Cluster cross-over randomised trial of paediatric airway management devices in the simulation lab and operating room among paramedic students.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare paediatric emergency airway management strategies in the simulation lab and operating room environments. METHODS: This was a two-part cluster cross-over randomised trial including simulation lab and operating room environments conducted between January 2017 and June 2018 in Portland, Oregon, USA. In simulated infant cardiac arrests, paramedic students placed an endotracheal tube, an i-gel or a laryngeal mask airway in random order. In the operating room, paramedic students placed a laryngeal mask airway or i-gel device in random order in sequential patients. The primary outcome for both portions of the study was time to ventilation. In the operating room portion, we also evaluated leak pressures and average initial tidal volumes. RESULTS: There were 58 paramedic students who participated in the simulation lab and 22 who participated in the operating room study. The mean time to airway placement in the simulation lab was 48.5 s for the i-gel, 68.9 s for the laryngeal mask and 129.5 s for the endotracheal tube. In the operating room, mean time to i-gel placement was 34.3 s with 45.2 s for the laryngeal mask. In multivariable analysis of the simulation study, the laryngeal mask and i-gel were significantly faster than the endotracheal tube, and the i-gel was faster than the laryngeal mask. In the operating room, there was no significant difference in time to placement, leak pressure and average volume of the first five breaths between the i-gel and laryngeal mask. CONCLUSIONS: We found that paramedic students were able to place supraglottic devices rapidly with high success rates in simulation lab and operating room environments. Supraglottic devices, particularly the i-gel, were rated as easy to use. The i-gel may be easiest to use since it lacks an inflable cuff and requires fewer steps to place.

Randomized trial of acupuncture with antiemetics for reducing postoperative nausea in children.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common after tonsillectomy in children. There is evidence that perioperative acupuncture at the pericardium 6 (P6) point is effective for preventing PONV in adults. Our goal was to determine if intraoperative acupuncture at the P6 point, in addition to usual antiemetics, is more effective than antiemetics alone in preventing PONV in children. METHODS: In a randomized double-blind trial, 161 children age 3 through 9 years undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy were randomized to either bilateral acupuncture at P6 plus antiemetics (n = 86) or antiemetics only (n = 75). All participants received ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg and dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg, up to 10 mg. The presence of nausea, retching, emesis and administration of additional antiemetics were recorded during phases I and II of PACU recovery. Follow-up calls occurred on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). RESULT: During phase I and II recovery, the incidence of PONV was significantly less with acupuncture than without (7.0% vs 34.7%, RR: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.09-0.46; P < 0.001). The difference in PONV was driven by less nausea in the acupuncture group (5.0% vs 24.0%), with no difference in vomiting between the two groups. In the first 24 hours, PONV occurred in 36.1% with acupuncture and 49.3% without; these values did not differ significantly (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Children receiving acupuncture plus antiemetic therapy had less risk of developing nausea during phase I and II recovery, but there was no difference in PONV on POD 1. Acupuncture may reduce nausea in the PACU, even when combined with antiemetics.

Pain and Analgesia During Labor and Delivery Between 16 0/7 and 22 6/7 Weeks of Gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe severity of pain during labor at previable estimated gestational age and to determine the effectiveness of various methods of analgesia in this population. METHODS: In this retrospective review of the records of women undergoing induction or augmentation of labor between 16 0/7 and 22 6/7 weeks of gestation, we examined pain scores (numeric rating scale 0-10) documented throughout labor and analgesia method (none, systemic, or neuraxial). We compared relevant patient and labor characteristics such as gestational age, fetal weight, time interval from induction to delivery as well as pain data including analgesia type and pain scores before and after analgesia. We compared analgesia response in patients who received neuraxial analgesia and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients met inclusion criteria: four requested no analgesia, 56 used systemic analgesia only, 11 used systemic analgesia initially and then requested neuraxial analgesia, and nine used neuraxial without using systemic analgesia first. Median peak pain score was 7 among all patients. Patients who chose neuraxial analgesia had higher estimated gestational age (21 compared with 20 weeks of gestation, P=.03), fetal weight (362 compared with 268 g, P=.047), and admission-to-delivery time intervals (19.25 compared with 10.3 hours, P=.003) than those who chose no or systemic analgesia. Immediate preanalgesia peak pain scores were not different between groups, but patients who received neuraxial analgesia had lower immediate postanalgesia nadir scores than those who chose systemic pain relief. CONCLUSION: Pain during induction of labor at previable gestational ages may be greater than is commonly appreciated. Neuraxial analgesia may provide more optimal pain relief for patients with higher estimated gestational age and fetal weight, particularly after 22 weeks of estimated gestational age.