Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0283907, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37027435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of surgically repaired digital nerve injuries in a Swedish population. Secondary objectives were to describe the demographics of the patient population, injury characteristics, post-operative care and rehabilitation. METHODS: From 2012 to 2018, 1004 patients with a surgically repaired digital nerve injury resident in the Stockholm region were identified in the Swedish national quality registry for hand surgery and all medical records were thoroughly reviewed. RESULTS: The incidence rate was 8.3 per 100.000 person-years and these injuries were more common in men than women. The median age at the time of injury was 37 years and a sharp cut was the most common mechanism of injury. Injuries were equally distributed over weekdays and the year, but surgery was most often performed on Mondays. There were no differences in treatment and rehabilitation regimens between sexes, except women were more likely than men to be operated within three days from injury. Timing and content of rehabilitation varied largely between individuals. One third of patients did not receive any sensory relearning and sensory assessment was performed in only 7%. CONCLUSION: The epidemiology shows no major changes over the last decade. However, we found a large individual variation in follow up visits, rehabilitation content and assessments indicating large differences in consumption of health care resources. Our findings expose the need to further improve and evaluate rehabilitation regimens after digital nerve injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Feminino , Incidência , Suécia/epidemiologia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/epidemiologia , Traumatismos dos Nervos Periféricos/cirurgia
2.
JTCVS Open ; 7: 1-9, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36003695

RESUMO

Objective: Current guidelines for elective proximal aortic repair are applicable to elective first-time procedures in asymptomatic patients without other primary indications or connective tissue disorders and with specified aortic diameter or growth rate. The objective was to characterize the surgical outcomes in this narrowly defined patient-population. Methods: Guideline-compliant patients were identified from a recent (2014-2019) single unit consecutive surgical cohort (n = 935) by excluding total arch replacements, redos, acute and symptomatic patients, and genetic syndromes. Remaining patients were included regardless of surgical procedure performed. Early (30-day or in-hospital) and 1-year mortality were primary outcome measures. Major complications (stroke, severe renal or respiratory insufficiency, postcardiotomy shock, deep sternal wound infection, permanent pacemaker, and re-exploration) up to 1 year postoperatively were secondary outcome measures. Results: In the resulting study population (n = 262), median age was 63 (interquartile range, 52-71) years, and median surgical risk (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) was 3.2% (2.0%-4.4%). Early mortality was 2 of 262 (0.76%) without additional deaths up to 1-year postoperatively. The occurrence of major complications was low: stroke, 2 (0.76%); renal insufficiency, 2 (0.76%); respiratory insufficiency, 1 (0.38%); postcardiotomy shock, 1 (0.38%); deep sternal wound infection, 0; permanent pacemaker, 3 (1.1%); and re-exploration, 20 (7.6%), all occurring in the immediate (30-day) postoperative period and without additional events up to 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions: In this recent cohort including the target population referred to by and managed in accordance with current guidelines, mortality and major complications were exceptionally infrequent. Guidelines should adequately weigh risks of conservative management against current surgical outcomes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA