Uterine artery embolization: a vascular surgery procedure? One vascular surgery group's experience.

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) has been performed by interventional radiology since the 1990s for symptomatic uterine fibroids with considerable success. Endovascular-trained vascular surgeons possess the necessary skills to successfully perform this procedure after an adequate but brief training period. Fourteen successful UAE procedures were performed by two vascular surgeons over a one-year period. Indications for the procedures were bleeding (12/14 patients, 86%), pain/bloating/pressure (13/14 patients, 93%) and dyspareunia (2/14 patients, 14%). All patients were initially evaluated by a gynecologist and referred for this procedure. Complications were minor and limited. Clinical follow-up demonstrated near-complete to complete symptom resolution in all but one patient for a 93% short-term success rate. Follow-up ultrasound studies demonstrated a reduction in the uterine fibroid size in all patients three months or more postprocedure. The mean fibroid size reduction was 4.07-3.26 cm (20%), P < 0.005. UAE is a procedure of proven benefit, well-matched to many vascular surgeons' skills and practice. Up to this point, few vascular surgeons have incorporated this endovascular procedure into their practices. This initial and somewhat limited study demonstrates one vascular surgery group's early success with this procedure.

Posterior tibial artery aneurysm: A case report.

Aneurysms of tibial vessels are extremely rare. The majority are pseudoaneurysms caused by trauma. Those that are true aneurysms have been associated with an inflammatory process or were mycotic in origin. We are reporting on a patient with a true posterior tibial artery aneurysm without any causative history. The aneurysm was repaired by resection and interposition of a reversed saphenous vein segment.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at hartford hospital: a six year experience.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Endograft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has become a viable alternative to open surgical repair in the last decade. We report here our experience and analysis of the surgical outcomes associated with endograft AAA repair. METHODS: Patients suffering from significant abdominal aortic aneurysms (> 5cm in diameter) underwent endovascular repair. We report our experience with 342 consecutive patients from June 1998 to December 2004. Outcomes such as perioperative mortality, length of admission, length of ICU admission, operative blood loss, rates of transfusion postoperatively, rates of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), rates of lower extremity ischemia, rates of conversion to open surgery, and the incidence of postoperative endoleaks were reviewed and analyzed. These results were compared to our patients undergoing open AAA repair during the same time period. Differences in the rates of perioperative mortality (2.0% vs 5.3%, NS) were not significant. However, the length of admission (4.8 vs 11.6 days, P=<0.001), length of ICU admission (0.6 vs 3.8 days, P=<0.001), blood transfusion (0.27 vs 1.83 units, P=<0.001), rates of postoperative MI (0.9% vs 5.0%, P=<0.001), and the incidence of postoperative renal insufficiency (4.1% vs 22.2%, P=<0.001) were superior in our endovascular group as compared to our open subset. In addition, most of our results were comparable to those results reported in recent major trials of endograft AAA repair. CONCLUSIONS: Endograft repair of AAA demonstrated superior outcomes when compared to our patients undergoing open AAA repair. However, these results must be weighed against the risk of endoleaks, secondary interventions, and routine radiographic surveillance required for the endovascular approach.