Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 11(8): 1493-502, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718677

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of anticoagulation status during dabigatran therapy may be desirable in certain clinical situations. OBJECTIVE: To determine the coagulation tests that are most useful for assessing dabigatran's anticoagulant effect. METHODS: Peak and trough blood samples from 35 patients taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, and one sample each from 30 non-anticoagulated individuals, were collected. Mass spectrometry and various coagulation assays were performed. 'Therapeutic range' was defined as the range of plasma dabigatran concentrations determined by mass spectrometry between the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of all values. RESULTS: The therapeutic range was 27-411 ng mL(-1) . The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), determined with multiple reagents, and activated clotting time (ACT) were insensitive to therapeutic dabigatran: 29%, 18% and 40% of samples had a normal PT, APTT, and ACT, respectively. However, normal PT, ACT and APTT ruled out dabigatran levels above the 75th percentile. The thrombin clotting time (TCT) correlated well and linearly with dabigatran levels below the 50th percentile, but was unmeasurable above it. The dilute thrombin time, ecarin clotting time and ecarin chromogenic assay showed linear correlations with dabigatran levels over a broad range, and identified therapeutic and supratherapeutic levels. CONCLUSIONS: The prothrombin time, APTT and ACT are often normal in spite of therapeutic dabigatran plasma levels. The TCT is useful for detecting minimal dabigatran levels. The dilute thrombin time and chromogenic and clotting ecarin assays accurately identify therapeutic and supratherapeutic dabigatran levels. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01588327).


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Antitrombinas/farmacologia , Benzimidazóis/farmacologia , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , beta-Alanina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Dabigatrana , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tempo de Tromboplastina Parcial , Estudos Prospectivos , Tempo de Protrombina , Tempo de Trombina , beta-Alanina/farmacologia
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 10(6): 1043-54, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22487084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder, is caused by deficiencies and/or defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF). An effective diagnostic and VWD typing strategy requires plasma testing for factor VIII, and VWF antigen plus one or more VWF 'activity' assays. VWF activity is classically assessed by using VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), although VWF collagen-binding (VWF:CB) and VWF mAb-based (VWF activity [VWF:Act]) assays are used by some laboratories. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cross-laboratory study to specifically evaluate these three VWF activity assays for comparative sensitivity to loss of high molecular weight (HMW) VWF, representing the form of VWF that is most functionally active and that is absent in some types of VWD, namely 2A and 2B. METHODS: A set of eight samples, including six selectively representing stepwise reduction in HMW VWF, were tested by 51 different laboratories using a variety of assays. RESULTS: The combined data showed that the VWF:CB and VWF:RCo assays had higher sensitivity to the loss of HMW VWF than did the VWF:Act assay. Moreover, within-method analysis identified better HMW VWF sensitivity of some VWF:CB assays than of others, with all VWF:CB assays still showing better sensitivity than the VWF:Act assay. Differences were also identified between VWF:RCo methodologies on the basis of either platelet aggregometry or as performed on automated analyzers. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that these results have significant clinical implications for the diagnosis of VWD and monitoring of its therapy, as well as for the future diagnosis and therapy monitoring of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Colágeno , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Ristocetina , Doenças de von Willebrand/diagnóstico , Fator de von Willebrand/análise , Biomarcadores/sangue , Calibragem , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/normas , Humanos , Peso Molecular , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Doenças de von Willebrand/sangue , Doenças de von Willebrand/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de von Willebrand/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA