Inhibition of Aurora A Kinase in Combination with Chemotherapy Induces Synthetic Lethality and Overcomes Chemoresistance in Myc-Overexpressing Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant Myc expression plays a critical role in various tumors, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Myc-positive lymphoma is clinically aggressive, more resistant to chemotherapy, and associated with high mortality. OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to show inhibition of aurora A kinase (AURKA) may overcome resistance to chemotherapy and improve outcomes in Myc-overexpressing lymphoma. METHODS: Myc-overexpressing lymphoma cell lines were evaluated by trypan blue, annexin V/propidium iodide staining, and western blotting for cytotoxicity, cell cycle, apoptosis, and Myc-associated protein expression, respectively, in the presence of cyclophosphamide with or without MLN8237, an AURKA inhibitor. Immunofluorescence for apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and acridine orange staining were used to analyze levels of autophagy. EµMyc genetically modified mouse model and xenograft models bearing Myc-overexpressing lymphoma cells were used to determine the efficacy of cyclophosphamide, MLN8237, or the combination in chemosensitive and chemoresistant tumors. RESULTS: In our in vitro experiments using chemoresistant lymphoma cells, MLN8237 and cyclophosphamide showed synergistic effects. Mice bearing lymphoma xenograft had rapid disease progression with median survival of ~ 35 days when treated with cyclophosphamide alone. In contrast, the combination of cyclophosphamide and MLN8237 induced complete tumor regression in all mice, which led to improvement in survival compared with the single agent control (p = 0.022). Kinome analysis of tumors treated with MLN8237 showed global suppression of various kinases. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that AURKA inhibition induces synthetic lethality and overcomes chemoresistance in Myc-overexpressing lymphoma. The combination of MLN8237 and conventional chemotherapy showed promising safety and anti-tumor activities in preclinical models of Myc-positive NHL.

Diagnostic complexities of eosinophilia.

CONTEXT: The advent of molecular tools capable of subclassifying eosinophilia has changed the diagnostic and clinical approach to what was classically called hypereosinophilic syndrome. OBJECTIVES: To review the etiologies of eosinophilia and to describe the current diagnostic approach to this abnormality. DATA SOURCES: Literature review. CONCLUSION: Eosinophilia is a common, hematologic abnormality with diverse etiologies. The underlying causes can be broadly divided into reactive, clonal, and idiopathic. Classically, many cases of eosinophilia were grouped together into the umbrella category of hypereosinophilic syndrome, a clinical diagnosis of exclusion. In recent years, an improved mechanistic understanding of many eosinophilias has revolutionized the way these disorders are understood, diagnosed, and treated. As a result, specific diagnoses can now be assigned in many cases that were previously defined as hypereosinophilic syndrome. Most notably, chromosomal rearrangements, such as FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusions caused by internal deletions in chromosome 4, are now known to be associated with many chronic eosinophilic leukemias. When present, these specific molecular abnormalities predict response to directed therapies. Although an improved molecular understanding is revolutionizing the treatment of patients with rare causes of eosinophilia, it has also complicated the approach to evaluating and treating eosinophilia. Here, we review causes of eosinophilia and present a framework by which the practicing pathologist may approach this diagnostic dilemma. Finally, we consider recent cases as clinical examples of eosinophilia from a single institution, demonstrating the diversity of etiologies that must be considered.