Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 123(1): 80-88, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33051871

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even though meshes and matrices are widely used in breast reconstruction, there is little high-quality scientific evidence for their risks and benefits. The aim of this study was to compare first-year surgical complication rates in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with a biological mesh with that of a synthetic mesh, in the same patient. METHODS: This study is a clinical, randomized, prospective trial. Patients operated on with bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction were randomized to biological mesh on one side and synthetic mesh on the other side. RESULTS: A total of 48 breasts were randomized. As the synthetically and the biologically reconstructed breasts that were compared belonged to the same woman, systemic factors were exactly the same in the two groups. The most common complication was seroma formation with a frequency of 38% in the biological group and 3.8% in the synthetical group (p = .011). A higher frequency of total implant loss could be seen in the biologic mesh group (8.5% vs. 2%), albeit not statistically significant (p = .083). CONCLUSIONS: In the same patient, a synthetic mesh seems to yield a lower risk for serious complications, such as implant loss, than a biological mesh.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário/efeitos adversos , Implantes de Mama/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Telas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Breast J ; 26(9): 1756-1759, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515840

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare seroma production in breast reconstruction with a biological mesh with that of a synthetic mesh, in the same patient. The patients were randomized to biological mesh in one breast and synthetical in the other. Twenty-four breasts were included. The total drain production and the daily drain production were similar in the two groups. After drain removal, there were more seroma aspirations in the biological group. During the exchange to a permanent implant, there was significantly more seroma in the biological group. Seroma formation is different in synthetic and biological meshes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Seroma/etiologia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA