Reappraisal and New Observations on Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Ablated From the Noncoronary Aortic Sinus.

BACKGROUND: The electrophysiological characteristics of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the noncoronary sinus (NCS) have not been fully described. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic NCS-VA. METHODS: This study comprised 11 patients undergoing radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for idiopathic NCS-VA. Angiography was performed to confirm the origin in the aortic sinus before RF ablation. RESULTS: Clinical arrhythmias presented left bundle block/inferior axis morphology in all patients. QRS morphology of R' and R/s' pattern was dominantly found in lead III. Mapping in the right ventricle demonstrated the earliest ventricular activation (EVA) site at the His Bundle region, whereas mapping in the NCS demonstrated that the EVA preceded the activation at the His Bundle region by 12.1 ± 7.9 milliseconds. All VAs were successfully ablated in <2.5 seconds within the NCS with 1 RF application. The successful ablation site was at the nadir of NCS in 10 patients, and near the junction of NCS and the right coronary sinus in the remaining one. A discrete potential can be observed at the EVA site within the NCS in 10 patients (91%); however, an excellent pace mapping at the EVA site was obtained in only 2 patients. Junctional beats did not occur during RF application in all 11 patients. There were no complications or clinical recurrence during a mean follow-up of 26.0 ± 9.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: NCS-VA presents a peculiar electrocardiogram. A discrete potential can be mapped within the NCS during VA and sinus rhythm, and can be used in guiding ablation.

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Clinical Practice Patterns in Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Clinician Survey in China.

The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted healthcare systems worldwide. This study investigated cardiologists' opinions on how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted clinical practice patterns in atrial fibrillation (AF). A multicenter clinician survey, including demographic and clinical questions, was administered to 300 cardiologists from 22 provinces in China, in April 2022. The survey solicited information about their treatment recommendations for AF and their perceptions of how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted their clinical practice patterns for AF. The survey was completed by 213 cardiologists (71.0%) and included employees in tertiary hospitals (82.6%) and specialists with over 10 years of clinical cardiology practice (53.5%). Most respondents stated that there were reductions in the number of inpatients and outpatients with AF in their hospital during the pandemic. A majority of participants stated that the pandemic had impacted the treatment strategies for all types of AF, although to different extents. Compared with that during the assumed non-pandemic period in the hypothetical clinical questions, the selection of invasive interventional therapies (catheter ablation, percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion) was significantly decreased (all p < 0.05) during the pandemic. There was no significant difference in the selection of non-invasive therapeutic strategies (the management of cardiovascular risk factors and concomitant diseases, pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention, heart rate control, and rhythm control) between the pandemic and non-pandemic periods (all p > 0.05). The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the clinical practice patterns of AF. The selection of catheter ablation and percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion was significantly reduced, whereas pharmacotherapy was often stated as the preferred option by participating cardiologists.

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Practice Patterns: Findings from a Multicenter Clinician Survey in China.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected healthcare systems around the world. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of cardiologists regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the clinical practice patterns for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A multicenter clinician survey was sent to 300 cardiologists working in 22 provinces in China. The survey collected demographic information and inquired about their perceptions of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected ACS clinical practice patterns. Results: The survey was completed by 211 (70.3%) cardiologists, 82.5% of whom were employed in tertiary hospitals, and 52.1% reported more than 10 years of clinical cardiology practice. Most respondents observed a reduction in ACS inpatients and outpatients in their hospitals during the pandemic. Only 29.9% of the respondents had access to a dedicated catheter room for the treatment of COVID-19-positive ACS patients. Most respondents stated that the COVID-19 pandemic had varying degrees of effect on the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina. Compared with the assumed non-pandemic period, in the designed clinical questions, the selection of coronary interventional therapy for STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly decreased (all p < 0.05), and the selection of pharmacotherapy was increased (all p < 0.05). The selection of fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI during the pandemic was higher than in the assumed non-pandemic period (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected ACS clinical practice patterns. The use of invasive therapies significantly decreased during the pandemic period, whereas pharmacotherapy was more often prescribed by the cardiologists.

The Diagnostic Value of Cardiac Deceleration Capacity in Vasovagal Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Increased parasympathetic activity is thought to play important roles in syncope events of patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). However, direct measurements of the vagal control are difficult. The novel deceleration capacity (DC) of heart rate measure has been used to characterize the vagal modulation. This study aimed to assess vagal control in patients with VVS and evaluate the diagnostic value of the DC in VVS. METHODS: Altogether, 161 consecutive patients with VVS (43±15 years; 62 males) were enrolled. Tilt table test was positive in 101 and negative in 60 patients. Sixty-five healthy subjects were enrolled as controls. DC and heart rate variability in 24-hour ECG, echocardiogram, and biochemical examinations were compared between the syncope and control groups. RESULTS: DC was significantly higher in the syncope group than in the control group (9.6±3.3 versus 6.5±2.0 ms, P<0.001). DC was similarly increased in patients with VVS with a positive and negative tilt table test (9.7±3.5 and 9.4±2.9 ms, P=0.614). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, DC was independently associated with syncope (odds ratio=1.518 [95% CI, 1.301-1.770]; P=0.0001). For the prediction of syncope, the area under curve analysis showed similar values when comparing single DC and combined DC with other risk factors (P=0.1147). From the receiver operator characteristic curves for syncope discrimination, the optimal cutoff value for the DC was 7.12 ms. CONCLUSIONS: DC>7.5 ms may serve as a good tool to monitor cardiac vagal activity and discriminate VVS, particularly in those with negative tilt table test.

Single transseptal puncture technique and contact force catheter: A simplified ablation strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an optimized single transseptal puncture technique and contact force sensing atrial fibrillation (AF) radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) strategy within a clinical setting. Fast anatomic mapping and contact force sensing ablation was applied to patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) ablation between September 2014 and December 2016 using a single trans-septal sheath. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation were performed in PAF individually with a 10-20 g contact force with minimal fluoroscopy. Stimulation with 10 mA outputs on the lesions without capture was used as endpoint. A total of 419 consecutive patients who underwent first-time RFCA were enrolled in the current study, and acute PVI was achieved in all patients. The average procedure time was 74.5±9.7 min, with an average ablation time of 27.3±7.8 min. The average fluoroscopy time was 4.7±3.3 min and the average radiation dose was 24.3±25.2 mGy. At a mean follow-up time of 14.5 ± 4.1 months, sinus rhythm was maintained at 85.0%. Cardiac tamponade occurred in one case. The results indicated that this simplified technique was a simple, safe and effective approach for PAF ablation therapy.

The value of extensive catheter linear ablation on persistent atrial fibrillation (the CLEAR-AF Study).

BACKGROUND: The ablation therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is still a challenge due to the high recurrence rate. This study was aimed to investigate the value of extensive linear ablation with contact force sensing techniques for PerAF. METHODS: A total of 214 patients with PerAF were enrolled in five centers. The patients were randomly assigned to Group I (PVI + LA roof line+ LA anterior wall line) and Group II (PVI + LA roof line), mitral valve isthmus lines were added in both groups if the atrial fibrillation (AF) could not be terminated after all approaches above. RESULTS: Acute success rate of AF termination during the ablation procedure in Group I was significantly higher than Group II (P = 0.028). Two-years follow-up showed no significant difference in the sinus rhythm maintenance rate between the two groups (63.4% in group I vs. 57.2% in group II, P = 0.218). More patients in Group I recurred as organized atrial tachycardia (AT) and can be precisely mapped during repeat ablation procedures (15 vs. 2, P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after repeat ablation procedures were 76.2% in Group I and 47.1% in Group II (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Extensive linear ablation with contact force monitoring did not improve the long-term outcomes for PerAF patients. Repeat ablation procedure showed a possible higher chance of sinus rhythm restoration during follow-up.

Relation of Left Atrial Appendage Morphology Determined by Computed Tomography to Prior Stroke or to Increased Risk of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology is considered to be associated with ischemic stroke, non-Chicken Wing LAA morphology increases the risk of thromboembolic events. However, existing classification of LAA morphology remains not well quantifiable and therefore may leave room for substantial subjective interpretation. This study aimed to assess interobserver and intraobserver agreements in LAA morphology and its real value in stroke prediction. A total of 2,264 atrial fibrillation patients who underwent computed tomography to explore the LAA anatomy were enrolled. All computed tomography images were given to 3 reviewers to judge the LAA morphology independently. A consensus between all 3 reviewers was only reached in 655 cases (28.9%). In which, 86 patients had previous stroke. Poor intraobserver consistency was observed between 2 times of reading in all the 3 reviewers (Kappa = 0.368, p = 0.014; Kappa = 0.350, p = 0.014; Kappa = 0.333, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio [OR] 1.679; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.031 to 2.736; p = 0.037), female gender (OR 1.761; 95% CI 1.037 to 2.994; p = 0.036) and age (OR 1.029; 95% CI 1.004 to 1.056; p = 0.025) were associated with previous stroke. LAA morphology was not associated with previous stroke and non-Chicken Wing LAA morphology did not increase the risk of stroke (OR 1.392; 95% CI 0.847 to 2.288; p = 0.192). In conclusion, high interobserver and intraobserver variabilities suggested that existing classification of LAA morphology was unreliable, the interpretation of the relation between LAA morphology and stroke needs caution.

Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for selected patients with systolic heart failure. Unlike conventional biventricular pacing (BIP), the left ventricular multipoint pacing (MPP) can increase the number of left ventricular pacing sites via a quadripolar lead positioned in the coronary sinus. This synthetic study was conducted to integratively and quantitatively evaluate the clinical outcome of MPP in comparison with BIP. We systematically searched the databases of EMBASE, Ovid medline, and Cochrane Library through May 2018 for studies comparing the clinical outcome of MPP with BIP in the patients who accepted CRT. Hospitalization for reason of heart failure, left ventricular eject fraction (LVEF), CRT response, all-cause morbidity, and cardiovascular death rate was collected for meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies with 29,606 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with BIP group, MPP decreased heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.50; P < 0.00001), improved LVEF (mean difference, 4.97; 95% CI, 3.11 to 6.83; P < 0.00001), increased CRT response (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.68 to 7.87; P = 0.001), and decreased all-cause morbidity (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.66; P = 0.0002) and cardiovascular death rate (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.40; P < 0.00001). The published literature demonstrates that MPP was more effective than BIP in the heart failure patients who accepted cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Atrial involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients referred for ventricular arrhythmias ablation.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a heritable myocardium disorder that predominantly affects the ventricle. Little is known about atrial involvement. This study aimed to assess atrial involvement, especially the role of genotype on atrium in ARVC. METHODS: The incidence, characterization and predictors of atrial involvement were investigated. Nine known ARVC-causing genes were screened and the correlation between genotype and atrial involvement was assessed. RESULTS: Right atrium (RA) dilation, left atrium (LA) dilation, and sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATa) were found in 45, 16 and 3 patients, respectively. Gene mutations were identified in 64 (64.0%) patients. Mutation carriers showed more RA dilation than noncarriers (54.7% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.009), and no difference in LA dilation and ATa. Multivariate analysis showed tricuspid regurgitation (OR: 18.867; 95% CI: 1.466-250.000; P = 0.024) increased the risk of RA dilation and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR: 1.134; 95% CI: 1.002-1.272; P = 0.031) correlated with LA dilation, whereas genotype showed no significant effect. At a median follow-up time of 91 months, 7 patients died and 1 patient accepted heart transplantation. New-onset RA dilation, LA dilation, and sustained ATa were found in 8, 7, and 6 patients, respectively. Atrial involvement was not associated with the long-term survival. Despite mutation carriers showing more RA dilation, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed genotype was not associated with atrial involvement. CONCLUSION: Atrial involvement was common in ARVC. Tricuspid regurgitation and decreased LVEF increased the risk for atrial dilation. Genotype was not associated with atrial involvement.