Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 27(5): 665-73, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11377893

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a questionnaire, the Refractive Status and Vision Profile (RSVP), in the assessment of patient outcomes following refractive surgery. SETTING: Patients recruited from 5 refractive surgery practices. METHODS: The RSVP was self-administered by patients before and 2 to 6 months after bilateral refractive surgery. Information on uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refractive error, and self-reported satisfaction with vision was also collected. Changes in total RSVP scores and in the scores of RSVP subscales (concern, functioning, driving, symptoms, optical problems, glare, and trouble with corrective lenses) were assessed. The relationship between change in the RSVP and subscale scores was assessed in relation to change in traditional clinical measures. The responsiveness of the RSVP to clinically meaningful changes in patients' vision was measured by calculating its effect size. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients completed baseline and postoperative RSVPs and had bilateral refractive surgery. Postoperatively, 92.0% of patients had a UCVA of 20/40 or better in at least 1 eye. Fifteen percent had some worsening in the total RSVP score, and there was substantial variation in the proportion of patients who had worsening in particular subscale scores, ranging from 7.0% who reported worsening in trouble with corrective lenses to 41.5% who reported worsening in driving. Change in satisfaction with vision following surgery was correlated with change in the overall RSVP and subscale scores but not with change in refractive error. A significant worsening in 3 or more RSVP subscales was independently associated with an almost 6-fold (odds ratio 5.84, 95% confidence interval: 1.88,18.13) likelihood of patient report of dissatisfaction with vision, after adjusting for age, sex, preoperative refractive error, and postoperative UCVA. Low scores (ie, minimal dysfunction) on 2 of the RSVP subscales (physical functioning and optical problems) at baseline were predictive of poor postoperative patient outcomes. The RSVP was very sensitive to the intervention of refractive surgery (effect size of 1.2 to 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: The RSVP was able to detect clinically relevant changes in functional status and quality of life after refractive surgery. Change in the RSVP score was correlated with change in patient report of satisfaction and was predictive of postoperative patient satisfaction. The RSVP provides a valuable new metric to assess outcomes of refractive surgery.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Refração Ocular/fisiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Refrativos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos da Visão/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Visão/fisiopatologia
2.
Ophthalmology ; 104(5): 799-807, 1997 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9160026

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is increased recognition that a rigorous approach to functional assessment should complement the assessment of clinical status. The authors compare the reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinical change of a visual function index (VF-14) in non-U.S. and in U.S. patients with cataracts. DESIGN: An observational longitudinal study was performed. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred seven first eye cataract surgery patients were recruited in four international sites: Manitoba (Canada), Denmark, Barcelona (Spain), and the United States. INTERVENTION: Patients were evaluated before cataract surgery and at a 4-month postoperative follow-up visit. Patients completed the preoperative interview and the clinical examination (766 in the United States, 152 in Manitoba, 291 in Denmark, and 198 in Barcelona), and 91.3% of those (1284) also completed the 4-month postoperative follow-up interview and were evaluated postoperatively by an ophthalmologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The authors used the following measures: the visual function index (VF-14), the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), global measures of patients' trouble and satisfaction with vision, and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) in each eye. RESULTS: The VF-14 showed a high internal consistency reliability level in all sites (Cronbach's alpha coefficients > or = 0.84). Correlation of preoperative visual function index scores with the Vision-Related SIP was strong (r = -0.68 in non-U.S. and r = -0.57 in U.S. patients) and with VA in the eye with better vision was moderate (r = 0.40 and r = 0.27, respectively), the pattern of relationships being very similar among U.S. and non-U.S. patients. In patients with only first-eye surgery who reported that their initial trouble with vision had improved, the amount of change in visual function as assessed by the VF-14 (effect size) was large (1.01 for the non-U.S. patients and 1.17 for the U.S. patients). CONCLUSIONS: The non-U.S. versions of the visual function index (VF-14) analyzed are as reliable, valid, and responsive to clinical change as the original U.S. version. These versions are appropriate for international studies of cataract patients outcomes and possibly in routine clinical practice.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Testes Visuais/instrumentação , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Womens Health ; 6(2): 199-207, 1997 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9140854

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the gender of women's regular physicians, controlling for physician specialty, is associated with women's receiving key preventive services within recommended intervals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, nationally representative women's health telephone survey conducted by Louis Harris and Associates in February and March 1993 for The Commonwealth Fund. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2,525 women in the continental United States, > or = 18 years old, including oversamples of African-American and Hispanic women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receipt of each of five preventive services (blood pressure reading, Pap smear, cholesterol test, clinical breast examination, and mammogram) within specific periods. RESULTS: Physician gender makes a significant difference for two specialty areas and for three preventive services. Patients of women family or general practitioners are more likely than the patients of men to have received a Pap smear or a blood cholesterol test within the last 3 years, and the patients of women internists are more likely to have received a Pap test. Physician gender is associated with a higher likelihood of mammography, but this finding was limited to patients ages 40-49 of women family or general practitioners. Physician gender does not affect receipt of blood pressure screening or breast examination. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses reveal limited evidence that physician gender affects women's receipt of preventive services. Physician specialty appears to be a more powerful predictor of preventive services received. The limited evidence for a physician gender effect, however, is relevant for those women who rely on a family or general practitioner or an internist for regular care.


Assuntos
Médicas , Prevenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde da Mulher/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos
4.
Ophthalmology ; 103(10): 1537-45, 1996 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8874424

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Previous analyses of Medicare claims data, as well as clinical series, have suggested that performance of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy after extracapsular cataract surgery increases significantly the risk of retinal detachment. However, methodologic problems with previous research limit the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from these earlier studies. This study was designed to resolve those methodological limitations while using a population-based approach for assessment of the independent association between the performance of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy and pseudophakic retinal detachment. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted. Medicare beneficiaries who had undergone extracapsular cataract extraction from 1988 to 1990 were identified from a 5% sample of Medicare claims data. Within this cohort, people who were diagnosed or treated for retinal detachment during the years 1988 through 1991 (cases) were identified from Medicare records. Four controls were matched to each case of retinal detachment using an incidence density design. Providers of the patients' cataract and retinal surgery were contacted and asked to provide clinical data for all cases and controls that they had treated. RESULTS: Seven hundred six cases of retinal detachment were originally identified from Medicare records. After exclusions due to ineligibility, a total of 291 cases and 870 matched controls were available for analysis. Conditional logistic regression models showed that a number of factors were associated independently with an excess risk of retinal detachment after cataract surgery. These included Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.9), a history of retinal detachment (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1), a history of lattice degeneration (OR = 6.6; 95% CI, 1.6-27.1), axial length (OR = 1.21/mm; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43), refractive error (OR = 0.92/diopter; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95), and a history of ocular trauma after cataract surgery (OR = 6.1; 95% CI, 4.3-28.2). CONCLUSION: Performance of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy is associated with a significantly elevated risk of retinal detachment in patients who have undergone extracapsular cataract extraction. Other independent risk factors for retinal detachment include axial length, myopia, posterior capsular rupture during surgery, history of retinal detachment or lattice degeneration, and ocular trauma after cataract surgery.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Descolamento Retiniano/etiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Cápsula do Cristalino/cirurgia , Lentes Intraoculares , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
5.
Arch Ophthalmol ; 113(12): 1508-13, 1995 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7487617

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the VF-14, which is an index of functional impairment in patient with cataracts. DESIGN: Observational longitudinal study. Patients were enrolled prior to undergoing their first cataract surgery between July 15 and December 15, 1991, and they were followed up for 1 year after surgery. SETTING: Patients were recruited from 72 ophthalmologists' practices in three US cities. PATIENTS: Five hundred fifty-two patients who had undergone a surgical procedure in only one eye by the 4-month postoperative follow-up (responsiveness analyses) and a subset of these (n = 426) who had not subsequently undergone surgery for the second eye by the 12-month postoperative follow-up (reproducibility analyses). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two health status measures (the VF-14 and the Sickness Impact Profile, two global measures of a patient's trouble and satisfaction with his or her vision, and best corrected visual acuity in each eye. RESULTS: The VF-14 is highly reproducible, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .79 when patient-rated criteria are used to define stable patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient was lower (.57 to .71) when various measures of visual acuity were used to define stable patients. The VF-14 is also about three times more responsive to a change in vision than the Sickness Impact Profile, which is a generic health status measure (effect size of approximately 1.00 vs 0.30). Estimates of the responsiveness of the VF-14 and the Sickness Impact Profile were not associated with preoperative visual acuity in the operated on or better eye. Responsiveness of the VF-14, however, was higher in patients with greater self-rated trouble with vision preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The VF-14 was reproducible in stable patients during an 8-month period, and it was more responsive to clinically significant changes in vision than was a generic health status measure (ie, the Sickness Impact Profile).


Assuntos
Catarata/fisiopatologia , Testes Visuais , Visão Ocular/fisiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Extração de Catarata , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Arch Ophthalmol ; 113(10): 1312-8, 1995 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7575266

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between patients' preoperative expectations regarding the outcome of cataract surgery and actual postoperative experience. METHODS: A longitudinal study of 772 patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery recruited from 75 ophthalmology practices in three metropolitan areas was conducted. Prior to surgery and approximately 4 months after surgery, a detailed interview was conducted that included general and vision-specific health status measures (including the Visual Function 12-Item Scale [VF-12]), patient-reported level of trouble and satisfaction with vision, and questions addressing patients' preoperative expectations regarding the outcomes of surgery. In addition, detailed clinical data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 552 patients had only single eye cataract surgery by 4 months postoperatively and are included in this analysis. RESULTS: Patients' preoperative expectations regarding the impact of cataract surgery were very high and were unrelated to their demographic or ocular characteristics. The preoperative VF-12 score, however, was positively correlated with expected postoperative VF-12 score (Spearman correlation, .45, P < .001). Only 61% of patients achieved or surpassed their expected level of postoperative functioning. The difference between expected and actual postoperative VF-12 scores was not associated with patients' demographic characteristics or provider-related variables. Older patients (> 75 years) and patients with ocular comorbidity had a larger difference between expected and actual postoperative functioning than younger patients and those without ocular comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Expectations regarding visual functioning after cataract surgery are very high, and in most cases such expectations are fulfilled. In selected cases, more comprehensive counseling may reduce the discrepancy between expectations and actual outcomes of cataract surgery.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/psicologia , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Catarata/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Percepção , Resultado do Tratamento , Visão Ocular/fisiologia
7.
Hosp Health Serv Adm ; 40(2): 296-308, 1995.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10143037

RESUMO

Because registered nurses are assuming expanded roles in hospital management, the appropriate educational preparation for these roles has become a widely debated issue. A national survey of hospital CEOs and CNOs was conducted to assess their personal preferences for management education for nurses and to gather information about their hospitals' policies and practices in hiring nurses for management positions at various levels within the hospital (from unit-level management to executive level). Both CEOs and CNOs preferred the joint MSN/MBA degree option as the best model for graduate management education for nurses, and they perceived greater demand in the future for hospital nurses with graduate management degrees. However, hospital policies and practices with regard to degree requirements and preferences for nurses hired in management positions at all levels varied widely.


Assuntos
Diretores de Hospitais/psicologia , Administração Hospitalar/educação , Enfermeiros Administradores/psicologia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/educação , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Diretores de Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Comércio/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Educacionais , Enfermeiros Administradores/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção de Pessoal , Desenvolvimento de Pessoal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
8.
Ophthalmology ; 102(5): 817-23, 1995 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7777281

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify preoperative patient characteristics associated with a lack of improvement on one or more measures 4 months after cataract surgery. METHODS: The authors collected preoperative and 4-month postoperative information on 552 patients undergoing first-eye cataract surgery from the practices of 72 ophthalmologists in three cities. The principal outcomes assessed were (1) Snellen visual acuity, (2) a cataract-related symptom score (possible range: 0, 0 of 6 symptoms present or bothersome, to 18, all 6 symptoms very bothersome), and (3) a measure of functional impairment in patients with cataract--the VF-14 score (possible range: 0, inability to perform any of the applicable activities, to 100, no difficulty performing any of the applicable activities). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between preoperative patient characteristics and failure to improve on one or more outcome measures. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the adjusted rate of lack of improvement in one or more outcome measures for one group of patients compared with another. RESULTS: Although 91 patients (16.5%) failed to improve on one or more of the outcome measures assessed, only 2 (0.4%) failed to improve on all three measures. The 91 patients who did not improve on at least one measure were approximately one sixth as likely to be satisfied with their vision postoperatively as the 461 patients who improved on all three outcome measures. Preoperative age of 75 years of age or older, VF-14 score of 90 or higher, cataract symptom score of 3 or lower, and ocular comorbidity (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, or age-related macular degeneration) were associated independently with increased likelihood of not improving on one or more measure (odds ratio: 3.57, 2.10, 3.29, and 2.16, respectively). The mean adjusted rate of failure to improve on at least one of the outcome measures ranged from 20.5% to 26.5% for patients with these preoperative characteristics compared with 8.8% to 13.8% for those patients without them. The preoperative level of Snellen visual acuity was not associated with the likelihood of not improving on one or more of the outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that specific preoperative characteristics (age, comorbidity, cataract symptom score, and VF-14 score) are independent predictors of patient outcome after cataract surgery.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Visão Ocular/fisiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lentes Intraoculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Med Care ; 33(4 Suppl): AS120-30, 1995 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7723440

RESUMO

The increased demand for health status measures in evaluating medical interventions has increased the importance of clarifying when to use generic versus disease-specific health status measures. The authors compared the performance of a well known generic health status measure, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and a disease-specific measure of functional impairment related to vision (the VF-14) in detecting functional impairment in 426 cataract patients before and at 12 months after first eye cataract surgery. Using analysis of covariance models, the associations were assessed between the SIP and VF-14 and four criterion variables--patient ratings of trouble and satisfaction with their vision and overall health, and best corrected visual acuity--after controlling for patient age and medical comorbidities. Preoperative patient ratings of trouble and satisfaction with vision were significantly associated with VF-14 scores (P < 0.001), but not with SIP scores. Preoperative visual acuity in the better eye was significantly associated with both VF-14 and SIP scores (P < 0.001). Patient general health ratings were significantly associated with SIP scores (P < 0.001), but not with VF-14 scores. Postoperative changes in patient ratings of their vision and in visual acuity were significantly associated with changes in VF-14 scores (P < 0.05), but not with changes in SIP scores. Changes in patient ratings of overall health were significantly associated with changes in SIP scores (P < 0.01), but not with changes in VF-14 scores. In patients undergoing cataract surgery, a disease-specific health status measure is more sensitive to preoperative functional impairment related to vision, and to change in functional impairment after cataract surgery, than is a generic health status measure.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Extração de Catarata/psicologia , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Acuidade Visual
10.
Health Serv Res ; 29(4): 415-33, 1994 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7928370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients discharged from a self-managed nursing unit are compared with patients from traditionally managed units on postdischarge outcomes. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Primary data were collected on patients discharged from eight nursing units in three clinical areas in one hospital from August through November 1990. STUDY DESIGN: A case series of eligible patients discharged from four self-managed nursing units (n = 140) are compared with patients from four matched traditionally managed units (n = 138) on postdischarge outcomes: perceived health status, perceived functional status, needs for care, unmet needs for care, unplanned health care visits, and readmissions to the hospital within 31 days of discharge. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Patients were interviewed by telephone at approximately two weeks postdischarge, and data from hospital records were merged with interview data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses showed no significant effects (either positive or negative) of self-managed units on the postdischarge outcomes studied. CONCLUSIONS: Self-managed nursing units, previously shown to improve nurses' work satisfaction and retention, have no impact on patient postdischarge outcomes.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Unidades Hospitalares/organização & administração , Modelos de Enfermagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Equipe de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Baltimore , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa em Administração de Enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente , Seleção de Pessoal
11.
Ophthalmology ; 101(6): 1131-40; discussion 1140-1, 1994 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8008355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although ophthalmologists have long recognized that visual acuity alone is an inadequate measure of visual impairment, the need for and outcomes of cataract surgery historically have been assessed in terms of visual acuity. PURPOSE: To examine the relation among different cataract surgery outcome measures, including a 14-item instrument designed to measure functional impairment caused by cataract (the VF-14), at 4 months after cataract surgery. METHODS: The authors performed a longitudinal study of 552 patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery by 1 of 75 ophthalmologists practicing in Columbus, Ohio, St. Louis, Missouri, or Houston, Texas. Patients were interviewed, and clinical data were obtained preoperatively (July 15, 1991-March 14, 1992) and 4 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The percentage of patients judged to be improved at 4 months after cataract surgery varied by the outcome measure used: Snellen visual acuity (96%); VF-14 score (89%); satisfaction with vision (85%); self-reported trouble with vision (80%); and Sickness Impact Profile score (67%). The change in patients' ratings of their trouble with vision and their satisfaction with vision were correlated more strongly with the change in VF-14 score than with the change in visual acuity (operated eye or better eye). The average change in VF-14 score was unrelated to the preoperative visual acuity in the eye undergoing surgery. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the proportion of patients benefiting from cataract surgery vary with the outcome measure used to measure benefit. Change in VF-14 score, a measure of functional impairment related to vision, may be a better measure of the benefit of cataract surgery than change in visual acuity.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Visão Ocular/fisiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Lentes Intraoculares , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
12.
Ophthalmology ; 101(6): 1142-52, 1994 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8008356

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine associations between surgical technique, patient and surgeon characteristics, and clinical outcomes of cataract surgery. METHODS: Seventy-five ophthalmologists were recruited from three cities based on a sampling scheme stratified by surgeon-reported annual volume of cataract surgery. Seven hundred seventy-two patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery were enrolled, with complete preoperative, perioperative, and 4-month postoperative clinical data on 717 patients (93%). RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of surgery was performed by phacoemulsification and 35% by standard extracapsular (ECCE) techniques. Performance of ECCE was associated with the presence of ocular comorbidity and 21 or more years in practice of the surgeon. Performance of phacoemulsification was associated with annual volume of cataract surgery, wherein high-volume (201-399 patients annually) and very high-volume (> 400 patients annually) surgeons had 3.7 and 3.9 times the likelihood of performing phacoemulsification compared with moderate-volume (51-200 cases annually) surgeons. The rates of intraoperative, perioperative, and 4-month postoperative adverse events and the amount of improvement in visual acuity did not differ either by surgical technique or volume stratum. The reported occurrence of posterior capsular opacification within 4 months of surgery was increased in the presence of cortical opacification, one city, and patients operated on by either high- or very high-volume surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, no difference in clinical outcomes, as measured by change in visual acuity or occurrence of postoperative adverse events (except for posterior capsular opacification), can be attributed to performance of phacoemulsification versus ECCE or to the reported annual volume of cataract surgery of the surgeon. Self-reported high and very high annual volume of cataract surgery is associated independently with performance of phacoemulsification and surgeon's report of posterior capsular opacification at 4 months after cataract surgery.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catarata/etiologia , Catarata/fisiopatologia , Extração de Catarata/efeitos adversos , Extração de Catarata/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Cápsula do Cristalino/patologia , Lentes Intraoculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oftalmologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Visão Ocular/fisiologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
13.
Arch Ophthalmol ; 112(5): 630-8, 1994 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8185520

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and the performance of a brief questionnaire designed to measure functional impairment caused by cataract (the VF-14). DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study. Patients were recruited between July 15 and December 15, 1991. SETTING: Patients were recruited from the practices of 70 ophthalmologists, located in Columbus, Ohio (N = 21), St Louis, Mo (N = 26), and Houston, Tex (N = 23). PATIENTS: Seven hundred sixty-six patients undergoing cataract surgery for the first time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative best corrected visual acuity in each eye; scores on the VF-14, a new index of functional impairment in patients with cataract; patient reports of overall trouble and satisfaction with their vision; and scores on the Sickness Impact Profile, a measure of general health status. RESULTS: The VF-14 has high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .85) and correlates more strongly with the overall self-rating of the amount of trouble and satisfaction patients have with their vision than do several measures of visual acuity or the Sickness Impact Profile score. The VF-14 score is moderately correlated with visual acuity in the better eye. CONCLUSIONS: The VF-14 is a reliable and valid measure of functional impairment caused by cataract and provides information not conveyed by visual acuity or a general measure of health status.


Assuntos
Catarata/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Visão Ocular , Extração de Catarata , Estudos Transversais , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Nurs Econ ; 11(5): 292-7, 323, 1993.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8232650

RESUMO

Costs of nursing care among hospital units that adopted a professional practice model (PPM) were compared with traditional nursing units. PPM inpatient units used fewer temporary personnel and nursing aides, resulting in similar RN costs but lower total nursing costs. However, PPM operating rooms were more costly, mostly because of the intense use of RNs.


Assuntos
Modelos de Enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/economia , Prática Profissional , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição
15.
Med Care ; 31(5): 381-93, 1993 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8501987

RESUMO

A number of innovative practice models have been introduced in an effort to resolve the hospital nursing shortage and improve the working conditions and retention of registered nurses. This study examines the effects of a unit-level self-management model (including salaried compensation and gainsharing) in a number of clinical areas at The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. In comparisons of nurses on self-managed and traditional nursing units, outcomes examined were nurses' perceptions of their work process, nurses' work satisfaction levels, and nurses' retention. The self-management model is found to increase work satisfaction through effects on two work process variables: coordination of care and effective team performance. The model is also associated with higher retention. Nurses on self-managed units work longer hours but earn increased pay; the effects of hours and pay on work satisfaction and retention are discussed.


Assuntos
Satisfação no Emprego , Modelos de Enfermagem , Serviço Hospitalar de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Baltimore , Estudos Transversais , Planos para Motivação de Pessoal , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Universitários/organização & administração , Humanos , Masculino , Reorganização de Recursos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Salários e Benefícios , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA