On-road driving remediation following acquired brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between on-road driving remediation and achieving fitness to drive following acquired brain injury. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary hospital outpatient driver assessment and rehabilitation service, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five participants (54.3% male), aged 18-65 years, 41 days-20 years post-acquired brain injury (including stroke, aneurysm, traumatic brain injury) recommended for on-road driving remediation following occupational therapy driver assessment were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 18) and waitlist control (n = 17) groups. INTERVENTION: Intervention group received on-road driving remediation delivered by a qualified driving instructor in a dual-control vehicle. The waitlist control group completed a 6 week period of no driving-related remediation. MAIN MEASURE: Fitness to drive rated following the conduct of an on-road occupational therapy driver assessment with a qualified driving instructor where outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. RESULTS: The intervention group were significantly more likely to achieve a fit to drive recommendation than no driving specific intervention (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Following comprehensive assessment, individualized on-road driving remediation programs devised by an occupational therapist with advanced training in driver assessment and rehabilitation and delivered by a qualified driving instructor are significantly associated with achieving fitness to drive after acquired brain injury.

Lifespace and occupational participation following acquired brain injury during driving disruption: a mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: To examine the lifespace of participants referred for occupational therapy driving assessment following acquired brain injury, to understand how, why, where and with whom access and participation in community-based occupations is occurring during the period of driving disruption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mixed methods, convergent research design utilised a travel diary and Lifespace Mobility Assessment-Composite quantitative elements and semi-structured interviews analysed qualitatively with an interpretive description lens. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants (56.25% male) aged between 26 and 65 years, left home on average once/day, primarily to conduct instrumental activities of daily living, health management, and social participation community-based occupations. Most reported restricted lifespace (54.2%) requiring assistance to conduct community occupations (68.1%). Support was primarily provided by family members (80.3%). Analysis of semi-structured interviews (n = 15) created three themes that shaped participant occupational experience during driving disruption: (i) changes to occupational participation; (ii) reliance on others for community access and participation; and (iii) trying to move forward. CONCLUSION: The period of driving disruption following the onset of acquired brain injury is a time of occupational disruption which restricts lifespace, changing how, why, where and with whom participation in community-based occupations occurs. Rehabilitation facilitating occupational adaptation process to enhance community access capacity is indicated.

The period of driving disruption following the onset of acquired brain injury is a time of occupational disruption which restricts lifespace and influences participation in community-based occupations.Occupational therapists should provide an individualised potential pathway to return to driving with frequent and varied means of reinforcing interim advice to abstain from driving.Implementing occupational adaptation can progress community participation goals by establishing community access skills, habits, routines and confidence to foster participation and satisfaction and rebuild occupational identity following acquired brain injury.

On-road driving remediation following acquired brain injury: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Return to independent driving is an important goal following acquired brain injury which may be explored through driving rehabilitation. Whilst on-road driving remediation often form the basis for rehabilitation, the efficacy of such intervention is uncertain. AIMS: To describe current evidence regarding the use of on-road driving remediation to facilitate return to independent driving following acquired brain injury and define gaps in research. METHODS: CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE (OVID), PsycInfo and Scopus were the primary information sources searched 8th and 29th January 2020 using the Joanna Briggs Institute protocol for scoping review. RESULTS: Searching identified 904 studies, after 442 duplicates were eliminated, 462 studies screened. Title and abstract screening revealed 447 irrelevant studies with 13 full-text studies assessed for eligibility. Six studies [cohort studies (n=4) and case report (n=2)] were selected for data extraction. c. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging evidence indicates a level of support for the use of on-road driving remediation as a rehabilitation tool following acquired brain injury. Further research is required to define which goals are suited to on-road remediation as a return to driving intervention and explore the capacity of participants to sustain any gains made through on-road driving remediation at follow-up.

Evaluating the effectiveness of on-road driving remediation following acquired brain injury: A wait-list feasibility study with follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Return to driving is an important goal for people recovering from acquired brain injury. Occupational therapy driving assessments aim to determine the impact of acquired brain injury on a person's capacity to drive and may include on-road driving rehabilitation. The primary objective of this project was to conduct a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an on-road driving remediation program for adults with acquired brain injury. Secondary objectives were to measure the effectiveness of the on-road driving program and determine sample size required for a randomised controlled trial. METHODS: A wait-list randomised controlled trial with blinded assessment and 6-month follow-up aimed to recruit 10 participants with acquired brain injury. Concealed methods randomly allocated participants to receive the on-road driving rehabilitation program immediately (intervention group) or after 6 weeks (wait-list group). The primary outcome measure of functional fitness to drive, was assessed pre- and post-intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. Driving performance was measured by percentage of correct manoeuvres and driving instructor intervention. RESULTS: Eight participants (seven male; average age 46 years; six traumatic brain injury and two stroke) were recruited. The protocol was feasible. Results of the RCT suggest intervention effectiveness initially with two of the three interventions, and no wait-list, participants achieving fitness to drive. This increased to five out of eight participants after the wait-list group completed the intervention. While three participants retained this outcome at 6-month follow-up, universal deterioration in on-road driving performance was evident for all participants at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The trial was feasible and findings suggest that on-road driving remediation assists people with acquired brain injury to achieve functional fitness to drive but the skills may not be maintained 6 months later. A full RCT is warranted to further determine the effectiveness of on-road driving remediation and capacity of participants to maintain the skills developed.