Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 316, 2024 Sep 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39333921

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sparsentan has shown positive effects on managing different subtypes of glomerulonephritis. The recent results of trials require a pooled analysis to validate these results. AIM: We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of sparsentan versus irbesartan for patients with IgA nephropathy and focal glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane through March 2024. We used Review Manager v.5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 884 patients were included. Sparsentan was superior to irbesartan in improving urine protein to creatinine ratio (UP/C) (ratio of percentage reduction 0.66, 95% CI [0.58 to 0.74], P < 0.001); as well as the proportion of patients achieved complete and partial remission of proteinuria (RR = 2.57, 95% CI [1.73 to 3.81], P < 0.001) and (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.4 to 1.91], P < 0.001) respectively. Regarding the effect on the glomerular filtration rate, the results estimate did not favor either sparsentan or irbesartan (MD = 1.98 ml/min per 1.73mm2, 95% CI [-1.05 to 5.01], P = 0.2). There were no significant differences in adverse events except for hypotension, which showed higher rates in the sparsentan group (RR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.3 to 3.16], P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Sparsentan is effective and has a good safety profile for treating FSGS and patients with IgA nephropathy. However, more well-designed RCTs against ARBs, ACE inhibitors, and steroids with larger sample sizes are needed to get conclusive evidence.


Assuntos
Glomerulonefrite por IGA , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal , Irbesartana , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Irbesartana/uso terapêutico , Glomerulonefrite por IGA/tratamento farmacológico , Glomerulosclerose Segmentar e Focal/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efeitos adversos , Proteinúria/tratamento farmacológico , Proteinúria/etiologia
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 297: 142-152, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the most common symptoms during menopause including hot flushes and night sweats. They are highly disruptive to the quality of life. Fezolinetant is an FDA-approved non-hormonal selective neurokinin3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of VMS. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for VMS associated with menopause. METHODS: Databases were searched until September 2023 for relevant studies comparing fezolinetant against placebo. Data was extracted into an online form and analyzed using RevMan (Version 5.4.1). The GRADE approach was conducted to evaluate the quality of evidence regarding efficacy outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fezolinetant to placebo in postmenopausal women experiencing VMS. Exclusion criteria comprised studies involving participants with contraindications to fezolinetant or those evaluating its efficacy for indications other than VMS associated with menopause. RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study involving 3301 patients. Compared to placebo, fezolinetant reduced the frequency of VMS episodes from baseline (SMD = -0.64, 95 % CI [-0.77, -0.5]) and (SMD = -0.63, 95 % CI [-0.72, -0.53] at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Additionally, fezolinetant reduced VMS severity score (SMD = -0.59, 95 %CI [-0.77, -0.42]) and (SMD = -0.4, 95 % CI [-0.54, -0.27]) at weeks 4 at 12 respectively. These reductions were positively reflected on Menopause specific quality of life score (SMD = -0.46, 95 %CI [-57, -0.34]), (SMD = -0.37, 95 %CI [-0.48, -0.25]) at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Regarding safety analysis, fezolinetant showed increased risk for drug-related TEAEs (RR = 1.47, 95 %CI [1.06,2.04]), serious TEAEs (RR = 1.67, 95 %CI [1.09,2.55]), fatigue (RR = 4.05, 95 %CI [1.27,12.88]), arthralgia (RR = 2.83, 95 %CI [1.02,7.8]) and ALT or AST > 3 times (RR = 2, 95 %CI [1.12,3.57]), with no other statistically significant difference regarding other safety terms. CONCLUSION: Fezolinetant has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of VMS in postmenopausal women, leading to an improvement in their quality of life. These findings suggest that Fezolinetant may serve as a viable alternative to hormonal therapy for managing VMS.


Assuntos
Fogachos , Menopausa , Humanos , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Sistema Vasomotor/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 2 Anéis , Tiadiazóis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA