Ultrasonographic scores for ileal Crohn's disease assessment: Better, worse or the same as contrast-enhanced ultrasound?

BACKGROUND: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is an increasingly used non-invasive tool to evaluate Crohn's disease (CD) activity. Recently, two IUS scores that evaluate inflammatory activity have emerged: the Simple Ultrasound Activity Score for CD (SUS-CD) and the International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS). We aimed to compare the accuracy of SUS-CD, IBUS-SAS and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in predicting inflammatory activity in the terminal ileum in ileocolonoscopy in CD patients. METHODS: Retrospective study including all consecutive CD patients submitted to IUS with CEUS directed to the terminal ileum performed by a single operator between April 2016 and March 2020. Segmental SUS-CD and IBUS-SAS were calculated. A time-intensity curve of the contrast bowel wall enhancement was created with measurement of peak intensity using CEUS. The CD endoscopic activity in ileocolonoscopy was graded by Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) as inactive (SES-CD < 7) or active (SES-CD ≥ 7). RESULTS: Fifty patients were included, 54.0% were female, with mean age of 34 ± 12 years, and most had isolated ileal disease (60.0%), and a nonstricturing, nonpenetrating behaviour (44.0%). Most of the patients (60.0%) had active endoscopic disease (SES-CD ≥ 7). SUS-CD and IBUS-SAS were not different between patients with active or inactive endoscopic disease (p = 0.15; 0.57, respectively), having a poor accuracy to correlate endoscopic activity (area under de curve (AUC) 0.62; 0.55, respectively). Peak intensity in CEUS was significantly different in patients with active or inactive endoscopic disease (p = 0.004), having a good accuracy to correlate endoscopic activity (AUC 0.80). CONCLUSION: Unlike CEUS, SUS-CD and IBUS-SAS were not able to accurately correlate endoscopic activity in terminal ileum in CD. Therefore, CEUS is a non-invasive emerging method that should be increasingly integrated in the ultrasonographic evaluation of CD patients.

Bowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy - The later, the better!

BACKGROUND: In small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), the presence of residue may compromise diagnostic accuracy. AIMS: To assess differences in quality of visualisation and diagnostic yield of SBCE using 3 different preparation protocols. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, blind, pilot study. Protocol A:Clear liquids diet the day before the examination with fasting from 8p.m.; Protocol B:Protocol A + 2 pouches of Moviprep®(polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution + sodium ascorbate) in 1 L of water from 8p.m. of the day before the examination; Protocol C: Protocol A + 2 pouches of Moviprep® in 1 L of water consumed after real-time confirmation of capsule arrival at small bowel. Small bowel preparation was classified by two experienced physicians, considering the percentage of the examination during which mucosal observation was adequate: Excellent(>90%); Good(90-75%); Fair(75-50%); Poor(<50%). RESULTS: 101 patients randomized to the 3 protocols (A 37, B 31, C 33 patients). Protocol C had an excellent/good small bowel preparation in a higher percentage of examinations for both readers(Reader 1-A:37.8% vs B:45.2% vs C:78.8%, p = 0.002 and Reader 2 -A:37.8% vs B:41.9% vs C:75.8%, p = 0.003). Also, protocol C had a higher detection of angioectasia (A:5.4% vs B:9.7% vs C:27.3%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of Moviprep® after the capsule had reached the small bowel was associated with a better small bowel preparation and a higher detection of angioectasia.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: confirming the clinical benefits far beyond anthropometry.

OBJECTIVES: The real benefit of gastrostomy is still a matter of debate. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the global impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in patients followed at a specialized multidisciplinary clinic, namely, the impact on the need for healthcare resources, anthropometric measures, pressure ulcers prevention and healing, and nutritional and hydration status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the 201 patients who underwent PEG between May 2011 and September 2014, 60 were included in a prospective study. Anthropometric, clinical, and laboratorial variables were collected and compared before and after PEG. Follow-up duration, mortality, and number of emergency department visits or hospital admissions were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-three (55.0%) patients were women and the median age was 79 years. The main indications for PEG were dementia (43.3%) and poststroke dysphagia (30.0%). Four months following PEG, significant decreases in the tricipital skinfold (P=0.002) and brachial perimeter (P=0.003) were found. A decrease in the mean number of hospitalizations (1.4 vs. 0.3; P<0.001) and visits to emergency department (2.2 vs. 1.1; P=0.003) was noted in the next 6 months after PEG compared with the previous semester. In 53.8% of patients with pressure ulcers, complete healing was observed after PEG. PEG was associated with increases in hemoglobin (P=0.024), lymphocytes (P=0.041), cholesterol (P=0.008), transferrin (P<0.001), albumin (P<0.001), and total proteins (P<0.001), and a decrease in serum sodium (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Anthropometric values may not translate the early benefits of a gastrostomy. PEG decreases the need for hospital health care, facilitates healing of pressure ulcers, and induces biochemical changes that may reflect better nutrition and hydration.