ABSTRACT
Background: The clinical outcomes and survival of patients with penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) were evaluated in a tertiary care hospital, comparing those who underwent aortic repair to those treated conservatively. Patients and methods: A retrospective single-centre analysis included all patients that underwent a computed tomography angiography (CT-A) scan with the diagnosis of a PAU between January 2009 and May 2019. "PAU" was identified in 1,493 of 112,506 CT-A scan reports in 576 patients. Clinical and angiomorphological data were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), with secondary outcomes focusing on identifying risk factors for poor OS. Survival probabilities were analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method using the log-rank test. A Cox hazard model using survival as dependent variable with stepwise backward eliminations based on the likelihood ratios was employed. Results: 315 PAUs were identified in 278 patients. The prevalence in the cohort was 0.8%. The mean age of the patients was 74.4 years, and they were predominantly male (n = 208, 74.8%). The mean ulcer depth was 11.8 mm (range 2-50 mm). Out of the patients, 232 were asymptomatic (83.5%). Among 178 PAUs (56.5%), high-risk factors, such as ulcer depth >10 mm, aortic diameter >40 mm, and ulcer length >20 mm, were observed. Aortic repair was associated with a better mean OS compared to conservatively managed patients (72.6 versus 32.2 months, p = 0.001). The Cox hazard model showed that ulcer depth >1 mm was associated with poor OS (HR 0.67, p = 0.048), while aortic repair was related to a better OS (HR 4.365, p<0.013). Conclusions: Aortic repair is associated with better OS, but this finding should be interpreted with caution because of differences in age and comorbidities between the groups. Further evaluation is warranted through prospective studies with randomized groups. Further assessment for angiomorphological parameters is recommended to identify patients at increased risk for poor OS.
Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases , Computed Tomography Angiography , Conservative Treatment , Ulcer , Humans , Male , Female , Ulcer/mortality , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/therapy , Ulcer/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/mortality , Aged , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Aortic Diseases/mortality , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/therapy , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Assessment , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aortography , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Penetrating Atherosclerotic UlcerABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Esophageal safety following radiofrequency (RF) left atrial (LA) linear ablation has not been established. To determine the esophageal safety profile of LA linear RF lesions, we performed systematic esophagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients with intraesophageal temperature rise (ITR) ≥ 38.5°C. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 2021 and July 2023, a total of 200 consecutive patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) underwent linear ablation with posterior dome (roof or floor) or posterior mitral isthmus line transection. Patients with ITR ≥ 38.5°C were scheduled for esophageal endoscopy ~3 weeks after ablation. Patient and ATA characteristics, procedural parameters, endoscopy findings and ablation lesion data were collected and analyzed. One hundred thirty-three out of 200 (67%) patients showed ITR ≥ 38.5°C during LA linear ablation. ITR (with maximal temperature of 45.7°C) was more frequently observed during floor line ablation (82% of cases). ITR was less observed during roof line ablation (34%) and posterior mitral isthmus ablation (4%). Endoscopy, performed in 115 patients after 24 ± 10 days, showed esophageal ulceration in four patients (two patients Kansas City classification [KCC] 2a and two patients KCC 2b). No patient showed esophageal perforation or fistula. CONCLUSION: Temperature rise during LA linear ablation is frequent and ulceration risk exists, particularly when floor line is performed. Safety measures are needed to avoid potential severe complications like esophageal perforation and fistula.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Ulcer , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/etiology , Ulcer/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Esophageal Diseases/etiology , Esophageal Diseases/diagnosis , Time Factors , Heart Atria/physiopathology , Heart Atria/surgery , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Endoscopy, Digestive System/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Esophagus/injuriesABSTRACT
Objective. Ulceration of the small intestine, which has a high incidence, includes Crohn's disease (CD), intestinal tuberculosis (ITB), primary small intestinal lymphoma (PSIL), cryptogenic multifocal ulcerous stenosing enteritis (CMUSE), and non-specific ulcer (NSU). However, the ulceration morphology can easily be misdiagnosed through enteroscopy.Approach. In this study, DRCA-DenseNet169, which is based on DenseNet169, with residual dilated blocks and a channel attention block, is proposed to identify CD, ITB, PSIL, CMUSE, and NSU intelligently. In addition, a novel loss function that incorporates dynamic weights is designed to enhance the precision of imbalanced datasets with limited samples. DRCA-Densenet169 was evaluated using 10883 enteroscopy images, including 5375 ulcer images and 5508 normal images, which were obtained from the Shanghai Changhai Hospital.Main results. DRCA-Densenet169 achieved an overall accuracy of 85.27% ± 0.32%, a weighted-precision of 83.99% ± 2.47%, a weighted-recall of 84.36% ± 0.88% and a weighted-F1-score of 84.07% ± 2.14%.Significance. The results demonstrate that DRCA-Densenet169 has high recognition accuracy and strong robustness in identifying different types of ulcers when obtaining immediate and preliminary diagnoses.
Subject(s)
Intestine, Small , Ulcer , Humans , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , China , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Surgical indications for low-grade carotid stenosis have not yet been established. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of low-grade carotid stenosis refractory to medical treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with symptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis (<50%). Recurrence was defined as an ipsilateral ischemic event in the symptomatic lesions during the follow-up period. Patient demographics and imaging findings were compared between the recurrence and nonrecurrence groups to investigate risk factors associated with medical treatment. RESULTS: The mean age was 74.1 (58-90 years), and the mean follow-up period was 35.4 months (2.0-97 months). Recurrence occurred in 15 of the symptomatic patients. Ulceration was significantly associated with recurrence under medical treatment (P = 0.001). The median time to recurrence was 26.1 months in patients with ulcers and 54.3 months in those without ulcers (P = 0.04). Pathological study with recurrence showed plaque rupture with multilayered lesions, indicating lesions refractory to medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of low-grade carotid stenosis, lesions with ulcerations are likely refractory to medical therapy. Consideration of the indications for surgical treatment may be warranted for lesions with ulceration, even if the degree of stenosis is low.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Carotid Stenosis , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Stroke , Humans , Aged , Carotid Stenosis/complications , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Ulcer/complications , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/surgery , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/pathology , Brain Ischemia/etiology , Risk Factors , Recurrence , Stroke/etiologySubject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Cicatrix/diagnostic imaging , Cicatrix/etiology , Cicatrix/surgery , Immersion , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/etiology , Ulcer/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Aortic Diseases , Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer , Humans , Aorta , Aortic Diseases/complications , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/therapy , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/therapy , Reference Standards , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/therapyABSTRACT
We present a case of life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding caused by a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) that ruptured into the esophagus. A 65-year-old man presented with pyrexia and nausea. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) performed on admission revealed a hematoma between the lower esophagus and descending aorta due to a contained rupture of a PAU, which was undiagnosed at that time. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed on the fifth day of admission revealed a subepithelial lesion in the lower esophagus, further complicated by ulcer formation. Biopsy did not reveal any malignant findings. On the eighth day of admission, the patient experienced substantial hematemesis with vital signs indicative of shock. Emergency EGD was performed, which revealed life-threatening bleeding in the lower esophagus. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed an aortoesophageal fistula with massive hematemesis, after which the patient died. An autopsy revealed perforation of the PAU into the esophagus without aortic dissection or a true aneurysm.Patients with atherosclerosis who develop recent-onset gastrointestinal symptoms, progressive anemia, and/or periaortic lesions should be carefully evaluated using contrast-enhanced CT, and PAU should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases , Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer , Male , Humans , Aged , Hematemesis/etiology , Aortic Diseases/complications , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Esophagus/pathology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Ulcer/complications , Ulcer/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although endovascular technology has resulted in a paradigm shift in treatment, medical management remains the standard of care for penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) and intramural hematoma (IMH). This study aimed to detail the short- and long-term outcomes of symptomatic PAU/IMH. METHODS: Institutional data on symptomatic PAU/IMH were gathered (2005-2020). The primary outcome was the composite of recurrent symptoms, radiographic progression, intervention, rupture, and death from related or unknown cause. Factors associated with the primary outcome were determined using a Fine-Gray model with death from an unrelated cause as a competing risk. RESULTS: A total of 83 symptomatic patients treated with medical management aside from ruptures and type A dissections: 21 isolated PAU, 30 isolated IMH, and 32 IMH and PAU. Adverse outcomes included symptom recurrence in 14 (16.9%), radiographic progression to dissection or saccular aneurysm in 17 (20.5%), surgery in 20 (24.1%) (17 thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 1 endovascular aortic repair, 1 frozen elephant trunk, and 1 open repair), and rupture in 4 (4.8%). Twenty-seven patients (32.5%) died during follow-up: 6 from IMH treatment complications, 8 from an unknown cause, and 13 from other causes. The 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year cumulative incidences of the primary outcome was 26.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9%-37.0%), 44.9% (95% CI, 32.8%-56.2%), and 57.5% (95% CI, 42.4%-69.9%), respectively. IMH with PAU was associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary outcome compared with isolated IMH (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.09-4.50; P = .027) and isolated PAU (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.44-8.88; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Complications from symptomatic PAU and IMH are frequent, with intervention, recurrent symptoms, radiographic progression, rupture, or death affecting 25% of patients at 30 days after diagnosis and almost one-half of patients 1 year after diagnosis. Given the high rate of adverse events in this population, investigation into a more aggressive interventional strategy may warranted, especially in patients with a combined IMH and PAU.
Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases , Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer , Humans , Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Diseases/surgery , Aorta , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/surgery , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Inflammation and ulcers at the anastomotic site are frequently observed after intestinal resection surgery for Crohn's disease (CD), which often signify postoperative recurrence. Crohn's disease causes abnormalities in whole-body fat metabolism, and alterations in subcutaneous and visceral fat are potential indicators of disease development. This study aimed to quantify the areas of subcutaneous (SFA) and visceral fat (VFA) and investigate the relationship between fat tissue and endoscopic recurrence and anastomotic ulceration after Crohn's disease surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 279 patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Using abdominal CT (Computed Tomography) scans at the level of the umbilicus, we measured the area of subcutaneous and visceral fat, and calculated the Mesenteric Fat Index (MFI), which is defined as the ratio of the area of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat. We compared the changes in fat tissue between surgical Crohn's disease patients and non-surgical patients in remission, as well as changes in fat tissue before and after surgery, and between patients with and without endoscopic recurrence after surgery. RESULTS: The MFI value of the surgical group was higher than that of the non-surgical group(0.88(1.27 ± 1.26) VS 0.39(0.44 ± 0.21), P < 0.001), while the SFA value was lower(70.16(92.97 ± 78.23) VS 157.64(175.96 ± 101.58), P < 0.001). Of the 134 surgical patients who underwent abdominal CT examination after surgery, the SFA value was significantly higher after surgery(143.61 ± 81.86 VS 90.87 ± 71.93, P < 0.001), and the MFI value decreased accordingly(0.57 ± 0.36 VS 1.30 ± 1.35, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that high VFA and MFI values, smoking history, and preoperative biologic therapy were all risk factors for postoperative endoscopic recurrence(p < 0.05), while high MFI values and preoperative biologic therapy were also risk factors for anastomotic ulcers(p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that these factors increased the risk of reaching the endpoint with time(p < 0.05). The ROC curve results showed that MFI value had high diagnostic value for postoperative endoscopic recurrence [AUC:0.831, 95% CI: 0.75-0.91, p < 0.001] and anastomotic ulcers [AUC:0.801, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical CD patients have significantly higher MFI values but the values decline after surgery. When the preoperative MFI value is > 0.82, the risk of postoperative endoscopic recurrence increases significantly, and when the MFI value is ≥ 1.10, the risk of anastomotic ulceration after surgery increases significantly. Meanwhile, biologic therapy preoperatively also is a high-risk factor for early postoperative endoscopic recurrence or anastomotic ulcers after intestinal resection surgery.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Humans , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Crohn Disease/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/etiology , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Intra-Abdominal Fat/diagnostic imaging , RecurrenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Abdominal penetrating aortic ulcer (aPAU) is defined as an ulceration of the aortic intima and media lamina, even with rupture of the internal elastic lamina. Recently, there have been an increasing number of publications on endovascular treatment for aPAU. This review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment and provide clinicians with the latest evidence-based medical data. METHODS: 3 academic databases (Embase, PubMed, and Scopus) were systematically searched for literature reporting on aPAU from 1986 (the earliest appearance of the concept of aPAU) to September 1, 2021, and related data were collected and evaluated. A fixed/random effects model was used to construct the forest plots. Funnel plots and linear regression tests were used to assess the publication bias. RESULTS: 6 articles including 121 patients were included in the analysis. The average age was 71.4 years, with 72.7% of males and 85.6% with hypertension. Saccular aneurysms (SA) were the most prevalent complication (35.5%). Endovascular treatment had a perioperative mortality rate of .24% (95% CI, .00-2.70). The technical success rate was 99.15% (95% CI, 96.49-100). The type-II endoleak rate was 5.69% (95% CI, .00-12.13). The 1-year survival rate was 95.69% (95% CI, 90.49-100). The revascularization rate was 7.20% (95% CI, .07-14.32). Endovascular treatments for aPAU would lead to a high rate of technical success, few complications, and satisfactory 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: aPAU are a common disease that mainly affects elderly males with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Endovascular treatment is required when an ulcer progresses rapidly or manifests symptoms. Endovascular treatment is associated with high technical success, low complication, and satisfactory 1-year survival. Further investigation into the long-term results of endovascular treatment is necessary.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Hypertension , Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer , Male , Humans , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Aorta/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/surgery , Risk Factors , Blood Vessel ProsthesisABSTRACT
We present a case report of an anorectal ulcer cause by an accidentally ingested toothpick, with radiologic an endoscopic images. This is a rare cause of foreign bodies in digestive tract, though it has a high rate of complications.
Subject(s)
Foreign Bodies , Ulcer , Humans , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/etiology , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Background: To report technical success as well as perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of penetrating abdominal aortic ulcers ≤35 mm in diameter (PAU). Patients and methods: The abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) quality registry of the German institute for vascular research (DIGG) was used to identify patients with standard EVAR for infrarenal PAU ≤35 mm between 1/1/2019 and 12/31/2021. Infectious, traumatic, inflammatory PAUs, PAUs associated with connective tissue disease, PAUs following aortic dissection as well as true aneurysms were excluded. Demographics, cardiovascular comorbidity, technical success as well as perioperative morbidity and mortality were determined. Results: Amongst 11 537 patients who underwent EVAR during the study period, 405 with PAU ≤35 mm were eligible from 95 participating hospitals across Germany (22% women, 20.5% octogenarians). The median aortic diameter was 30 mm (Interquartile range 27-33). Cardiovascular comorbidities were frequent with coronary artery disease (34.8%), chronic heart failure (30.9%), history of myocardial infarction (19.8%), hypertension (76.8%), diabetes (21.7%), smoking (20.8%), history of stroke (9.4%), symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (20%), chronic kidney disease (10.4%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (9.6%). Most patients were asymptomatic (89.9%). Among the symptomatic patients, 13 presented with distal embolization (3.2%) and 3 with contained ruptures (0.7%). Technical success of endovascular repair was 98.3%. Both, percutaneous (37.1%) or femoral cut-down access approaches (58.5%) were registered. Endoleaks of any type were present with type 1 (0.5%), type 2 (6.4%) and type 3 (0.3%) endoleaks. Overall mortality was 0.5%. Perioperative complications occurred in 12 patients (3.0%). Conclusions: According to this registry data, endovascular repair of PAU is technically feasible with acceptable perioperative outcomes, but further studies investigating mid- and long-term data are needed before invasive treatment of PAU disease in an elderly and comorbid patient population should be recommended.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Endoleak/etiology , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/surgery , Ulcer/complications , Treatment Outcome , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Postoperative ComplicationsSubject(s)
Oral Ulcer , Tongue Diseases , Female , Humans , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Tongue , Diagnosis, Differential , Tongue Diseases/etiology , Oral Ulcer/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) is determined by atherosclerotic degeneration of the tunica media with disruption of the intima. Usually it is detected in the thoracic aorta, with few series describing an abdominal location. The aim of the study was to report early and late outcomes of the endovascular repair of complicated infrarenal abdominal PAU (a-PAU) by aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization. METHODS: Data from all complicated a-PAU submitted to endovascular repair by aortobi-iliac endograft (Cook-Zenith Alpha) between 2016 and 2021 (February) were analyzed. The a-PAU coil embolization was performed to decrease the risk of persistent type II endoleak whenever possible. Complicated a-PAU were defined according with the presence of symptoms, aortic rupture, or saccular or pseudo-aneurysm. Technical success, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and reinterventions were assessed as early outcomes. Survival, endoleaks, and freedom from reinterventions were evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1153 endovascular aortic procedures, 45 cases (4%) of complicated a-PAU were identified. Fourteen cases (31%) were managed in urgent setting (symptoms, n = 10 [22%]; shock, n = 4 [9%]). The median diameter of a-PAU was 49 mm (interquartile range, 14 mm). Thirteen patients (29%) had severe femoral or iliac access (angle >90°, circumferential calcification [>50%], hemodynamic iliac stenosis or obstruction, an external iliac artery diameter of less than 7 mm, or a previous femoral surgical graft). The a-PAU embolization was performed in 30 cases (67%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Postoperative cardiac, pulmonary and renal morbidity occurred in one (2%), two (4%), and eight (18%) patients, respectively. Two patients (4%) required reintervention within 30 days for access related complications. The 30-day mortality was 2%. At a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 18 months), no type I or III endoleaks, iliac leg occlusion, or graft infection occurred and no patient required late reinterventions; the 36-month survival rate was 72%. No a-PAU enlarged or ruptured during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of complicated a-PAU by a low-profile aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization is safe and effective. Excellent technical results are reported even in challenging anatomic features. Midterm clinical results are satisfactory in terms of aortic-related complications or mortality, freedom from reintervention, and survival.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Endoleak/diagnostic imaging , Endoleak/etiology , Endoleak/therapy , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the treatment option of choice for almost all pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of aortic pathology on the occurrence of postimplantation syndrome (PIS) after TEVAR. METHODS: Seventy-four patients undergoing TEVAR for aortic dissection (TAD, 25), aortic aneurysm (TAA, 26), and aortic rupture or perforated ulcer (TAR/PAU, 23) were included in this retrospective study. The clinical outcome measures were persistent inflammation at hospital discharge and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: PIS was assessed in 22.97% of all patients, predominantly in the TAD group (P=0.03). CRP increased after TEVAR (156.6±94.5, P<0.001; 108.1±57.7, P<0.01 and 117.8±70.4, P<0.05) vs. baseline (58.1±77.5, 31.94±52.1 and 31.9±52.1 mg/L, in TAD, TAA and TAR/PAU, respectively) and this increase was more accentuated in TAD group (P<0.05). Stent-length was similar in all groups (P=0.226) but correlated with postoperative CRP only in TAD (R=0.576, P=0.013). Fresh parietal thrombus correlated with CRP (R=0.4507, P=0.0005) and is (OR=1.0883, P=0.0001), together with the pathology of aortic dissection (OR=6.2268, P=0.0288), a predictor of PIS after TEVAR. Whereas mortality (5.4%) did not correlate with PIS (P=0.38) either with aortic pathology (P=0.225), hospital stay after TEVAR was significantly prolonged by PIS (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic dissection is associated with more inflammation after TEVAR than aortic aneurysm, rupture or perforated ulcer, with the amount of fresh parietal thrombus playing the most significant role in the occurrence of PIS. Importantly, PIS prolongs hospital stay but not mortality after TEVAR.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic , Aortic Aneurysm , Aortic Dissection , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Humans , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Ulcer/diagnostic imaging , Ulcer/surgery , Ulcer/complications , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm/surgery , Inflammation/complications , Inflammation/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/complications , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has emerged as a novel tool for the assessment of disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD). Real world data from Indian subcontinent on performance of MRE in terminal ileal CD are lacking. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with terminal ileal CD who underwent both ileo-colonoscopy and MRE was performed. Ileo-colonoscopy was considered the gold standard for assessment of disease activity. On ileo-colonoscopy, a simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) ≥2 was considered active disease; presence of ulcers indicated severe disease. MRE scoring of the disease activity was performed using magnetic resonance index of activity (MARIA) and simplified MARIA (MARIAs). The measure of agreement between ileo-colonoscopy and MRE and comparison of MARIA and MARIAs for assessment of disease activity and sensitivity of MRE to detect mucosal ulcerations were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy patients with terminal ileal CD (mean age 40.74±15.56 years; 71.4% males [n=50]) were evaluated. The sensitivities of MARIA and MARIAs scores to detect active disease were 0.76 and 0.84, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for detecting severe disease was 0.836 (p<0.0001) for MARIA and 0.861 (p<0.0001) for MARIAs. For mild active disease, there was no agreement between SES-CD and MARIA or MARIAs; however, for severe disease, the agreement was fair and moderate for MARIA and MARIAs, respectively. MARIA and MARIAs were comparable for identification of active and severe disease (κ 0.759, p<0.0001 and κ 0.840, p<0.0001, respectively). MRE was 68.18% sensitive to detect mucosal ulcers. CONCLUSION: MRE is a reliable and sensitive tool for detection of endoscopically severe, but not mild, terminal ileal CD.