Primary flexor tendons repair in zone 2: Current trends with GEMMSOR survey results.

The repair of flexor tendon lesions in zone 2 remains a highly controversial subject in hand surgery. Currently, there is no consensus about the management of these lesions intra- and postoperatively, but the literature suggests that a solid suture will allow early active motion. We hypothesized that the management of flexor tendon injury in zone 2 varies widely. Two online surveys were conducted with surgeons and hand therapists. The questions captured the demographics of the surveyed population, surgical technique, common complications, postoperative management (duration of immobilization, type of splint, rehabilitation techniques and principles of self-rehabilitation). The responses were compared to current literature data. We collected 366 responses to the "surgery" survey and 206 responses to "rehabilitation" survey. Most surgeons performed suture repair with at least 4 strands (75.9%). Active rehabilitation protocols were used in 48.9% of cases. The "rehabilitation" survey underlined the lack of information provided to therapists by surgeons. Therapists used active protocols in 79.7% of cases. This study found a large variation in the management of flexor tendon injuries, which is not always consistent with current published recommendations. Ideally, the suture repair should be a 4-strand pattern with an epitendinous circumferential suture and a release of the pulley in the suture area. Mobilization and rehabilitation should be started on the 3rd day using an active protocol.

Unacceptable failure of the PI2® implant.

The PI2® spacer is designed for treatment of trapeziometacarpal (TM) osteoarthritis. However, the shape of this implant has raised concerns about its stability. We retrospectively investigated 45 implants in 41 patients treated for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in our hospital between 2004 and 2009 who underwent trapeziectomy and insertion of a PI2® spacer. Outcome parameters included revision rates and clinical outcomes correlated with implant position and scaphometacarpal distance, assessed using standard radiographs. A total of 12 implants (27%) were removed at a median time of 10 months (interquartile range (IQR), 7-22 months). These included five dislocations and one early infection. Additionally, a further six patients underwent revision due to persistent pain. Three of these had scapho-trapezoid osteoarthritis, two had developed subluxation of the implant, and one did not show any radiographic abnormalities. A review of patient records revealed that 33 implants remained in place at a median time of 29 months (IQR, 20-57). However, of those, only 21 implants (64%) in 17 patients were available for clinical evaluation at a median follow-up of 29 months (IQR, 19-62 months). No significant differences in clinical outcomes including functional results were observed between in-place ( n = 8) and subluxated ( n = 13) implants. Due to the high revision rate (12/45), consistent with other reports in the literature, we have abandoned the use of the PI2® spacer. We recommend the establishment of a registry for evaluation of future implants. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-series study/level IV.

[Functional magnetic resonance imaging. What are the benefits expected in hand surgery?]. / IRM fonctionnelle. Quels apports en chirurgie de la main ?

Functional MRI (fMRI) allowed considerable advances upon understanding of cerebral functioning. Cortical plasticity, which allows the voluntary command of a restored function by a transferred muscle remains to be investigated in its intimacy. The authors present here the round table held at the 48th annual meeting of the French Society for Surgery of the Hand on December 22nd, 2012. It tries to review the analysis of the phenomenon observed during multiple tendinous transfers for restoration of proximal radial nerve palsy. Were successively approached: 1) Methods of acquisition and analysis of the signals (C. D-M.); 2) Movement reorganization (O.M.); 3) Motor plasticity after hand allograft (A. S.); 4) The potential interest of the fMRI in hand rehabilitation (F. D.); 5) The analysis of cerebral plasticity in general (H. B.). A rather philosophical conclusion opens other fields to f MRI (A.M.).