Steps to Improve Precision Medicine in Epilepsy.

Precision medicine is an old concept, but it is not widely applied across human health conditions as yet. Numerous attempts have been made to apply precision medicine in epilepsy, this has been based on a better understanding of aetiological mechanisms and deconstructing disease into multiple biological subsets. The scope of precision medicine is to provide effective strategies for treating individual patients with specific agent(s) that are likely to work best based on the causal biological make-up. We provide an overview of the main applications of precision medicine in epilepsy, including the current limitations and pitfalls, and propose potential strategies for implementation and to achieve a higher rate of success in patient care. Such strategies include establishing a definition of precision medicine and its outcomes; learning from past experiences, from failures and from other fields (e.g. oncology); using appropriate precision medicine strategies (e.g. drug repurposing versus traditional drug discovery process); and using adequate methods to assess efficacy (e.g. randomised controlled trials versus alternative trial designs). Although the progress of diagnostic techniques now allows comprehensive characterisation of each individual epilepsy condition from a molecular, biological, structural and clinical perspective, there remain challenges in the integration of individual data in clinical practice to achieve effective applications of precision medicine in this domain.

Audit of use of stiripentol in adults with Dravet syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: There are very few data available in the literature on the use of stiripentol in adults with Dravet syndrome (DS). DS cases are increasingly recognized in adulthood, and more children with DS now survive to adulthood. The aim of the study was to document the effectiveness and tolerability of stiripentol in adults with DS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an observational clinical audit in the epilepsy service of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London (UK). RESULTS: We included 13 adult subjects with DS (eight females, five males). The responder (defined as more than 50% reduction in all seizure types) rate was 3/13 (23%) at 36 months. The following other outcomes were reported: seizure exacerbation (3/13, 23%), no change (3/13, 23%), less than 50% reduction in seizures (2/13, 15%), more than 50% reduction in generalized tonic-clonic seizures but no other seizure types (1/13, 8%), undefined response (1/13, 8%). The retention rate was 62% after 1 year and 31% after 5 years. Adverse effects were reported in 7/13 (54%): the most frequent were anorexia, weight loss, unsteadiness and tiredness. Withdrawal due to adverse effects occurred in 3/13 (23%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous studies on children with DS, our results show a lower responder rate and a similar tolerability profile. Stiripentol can be effective with a good tolerability profile. Our audit is small, but supports the use of stiripentol in adults with DS when first-line treatments are ineffective or not tolerated, in keeping with published guidelines.

Diagnostic delay and prognosis in primary central nervous system lymphoma compared with glioblastoma multiforme.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are malignant cerebral neoplasms associated with poor prognosis. Early diagnosis and subsequent planning of adequate treatment strategy are relevant to improve survival and reduce neurological deficit. Two groups of patients affected by GBM and PCNSL were compared to identify: (1) factors influencing the time necessary to obtain a correct diagnosis; (2) the influence of the interval time from clinical onset to diagnosis on the prognosis. Fifty-six patients (28 PCNSL and 28 GBM, 23 females and 33 males) referred to the same hospital setting were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, clinical symptoms at onset and performance status. There was no relevant difference in time span from clinical onset to first neuroimaging examination, while time span from first neuroimaging to final morphological diagnosis was much longer in PCNSL patients (p = 0.008). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, including both PCNSL and GBM cases, showed a significant association of the overall survival with: time to diagnosis (HR 0.06), age at onset (HR 1.04). Our results show a significant diagnostic delay in PCNSL cases. Age at onset of disease and time to diagnosis emerge as clinical factors affecting overall survival in both groups. Stereotactic-guided biopsy should be chosen as routine method to early diagnose PCNSL. The clinical relevance of early diagnosis in GBM and PCNSL needs to be emphasized to maximize the overall survival in both neoplasms.

Emergency room access for recurring seizures: when and why.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop a hypothetical model identifying potentially modifiable predictive factors of Emergency Room (ER) visits by patients suffering from drug resistant epilepsy. METHODS: During a 1-year period, all adult drug resistant patients followed by the same epileptologist were recruited after the occurrence of one or more epileptic attacks. They were divided into two groups based on whether they went to the ER after seizures. A prospective comparative analysis of the clinical and social characteristics of the two groups was performed in order to identify independent predictors of ER visits. Logistic regression analysis was used to confirm the potential predictive role of the evaluated variables. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis confirmed the potential role in predicting ER visits for these variables: foreign nationality, current psychiatric therapy, current antiepileptic drug polytherapy, comorbidities, more than one episode in the same day and changes in usual seizure pattern. A relevant association was also found between the frequency of ER neuroimaging use and the following variables: occurrence of episodes on holidays or weekends, current antiepileptic drug monotherapy, multiple comorbidities and brain injury after seizure. CONCLUSIONS: The present study evaluated factors, some potentially amenable to change, related to drug resistant epileptic patients' ER visits following a seizure. This information may serve to improve the clinical and therapeutic management of patients, decrease the need for urgent care and reduce subsequent patient stress and related costs.