[Radiation therapy in patients with cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Interdisciplinary safety recommendations]. / Strahlentherapie bei Patienten mit Herzschrittmachern oder implantierbaren Kardioverter-Defibrillatoren. Interdisziplinäre Sicherheitsempfehlungen.

BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of implanted pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and a rising incidence of malignant tumors, there is a growing probability of radiation-mediated device dysfunction. The only guidelines for the management of patients with cardiac pacemakers in the case of radiation therapy were published in 1994 and have not been updated since then. Based on the current evidence and modern device technology, the present paper aims to develop contemporary and interdisciplinary safety recommendations for the minimization of patient risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature research was carried out including the most relevant medical electronic databases. The search yielded 147 articles published between 1994 and 2012 of which 45 met the selection criteria and of these studies 34 presented primary data (9 in vitro and 25 in vivo studies). The impact of ionizing radiation varied significantly between implanted devices and ranged from no functional changes to complete loss of function. Important device dysfunctions included changes in sensing capability, altered pacing pulses or rate, changed or disabled tachyarrhythmia ICD therapies, early battery depletion and loss of telemetry. Modern pacemakers and ICDs are more sensitive to radiation than older models. Potentially life-threatening complications were observed after exposure of the pulse generator to comparatively low radiation doses (0.11 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Practical recommendations for patient management and safety are presented that can be readily adopted by any institution carrying out radiation therapy.

Unmasking of myopotential oversensing by an integrated bipolar defibrillator lead following AV node ablation.

A 73-year-old man with nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia that had resulted in frequent shocks from his implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). Coexisting atrial fibrillation required AV node ablation which rendered the patient pacemaker dependent. During follow-up, recurrent episodes of dizziness occurred caused by inhibition of pacing due to oversensing of pectoral muscle myopotentials. Surgical revision was performed and the intraoperative examination revealed an intact integrated bipolar defibrillator lead with appropriate connections to the CRT-D header. The placement of an additional pace/sense lead completely resolved the patient's symptoms and no further myopotential oversensing was recorded.

[Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac devices. Current status and future perspectives of MR-compatible systems]. / Magnetresonanztomographie und implantierbare kardiale Devices. Stellenwert und Ausblick von MR-kompatiblen Systemen.

Conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have always been regarded as a contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MR-compatible systems represent a recent and particularly important innovation, since they will provide device patients with significantly improved access to MR examinations. However, the safe application of MR-compatible technology requires a detailed understanding of the strictly defined cardiologic and radiologic requirements and conditions that are to be adhered to before and during an MR examination. The present article gives an overview of problematic MR interactions with implanted devices, illustrates the most important aspects of MR-compatible pacemaker and ICD systems, analyzes their current clinical status, and offers a critical perspective.

Involvement of adrenoceptors in the angiotensin II-induced expression of inducible transcription factors in the rat forebrain and hypothalamus.

Angiotensin II (Ang II) acts as a neuromodulator/neurotransmitter in specific brain nuclei involved in the regulation of blood pressure and volume homeostasis. It also induces a highly differentiated transcription factor expression in these nuclei. We investigated whether adrenoceptors, which modulate other central actions of angiotensin II like the vasopressin release, also play a role in the AT1 receptor-mediated expression of the transcription factors (TF) c-Fos, c-Jun and Krox-24 in the rat brain. Ang II, injected intracerebroventricularly, induced the expression of c-Fos, c-Jun and Krox-24 in the hypothalamic paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic (SON) nuclei. Pretreatment with the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin, significantly inhibited the Ang II-induced transcription factor expression in the SON and PVN. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, also reduced Ang II-stimulated transcription factors significantly in both nuclei. This inhibition was mainly localized in vasopressinergic magnocellular neurons in both nuclei. The beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol, did not influence the Ang II-induced expression of TF. Our results show that both, Ang II-induced vasopressin release and transcription factor expression, involve the same neuronal connections in the brain, implicating that the signal transduction pathways leading to the two different effects are at least to a certain degree convergent.