Increasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the late complications after endovascular graft repair of elective abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) at the authors' institution since November 1992. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Recently, the use of endovascular grafts for the treatment of AAAs has increased dramatically. However, there is little midterm or long-term proof of their efficacy. METHODS: During the past 9 years, 239 endovascular graft repairs were performed for nonruptured AAAs, many (86%) in high-risk patients or in those with complex anatomy. The grafts used were Montefiore (n = 97), Ancure/EVT (n = 14), Vanguard (n = 16), Talent (n = 47), Excluder (n = 20), AneuRx (n = 29), and Zenith (n = 16). All but the AneuRx and Ancure repairs were performed as part of a U.S. phase 1 or phase 2 clinical trial under a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption. Procedural outcomes and follow-up results were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: The major complication and death rates within 30 days of endovascular graft repair were 17.6% and 8.5%, respectively. The technical success rate with complete AAA exclusion was 88.7%. During follow-up to 75 months (mean +/- standard deviation, 15.7 +/- 6.3 months), 53 patients (22%) died of unrelated causes. Two AAAs treated with endovascular grafts ruptured and were surgically repaired, with one death. Other late complications included type 1 endoleak (n = 7), aortoduodenal fistula (n = 2), graft thrombosis/stenosis (n = 7), limb separation or fabric tear with a subsequent type 3 endoleak (n = 1), and a persistent type 2 endoleak (n = 13). Secondary intervention or surgery was required in 23 patients (10%). These included deployment of a second graft (n = 4), open AAA repair (n = 5), coil embolization (n = 6), extraanatomic bypass (n = 4), and stent placement (n = 3). CONCLUSION: With longer follow-up, complications occurred with increasing frequency. Although most could be managed with some form of endovascular reintervention, some complications resulted in a high death rate. Although endovascular graft repair is less invasive and sometimes effective in the long term, it is often not a definitive procedure. These findings mandate long-term surveillance and prospective studies to prove the effectiveness of endovascular graft repair.

Hypogastric artery aneurysm rupture after endovascular graft exclusion with shrinkage of the aneurysm: significance of endotension from a "virtual," or thrombosed type II endoleak.

Type II endoleaks, resulting from retrograde branch flow, after endovascular graft aneurysm exclusion are considered benign because they usually thrombose and are commonly associated with stable or shrinking aneurysm sacs. We report a hypogastric artery aneurysm rupture from endotension from an undetected, thrombosed Type II endoleak, associated with sac shrinkage. The patient had undergone an endovascular graft repair of a 4-cm right common iliac artery and 9-cm hypogastric artery aneurysm with distal hypogastric artery coil embolization. Serial computed tomography scans revealed no endoleak and a hypogastric aneurysm thrombosis with shrinkage. Eighteen months later, the aneurysm ruptured as a result of pressurization from backbleeding, patent branches.

Diameter changes in isolated iliac artery aneurysms 1 to 6 years after endovascular graft repair.

OBJECTIVE: Precise diameter changes in iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) after endovascular graft (EVG) repair are yet to be determined. This report describes the midterm size changes in isolated IAAs 13 to 72 months after treatment with an EVG. METHODS: From January 1993 to April 1999, 31 patients with 35 true isolated IAAs (32 common iliac and 3 hypogastric) had these lesions treated with EVGs and coil embolization of the hypogastric artery or its branches. The EVG used in this study consisted of a balloon-expandable stent attached to a polytetrafluoroethylene graft. Contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomographic scans were performed at 3- to 6-month intervals to follow the aneurysms for change in diameter and endoleaks. RESULTS: Thirty patients had a decrease in the size of their iliac aneurysms with EVG repair. All EVGs remained patent. All patients, except for one, were followed up for 13 to 72 months (mean, 31 months). The pretreatment aneurysm size ranged from 2.5 to 11.0 cm in diameter (mean, 4.6 +/- 1.62 cm). After EVG treatment, the aneurysms ranged from 2.0 to 8.0 cm in diameter (mean, 3.8 +/- 1.36 cm). The change in aneurysm diameter ranged from 0.5 to 3.1 cm (mean, 1.1 +/- 0.62 cm) with an average change of -0.516 +/- 0.01 cm/y for the first year. Five patients died of their intercurrent medical conditions during the follow-up period. One of the patients had a new endoleak and an increase in common iliac aneurysm size 18 months after EVG treatment, despite an early contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan that showed no endoleak. This patient's aneurysm ruptured, and a standard open surgical repair was successfully performed. Another patient had a decrease in hypogastric aneurysm size after EVG treatment and no radiographic evidence of an endoleak, but eventually the aneurysm ruptured. He was successfully treated with a standard open surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS: EVGs can be an effective treatment for isolated IAAs. Properly treated with EVGs, IAAs decrease in size. The enlargement of an IAA, even if no endoleak can be detected, appears to be an ominous sign suggestive of an impending rupture. IAAs that enlarge should be closely evaluated for an endoleak. If an endoleak is detected, it should be eliminated if possible. If an endoleak cannot be found, open surgical repair should be considered.

Unilateral and bilateral hypogastric artery interruption during aortoiliac aneurysm repair in 154 patients: a relatively innocuous procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Hypogastric artery (HA) occlusion during aortic aneurysm repair has been associated with considerable morbidity. We analyzed the consequences of interrupting one or both HAs in the standard surgical or endovascular treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms (AIAs). METHODS: From 1992 to 2000, 154 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 66), iliac aneurysms (n = 28), or AIAs (n = 60) required interruption of one (n = 134) or both (n = 20) HAs as part of their endovascular (n = 107) or open repair (n = 47). Endovascular treatment was performed with a variety of industry- or surgeon-made grafts in combination with coil embolization of the HAs. The standard surgical techniques included oversewing or excluding the origins of the HAs and extending the prosthetic graft to the external iliac or femoral artery. RESULTS: There were no cases of buttock necrosis, ischemic colitis requiring laparotomy, or death when one or both HAs were interrupted. Persistent buttock claudication occurred after 16 (12%) of the unilateral and 2 (11%) of the bilateral HA interruptions. Impotence occurred in 7 (9%) of the unilateral and 2 (13%) of the bilateral HA interruptions. Minor neurologic deficits of the lower extremity were observed in 2 (1.5%) of the patients with unilateral HA interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Although HA flow should be preserved if possible, selective interruption of one or both HAs can usually be accomplished safely during endovascular and open repair of anatomically challenging AIAs. We believe other comorbid factors such as shock, distal embolization, or the failure to preserve collateral branches from the external iliac and femoral arteries may have contributed to the morbidity in other reports of HA interruption.

Basic arterial techniques for peripheral arterial thrombolysis.

This article is an overview of the techniques of percutaneous intervention for recanalizing acute or subacute occluded arteries. The indications and results for specific thrombolytics and interventions are discussed in subsequent articles.

Hypogastric artery coil embolization prior to endoluminal repair of aneurysms and fistulas: buttock claudication, a recognized but possibly preventable complication.

PURPOSE: Hypogastric artery embolization is considered to be necessary to prevent retrograde flow and potential endoleaks when a stent-graft crosses the origin of the hypogastric artery. The authors assess the incidence of buttock claudication, which is the primary complication encountered. The effect of coil location and the presence of antegrade flow at the completion of embolization are evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hypogastric artery embolization and endoluminal repair of aneurysms and fistulas was performed in 34 patients (30 men; four women) aged 27-91 years (mean, 76 years). Ten patients were being treated for solitary abdominal aortic aneurysms, 13 were being treated for aortoiliac aneurysms, and six patients were being treated for isolated common iliac aneurysms, three for hypogastric artery aneurysms and two for iliac arteriovenous fistulas. Eleven patients had coils placed completely above the bifurcation of the hypogastric artery and 23 patients had coils placed at the bifurcation, or within the branches of the hypogastric artery. Preservation of antegrade flow after embolization was noted in 14 of 34 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent stent-graft repair after hypogastric artery embolization. There were two perioperative deaths, three proximal leaks, and one collateral leak. Of the 32 patients who survived the procedure, there was one retrograde leak, even though 13 of 32 (41%) patients had continued antegrade flow at completion of the hypogastric artery embolization. When coils were placed at or in the bifurcation of the hypogastric artery, 12 of 22 (55%) experienced claudication. When coils were placed in the proximal hypogastric artery, one of 10 (10%) claudicated. CONCLUSION: It is probably not necessary to completely occlude antegrade flow in the hypogastric artery to prevent a distal endoleak. Buttock claudication is rare when coils are placed in the proximal hypogastric artery rather than at its bifurcation or in its branches.

Midterm experience with the endovascular treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms.

PURPOSE: This report describes our 5-year experience with the endovascular repair of isolated iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. METHODS: Between June 1993 and July 1998, 40 isolated iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms were treated with endovascular grafts in 39 patients. Thirty-seven aneurysms were treated with endovascular grafts composed of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and balloon expandable stents, and the other three underwent repair with a polycarbonate urethane endoluminal graft. RESULTS: All the patients underwent initially successful endovascular treatment of isolated iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms and were followed from 1 to 51 months (mean, 18 months). The 4-year primary patency rate was 94.5% +/- 10%. The perioperative complications included one episode of distal embolization, an episode of colonic ischemia, five episodes of kinking or compression of the endovascular graft, and one early postoperative graft thrombosis. There was only one perioperative death in a patient whose aneurysm ruptured in the operating room just before endovascular repair. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 3.0 +/- 1.3 days in this group of patients at moderate and high risk. The long-term complications included one graft thrombosis and two endoleaks. One small endoleak was followed until the patient died of unrelated causes, and the other one led to aneurysm rupture in the only patient temporarily lost to follow-up examination. This patient successfully underwent treatment in the standard open surgical fashion. To date, all the other aneurysms have remained stable or have decreased in size during the follow-up examinations with duplex or contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scans. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms is a safe and effective technique with good midterm results in patients at standard and high risk. These grafts are particularly beneficial for patients with medical, surgical, or anatomic contraindications for open surgical repair.

When is urokinase treatment an effective sole or adjunctive treatment for acute limb ischemia secondary to native artery occlusion?

BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy is currently a therapeutic option for the treatment of acute limb ischemia. A recent large prospective randomized trial (TOPAS) comparing lytic therapy and operative intervention showed that both forms of treatment had similar results in terms of amputation-free survival. However, the exact role for lytic treatment is unclear. METHOD: Over a 4-year period we treated 60 cases of acute limb ischemia in 57 patients secondary to native artery occlusion with thrombolytic therapy with urokinase. All patients were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and then at 3-month intervals posttreatment. Follow-up evaluations included pulse examination, pulse volume recordings, and duplex examinations to confirm arterial patency. No patients were lost to follow-up with a range of 8 to 54 months (mean 26). RESULTS: Of these 60 native arterial occlusions, complete lysis was achieved in 46 cases (76%). Of these 46 cases, 18 required lysis only, 19 cases (9 iliac, 7 superficial femoral artery (SFA), and 3 popliteal) required angioplasty of lesions uncovered by clot lysis, and 9 patients had lysis and angioplasty of iliac arteries followed by infrainguinal bypasses. Eight of the 57 patients (14%) who had been asymptomatic presented with symptoms limited to new onset claudication, all of which were successfully lysed. Cumulative patency for the 43 successful cases was 90% +/- 5% at 1 year and 75% +/- 4% at 2 years. The 1-year amputation-free survival for all native artery occlusions was 85% +/- 6%. CONCLUSION: Thrombolysis with urokinase simplified the treatment of native arterial occlusion proving to be the sole therapy in 18 (29%) patients or a valuable adjunct by facilitating the angioplasty of arterial lesions and avoiding open surgery in 60% of patients treated. In addition, the correction of inflow lesions reduced the magnitude of required subsequent bypass procedures to achieve limb salvage. In conclusion, successful thrombolysis of native artery occlusion provided durable arterial patency and limb salvage, particularly in patients with new onset claudication.

Analysis of endovascular graft treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease: what is its role based on midterm results?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the authors' midterm results (up to 4 years) using endovascular grafts to treat aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients with limb-threatening ischemia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Endovascular grafts are being used to manage some aortoiliac lesions formerly treated by aortofemoral or extraanatomic bypass grafts. However, widespread acceptance of these new grafts depends on their late patency and clinical utility. METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 1997, 52 patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease were treated with endovascular grafts. The primary indication for treatment was gangrene or ulceration in 42 patients (81%) and rest pain in 10 patients (19%). Sixteen patients had symptomatic contralateral limbs that were also treated, and 27 (52%) patients required a synchronous infrainguinal bypass. Results up to 4 years were evaluated by life table analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six (88%) of the patients had complete follow-up of 3 to 57 months (median 22 months). Six patients were lost to follow-up at a mean of 20 months after surgery. The 4-year primary and secondary patency rates for the endovascular grafts were 66.1% and 72.3% respectively. Six patients required a major amputation, and the limb salvage rate was 88.7%. Four-year patient survival was 37%, with 23 patients dying during this follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular grafts can often be used when conventional procedures are contraindicated or technically impractical. These grafts are a valuable alternative to extraanatomic and aortofemoral bypasses in high-risk patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease and critical ischemia.

Endovascular graft repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of endovascular graft (EVG) repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms (AIAs) has yet to be demonstrated. There are inherent limitations in EVG repair, including the need for preoperative measurements of the aneurysmal and adjacent arterial anatomy to determine the appropriate size and type of graft and the inherent delay to obtain proximal occlusion. We developed an EVG system with broad versatility that largely eliminates these problems. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1993 and 1998, within an experience of 134 endovascular AIA repairs, 12 ruptured AIAs were treated using EVGs that facilitated intraoperative customization and eliminated the need for preoperative measurements. The EVGs consisted of either a Palmaz stent and a PTFE graft deployed by a compliant balloon (n = 9) or a self-expanding covered stent graft (n = 3). Both grafts were cut to the appropriate length intraoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 72 years (range 40 to 86 years). The mean size of the aneurysms was 7.6 cm (range 3 to 16 cm). Preoperative symptoms were present in all patients and included abdominal or back pain (n = 9), syncope (n = 4), and external bleeding (n = 2). All patients were high surgical risks because of comorbid disease (n = 10) or previous abdominal operations (n = 6), and nine experienced hypotension. RESULTS: All EVGs were inserted successfully and excluded the aneurysms from the circulation. The mean operating time was 263 minutes, the mean blood loss was 715 mL, and the mean length of hospital stay was 6.5 days. There were two deaths (16%), one from the preexisting acute myocardial infarction and one from multiple organ failure. There were three minor complications (25%). Two patients required evacuation of an intraabdominal hematoma from the initial rupture. All but one of the grafts was functioning at a mean followup of 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of EVG repair for ruptured AIAs using a graft that can be customized intraoperatively for each patient. Such repairs currently are valuable in patients with ruptured AIAs and serious comorbidities and may be applicable in other circumstances as well.

Use of spiral computerized tomography in lieu of angiography for preoperative assessment of living renal donors.

PURPOSE: We evaluate whether spiral computerized tomography (CT) can be used in lieu of renal angiography for preoperative assessment of living renal donors, with special attention to multiplicity of renal vasculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 living renal donor candidates were evaluated with spiral CT and all but 2 underwent donor nephrectomy. Patients were divided into early and late groups because there was a learning curve with spiral CT. In the early group 18 donors underwent renal angiography as well as spiral CT and 10 underwent nephrectomy after spiral CT only. In the late group 5 had dual radiographic evaluation for ambiguities in spiral CT interpretation and 12 underwent nephrectomy after spiral CT only. Spiral CT was performed and interpreted blind to angiographic results, and vice versa. RESULTS: Spiral CT identified 50 of 52 renal arteries (96%) found at surgery overall and 23 of 25 (92%) found at surgery after spiral CT only. Two accessory arteries were missed in the 10 early group donors evaluated with spiral CT only, yielding an early negative predictive value of 80%. Renal angiography identified another accessory artery missed by spiral CT in the early group. All 3 missed vessels were identified retrospectively. No arteries found at surgery were missed in the late group (negative predictive value 100%), although there were 2 false-positive results detected by spiral CT relative to renal angiography in 1 candidate renal unit. Overall accuracy to predict early renal artery division relative to surgical findings was 93% for spiral CT and 91% for renal angiography. However, early renal artery division was clinically significant for only 1 of 11 vessels found at surgery. Spiral CT demonstrated 4 anomalous venous returns and renal angiography identified none. However, spiral CT missed 2 accessory veins and identified only 1 of 2 fibromuscular dysplasia cases. Total cost for spiral CT and renal angiography was $886 and $2,905, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral CT is a reasonably good alternative to renal angiography for living renal donor assessment but there is a profound learning curve for performance and interpretation. Renal angiography is still the gold standard with respect to the identification of arterial multiplicity and fibromuscular dysplasia, and it should be used adjunctively in cases with spiral CT ambiguity. Neither spiral CT nor renal angiography is ideal for the assessment of early renal artery division which is seldom an issue. The benefits of spiral CT over renal angiography are potentially lower morbidity, improved donor convenience and reduced cost.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a registry of patients (n = 473) with symptomatic lower limb DVT, results of 312 urokinase infusions in 303 limbs of 287 patients (137 male and 150 female patients; mean age, 47.5 years) were analyzed. DVT symptoms were acute (< or = 10 days) in 188 (66%) patients, chronic (> 10 days) in 45 (16%), and acute and chronic in 54 (19%). A history of DVT existed in 90 (31%). Lysis grades were calculated by using venographic results. RESULTS: Iliofemoral DVT (n = 221 [71%]) and femoral-popliteal DVT (n = 79 [25%]) were treated with urokinase infusions (mean, 7.8 million i.u.) for a mean of 53.4 hours. After thrombolysis, 99 iliac and five femoral vein lesions were treated with stents. Grade III (complete) lysis was achieved in 96 (31%) infusions; grade II (50%-99% lysis), in 162 (52%); and grade I (< 50% lysis), in 54 (17%). For acute thrombosis, grade III lysis occurred in 34% of cases of acute and in 19% of cases of chronic DVT (P < .01). Major bleeding complications occurred in 54 (11%) patients, most often at the puncture site. Six patients (1%) developed pulmonary emboli. Two deaths (< 1%) were attributed to pulmonary embolism and intracranial hemorrhage. At 1 year, the primary patency rate was 60%. Lysis grade was predictive of 1-year patency rate (grade III, 79%; grade II, 58%; grade I, 32%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is safe and effective. These data can guide patient selection for this therapeutic technique.

Early experience with the Corvita endoluminal graft for treatment of arterial injuries.

The aim of this study was to evaluate our early experience with the Corvita endoluminal graft for the treatment of a variety of arterial injuries. Ten patients with arterial pseudoaneurysms (8) or arteriovenous fistulas (2) due to arterial injuries were followed prospectively after undergoing treatment with the endovascular graft. Our results showed that the Corvita low-profile endoluminal graft can be successfully used to treat arterial injuries but that it sometimes requires the placement of additional stents in patients with tortuous or tapering vessels. These grafts are extremely useful for the safe treatment of difficult and high-risk patients. Further improvements in available endovascular grafts and good long-term results will be necessary before considering these grafts the best treatment available for most patients with significant arterial injuries.

Value of CT angiography for postoperative assessment of patients with iliac artery aneurysms who have received endovascular grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to assess the usefulness of CT angiography for follow-up of patients with iliac artery aneurysms who have undergone endovascular treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with iliac artery aneurysms (10 true aneurysms and two pseudoaneurysms) were examined with CT angiography within 1 week of receiving transfemorally placed endovascular grafts. All patients underwent follow-up CT angiography from 3 to 30 months (mean, 11 months) later. Follow-up CT angiography at 6 months or later (mean, 14 months) was also available in 10 patients. All studies were obtained after i.v. contrast administration using 3-mm collimation, 1.6-2.0 pitch, 2-mm retrospective reconstruction, and with subsequent three-dimensional rendering and multiplanar reformation. The shape and patency of the graft, perigraft thrombosis, and the size of the aneurysm were assessed. RESULTS: All grafts remained patent and without deformity. Complete thrombosis of the aneurysm was shown by initial postoperative CT angiography in 11 patients and confirmed by follow-up studies. A single case of a perigraft leak was revealed by CT angiography and confirmed by follow-up angiography. No aneurysm showed change in size at late follow-up. CONCLUSION: CT angiography is an accurate method for evaluating endovascular devices. CT angiography can be used as a primary technique for follow-up of patients who have undergone endovascular repair of iliac aneurysms.

Endoleak after endovascular graft repair of experimental aortic aneurysms: does coil embolization with angiographic "seal" lower intraaneurysmal pressure?

PURPOSE: To investigate the relation between endoleaks and intraaneurysmal pressure (IAP) and the effect of coil embolization in the management of endoleaks. METHODS: The infrarenal aorta of a dog (n = 15) was replaced by a polytetrafluoroethylene aneurysm containing a pressure transducer. Group I (n = 4) had untreated aneurysms. Group II (n = 4) had endovascularly excluded aneurysms without an endoleak. Group III (n = 7) had aneurysms excluded by means of grafts with a defect that represented the source of an endoleak. After 4 weeks of follow-up study, the endoleaks in group III dogs were subjected to coil embolization. Systolic IAP was measured daily and expressed as a ratio of systolic blood pressure obtained from a forelimb cuff. Arteriography, duplex ultrasonography, and spiral contrast computed tomography were performed to evaluate endoleaks. RESULTS: In group I, the LAP remained close to systolic blood pressure (ratio of 0.96 +/- 0.06), whereas in group II the IAP ratio showed a decline to 0.34 +/- 0.16 (p = 0.0009 group I versus II). After an initial decrease, the IAP ratio in group III stabilized at 0.75 +/- 0.18 (p = 0.003, group II versus III). Aneurysms with an endoleak remained pulsatile with a pulse pressure of 30 +/- 16 mm Hg, which was less than that of untreated aneurysms (62 +/- 15 mm Hg; p < 0.0001 group I versus III). Arteriography and computed tomography revealed "sealing" of endoleaks after coil embolization, but IAP ratio did not decrease (0.76 +/- 0.14) after coil embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete endovascular aneurysm exclusion caused by an endoleak fails to reduce IAP ratio and may subject the aneurysm to a continued risk for rupture. Although coil embolization resulted in angiographic and computed tomographic sealing, it failed to reduce IAP ratio.

Endovascular grafts for noninfected aortoiliac anastomotic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: This report describes our experience with endovascular repair of aortic and iliac anastomotic aneurysms. METHODS: Between June 1994 and March 1996, 12 noninfected aortic or iliac anastomotic aneurysms in 10 patients who had serious comorbid medical conditions that precluded or made difficult standard operative repair were treated using endovascular grafts. No patient in this study had a history of fever, leukocytosis, or computed tomographic evidence of a periprosthetic fluid collection that was suggestive of infection of the original graft. Endovascular grafts composed of polytetrafluoroethylene and balloon-expandable stents were introduced through a femoral arteriotomy and were placed using over-the-wire techniques under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Endovascular grafts were successfully inserted in all patients with aortic or iliac anastomotic aneurysms. There were no procedure-related deaths, and complications included one postprocedure wound hematoma and one perioperative myocardial infarction. Graft patency has been maintained for a mean of 16.1 months, with no computed tomographic evidence of aneurysmal enlargement or perigraft leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular grafts appear to be a safe and effective technique for excluding some noninfected aortoiliac anastomotic aneurysms in high-risk patients and may become a treatment option in all patients who have clinically significant lesions.