Load Distribution After Serial Resection of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus and Subsequent Meniscal Allograft Transplant: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking as to when a meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) may be biomechanically superior to a partially resected lateral meniscus. HYPOTHESIS: Lateral MAT using a bone bridge technique would restore load distribution and contact pressures in the tibiofemoral joint to levels superior to those of a partial lateral meniscectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were evaluated in 5 lateral meniscal testing conditions (native, one-third posterior horn meniscectomy, two-thirds posterior horn meniscectomy, total meniscectomy, MAT) at 3 flexion angles (0°, 30°, and 60°) under a 1600-N axial load. Pressure sensors were used to acquire contact pressure, contact area, and peak contact pressure within the tibiofemoral joint. RESULTS: Limited (one-third and two-thirds) partial lateral posterior horn meniscectomy showed no significant increase in mean and peak contact pressures as well as no significant decrease in contact area compared with the intact state. Total meniscectomy significantly increased mean contact pressure at 0° and 30° (P = .008 and P < .001, respectively), increased peak contact pressure at 30° (P = .04), and decreased mean contact area in all flexion angles compared with the native condition (P < .01). Lateral MAT significantly improved mean contact pressure compared with total meniscectomy at 0° and 30° (P = .002 and P = .003, respectively) and increased contact area at 30° and 60° (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively), although contact area was still significantly smaller (24.1%) after MAT relative to the native meniscus (P = 0.015). However, allograft transplant did not result in better tibiofemoral contact biomechanics compared with limited partial meniscectomy (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The peripheral portion of the lateral meniscus provided the most important contribution to the distribution of contact pressure across the tibiofemoral joint in the cadaveric model. Total meniscectomy significantly increased mean and peak contact pressure in the cadaveric model and decreased contact area. Lateral MAT restored contact biomechanics close to normal but was not superior to the partially meniscectomized status. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should attempt to preserve a peripheral rim of the posterior lateral meniscus. Meniscal allograft transplant appears to improve but not normalize mean contact pressure and contact area relative to total lateral meniscectomy.

Conventional vs. endoscopic-assisted curettage of benign bone tumours. An experimental study.

BACKGROUND: This experimental study aimed at directly comparing conventional and endoscopic-assisted curettage towards (1) amount of residual tumour tissue (RTT) and (2) differences between techniques regarding surgical time and surgeons' experience level. METHODS: Three orthopaedic surgeons (trainee, consultant, senior consultant) performed both conventional (4x each) and endoscopic-assisted curettages (4x each) on specifically prepared cortical-soft cancellous femur and tibia sawbone models. "Tumours" consisted of radio-opaque polyurethane-based foam injected into prepared holes. Pre- and postinterventional CT-scans were carried out and RTT assessed on CT-scans. For statistical analyses, percentage of RTT in relation to total lesion's volume was used. T-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to assess differences between surgeons and surgical techniques regarding RTT and timing. RESULTS: Median overall RTT was 1% (IQR 1 - 4%). Endoscopic-assisted curettage was associated with lower amount of RTT (median, 1%, IQR 0 - 5%) compared to conventional curettage (median, 4%, IQR 0 - 15%, p = 0.024). Mean surgical time was prolonged with endoscopic-assisted (9.2 ± 2.9 min) versus conventional curettage (5.9 ± 2.0 min; p = 0.004). No significant difference in RTT amount (p = 0.571) or curetting time (p = 0.251) depending on surgeons' experience level was found. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-assisted curettage appears superior to conventional curettage regarding complete tissue removal, yet at expenses of prolonged curetting time. In clinical practice, this procedure may be reserved for cases at high risk of recurrence (e.g. anatomy, histology).

Trochlear Dysplasia Is Associated With Increased Sagittal Tibial Tubercle Trochlear-Groove Distance in Patients With Patellar Instability.

PURPOSE: To compare the sagittal position of the tibial tubercle in relation the trochlea groove in patients with and without trochlear dysplasia (TD). Patients with high-grade TD show a significantly increased sagittal position of the tibial tubercle in relation to the trochlear groove (sTTTG) compared with patients without TD. This may affect patellofemoral loading and contribute to the increased prevalence of cartilage lesions seen in the patellofemoral joint of patients with dysplasia of the trochlear groove. METHODS: All patients between January 2017 and December 2020 with high-grade TD (Dejour type B, C, and D) who underwent patellar-stabilizing surgery for patellar instability at a single institution were included in the current study. Patients without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), any previous osteotomy on the affected lower extremity, or cruciate ligament insufficiency were excluded. Patients who underwent knee arthroscopy for meniscal repair/debridement without any signs of TD or any of the aforementioned criteria served as the control group. Preoperative MRI was retrospectively assessed to compare common patellofemoral anatomic parameters including patellar angle, patellar tilt, patella morphology according to Wiberg, Caton-Deschamps index, PF index, trochlear sulcus angle, sulcus depth, lateral inclination angle of the trochlea, tibiofemoral rotation, TTTG, and sTTTG distance between both groups. The sTTTG is measured as the distance between the nadir point of the cartilaginous trochlear groove and the most anterior point of the tibial tubercle on an axial MRI. Independent predictors for the sTTTG were assessed for patients with TD. RESULTS: Patients with high-grade TD (n = 82) showed an increased patellar tilt, Caton-Deschamps index, trochlear sulcus angle, lateral tibiofemoral rotation angle, TTTG, and sTTTG (9.16 ± 4.47 mm vs 2.66 ± 4.21 mm) compared with the control group (n = 83) (P < .001). Patellar angle, PF index, sulcus depth, and lateral inclination angle of the trochlear were significantly decreased in the TD group (P < .001). The sTTTG was similar in all TD groups (n.s.). Among patients with TD, both tibiofemoral rotation and patellar height were independent predictors of the sTTTG (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high-grade TD show not only abnormal values in common patellofemoral instability risk factors but also a significantly increased sTTTG compared with patients without TD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case comparative study.

No significant change of tibiofemoral rotation after femoral rotational osteotomy in patients with patellofemoral instability.

PURPOSE: An increased value of tibiofemoral rotation is frequently observed in patients with patellofemoral instability or maltracking. Nevertheless, the appropriate approach for addressing this parameter remains unclear so far. One potential approach for correcting tibiofemoral rotation is femoral rotational osteotomy. We hypothesized that femoral rotational osteotomy affects tibiofemoral rotation. METHODS: All patients who underwent femoral rotational osteotomy between January 2018 and May 2022 were included in this study. Pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral rotation and the degree of femoral rotation were measured using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) measurements. The effect of femoral rotation on tibiofemoral rotation was assessed. RESULTS: Forty knees (18 right and 22 left) of 36 patients (28 females and 8 males) were included. Mean preoperative femoral torsion was 32.1 ± 10.1° in 2D and 30.8 ± 10.1° in 3D. Femoral rotation was performed by -14.1 ± 8.3° using 2D measurements and -15.0 ± 8.0° using 3D measurements. Tibiofemoral rotation changed from 9.9 ± 6.2° to 9.7 ± 6.0° (p = n.s.) in 2D, and from 10.2 ± 5.5° to 9.4 ± 5.4° (p = n.s.) in 3D. CONCLUSION: Tibiofemoral rotation showed no significant changes after femoral rotational osteotomy. Hence, femoral rotational osteotomy cannot be used to correct tibiofemoral rotation in addition to correcting the femoral version. Other surgical techniques need to be evaluated if correction of tibiofemoral rotation is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased tibial tuberosity torsion has the greatest predictive value in patients with patellofemoral instability compared to other commonly assessed parameters.

PURPOSE: The multifactorial nature of patellofemoral instability requires a comprehensive assessment of the affected patients. While an association between tibial tuberosity (TT) torsion and patellofemoral instability is known, its specific effect has not yet been investigated. This study investigated the effect of TT torsion on patellofemoral instability. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent surgical intervention for patellofemoral instability and asymptomatic controls. TT torsion was measured in addition to other commonly assessed risk factors for patellofemoral instability using standardised computed tomography (CT) data of the lower extremities. The diagnostic performances of the assessed parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. RESULTS: The patellofemoral instability group consisted of 79 knees, compared to 72 knees in the asymptomatic control group. Both groups differed significantly in all assessed parameters (p < 0.001), except for tibial torsion (n.s.). Among all parameters, TT torsion presented the best diagnostic performance for predicting patellar instability with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98; p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 17.7° yielded a 0.87 sensitivity and 0.89 specificity to predict patellar instability (OR, 55.2; 95% CI, 20.5-148.6; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among the evaluated risk factors, TT torsion had the highest predictive value for patellofemoral instability. Patients with TT torsions ≥ 17.7° showed a 55-fold increased probability of patellofemoral instability. Therefore, TT torsion should be included in the assessment of patients with patellofemoral instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Typical Complications After Cartilage Repair of the Ankle Using Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC).

Background: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) results in favorable clinical outcomes, yet high reoperation rates. The aim of this study was to report and analyze typical complications and their risk factors after AMIC for OLT. Methods: A total of 127 consecutive patients with 130 AMIC procedures for OLT were retrospectively assessed. All AMIC procedures were performed in an open fashion with 106 (81.5%) cases requiring a malleolar osteotomy (OT) to access the OLT. Seventy-one patients (54.6%) underwent subsequent surgery. These cases were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 3.1 years (±2.5) for complications reviewing postoperative imaging and intraoperative findings during revision surgery. Six patients (8.5%) were lost to follow-up. Regression model analysis was conducted to identify factors that were associated with AMIC-related complications. Results: Among the 65 (50%) patients who required revision surgery, 18 patients (28%) demonstrated AMIC-related complications with deep fissuring (83%) and thinning (17%) of the AMIC graft. Conversely, 47 patients (72%) underwent subsequent surgery due to AMIC-unrelated reasons including isolated removal of symptomatic hardware (n = 17) and surgery addressing concomitant pathologies with (n = 25) and without hardware removal (n = 5). Previous prior cartilage repair surgery was significantly associated with AMIC graft-associated complications in patients undergoing revision surgery (P = .0023). Among age, body mass index, defect size, smoking, and bone grafting, smoking was the only factor showing statistical significance with an odds ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 1.24, 10.9; P = .019) to undergo revision surgery due to graft-related complications, when adjusted for previous cartilage repair surgery. Conclusion: The majority of revision surgeries after AMIC for OLT are unrelated to the performed AMIC graft but frequently address symptomatic hardware and concomitant pathologies. Both smoking and previous cartilage repair surgery seem to significantly increase the risk of undergoing revision surgery due to AMIC-related complications. Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.

Short-to Mid-Term Survivorship of a Patient-specific Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Implant Cast from a Three-Dimensional Printed Mold.

The purpose of this study was to determine early survivorship and complication rates associated with the implantation of a new patient-specific unicompartmental knee implant cast from a three-dimensional (3D) printed mold, introduced in 2012. We retrospectively reviewed 92 consecutive patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a patient-specific implant cast from a 3D printed mold between September 2012 and October 2015. The early results of a patient-specific UKA implant were favorable in our cohort, with survivorship free from reoperation of 97% at an average 4.5 years follow-up. Future studies are necessary to investigate the long-term performance of this implant. Survivorship of a patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implant cast from a 3D printed mold.

Registration based assessment of femoral torsion for rotational osteotomies based on the contralateral anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted techniques for surgical treatment of femoral deformities have become increasingly important. In state-of-the-art 3D deformity assessments, the contralateral side is used as template for correction as it commonly represents normal anatomy. Contributing to this, an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm is used for registration. However, the anatomical sections of the femur with idiosyncratic features, which allow for a consistent deformity assessment with ICP algorithms being unknown. Furthermore, if there is a side-to-side difference, this is not considered in error quantification. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence and value of the different sections of the femur in 3D assessment of femoral deformities based on the contralateral anatomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 3D triangular surface models were created from CT of 100 paired femurs (50 cadavers) without pathological anatomy. The femurs were divided into sections of eponymous anatomy of a predefined percentage of the whole femoral length. A surface registration algorithm was applied to superimpose the ipsilateral on the contralateral side. We evaluated 3D femoral contralateral registration (FCR) errors, defined as difference in 3D rotation of the respective femoral section before and after registration to the contralateral side. To compare this method, we quantified the landmark-based femoral torsion (LB FT). This was defined as the intra-individual difference in overall femoral torsion using with a landmark-based method. RESULTS: Contralateral rotational deviation ranged from 0° to 9.3° of the assessed femoral sections, depending on the section. Among the sections, the FCR error using the proximal diaphyseal area for registration was larger than any other sectional error. A combination of the lesser trochanter and the proximal diaphyseal area showed the smallest error. The LB FT error was significantly larger than any sectional error (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that if the contralateral femur is used as reconstruction template, the built-in errors with the registration-based approach are smaller than the intraindividual difference of the femoral torsion between both sides. The errors are depending on the section and their idiosyncratic features used for registration. For rotational osteotomies a combination of the lesser trochanter and the proximal diaphyseal area sections seems to allow for a reconstruction with a minimal error.

Long-Term Results and Failure Analysis of the Open Latarjet Procedure and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair compared with an open Latarjet procedure in adolescents who are at high risk for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. We hypothesized that the long-term stability rate of an open Latarjet procedure would be superior to that of arthroscopic Bankart repair. METHODS: Forty eligible patients (41 shoulders) with a mean age of 16.4 years (range, 13 to 18 years) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair, and 37 patients (40 shoulders) with a mean age of 16.7 years (range, 14 to 18 years) underwent an open Latarjet procedure. Of these, 34 patients (35 shoulders) in the Bankart group and 30 patients (31 shoulders) in the Latarjet group with long-term follow-up were compared; the overall follow-up rate was 82%. Clinical and radiographic results were obtained after a mean follow-up of 12.2 years (range, 8 to 18 years). RESULTS: Treatment failure occurred in 20 shoulders (57%) in the Bankart repair group and in 2 shoulders (6%) in the open Latarjet procedure group (p < 0.001), representing a significantly higher revision rate for instability in the Bankart group (13) compared with the Latarjet group (1) (p < 0.001). In patients without recurrent shoulder instability (15 in the Bankart group and 29 in the Latarjet group), there was a significant improvement in the Constant score (p = 0.006 in the Bankart group and p < 0.001 in the Latarjet group) and Subjective Shoulder Value (p = 0.009 in the Bankart group and p < 0.001 in the Latarjet group), without any significant difference between the 2 groups. Younger age was the only variable significantly correlated with failure following a Bankart repair (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents are at a high risk for treatment failure after Bankart repair, and, therefore, the Latarjet procedure should be strongly considered as a primary procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Association of Subchondral Changes With Age and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Osteochondral Fractures in the Knee: MRI Analysis at 1 to 10 Years Postoperatively.

Background: Predictive factors influencing outcomes after surgical fixation of osteochondral fractures (OCFs) in the knee, particularly time between injury and surgery, have not been determined. Purpose: To report imaging and clinical outcomes after OCF fixation and to assess the association between clinical scores and patient characteristics, lesion morphology, and appearance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We assessed the clinical and imaging outcomes of 19 patients after screw fixation for OCFs in the knee at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Patient characteristics, lesion morphology, and time from trauma to surgery were reviewed for each patient. At final follow-up, patients completed a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner activity scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and patient satisfaction survey. Postoperative MRI scans were assessed using the MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue), Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System, and bone marrow edema (BME) size. Results: The mean patient age at surgery was 21.3 ± 11.4 years, and the median time from trauma to surgery was 10 days (range, 0-143 days). The refixed OCF fragment failed in 1 (5.3%) patient on the lateral condyle at 15 months postoperatively. The mean follow-up for the remaining 18 patients was 4.7 ± 3.2 years, and postoperative outcomes were as follows: VAS pain score, 9.5 ± 17.9; Tegner score, 4.8 ± 2.3; KOOS-Pain, 85.9 ± 17.6, KOOS-Symptoms, 76.4 ± 16.1; KOOS-Activities of Daily Living, 90.3 ± 19.0; KOOS-Sport, 74.4 ± 25.4; and KOOS-Quality of Life, 55.9 ± 24.7. Overall, 84.2% were satisfied or very satisfied with outcomes. Patient age was significantly associated with KOOS subscale scores and subchondral imaging parameters including BME and presence of subchondral cysts, which in turn were the only imaging variables linked to clinical outcomes (P < .05). Time from injury to surgery was not correlated with clinical or imaging outcomes. Conclusion: Fixation of OCFs yielded acceptable clinical and imaging outcomes at a mean 5-year follow-up with seemingly little influence of delayed surgical treatment. Postoperative subchondral changes were significantly associated with clinical outcomes and were linked to patient age at surgery.

Correlation of Postoperative Imaging With MRI and Clinical Outcome After Cartilage Repair of the Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used for evaluation of ankle cartilage repair, yet its association with clinical outcome is controversial. This study analyzes the correlation between MRI and clinical outcome after cartilage repair of the talus including bone marrow stimulation, cell-based techniques, as well as restoration with allo- or autografting. Methods: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration. Articles were screened for correlation of MRI and clinical outcome. Guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) were used. Chi-square test and regression analysis were performed to identify variables that determine correlation between clinical and radiologic outcome. Results: Of 2687 articles, a total of 43 studies (total 1212 cases) were included with a mean Coleman score of 57 (range, 33-70). Overall, 93% were case series, and 5% were retrospective and 2% prospective cohort studies. Associations between clinical outcome and ≥1 imaging variable were found in 21 studies (49%). Of 24 studies (56%) using the composite magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score, 7 (29%) reported a correlation of the composite score with clinical outcome. Defect fill was associated with clinical outcome in 5 studies (12%), and 5 studies (50%) reported a correlation of T2 mapping and clinical outcome. Advanced age, shorter follow-up, and larger study size were associated with established correlation between clinical and radiographic outcome (P = .021, P = .028, and P = .033). Conclusion: Interpreting MRI in prediction of clinical outcome in ankle cartilage repair remains challenging; however, it seems to hold some value in reflecting clinical outcome in patients with advanced age and/or at a shorter follow-up. Yet, further research is warranted to optimize postoperative MRI protocols and assessments allowing for a more comprehensive repair tissue evaluation, which eventually reflect clinical outcome in patients after cartilage repair of the ankle.Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Restoration of Native Leg Length After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: An Intraindividual Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) has been shown to significantly increase leg length, especially in patients with large varus deformity. Thus, the current literature recommends closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy to correct malalignment in these patients to prevent postoperative leg length discrepancy. However, potential preoperative leg length discrepancy has not been considered yet. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that patients have a decreased preoperative length of the involved leg compared with the contralateral side and that OWHTO would subsequently restore native leg length. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Included were 67 patients who underwent OWHTO for unilateral medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and who received full leg length assessment pre- and postoperatively. Patients with varus or valgus deformity (>3°) of the contralateral side were excluded. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed imaging for the mechanical axis, full leg length, and tibial length of the involved and contralateral lower extremity. Statistical analysis determined the pre- and postoperative leg length discrepancy and the influence of the mechanical axis. RESULTS: Most patients (62.7%) had a decreased length of the involved leg, with a mean preoperative mechanical axis of 5.0° ± 2.9°. Length discrepancy averaged -2.2 ± 5.8 mm, indicating a shortened involved extremity (P = .003). OWHTO significantly increased the mean lengths of the tibia and lower limb by 3.6 ± 2.9 and 4.4 ± 4.7 mm (P < .001), leading to a postoperative tibial and full leg length discrepancy of 2.8 ± 4.3 mm and 2.2 ± 7.3 mm (P < .001 and P = .017, respectively). Preoperative leg length discrepancy was significantly correlated with the preoperative mechanical axis of the involved limb (r = 0.292; P = .016), and the amount of correction was significantly associated with leg lengthening after OWHTO (r = 0.319; P = .009). Patients with a varus deformity of ≥6.5° (n = 14) had a preoperative length discrepancy of -4.5 ± 1.6 mm (P < .001) that was reduced to 1.8 ± 3.5 mm (P = .08). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing OWHTO have a preoperative leg length discrepancy that is directly associated with the varus deformity of the involved extremity. As OWHTO significantly increases leg length, restoration of native leg length can be achieved particularly in patients with large varus deformity.

Epidemiology of Traumatic Posterior Hip Instability in the National Football League.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding injury incidence, mechanism, and return to play in National Football League (NFL) players who have sustained traumatic posterior hip instability. PURPOSE: To describe the incidence of traumatic posterior hip instability and the rate of return to play in NFL players across 18 seasons. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed all traumatic posterior hip dislocations/subluxations that occurred during football-related activities in the NFL seasons from 2000 through 2017. Player demographics and injury data (injury mechanism, season of injury, treatment, days missed, and return to play time) were collected from all 32 NFL teams prospectively through a leaguewide electronic health record system. Descriptive statistics are presented. RESULTS: Across the 18 NFL seasons, 16 posterior hip instability injuries in 14 players were reported, with a maximum incidence of 4 (25%) in 2013. Posterior hip instability was predominantly sustained by offensive players (64.3%), with tight ends being the most affected (31.3%). Half of the injuries occurred during the regular season, 43.8% in the preseason, and 6.2% in the offseason. Of all injuries, 37.5% were noncontact, while 56.3% involved contact (direct or indirect), and 6.2% were of unknown mechanism. Among noncontact injuries, 66.7% occurred during cutting and change of direction while sprinting. The time of return to full participation was documented for 11 of the 16 reported injuries (68.8%); among them, the mean time loss was 136.7 ± 83.8 days-143.3 ± 99.6 days if the player underwent surgery (n = 4) and 116.7 ± 76.2 days missed by players without surgery (n = 6)-the treatment modality was unknown in 1 player. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of traumatic posterior hip instability during the study period was low, all injured athletes missed time from football activities and competitions. Injuries that required surgery led to more missed time than those that did not. Ongoing research to understand risk factors and mechanisms of this injury, in conjunction with improvements to prevention and rehabilitation protocols, is necessary to ensure the safety of professional American football players.

Association of Sex Mismatch Between Donor and Recipient With Graft Survivorship at 5 Years After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Sex mismatch between donor and recipient has been considered a potential contributor to adverse outcomes after solid organ transplantation. However, the influence of sex mismatching in osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has yet to be determined. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether donor-recipient sex mismatching affects graft survival after OCA transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In this review of prospectively collected data, patients who underwent OCA transplantation between November 2013 and November 2017 by a single surgeon were analyzed. Cumulative survival was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method using log-rank tests to compare patients with similar donor groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for patient age, graft size, and body mass index was used to evaluate the influence of donor-recipient sex on graft survival. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included: 102 (66.2%) who received OCAs from a same-sex donor and 52 (33.8%) who received OCAs from a different-sex donor. At 5-year follow-up, a significantly lower graft survival rate was observed for different-sex donor transplantation in comparison with same-sex donorship (63% vs 92%; P = .01). When correcting for age, graft size, and body mass index, donor-recipient sex-mismatch transplantation demonstrated a 2.9-times greater likelihood to fail at 5 years compared with donor-recipient same-sex transplantation (95% CI, 1.11-7.44; P = .03). A subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in graft survival between the female-to-female and female-to-male groups (91% and 84%, respectively). Conversely, male-to-male transplantation demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative 5-year survival (94%; P = .04), whereas lower survival was found with male-to-female donorship (64%; P = .04). Multivariable Cox regression indicated a 2.6-times higher likelihood of failure for the male-to-female group in comparison with the other groups (95% CI, 1.03-6.69; P = .04). Male-to-male transplantation had a tendency toward decreased likelihood of OCA failure (hazard ratio, 0.33), although without statistical significance (95% CI, 0.11-1.01; P = .052). CONCLUSION: Mismatch between donor and recipient sex had a negative effect on OCA survival after transplantation, particularly in those cases when male donor tissue was transplanted into a female recipient.

The effect of native knee rotation on the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove distance in patients with patellar instability: an analysis of MRI and CT measurements.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantify the effect of lower limb rotational parameters on the difference in the tibial-tubercle-trochlear-groove (TTTG) distance when assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with patellar instability. It was hypothesized that an increased native knee rotation angle significantly contributes to an underestimation of TTTG by MRI. METHODS: Forty patients with patellar instability who had undergone standard radiographs, MRI and CT scans were included in this retrospective study. A musculoskeletal radiologist assessed all imaging for TTTG, femoral and tibial rotation, knee rotation and flexion angle, and trochlear dysplasia. ΔTTTG was defined as the TTTG measured on MRI subtracted from the TTTG measured on CT. Statistical analysis determined the effect of these parameters on the calculated difference between TTTG when measured on CT and MRI. RESULTS: Equal knee flexion in MRI and CT resulted in a ΔTTTG of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm compared to 4.0 ± 3.3 mm in patients with different knee flexion angles in both imaging acquisitions (p = 0.036). The knee rotation angle measured on CT (native knee rotation angle) was negatively correlated with ΔTTTG (r = - 0.365; p = 0.002), while neither tibial nor femoral rotation showed any associations with TTTG (n.s.). Trochlear dysplasia did not show any significant correlation with ΔTTTG, regardless of classification by Dejour or Lippacher (n.s.). Both the native knee rotation angle and the MRI knee flexion angle were independent predictors of ΔTTTG, yet with an opposing effect (knee rotation: 95% Confidence Interval [CI] for ß - 0.468 to - 0.154, p < 0.001; knee flexion 95% CI for ß 0.292 to 0.587, p < 0.001). Patients with a native knee rotation angle > 20° showed a ΔTTTG of - 5.8 ± 4.0 mm (MRI rather overestimates TTTG) compared to 0.9 ± 4.1 mm Δ TTTG (MRI rather underestimates TTTG) in patients with < 20° native knee rotation angle. CONCLUSION: The native knee rotation angle is an independent, inversely correlated predictor of ΔTTTG, thus opposing the effect of knee flexion during MRI acquisition. Consequently, these results suggest that not only knee flexion but also knee rotation should be appreciated when assessing TTTG during patellar instability diagnostic evaluation as it can potentially lead to a false estimation of the TTTG distance on MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Etiology of Cartilage Lesions Does Not Affect Clinical Outcomes of Patellofemoral Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between cartilage lesion etiology and clinical outcomes after second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients that underwent ACI in the PFJ by a single surgeon was performed. Seventy-two patients with a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 2.0 years were enrolled in this study and were stratified into 3 groups based on the etiology of PFJ cartilage lesions: patellar dislocation (group 1; n = 23); nontraumatic lesions, including chondromalacia, osteochondritis dissecans, and degenerative defects (group 2; n = 28); and other posttraumatic lesions besides patellar dislocations (group 3; n = 21). Patient's mean age was 29.6 ± 8.7 years. Patients in group 1 were significantly younger (25.4 ± 7.9 years) than group 2 (31.7 ± 9.6 years; P = 0.025) and group 3 (31.5 ± 6.6 years; P = 0.05). Body mass index averaged 26.2 ± 4.3 kg/m2, with a significant difference between group 1 (24.4 ± 3.2 kg/m2) and group 3 (28.7 ± 4.5 kg/m2; P = 0.005). A clinical comparison was established between groups based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and failure rates. RESULTS: Neither pre- nor postoperative PROMs differed between groups (P > 0.05). No difference was seen in survivorship between groups (95.7% vs. 82.2% vs. 90.5%, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cartilage lesion etiology did not influence clinical outcome in this retrospective study after second generation ACI in the PFJ. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for Isolated Retropatellar Cartilage Lesions: Outcome after a Follow-Up of Minimum 2 Years.

PURPOSE: To evaluate autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for isolated focal retropatellar cartilage lesions and the influence of patellofemoral (PF) anatomy on clinical outcomes at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients (31 knees) who underwent retropatellar AMIC with a mean age of 27.9 ± 11.0 years were evaluated at a follow-up averaging 4.1 ± 1.9 years (range, 2-8 years). Patient factors, lesion morphology, and patient-reported outcome measures, including Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner, Kujula score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were collected. PF anatomy was assessed on pre- and postoperative imaging, and subsequently correlated to outcome scores and failure to determine risk factors for poor outcome. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the AMIC graft failed in 4 cases (12.9%) at a mean follow-up of 21 ± 14.1 months. Patients with failed grafts had a significantly smaller patellar and Laurins's PF angle than patients whose graft did not fail (P = 0.008 and P = 0.004, respectively). Concomitant corrective surgery for patellar instability was performed in 29 knees (93.5%). Grafts that did not fail presented with an average Kujala score of 71.3 ± 16.9, KOOS Pain of 76.2 ± 16.6 and Tegner scores of 4.2 ± 1.8. The patellar angle was significantly associated with the patient's satisfaction level (r = 0.615; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AMIC for retropatellar cartilage lesions in combination with concomitant corrective surgery for patellar instability results in low failure rate with satisfactory clinical outcome and patient satisfaction of almost 80% at mid-term follow-up. As most failures occurred in patients without concurrent tibial tubercle osteotomy and both a smaller patellar and Laurins's PF angle were associated with less favorable outcome, this study supports the growing evidence for the need of unloading retropatellar cartilage repair, when indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series; level of evidence, 4.

Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis With Lateral Ligament Stabilization for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Patients With Ankle Instability.

BACKGROUND: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) has been shown to result in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Though, the influence of ankle instability on cartilage repair of the ankle has yet to be determined. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with and without concomitant lateral ligament stabilization (LLS) undergoing AMIC for the treatment of OLT. It was hypothesized that the outcomes would be comparable between these patient groups. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (13 with and 13 without concomitant ankle instability) who underwent AMIC with a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 1.5 years were enrolled in this study. Patients were matched 1:1 according to age, body mass index (BMI), lesion size, and follow-up. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and Tegner, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores were obtained at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A musculoskeletal radiologist scored all grafts according to the MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) 1 and MOCART 2.0 scores. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 33.4 ± 12.7 years, with a mean BMI of 26.2 ± 3.7. Patients with concomitant LLS showed worse clinical outcome measured by the AOFAS (85.1 ± 14.4 vs 96.3 ± 5.8; P = .034) and Tegner (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 4.4 ± 2.3; P = .012) scores. Postoperative CAIT and AOFAS scores were significantly correlated in patients with concomitant LLS (r = 0.766; P = .002). A CAIT score >24 (no functional ankle instability) resulted in AOFAS scores comparable with scores in patients with isolated AMIC (90.1 ± 11.6 vs 95.3 ± 6.6; P = .442). No difference was seen between groups regarding MOCART 1 and 2.0 scores (P = .714 and P = .371, respectively). CONCLUSION: Concurrently performed AMIC and LLS in patients with OLT and ankle instability resulted in clinical outcomes comparable with isolated AMIC if postoperative ankle stability was achieved. However, residual ankle instability was associated with worse postoperative outcomes, highlighting the need for adequate stabilization of ankle instability in patients with OLT.

Is the contralateral lesser trochanter a reliable reference for planning of total hip arthroplasty - a 3-dimensional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is mandatory to achieve appropriate offset and leg length equality. However, templating methods using the contralateral hip might be susceptible to errors resulting from side-differences in the femoral morphology. The distance of the lesser trochanter to the femoral head center (LTFHD) is a frequently used reference parameter for preoperative planning and intraoperative validation during THA. However, currently no three-dimensional (3D) analysis of side differences of the LTFHD exists. METHODS: Using Computer tomography (CT)-based surface models from 100 paired femora (50 cadavers), side-to-side asymmetry of the LTFHD, femoral length, femoral head diameter (FHD) and femoral antetorsion were analyzed. Univariate linear regression models were established to evaluate potential associations between sides regarding LTFHD and FHD as well as a correlation of these parameters with each other. RESULTS: Statistically significant side-differences were found for the LTFHD (p = 0.02) and FHD (p = 0.03) with a mean absolute side-difference of 1.6 ± 1.4mm (range 0.1-5.5mm) and 0.4mm ± 0.6mm (range 0-3mm), respectively. The ratio between the LTFHD and FHD was consistent with an average value of 1.16 ± 0.08 and reliable between sides with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.72 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The LTFHD is a reliable reference parameter for preoperative templating and intraoperative validation during THA with a high correlation between sides (r = 0.93, p < 0.01). However, 8 % of the investigated specimens revealed a LTFHD of more than 4mm, which should be anticipated during THA to avoid unsatisfiable results.