RESUMO
Introduction Limited data relating to treatment burden, quality of life, and mental health burden of hemophilia A (HA) are currently available. Aim To provide a comprehensive overview of unmet needs in people with HA (PwHA) using data generated from the Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey-II (CHESS II) and CHESS in the pediatric population (CHESS PAEDs) studies. Methods CHESS II and CHESS PAEDs are cross-sectional surveys of European males with HA or hemophilia B (HB) aged ≥18 and ≤17 years, respectively. Participants with FVIII inhibitors, mild HA, or HB were excluded from this analysis, plus those aged 18 to 19 years. Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), target joints, and other patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. Results Overall, 468 and 691 PwHA with available data for the outcomes of interest were stratified by hemophilia severity and treatment regimen in CHESS II and CHESS PAEDs, respectively. In these studies, 173 (37.0%) and 468 (67.7%) participants received FVIII prophylaxis, respectively; no participants received the FVIII mimetic emicizumab or gene therapy. ABRs of 2.38 to 4.88 were reported across disease severity and treatment subgroups in both studies. Target joints were present in 35.7 and 16.6% of participants in CHESS II and CHESS PAEDS; 43.8 and 23.0% had problem joints. Chronic pain was reported by a large proportion of PwHA (73.9% in CHESS II; 58.8% in CHESS PAEDs). Participants also reported low EQ-5D scores (compared with people without HA), anxiety, depression, and negative impacts on their lifestyles due to HA. Conclusions These analyses suggest significant physical, social, and mental burdens of HA, irrespective of disease severity. Optimization of prophylactic treatment could help reduce the burden of HA on patients.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Adequate prophylactic treatment and physical activity improve joint health and clinical outcomes for people with haemophilia A (HA). However, non-clinical joint-related burden of moderate (MHA) and severe (SHA) HA has not been well characterised. AIM: To quantify the joint health-related humanistic and economic burden of MHA and SHA in Europe. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the cross-sectional CHESS population studies using a patient-centric measure of joint health (problem joints, PJs: chronic joint pain and/or limited range of movement due to compromised joint integrity with or without persistent bleeding) was conducted. Descriptive statistics summarised health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity/activity impairment and costs by number of PJs (0, 1 or ≥2) and HA severity. RESULTS: A total of 1171 patients were included from CHESS-II (n = 468) and CHESS-PAEDs (n = 703). In both studies, 41 and 59% of patients had MHA and SHA, respectively. Prevalence of ≥2 PJs was similar with MHA and SHA (CHESS-II: 23 and 26%; CHESS-PAEDs: 4 and 3%, respectively). HRQoL was worse with an increasing number of PJs (CHESS-II: .81 vs. .66 with 0 and ≥2 PJs, respectively, for MHA; .79 vs. .51 for SHA; CHESS-PAEDs: .64 vs. .26 and .72 vs. .14). Total costs increased with increasing PJs regardless of severity in CHESS-II (2923 vs. 22,536 with 0 and ≥2 PJs, respectively, for MHA; 11,022 vs. 27,098 for SHA) and CHESS-PAEDs (6222 vs. 11,043 for MHA; 4457 vs. 14,039 for SHA). CONCLUSION: Presence of PJs was associated with a substantial humanistic and economic burden on patients with MHA or SHA across the lifespan.