ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Owing to a lack of data, this study aimed to explore the effect of cardiac preload on myocardial strain in patients with sepsis. METHODS: A total of 70 patients with sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to July 2019 and underwent transthoracic echocardiography were enrolled. Echocardiographic data were recorded at ICU admission and 24 h later. Patients were assigned to low left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and normal LVEDVI groups. We assessed the impact of preload on myocardial strain between the groups and analyzed the correlation of echocardiographic parameters under different preload conditions. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (53%) had a low LVEDVI and 33 (47%) a normal LVEDVI. Those in the low LVEDVI group had a faster heart rate (121.7 vs. 95.3, p < 0.001) and required a greater degree of fluid infusion (3.67 L vs. 2.62 L, P = 0.019). The left ventricular global strain (LVGLS) (-8.60% vs. -10.80%, p = 0.001), left ventricular global circumferential strain (LVGCS) (-13.83% vs. -18.26%, p = 0.006), and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) (-6.9% vs. -10.60%, p = 0.001) showed significant improvements in the low LVEDVI group after fluid resuscitation. However, fluid resuscitation resulted in a significantly increased cardiac afterload value (1172.00 vs. 1487.00, p = 0.009) only in the normal LVEDVI group. Multivariate backward linear regression showed that LVEDVI changes were independently associated with myocardial strain-related improvements during fluid resuscitation. The baseline LVEDVI was significantly negatively correlated with the LVGLS and RVGLS (r = -0.44 and - 0.39, respectively) but not LVGCS. LVEDVI increases during fluid resuscitation were associated with improvements in the myocardial strain degree. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial strain alterations were significantly influenced by the cardiac preload during fluid resuscitation in sepsis.
Subject(s)
Sepsis , Ventricular Function, Left , Humans , Male , Sepsis/physiopathology , Sepsis/therapy , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/complications , Middle Aged , Female , Aged , Fluid Therapy , Time Factors , Stroke Volume , China , Myocardial Contraction , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests , EchocardiographyABSTRACT
Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) remains the most common cause of pulmonary hypertension globally. Etiologies include heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and left-sided valvular heart diseases. Despite the increasing prevalence of PH-LHD, there remains a paucity of knowledge about the hemodynamic definition, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and prognosis among clinicians. Moreover, clinical trials have produced mixed results on the usefulness of pulmonary vasodilator therapies for PH-LHD. In this expert review, we have outlined the critical role of meticulous hemodynamic evaluation and provocative testing for cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Therapeutic strategies-pharmacologic, device-based, and surgical therapies used for managing PH-LHD-are also outlined. PH-LHD in advanced heart failure, and the role of mechanical circulatory support in PH-LHD is briefly explored. An in-depth understanding of PH-LHD by all clinicians is needed for improved recognition and outcomes among patients with PH-LHD.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Hypertension, Pulmonary , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pulmonary/therapy , Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/complications , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Heart-Assist Devices , Hemodynamics/physiology , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effect of left ventricular septal myocardial pacing (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) on ventricular synchrony and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic status is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVSP and LBBP vs biventricular pacing (BVP) on ventricular electrical synchrony and hemodynamic status in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. METHODS: In cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates with LV conduction disease, ventricular synchrony was assessed by measuring QRS duration (QRSd) and using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography. LV electrical dyssynchrony was assessed as the difference between the first activation in leads V1 to V8 to the last from leads V4 to V8. LV hemodynamic status was estimated using invasive systolic blood pressure measurement during multiple transitions between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with a mean LV ejection fraction of 29% and a mean QRSd of 168 ± 24 ms were included. Thirteen had ischemic cardiomyopathy. QRSd during BVP, LVSP, and LBBP was the same, but LBBP provided shorter LV electrical dyssynchrony than BVP (-10 ms; 95% CI: -16 to -4 ms; P = 0.001); the difference between LVSP and BVP was not significant (-5 ms; 95% CI: -12 to 1 ms; P = 0.10). LBBP was associated with higher systolic blood pressure than BVP (4%; 95% CI: 2%-5%; P < 0.001), whereas LVSP was not (1%; 95% CI: 0%-2%; P = 0.10). Hemodynamic differences during LBBP and LVSP vs BVP were more pronounced in nonischemic than ischemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography allowed the documentation of differences in LV synchrony between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP, which were not observed by measuring QRSd. LVSP provided the same LV synchrony and hemodynamic status as BVP, while LBBP was better than BVP in both.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Electrocardiography , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Hemodynamics/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Septum/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and complete left bundle branch block benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a large heterogeneity of response to CRT is described. Several predictors of response to CRT have been identified, but the role of the underlying genetic background is still poorly explored. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, the authors sought to define differences in LV remodeling and outcome prediction after CRT when stratifying patients according to the presence or absence of DCM-causing genetic background. METHODS: From our center, 74 patients with DCM subjected to CRT and available genetic testing were retrospectively enrolled. Carriers of causative monogenic variants in validated DCM-causing genes, and/or with documented family history of DCM, were classified as affected by genetically determined disease (GEN+DCM) (n = 25). Alternatively, by idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (idDCM) (n = 49). The primary outcome was long-term LV remodeling and prevalence of super response to CRT (evaluated at 24-48 months after CRT); the secondary outcome was heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device. RESULTS: GEN+DCM and idDCM patients were homogeneous at baseline with the exception of QRS duration, longer in idDCM. The median follow-up was 55 months. Long-term LV reverse remodeling and the prevalence of super response were significantly higher in the idDCM group (27% in idDCM vs 5% in GEN+DCM; P = 0.025). The heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device outcome occurred more frequently in patients with GEN+DCM (53% vs 24% in idDCM; P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Genotyping contributes to the risk stratification of patients with DCM undergoing CRT implantation in terms of LV remodeling and outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated , Ventricular Remodeling , Humans , Female , Male , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/genetics , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/therapy , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Ventricular Remodeling/genetics , Ventricular Remodeling/physiology , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Heart Failure/genetics , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Adult , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/genetics , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Bundle-Branch Block/genetics , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , Bundle-Branch Block/physiopathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure is the final stage of most heart diseases and, with over 64 million people affected worldwide, is considered a global pandemic. The prevalence is expected to continue to rise. The prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases and the early detection of patients suffering from heart failure are essential. Different therapies are available depending on the extent of the reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Optimal treatment prevents unnecessary admissions to hospital, reduces mortality and improves quality of life. In the following article, we discuss the diagnosis of heart failure and explain the various treatment options for heart failure with reduced LVEF (HFrEF, HFmrEF).
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , PrognosisABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article presents a comprehensive review of coronary revascularization versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. RECENT FINDINGS: The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial randomized 700 patients with extensive coronary artery disease and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and viability in more than four dysfunctional myocardial segments to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) plus OMT versus OMT alone. Over a median duration of 41 months, there was no difference in the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or improvement in LVEF with PCI plus OMT versus OMT alone at 6 and 12 months, quality of life scores at 24 months, or fatal ventricular arrhythmia. The STICH randomized trial was conducted between 2002 and 2007, involving patients with LV dysfunction and coronary artery disease. The patients were assigned to either CABG plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. At the 5-year follow-up, the trial showed that CABG plus medical therapy reduced cardiovascular disease-related deaths and hospitalizations but no reduction in all-cause mortality. However, a 10-year follow-up showed a significant decrease in all-cause mortality with CABG. The currently available evidence showed no apparent benefit of PCI in severe ischemic cardiomyopathy as compared to OMT, but that CABG improves outcomes in this patient population. The paucity of data on the advantages of PCI in this patient population underscores the critical need for optimization of medical therapy for better survival and quality of life until further evidence from RCTs is available.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Myocardial Ischemia , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Myocardial Ischemia/complications , Treatment Outcome , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stroke Volume , Coronary Artery BypassABSTRACT
Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, a known risk factor for adverse cardiac outcomes and recurrent acute ischemic stroke, may be detected during an acute ischemic stroke hospitalization. A multidisciplinary care paradigm informed by neurology and cardiology expertise may facilitate the timely implementation of an array of proven heart failure-specific therapies and procedures in a nuanced manner to optimize brain and cardiac health.
Subject(s)
Ischemic Stroke , Stroke Volume , Humans , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Ischemic Stroke/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Brain/physiopathology , Stroke/therapy , Stroke/physiopathologyABSTRACT
We decided to evaluate the effect of treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in improving heart function by strain echocardiography than conventional transthoracic echocardiography. This prospective cross-sectional study included patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Conventional and two-dimensional strain echocardiography performed before and after three months diabetic foot treatment. Then, we compared the echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS). Multivariate and univariate logistic regression analysis were performed to find which variable was mainly associated with LV-GLS changes. 62 patients with DFU were conducted. After echocardiography, all patients underwent surgical or non-surgical treatments. Three months after the treatment, LV-EF was not significantly different with its' primary values (P = 0.250), but LV-GLS became significantly different (P<0.05). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, with the increase in the grade of ulcer, LV-GLS improved by 6.3 times. Not only the treatment of DFU helps to control adverse outcomes like infection, limb loss and morbidity but also it enhances cardiac function. Of note, strain echocardiography found to be a better indicator of myocardial dysfunction than LV-EF. These findings make a strong reason for the routine assessment of cardiac function in patients with DFU.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Ventricular Function, Left , Global Longitudinal Strain , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Diabetic Foot/diagnostic imaging , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Prospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Echocardiography/methodsABSTRACT
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel device-based therapy used to treat patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In both randomized clinical trials and real-life studies, CCM has been shown to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life, reverse left ventricular remodeling, and reduce hospitalization in patients with HFrEF. In this case report, we describe for the first time the use of CCM combined with left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation therapy in a female with a 22-year history of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. With the optimal medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) strategies, the patient's quality of life initially recovered to some extent, but began to deteriorate in the past year. Additionally, heart transplantation was not considered due to economic reasons and late stage systolic heart failure. This is the first case of CCM implantation in Fujian Province and the first report of a combined CCM and left bundle branch pacing CRT-P implantation strategy in a patient with non-ischemic etiology dilated cardiomyopathy in China.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated , Heart Failure , Pacemaker, Artificial , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Female , Heart Failure/therapy , Quality of Life , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/complications , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/therapy , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Electrocardiography , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many patients with mildly to moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who require permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation do not have a concurrent indication for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. However, the risk of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in this population is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the risk of VT/VF after PPM implantation in patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 243 patients with LVEF between 35% and 49% who underwent PPM placement and did not meet indications for an ICD. The primary end point was occurrence of sustained VT/VF. Competing risks regression was performed to calculate subhazard ratios for the primary end point. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 27 months; 73% of patients were male, average age was 79 ± 10 years, average LVEF was 42% ± 4%, and 70% were New York Heart Association class II or above. Most PPMs were implanted for sick sinus syndrome (34%) or atrioventricular block (50%). Of 243 total patients, 11 (4.5%) met the primary end point of VT/VF. Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) was associated with significantly higher rates of VT/VF, with a subhazard ratio of 5.4 (95% CI, 1.5-20.1; P = .01). Of patients with multivessel CAD, 8 of 82 (9.8%) patients met the primary end point for an annualized risk of 4.3% per year. CONCLUSION: Patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF and multivessel CAD undergoing PPM implantation are at increased risk for the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Patients in this population may benefit from additional risk stratification for VT/VF and consideration for upfront ICD implantation.
Subject(s)
Pacemaker, Artificial , Stroke Volume , Tachycardia, Ventricular , Humans , Male , Female , Stroke Volume/physiology , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia, Ventricular/physiopathology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/etiology , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Defibrillators, Implantable , Ventricular Fibrillation/physiopathology , Ventricular Fibrillation/etiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapySubject(s)
Aortic Valve , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Massage/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Female , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has several hemodynamic effects including increases in afterload (due to vasoconstriction) and decreases in cardiac output. This, along with rare reports of pulmonary edema during emergency treatment, has led providers to consider HBOT relatively contraindicated in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, there is limited evidence regarding the safety of elective HBOT in patients with heart failure (HF), and no existing reports of complications among patients with HF and preserved LVEF. We aimed to retrospectively review patients with preexisting diagnoses of HF who underwent elective HBOT, to analyze HBOT-related acute HF complications. METHODS: Research Ethics Board approvals were received to retrospectively review patient charts. Patients with a history of HF with either preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), mid-range ejection fraction (HFmEF), or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent elective HBOT at two Hyperbaric Centers (Toronto General Hospital, Rouge Valley Hyperbaric Medical Centre) between June 2018 and December 2020 were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with a history of HF underwent HBOT, completing an average of 39 (range 6-62) consecutive sessions at 2.0 atmospheres absolute (ATA) (n = 11) or at 2.4 ATA (n = 12); only two patients received fewer than 10 sessions. Thirteen patients had HFpEF (mean LVEF 55 ± 7%), and seven patients had HFrEF (mean LVEF 35 ± 8%) as well as concomitantly decreased right ventricle function (n = 5), moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation (n = 3), or pulmonary hypertension (n = 5). The remaining three patients had HFmEF (mean LVEF 44 ± 4%). All but one patient was receiving fluid balance therapy either with loop diuretics or dialysis. Twenty-one patients completed HBOT without complications. We observed symptoms consistent with HBOT-related HF exacerbation in two patients. One patient with HFrEF (LVEF 24%) developed dyspnea attributed to pulmonary edema after the fourth treatment, and later admitted to voluntarily holding his diuretics before the session. He was managed with increased oral diuretics as an outpatient, and ultimately completed a course of 33 HBOT sessions uneventfully. Another patient with HFpEF (LVEF 64%) developed dyspnea and desaturation after six sessions, requiring hospital admission. Acute coronary ischemia and pulmonary embolism were ruled out, and an elevated BNP and normal LVEF on echocardiogram confirmed a diagnosis of pulmonary edema in the context of HFpEF. Symptoms subsided after diuretic treatment and the patient was discharged home in stable condition, but elected not to resume HBOT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF, including HFpEF, may develop HF symptoms during HBOT and warrant ongoing surveillance. However, these patients can receive HBOT safely after optimization of HF therapy and fluid restriction.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Pulmonary Edema , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Male , Humans , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Retrospective Studies , Hyperbaric Oxygenation/adverse effects , Pulmonary Edema/etiology , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Prognosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Diuretics , Dyspnea/therapyABSTRACT
Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction represents a highly treatable cause of heart failure (HF). A substantial proportion of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF;HFrEF) demonstrate improvement in LV systolic function (termed HF with improved EF [HFimpEF]), either spontaneously or when treated with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Although it is a relatively new HF classification, HFimpEF has emerged in recent years as an important and distinct clinical entity. Improvement in LVEF leads to decreased rates of mortality and adverse HF-related outcomes compared to patients with sustained LV systolic dysfunction (HFrEF). While numerous clinical and imaging factors have been associated with HFimpEF, identification of which patients do and do not improve requires further investigation. In addition, patients improve at different rates, and what determines the trajectory of HFimpEF patients after improvement is incompletely characterized. A proportion of patients maintain improvement in LV systolic function, while others experience a recrudescence of systolic dysfunction, especially with GDMT discontinuation. In this review we discuss the contemporary guideline-recommended classification definition of HFimpEF, the epidemiology of improvement in LV systolic function, and the clinical course of this unique patient population. We also offer evidence-based recommendations for the clinical management of HFimpEF and provide a roadmap for future directions in understanding and improving outcomes in the care of patients with HFimpEF.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , EchocardiographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently undertaken in patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The REVIVED (Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction)-BCIS2 (British Cardiovascular Society-2) trial concluded that PCI did not reduce the incidence of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization; however, patients assigned to PCI reported better initial health-related quality of life than those assigned to optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of PCI+OMT compared with OMT alone. METHODS: REVIVED-BCIS2 was a prospective, multicenter UK trial, which randomized patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction to either PCI+OMT or OMT alone. Health care resource use (including planned and unplanned revascularizations, medication, device implantation, and heart failure hospitalizations) and health outcomes data (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire) on each patient were collected at baseline and up to 8 years post-randomization. Resource use was costed using publicly available national unit costs. Within the trial, mean total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the perspective of the UK health system. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using estimated mean costs and QALYs in both groups. Regression analysis was used to adjust for clinically relevant predictors. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2020, 700 patients were recruited (mean age: PCI+OMT=70 years, OMT=68 years; male (%): PCI+OMT=87, OMT=88); median follow-up was 3.4 years. Over all follow-ups, patients undergoing PCI yielded similar health benefits at higher costs compared with OMT alone (PCI+OMT: 4.14 QALYs, £22â 352; OMT alone: 4.16 QALYs, £15â 569; difference: -0.015, £6782). For both groups, most health resource consumption occurred in the first 2 years post-randomization. Probabilistic results showed that the probability of PCI being cost-effective was 0. CONCLUSIONS: A minimal difference in total QALYs was identified between arms, and PCI+OMT was not cost-effective compared with OMT, given its additional cost. A strategy of routine PCI to treat ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction does not seem to be a justifiable use of health care resources in the United Kingdom. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920048.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Heart Failure , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Aged , Humans , Male , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , FemaleABSTRACT
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%; HFrEF) and conduction disturbances (QRS duration ≥ 130 ms). The presence of mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) on echocardiography has been hypothesised to be of predictive value in determining indication for CRT. This study investigated the impact of MD (apical rocking [AR] and septal flash [SF]) on long-term survival in CRT recipients. HFrEF patients (n = 425; mean age 63.0 ± 10.6 years, 72.3% male, 60.7% non-ischaemic aetiology) with a guideline-derived indication for CRT underwent device implantation. MD markers were determined at baseline and after a mean follow-up of 11.5 ± 8.0 months; long-term survival was also determined. AR and/or SF were present in 307 (72.2%) participants at baseline. During post-CRT follow-up, AR and/or SF disappeared in 256 (83.4%) patients. Overall mean survival was 95.9 ± 52.9 months, longer in women than in men (109.1 ± 52.4 vs. 90.9 ± 52.4 months; p < 0.001) and in younger (< 60 years) versus older patients (110.6 ± 53.7 vs. 88.6 ± 51.1 months; p < 0.001). Patients with versus without MD markers at baseline generally survived for longer (106.2 ± 52.0 vs. 68.9 ± 45.4 months; p < 0.001), and survival was best in patients with resolved versus persisting MD (111.6 ± 51.2 vs. 79.7 ± 47.6 months p < 0.001). Age and MD at baseline were strong predictors of long-term survival in HFrEF patients undergoing CRT on multivariate analysis. Novel echocardiography MD parameters in HFrEF CRT recipients predicted long-term mediated better outcome, and survival improved further when AR and/or SF disappear after CRT implantation.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Heart Failure , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Stroke Volume , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left , Predictive Value of Tests , Echocardiography , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular events, including heart failure and arrhythmias, following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are increasingly recognized. Although global longitudinal strain (GLS) has demonstrated prognostic utility for other cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, less is known regarding the association of GLS with adverse cardiac events following CAR T-cell therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of baseline GLS with adverse cardiovascular events in adults receiving CAR-T cell therapy. METHODS: Patients who had an echocardiogram within 6 months prior to receiving CAR T-cell therapy were retrospectively identified. Clinical data and cardiac events were collected via chart review. Echocardiograms were analyzed offline for GLS, left ventricular ejection fraction, and Doppler parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between adverse cardiovascular events and echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS: Among 75 CAR T-cell therapy patients (mean age 63.9, 34.7% female), nine patients (12%) experienced cardiac events (CEs) including cardiovascular death, new/worsening heart failure, and new/worsening arrhythmia within 1 year of treatment. In univariable models, higher baseline GLS (OR 0.78 [0.63, 0.96], p = .021) was associated with a lower risk of CE and higher baseline mitral E/e' (OR 1.40 [1.08, 1.81], p = .012) was associated with a higher risk of CE. After adjusting for age and LDH, higher baseline GLS (OR 0.65 [0.48-0.88], p = <.01) was associated with a lower risk of CE and higher baseline mitral E/e' (OR 1.56 [1.06, 2.29], p = .024) was associated with a higher risk of CE. CONCLUSION: Lower GLS and higher mitral E/e' on a baseline echocardiogram were associated with higher risk for CEs in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Adult , Humans , Female , Male , Ventricular Function, Left , Stroke Volume/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy is a well described phenomenon in patients with preserved ejection fraction at the time of permanent pacemaker implant. One of the identified risk factors for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy is the degree of ventricular pacing burden. However, it is unclear how a high right ventricular pacing burden affects patients with depressed left ventricular function at the time of pacemaker implantation. We sought to assess the relationship between right ventricular pacing and change in left ventricular function over time. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of all patients who had received either a single or dual lead cardiac implantable electronic devices, excluding biventricular devices, and had a prior transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrating an ejection fraction of less than 50%. The primary end-point was the correlation between the percentage of ventricular pacing and the change in LV ejection fraction. RESULTS: Fifty eight patients with preceding heart failure had pacemakers implanted and had follow up echocardiograms. There was no correlation between the degree of ventricular pacing and the absolute change in LV function (r = .04, p = .979). None of the previously identified risk factors for pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy were predictive of a significant fall in ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: The degree of RV pacing and other established risk factors for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with normal left ventricular function at the time of implantation do not appear to carry the same risk in patients with pre-existing heart failure who receive either single or dual lead pacemakers.
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies , Heart Failure , Pacemaker, Artificial , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Ventricular Function, Left , Stroke Volume , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/complications , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can decrease the risk of heart failure (HF) events in relatively asymptomatic patients with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) and wide QRS complex. However, individual response to this type of therapy varies widely. Often based on either EF increase or end-systolic volume (ESV) decrease as criterion, a subgroup of super-responders has been described. Therefore, it is important to determine factors that can predict a favorable response and identify those patients who may benefit from CRT. With this goal in mind we explored the possible role of ESV.To improve insight in ventricular pump function we previously introduced the volume regulation graph (VRG), relating ESV to end-diastolic volume (EDV). An individual patient is uniquely defined by the prevailing working point in the volume domain. The traditional metric EF can be graphically derived for each working point. The nonlinear association between EF and ESV is given by EF = 1 + γ {ESV / (δ - ESV)}, with empirical constants γ and δ. The impact of CRT super-responders on EF can be evaluated, taking into account sex-specific ESV values. Based on available regression equations we modeled the impact on EF (as percent points) resulting from CRT-induced fractional ESV changes expressed as % of baseline ESV. Our analysis confirms clinical findings, indicating that CRT super-responders are likely to be women, and clarify why a specific reduction of ESV cannot be directly translated into EF improvement. We propose that the EF as CRT criterion should be abandoned and replaced by sex-specific ESV evaluations.Clinical Relevance- Response to CRT should be evaluated in a sex-specific manner. The smaller heart size in women has implications for the interpretation of percentwise reductions of ESV and their translation into an associated increase of EF.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Heart Failure , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Male , Humans , Female , Stroke Volume/physiology , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Arrhythmias, CardiacABSTRACT
OPINION STATEMENT: Individuals who have ever been diagnosed with cancer are at increased risk for cardiovascular conditions during and after cancer treatment. Especially during cancer treatment, cardiovascular conditions can manifest in many ways, including peripheral or pulmonary edema. Edema can indicate volume overload affecting the heart even without other unequivocal evidence of apparent diastolic or systolic left ventricular dysfunction, particularly at rest. We propose a novel algorithm to streamline the diagnostic evaluation and cardiovascular classification for cancer patients with edema. We initially advise prompt evaluation with a chest X-ray and echocardiogram. We then suggest classification into one of five categories based on the timing of presentation of edema relative to cancer treatment, as well as echocardiography results and the presence or absence of hypertension or lymphatic causes of edema. This classification tool can then be utilized to guide further cardiovascular management suggestions. These concurrent syndromes presenting as edema may indicate the development or aggravation of undiagnosed diastolic dysfunction with or without hypertension, even if transiently present only while on cancer treatment.
Subject(s)
Hypertension , Pulmonary Edema , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left , Humans , Cardio-Oncology , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/diagnosis , Pulmonary Edema/diagnosis , Pulmonary Edema/etiology , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Edema/complicationsABSTRACT
SOURCE CITATION: Perera D, Morgan HP, Ryan M, et al; REVIVED-BCIS2 Investigators. Arrhythmia and death following percutaneous revascularization in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: prespecified analyses from the REVIVED-BCIS2 trial. Circulation. 2023;148:862-871. 37555345.