Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation.

PURPOSE: The standard laryngeal mask airway LMA-Classic was designed as an alternative to the endotracheal tube (ETT) or the face mask for use with either spontaneous or positive pressure ventilation. Positive pressure ventilation may exploit leaks around the LMA cuff, leading to gastric distension and/or inadequate ventilation. We compared gastric distension and ventilation parameters with LMA vs ETT during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: One hundred and one, ASA I-II adults scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to LMA-Classic or ETT. Patients with BMI >30 kg x m(-2), hiatus hernia or gastroesophageal reflux were excluded. Following induction of anesthesia, an in-and-out orogastric tube was passed to decompress the stomach before insertion of the LMA (women size #4, men size #5) or ETT (women 7 mm, men 8 mm). Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen (FIO2 0.3-0.5), rocuronium and fentanyl. The surgeon, blinded to the type of airway, scored gastric distention 0-10 at insertion of the laparoscope and immediately before removal at the end of the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Incidence and degree of change in gastric distension were similar in both groups. Ventilation parameters during insufflation (mean +/- SD) for LMA and ETT were: S(P)O2 98 +/- I vs 98 +/- I, P(ET)CO2 38 +/- 4 vs 36 +/- 4 mm Hg and airway pressure 21 +/- 4 vs 23 +/- 3 cm water. CONCLUSION: Positive pressure ventilation with a correctly placed LMA-Classic of appropriate size permits adequate pulmonary ventilation. Gastric distension occurs with equal frequency with either airway device.

Laryngeal mask airway with mouth opening less than 20 mm.

We describe the use of a laryngeal mask airway in three adult patients whose mouth opening varied from 12 mm to 18 mm. The first patient's incisal opening was 12 mm. His airway was otherwise normal and the standard laryngeal mask was used as the definitive airway for the 90 min revision of facial scars and bone graft to mandible. The second patient, who had an incisal opening of 18 mm, was scheduled for posterior fossa craniotomy. She adamantly refused awake fibreoptic tracheal intubation. Following induction of general anaesthesia, a standard laryngeal mask was inserted and, through this, fibreoptic intubation was performed. The third patient, in addition to a mouth opening of only 18 mm, had limited neck movement from previous flap reconstruction following mandibulectomy, hemiglossectomy and radical neck dissection. For three more reconstructive head and neck procedures that ranged from 90 min to nine hours, the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask was inserted under topical anaesthesia and its correct position confirmed by fibreoptic laryngoscopy before induction of general anaesthesia. Maintenance of anaesthesia in all cases was uneventful and there were no postoperative complications.