TMD patients seeking treatment in a private specialized clinic were included in the study sample. Patients presenting multiple subtypes of TMD diagnosed simultaneously were categorized according to the AAOP criteria. Descriptive statistics and two-step cluster analysis were used to characterize the clinical presentation of these patients based on the primary and secondary clinical diagnoses. RESULTS: The most common diagnoses were localized masticatory muscle pain (n = 125) and disc displacement without reduction (n = 104). Comorbidity was identified in 288 patients. The automatic selection of an optimal number of clusters included 100% of cases, generating an initial 6-cluster solution and a final 4-cluster solution. The interpretation of within-group ranking of the importance of variables in the clustering solutions resulted in the following characterization of clusters: chronic facial pain (n = 36), acute muscle pain (n = 125), acute articular pain (n = 75) and chronic articular impairment (n = 121). CONCLUSION: Subgroups of acute and chronic TMD patients seeking treatment can be identified using clustering methods to provide a better understanding of the clinical presentation of TMD when multiple diagnosis are present. Classifying patients into identifiable symptomatic profiles would help clinicians to estimate how common a disorder is within a population of TMD patients and understand the probability of certain pattern of clinical complaints.

Intraarticular dexamethasone in advanced chronic synovitis in hemophilia.

From 1988 to 1966, 34 patients with advanced chronic hemophilic synovitis (25 Grade III and nine Grade IV) were treated with intraarticular injections of long acting dexamethasone (sodium phosphate of dexamethasone plus acetate of dexamethasone) in cycles of three injections with 3-week intervals between each injection with 6-month rest intervals between cycles for as many as three cycles, depending on the evolution of each case. All patients had chronic severe synovitis, axial deformity, muscular atrophy, and diminution of range of movement. There were 31 knees, two ankles, and two shoulders. Subjective and objective evaluations were done grouping the results in good, fair, and poor according to grade of patient satisfaction, presence of synovitis and pain, range of movement, and limitation of activities of daily living. In the subjective results there were 19 good results, 12 fair results, and four poor results, and in the objective evaluation there were 22 good results, nine fair results, and four poor results at an average followup of 1.5 years. The use of intraarticular dexamethasone as an alternative in the short to medium term for treatment of advanced chronic hemophilic synovitis with pain and limitation of function before doing an invasive surgical treatment is proposed.

Chemical synoviorthesis for hemophilic synovitis.

For many years, Rifampicin has been used empirically for the treatment of hemophilic chronic synovitis with encouraging results. A study was performed in which Rifampicin was shown to reduce the inflammation of joints affected by hemophilic synovitis. A clinical study was performed on 48 hemophilic patients (48 joints). Seventeen elbows, eight knees, and 23 ankles were treated. The mean age of the patients was 6 years (range, 4-23 years) and the mean followup was 29 months (range, 24-53 months). Overall, 40 excellent results and eight good results were obtained. The average number of weekly injections of Rifampicin was 3.06 (range, 1-10 injections). Eight patients experienced pain on the first injection, which subsided gradually with the subsequent procedures. Synoviorthesis with Rifampicin seems to be a good method for the treatment of hemophilic synovitis, especially in small joints (elbows and ankles) and in younger children.