Perceptions of a virtual interview process for pharmacy residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multisite survey of residency candidates, preceptors, and residency program directors.

PURPOSE: To describe the perceptions of residency candidates, residency practitioners (current residents and preceptors), and residency program directors (RPDs) regarding a virtual interview process for pharmacy residency programs across multiple institutions. METHODS: In May 2021, an anonymous web-based questionnaire characterizing perceptions of the virtual interview process used during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was distributed to residency candidates, residency practitioners, and RPDs across 13 institutions. Quantitative responses measured on a 5-point Likert scale were summarized with descriptive statistics, and open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic qualitative methods. RESULTS: 236 residency candidates and 253 residency practitioners/RPDs completed the questionnaire, yielding response rates of 27.8% (236 of 848), and 38.1% (253 of 663), respectively. Overall, both groups perceived the virtual interview format positively. When asked whether virtual interviews should replace in-person interviews moving forward, 60.0% (18 of 30) of RPDs indicated they agreed or strongly agreed, whereas only 30.5% (61 of 200) of current preceptors/residents and 28.7% (66 of 230) of residency candidates agreed or strongly agreed. Thematic analysis of qualitative responses revealed that while virtual interviews were easier logistically, the lack of in-person interactions was a common concern for many stakeholders. Lastly, the majority (65.0%) of residency candidates reported greater than $1,000 in savings with virtual interviews. CONCLUSION: Virtual interviews offered logistical and financial benefits. The majority of RPDs were in favor of offering virtual interviews to replace in-person interviews, whereas the majority of residency candidates and practitioners preferred on-site interviews. As restrictions persist with the ongoing pandemic, our results provide insight into best practices for virtual pharmacy residency interviews.

Search Strategies Used for Meta-Analyses Published on Cardiovascular Drug Therapy.

PURPOSE: Meta-analyses are routinely shaping patient care decisions. However, it is unknown whether meta-analyses are increasing in cardiology or whether complete search strategies are used. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of search strategies of meta-analyses. METHODS: Meta-analyses assessing cardiovascular drug therapy published from 2006 to 2011 were identified through PubMed/Medline with the terms "cardiovascular agents" and "drug therapy." RESULTS: A total of 130 meta-analyses were identified. There was a 100% increase with the largest growth from 2008 to 2009. Only half of the analyses used 3 databases to identify studies for inclusion, which was predictive of using search terms ( P < .01; odds ratio, 3.05, 95% confidence interval, 1.341-6.952) and using a quality assessment tool ( P < .001; odds ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.038-8.066). CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analyses evaluating cardiovascular drug therapy increased in 2011. Meta-analyses should exhaust all resources to identify trials for inclusion. As meta-analyses continue to change clinical practice, researchers and clinicians must critically assess the quality of these studies.