Establishing surgical volume benchmarks for Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA)-accredited fellowship training.

INTRODUCTION: Case volumes of trauma centers and surgeons influence clinical outcomes following orthopaedic trauma surgery. This study quantifies surgical volume benchmarks for Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA)-accredited fellowship training in the United States. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of orthopaedic trauma fellows graduating between 2018 and 2019 to 2022-2023. Case volume percentiles were calculated across categories and variability defined as the fold-difference between 90th and 10th percentiles. Temporal trends were assessed with linear regression. RESULTS: 446 orthopaedic trauma fellows were included in this study. Mean reported case volume increased from 898 ± 245 in 2018-2019 to 974 ± 329 in 2022-2023 (P = 0.066). Mean case volume was 924 over the study period and mostly consisted of other (418 cases, 45 %), subtrochanteric/intertrochanteric femoral neck (84 cases, 9 %), open fracture debridement (72 cases, 8 %), pelvic ring disruption / fracture (55 cases, 6 %), acetabular fracture (41 cases, 4 %), tibial shaft fracture (39 cases, 4 %), and femoral shaft fracture (38 cases, 4 %) cases. Overall variability in total reported case volume was 2.0. Variability was greatest in distal radius fracture (14.8), amputation (9.5), fasciotomy (8.0), and proximal humerus repair (5.0). CONCLUSION: Graduates from OTA-accredited fellowship training perform 924 cases on average, which exceeds the current minimum requirement of 600 cases. Case volume benchmarks can assist trainees and faculty align training goals with fellowship program strengths. More research is needed to determine evidence-based case minimum requirements for core competency training in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Development of a Standardized Nursing Handoff With Tablet Technology: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Nursing handoff of complete and accurate information is critical for patient safety yet is often difficult to achieve with consistency between nursing departments. OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement project aims to describe the development and piloting of a standardized handoff tool for administration by computer tablet for nursing report. METHODS: This descriptive quality improvement initiative was conducted in an 885-bed Level I trauma center in the Southeast Region of the United States. The study was completed in three phases. First, emergency department and trauma intensive care unit nurses were surveyed to determine handoff barriers and best practices. Second, the survey information was used to develop a standardized handoff tool incorporating tablet technology. Third, staff pilot testing was performed, followed by a final survey to ascertain staff feedback on the tool. RESULTS: A total of n = 120 nurses completed the surveys, and pilot testing was conducted on n = 177 patient handoffs. Ninety-five percent of nurses expressed satisfaction with the tool and 65% with the tablet. CONCLUSION: This study supported using a standardized handoff tool between the emergency department and trauma intensive care unit and substantiated the benefits of using a tablet for face-to-face communication.

[Expert consensus on key indicators for quality control in trauma medicine center].

Trauma is recognized globally as a great public health challenge. It stands as the predominant cause of mortality among those under the age of 45 and is also ranked among the top five causes of death for both urban and rural populations within China. This stark reality underscores the critical urgency in establishing an efficient system for trauma care, which is pivotal for substantially enhancing the survival rates of patients. An optimally developed system for trauma care not only guarantees that patients promptly receive professional medical assistance but also facilitates significant improvements in the outcomes of trauma care through the strategic establishment of trauma centers. At present, a considerable variation exists in the quality of trauma care provided across various regions within China. The adoption of comprehensive quality management strategies for the medical processes involved in trauma care, alongside the standardized management of on-site rescue operations, pre-hospital emergency care, and in-hospital treatment protocols, stands as a fundamental approach to boost the capabilities of trauma care and, consequently, the survival rates of trauma patients. Serving as the cornerstone of comprehensive medical quality management, key quality control indicators possess the capacity to steer the development direction of trauma centers. In a concerted effort to further augment the medical quality management of trauma care, standardize clinical diagnosis and treatment methodologies, and advocate for the standardization and ho-mogenization of medical services, the Medical Quality Control Professional Committee of the National Center for Trauma Medicine has undertaken a detailed refinement and update of the 16 key quality control indicators for trauma centers. These were initially put forward in the "Notice on Further Enhancing Trauma Care Capabilities" disseminated by the National Health Commission in 2018.Consequent to this endeavor, a revised set of 19 quality control indicators has been devised. This comprehensive set, inclusive of the indicators' names, definitions, calculation methodologies, significance, and the subjects for quality control, is designed for utilization within the quality management and control operations of trauma centers across various levels. This initiative aims to furnish a concrete and executable roadmap for the quality control endeavors of trauma centers. Through the enactment of these quality control indicators, medical institutions are empowered to conduct more stringent monitoring and evaluative measures across all facets of trauma care. This not only facilitates the prompt identification and rectification of existing challenges but also substantially boosts the efficiency of internal collaboration. It enhances the synergy between different departments, thereby markedly improving the efficiency and quality of trauma care.

From targets to solutions: Implementing a trauma quality improvement bundle in Cameroon.

BACKGROUND: Global surgery research efforts have been criticized for failure to transition from problem identification to intervention implementation. We developed a context-appropriate trauma quality improvement (TQI) bundle to ameliorate care gaps at a regional referral hospital in Cameroon. We determined associations between bundle implementation and improvement in trauma resuscitation practices. METHODS: We implemented a TQI bundle consisting of a hospital-specific trauma protocol, staff training, a trauma checklist, provision of essential emergency trauma supplies in the resuscitation area, and monthly quality improvement meetings. We compared trends in target process measures (e.g., frequency and timing of vital sign collection and primary survey interventions) in the six-month period pre- and post-bundle implementation using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: We compared 246 pre-bundle patients with 203 post-bundle patients. Post-bundle patients experienced a greater proportion of all vital signs collected compared to the pre-intervention cohort (0 % pre-bundle vs. 69 % post-bundle, p < 0.001); specifically, the proportion of respiratory rate (0.8 % pre-bundle vs. 76 % post-bundle, p < 0.001) and temperature (7 % pre-bundle vs. 91 % post-bundle, p < 0.001) vital sign collection significantly increased. The post-bundle cohort had vital signs measured sooner (74 % vital signs measured within 15 min of arrival pre-bundle vs. 90 % post-bundle, p < 0.001) and more frequently per patient (7 % repeated vitals pre-bundle vs 52 % post-bundle, p < 0.001). Key primary survey interventions such as respiratory interventions (1 % pre-bundle vs. 8 % post-bundle, p < 0.001) and cervical collar placement (0 % pre-bundle vs. 7 % post-bundle, p < 0.001) also increased in the post-bundle cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a context-appropriate TQI bundle was associated with significant improvements in previously identified trauma care deficits at a single regional hospital. Data-derived interventions targeting frontline capacity at the local level can bridge the gap between identifying care limitations and improvement in resource-limited settings.

The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients

The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures. Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023. The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient's directives, family feelings and representatives' desires, and all decisions should be shared. The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.

Characteristics and Validation of Pediatric Extremity Vascular Trauma in Dedicated Pediatric and Adult Trauma Centers: A Scoping Review Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric extremity vascular injuries constitute a rare yet serious entity that can lead to serious complications especially if left untreated or become late diagnosed. In our scoping review, we sought to evaluate different characteristics and outcomes of pediatric and combined adult trauma centers (ATCs) in the management of pediatric extremity vascular injury. METHODS: We sought to analyze various characteristics and parameters that differentiate a dedicated pediatric and a combined pediatric ATC in terms of effectiveness and quality of care in the acute setting and to describe special features and characteristics of an acute vascular disease that constitute pediatric population unique from the aspect of diagnosis and management. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews guidelines to conduct the study. RESULTS: The search identified 8,815 records in title using MeSH terms from PubMed/MEDLINE database among which 12 studies reporting a total of 2,124 pediatric patients with vascular extremity injuries were included for analysis. Incidence of pediatric extremity vascular injury was 0.5%. Upper extremity injuries were the most frequent presenting in 63% of cases followed by lower extremity injuries in 37% of cases. Blunt injuries were marginally more common than penetrating injuries (58% vs. 42%). In-hospital mortality and morbidity ranged from 13.2% to 0.9% and 13% to 30%, respectively. Limb-salvage rates were high, ranging from 92% to 99%. Furthermore, there are no clearly defined clinical guidelines involving the mode of imaging and diagnosis, the surgical specialties involved and the competency of nursing or medical staff overall. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated children trauma centers theoretically represent the optimal path for acute pediatric trauma admission, especially in complex trauma necessitating vascular reconstruction. However, in the current setting of rapidly increasing health costs and economic crisis worldwide, regional or resource-related factors make this option rather unavailable. In any case, it is imperative the clinicians have a high index of suspicion when confronting with these types of injuries because early diagnosis is highly related with reduced morbidity and superior outcomes.

[Latent safety threats in a pediatric emergency department: Using in situ simulation to test a new trauma room concept]. / Latente Sicherheitsmängel in einer pädiatrischen Notaufnahme: Testung eines neuen Schockraumkonzepts mithilfe von In-situ-Simulation.

INTRODUCTION: Structured emergency room concepts have been shown to contribute to patient safety. Until now there has been no uniform emergency room concept for critically ill and seriously injured children and adolescents in the emergency room at the Altona Children's Hospital in Hamburg. This concept has been newly developed in interdisciplinary cooperation and includes the use of new clinical premises as well as new responsibilities and team compositions. The introduction of new processes and rooms for handling emergencies is associated with a risk of overlooking latent safety deficiencies or detecting them only after the process has been implemented. This may have a direct impact on patient safety. Before moving to new clinical premises, in situ simulation can be helpful to identify and to resolve latent safety threats in advance. Therefore, this method was chosen to test the newly created emergency room concept in the future emergency room at the Altona Children's Hospital. METHODS: Two in situ simulations were carried out in the future real emergency room. Latent safety threats detected by the observation team and the participants (medical and nursing staff of the Altona Children's Hospital from the departments of pediatric surgery, traumatology, orthopedics, pediatrics, anesthesia, intensive care medicine, radiology, emergency medicine) were collected using free text notes after the simulations and evaluated retrospectively. In order to better deal with these latent safety threats, the observations were classified into different categories: working environment (e.g., lack of equipment, unfavorable positioning of material), process (e.g., lack of defined responsibilities in the team) and other safety threats that did not fall into one of the two categories defined. RESULTS: A total of 51 latent safety threats were identified during the two in situ simulations. Of these, 22 (43.1%) were assigned to the "working environment" category, 20 (39.2%) to the "process" category and 9 (17.7%) to the "other safety threats" category. Of the latent safety threats identified, 46 (90.2 %) could be resolved before the emergency room was put into operation. For the non-recoverable safety threats, safety concepts were developed in order to further minimize the risk of patient hazard. DISCUSSION: With the help of this study, it could be shown that the implementation of in situ simulation before the commissioning of new clinical premises and the introduction of new processes can contribute to the detection of latent safety threats in an interdisciplinary German pediatric emergency department.

Variability in Standardized Mortality Rates Among Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Trauma Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes significant morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients and care is highly variable. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) summarizes the mortality rate of a specific center relative to the expected rates across all centers, adjusted for case-mix. This study aimed to evaluate variations in SMRs among pediatric trauma centers for TBI. METHODS: Patients aged 1-18 diagnosed with TBI within the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017 to 2019 were included. Center-specific SMRs and 95% confidence intervals identified centers with mortality rates significantly better or worse than the median SMR for all centers. RESULTS: 316 centers with 10,598 patients were included. SMRs were risk-adjusted for patient risk factors. Unadjusted mortality ranged from 16.5 to 29.5%. Three centers (1.5%) had significantly better SMR (SMR <1) and three centers (1.5%) had significantly worse SMR (SMR >1). Significantly better centers had a lower proportion of neurosurgical intervention (2.4% vs. 11.8%, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of supplemental oxygen administration (93.7% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.004) and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (53.2% vs. 40.6%, p < 0.001) compared to significantly worse centers. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified centers that have significantly higher and lower mortality rates for pediatric TBI patients relative to the overall median rate. These data provide a benchmark for pediatric TBI outcomes and institutional quality improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study.

Improvement in quality of trauma care at non-tertiary hospitals in Ghana during on-hours and off-hours with a trauma intake form: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the achievement of key performance indicators (KPIs) of initial trauma care at non-tertiary hospitals in Ghana during on-hours (8AM-5PM weekdays) compared to off-hours (nights, weekends, and holidays). We also sought to assess the effectiveness of a standardized trauma intake form (TIF) with built-in decision support prompts to improve care and to assess whether this effectiveness varied between on-hours and off-hours. METHODS: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was performed with research assistants directly observing trauma care before and after introducing the TIF at emergency units of eight hospitals for 17.5 months. Differences in KPIs and mortality were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear mixed regression. RESULTS: Management of 4,077 patients was observed; 1,126 (28 %) during on-hours and 2,951(72 %) during off-hours. At baseline, four of 20 KPIs were performed significantly more often during off-hours. TIF improved care during both on- and off-hours. Seventeen KPIs improved during on-hours and 18 KPIs improved during off-hours. After TIF, six KPIs were performed more often during on-hours, but differences, though significant, were small (1-5 %). Examples of KPIs which were performed more often during on-hours after TIF included: airway assessment (99 % for on-hours vs. 98 % for off-hours), evaluation for intra-abdominal bleeding (91 % vs. 87 %), and spine immobilization for blunt trauma (90 % vs. 85 %) (all p < 0.05). At baseline, mortality among seriously injured patients (Injury Severity Score >9) was higher during on-hours (27 %) compared to off-hours (17 %, p = 0.047). TIF lowered mortality for seriously injured patients during both on-hours (27 % before TIF, 8 % after, p = 0.027) and during off-hours (17 % before, 7 % after, p = 0.004). After TIF, mortality among seriously injured patients was equal between on- and off-hours (8 % vs. 7 %, NS). CONCLUSIONS: At baseline, KPIs of trauma care were slightly better during off-hours compared with on-hours, and mortality was lower among seriously injured patient during off-hours. A quality improvement initiative (the TIF) using built-in decision support prompts improved care strongly in both on- and off-hours and eliminated the mortality difference between on- and off-hours. Use of similar decision support prompts during initial trauma care should be promoted widely in other low- and middle-income countries.

A multidimensional approach to identifying high-performing trauma centers across the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The differentiators of centers performing at the highest level of quality and patient safety are likely both structural and cultural. We aimed to combine five indicators representing established domains of trauma quality and to identify and describe the structural characteristics of consistently performing centers. METHODS: Using American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2017 to 2020, we evaluated five quality measures across several care domains for adult patients in levels I and II trauma centers: (1) time to operating room for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds and shock, (2) proportion of patients receiving timely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, (3) failure to rescue (death following a complication), (4) major hospital complications, and (5) mortality. Overall performance was summarized as a composite score incorporating all measures. Centers were ranked from highest to lowest performer. Principal component analysis showed the influence of each indicator on overall performance and supported the composite score approach. RESULTS: We identified 272 levels I and II centers, with 28 and 27 centers in the top and bottom 10%, respectively. Patients treated in high-performing centers had significant lower rates of death major complications and failure to rescue, compared with low-performing centers ( p < 0.001). The median time to operating room for gunshot wound was almost half that in high compared with low-performing centers, and rates of timely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis were over twofold greater ( p < 0.001). Top performing centers were more likely to be level I centers and cared for a higher number of severely injured patients per annum. Each indicator contributed meaningfully to the variation in scores and centers tended to perform consistently across most indicators. CONCLUSION: The combination of multiple indicators across dimensions of quality sets a higher standard for performance evaluation and allows the discrimination of centers based on structural elements, specifically level 1 status, and trauma center volume. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic /Care Management; Level IV.

Does destination make a difference? Outcomes after a policy change affecting cutoff times for prehospital transport.

BACKGROUND: Facilitating primary triage and care at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) can improve outcomes for children after trauma. However, scene location and regional emergency medical services regulations may result in initial evaluation occurring at nonpediatric facilities with later transportation to PTCs for definitive care. In this study, we assessed the results of a change in transport time cutoff from 30 to 45 minutes on pediatric patient outcomes. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the Pediatric Trauma Database at a level 1 PTC was queried for patients seen before (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017) and after (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020) the implementation of a policy increasing transport cutoff time from 30 to 45 minutes. Patient outcomes were compared by transport status and Injury Severity Score (ISS) using generalized linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 505 patients were seen before policy changes, and 413 patients, after policy changes. Both groups had similar numbers of severely injured patients (ISS, ≥15; pre, 64 [13%]; post, 61 [15%]). Average transport time increased after change (pre, 20 minutes [95% confidence interval, 18-22 minutes]; post, 29 minutes [95% confidence interval, 26-33 minutes]; p = 0.0252), consistent with policy compliance. The proportion of transferred patients did not change after policy implementation ( p = 0.5856), and the complications among all patients with an ISS of ≥15 did not significantly decrease (pre, 75%; post, 65.6%). However, those patients with an ISS of ≥15 admitted directly from the scene had a lower frequency of complications after the policy changes (pre, 76%; post, 59%; p = 0.0319), and in the postperiod, transferred patients with an ISS of ≥15 had a higher complication rate than those admitted directly from the scene ( p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Direct scene admission to a PTC is associated with a lower complication profile for patients with higher ISS. Methods to ensure adherence to cutoff thresholds for emergency medical services transport may have a positive benefit on patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Timing to First Whole Blood Transfusion and Survival Following Severe Hemorrhage in Trauma Patients.

Importance: Civilian trauma centers have revived interest in whole-blood (WB) resuscitation for patients with life-threatening bleeding. However, there remains insufficient evidence that the timing of WB transfusion when given as an adjunct to a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) is associated with a difference in patient survival outcome. Objective: To evaluate whether earlier timing of first WB transfusion is associated with improved survival at 24 hours and 30 days for adult trauma patients presenting with severe hemorrhage. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program databank from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, for adult patients presenting to US and Canadian adult civilian level 1 and 2 trauma centers with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, with shock index greater than 1, and requiring MTP who received a WB transfusion within the first 24 hours of emergency department (ED) arrival. Patients with burns, prehospital cardiac arrest, deaths within 1 hour of ED arrival, and interfacility transfers were excluded. Data were analyzed from January 3 to October 2, 2023. Exposure: Patients who received WB as an adjunct to MTP (earlier) compared with patients who had yet to receive WB as part of MTP (later) at any given time point within 24 hours of ED arrival. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were survival at 24 hours and 30 days. Results: A total of 1394 patients met the inclusion criteria (1155 male [83%]; median age, 39 years [IQR, 25-51 years]). The study cohort included profoundly injured patients (median Injury Severity Score, 27 [IQR, 17-35]). A survival curve demonstrated a difference in survival within 1 hour of ED presentation and WB transfusion. Whole blood transfusion as an adjunct to MTP given earlier compared with later at each time point was associated with improved survival at 24 hours (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.73; P = .003). Similarly, the survival benefit of earlier WB transfusion remained present at 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22-0.45; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, receipt of a WB transfusion earlier at any time point within the first 24 hours of ED arrival was associated with improved survival in patients presenting with severe hemorrhage. The survival benefit was noted shortly after transfusion. The findings of this study are clinically important as the earlier timing of WB administration may offer a survival advantage in actively hemorrhaging patients requiring MTP.

Extending Trauma Quality Improvement Beyond Trauma Centers: Hospital Variation in Outcomes Among Nontrauma Hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) conducts a robust quality improvement program for ACS-verified trauma centers, yet many injured patients receive care at non-accredited facilities. This study tested for variation in outcomes across non-trauma hospitals and characterized hospitals associated with increased mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The study included state trauma registry data of 37,670 patients treated between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Clinical data were supplemented with data from the American Hospital Association and US Department of Agriculture, allowing comparisons among 100 nontrauma hospitals. METHODS: Using Bayesian techniques, risk-adjusted and reliability-adjusted rates of mortality and interfacility transfer, as well as Emergency Departments length-of-stay (ED-LOS) among patients transferred from EDs were calculated for each hospital. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients ages >55 years and those with decreased Glasgow coma scores (GCS). Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. RESULTS: Mortality varied 3-fold (0.9%-3.1%); interfacility transfer rates varied 46-fold (2.1%-95.6%); and mean ED-LOS varied 3-fold (81-231 minutes). Hospitals that were high and low statistical outliers were identified for each outcome, and subgroup analyses demonstrated comparable hospital variation. Metropolitan hospitals were associated increased mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, P = 0.004], decreased likelihood of interfacility transfer (OR 0.7, P ≤ 0.001), and increased ED-LOS (coef. 0.1, P ≤ 0.001) when compared with nonmetropolitan hospitals and risk-adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation in trauma outcomes exists across nontrauma hospitals. Efforts to improve trauma quality should include engagement of nontrauma hospitals to reduce variation in outcomes of injured patients treated at those facilities.

Utilizing triage rates to improve ICU admission guidelines of elderly rib fracture patients.

BACKGROUND: Elderly rib fracture patients are generally admitted to an ICU which may result in overutilization of scarce resources. We hypothesized that this practice results in significant overtriage. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients over age 70 with acute rib fracture(s) as sole indication for ICU admission. Primary outcomes were adverse events (intubation, pneumonia, death), which we classified as meriting ICU admission. We utilized Cribari matrices to calculate triage rates. RESULTS: 101 patients met study criteria. 12% had adverse events occurring on average at day 5. Our undertriage rate was 6% and overtriage rate 87%. The 72 overtriaged patients utilized 295 total ICU days. Evaluating guideline modification, ≥3 fractures appears optimal. Changing to this would have liberated 50 ICU days with 3% undertriage. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with small numbers of rib fractures are overtriaged to ICUs. Modifying guidelines to ≥3 rib fractures will improve resource utilization and save ICU beds.

Error reduction in trauma care: Lessons from an anonymized, national, multicenter mortality reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Twenty years ago, the landmark report To Err Is Human illustrated the importance of system-level solutions, in contrast to person-level interventions, to assure patient safety. Nevertheless, rates of preventable deaths, particularly in trauma care, have not materially changed. The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program developed a voluntary Mortality Reporting System to better understand the underlying causes of preventable trauma deaths and the strategies used by centers to prevent future deaths. The objective of this work is to describe the factors contributing to potentially preventable deaths after injury and to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies identified by trauma centers to mitigate future harm, as reported in the Mortality Reporting System. METHODS: An anonymous structured web-based reporting template based on the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations taxonomy was made available to trauma centers participating in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program to allow for reporting of deaths that were potentially preventable. Contributing factors leading to death were evaluated. The effectiveness of mitigating strategies was assessed using a validated framework and mapped to tiers of effectiveness ranging from person-focused to system-oriented interventions. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, 395 deaths were reviewed. Of the mortalities, 33.7% were unanticipated. Errors pertained to management (50.9%), clinical performance (54.7%), and communication (56.2%). Human failures were cited in 61% of cases. Person-focused strategies like education were common (56.0%), while more effective system-based strategies were seldom used. In 7.3% of cases, centers could not identify a specific strategy to prevent future harm. CONCLUSION: Most strategies to reduce errors in trauma centers focus on changing the performance of providers rather than system-level interventions such as automation, standardization, and fail-safe approaches. Centers require additional support to develop more effective mitigations that will prevent recurrent errors and patient harm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, level V.

Comparison of paper and electronic documentation for trauma activations in a pediatric trauma center.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the accuracy of documentation of trauma activations in the electronic medical record (EMR) compared with a paper chart. Our primary objective was to compare the accuracy of documentation between a paper chart and EMR in pediatric trauma. METHODS: We studied video recordings of trauma activations at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. These videos were reviewed, and data points collected were used to compare accuracy of documentation in the paper chart and EMR. RESULTS: We reviewed 106 videos with 1614 data points collected. Of those, 805 data points were compared with their corresponding paper chart with 710 data points correctly documented (88.2%). The remaining 809 data points were compared with their corresponding electronic documentation after implementation of the EMR with 681 data points being correctly documented (84.2%). Overall, we found that paper documentation was significantly more accurate than the EMR (p = 0.019). When analyzed in subcategories of pre-arrival information, primary and secondary survey, and interventions, paper documentation was found to be significantly more accurate than the EMR for components of the primary and secondary survey (87.3% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in accuracy of documentation between paper and EMR for pre-arrival information (88.1% vs. 89.4%) or interventions (90.3% vs. 92%). CONCLUSION: Documentation of trauma activations is overall more accurate using a paper chart than EMR. Although documentation was accurate for most categories using both a paper chart and EMR, we found significantly less accuracy in documentation of the primary and secondary survey in the EMR.

Proposal of standardization of every step of angiographic procedure in bleeding patients from pelvic trauma.

Trauma accounts for a third of the deaths in Western countries, exceeded only by cardiovascular disease and cancer. The high risk of massive bleeding, which depends not only on the type of fractures, but also on the severity of any associated parenchymal injuries, makes pelvic fractures one of the most life-threatening skeletal injuries, with a high mortality rate. Therefore, pelvic trauma represents an important condition to correctly and early recognize, manage, and treat. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach involving trauma surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, emergency room physicians and interventional radiologists is needed to promptly manage the resuscitation of pelvic trauma patients and ensure the best outcomes, both in terms of time and costs. Over the years, the role of interventional radiology in the management of patient bleeding due to pelvic trauma has been increasing. However, the current guidelines on the management of these patients do not adequately reflect or address the varied nature of injuries faced by the interventional radiologist. In fact, in the therapeutic algorithm of these patients, after the word "ANGIO", there are no reports on the different possibilities that an interventional radiologist has to face during the procedure. Furthermore, variations exist in the techniques and materials for performing angioembolization in bleeding patients with pelvic trauma. Due to these differences, the outcomes differ among different published series. This article has the aim to review the recent literature on optimal imaging assessment and management of pelvic trauma, defining the role of the interventional radiologist within the multidisciplinary team, suggesting the introduction of common and unequivocal terminology in every step of the angiographic procedure. Moreover, according to these suggestions, the present paper tries to expand the previously drafted algorithm exploring the role of the interventional radiologist in pelvic trauma, especially given the multidisciplinary setting.

Fragmentation of care in the blunt abdominal trauma patient: Capturing our true outcomes and impact on care.

BACKGROUND: Trauma care is associated with unplanned readmissions, which may occur at facilities other than the index treatment facility. This "fragmentation of care" may be associated with adverse outcomes. We evaluated a statewide database that includes readmissions to analyze the incidence and impact of FC. METHODS: The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development patient discharge data set was evaluated for calendar years 2016 to 2018. Patients 15 years or older diagnosed with blunt abdominal solid organ injury during the index admission were identified. Readmissions were evaluated postdischarge at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients readmitted within 6 months to a facility other than the index admission facility (fragmented care [FC]) were compared with those readmitted to their index admission facility (non-FC). Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate risk of FC. RESULTS: Of the total 1,580 patients, there were 752 FC (47.6%) and 828 (52.4%) non-FC. Readmissions representing FC at months 1, 3, and 6 were 40.3%, 49.3%, and 53.4%, respectively. At index admission, the groups were demographically and clinically similar, with similar rates of abdominal operations and complications. Non-FC patients had a higher rate of abdominal reoperation at readmission (5.8% non-FC vs. 2.9% FC, p = 0.006). In an adjusted model, multiple readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, p = 0.014), readmission >30 days after index facility discharge (OR, 1.98; p < 0.001), and discharge to a nonmedical facility (OR, 2.46; p < 0.0001) were associated with increased odds of FC. Operative intervention at index admission was associated with lower odds of FC (OR, 0.77; p = 0.039). However, FC was not independently associated with demographic or insurance characteristics. CONCLUSION: The rate of FC among patients with blunt abdominal injury is high. The risk of FC is mitigated when patients are managed operatively during the index admission. Trauma systems should implement measures to ensure that these patients are followed postdischarge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III; Care management, level IV.