Atrial Flutter and Fibrillation Following Lung Transplantation: Incidence, Associations and a Suggested Therapeutic Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmias are relatively common following lung transplantation and confer considerable perioperative risk, specifically haemodynamic instability, pulmonary congestion, dyspnoea, and can mask other post-transplant complications such as infection or acute rejection. However, for most patients, arrhythmias are limited to the short-term perioperative period. METHODS: We present a retrospective case-control analysis of 200 lung transplant recipients and using multivariate regression analysis, document the present incidence, risk factors, and outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five per cent (25%) of lung transplantation patients developed atrial flutter or fibrillation, most frequently at day 5-7 post lung transplantation, and more commonly present in older recipients and those with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but not in those with previously noted structural heart disease, or in those undergoing single rather than double lung transplants. Atrial arrhythmias were associated with increased intensive care unit and overall length of stay, but were not associated with increased risk of in-hospital stroke, or mortality. Based on our experience, we propose a suggested management algorithm for pharmacological and mechanical rate/rhythm control strategies, for anticoagulation, and discuss the appropriate duration of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial arrhythmias are relatively common post lung transplantation. Carefully managed, the associated risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality can be mitigated. Further prospective studies are required to validate these strategies.

High rates of potentially infectious exposures between immunocompromised patients and their companion animals: an unmet need for education.

A cross-sectional survey of 265 adult patients with haematological malignancy, haemoglobinopathy or human immunodeficiency virus was performed to determine the potential risk of infection from animal exposures. One hundred and thirty-seven (52%) owned an animal; the majority were dogs (74%) and cats (39%), but 14% owned birds and 3% reptiles. Eighty percent engaged in behaviour with their animals that potentially put them at risk of zoonotic infections. The most frequent behaviours were picking up animal faeces 72 (52%), cleaning animal areas 69 (50%) and allowing animals to sleep in the same bed 51 (37%). Twenty-eight percent allowed the animal to lick their face. Of all patients, 80 (30%) had been bitten or scratched by an animal. Only 16% of those who owned pets could recall receiving education regarding safe behaviours around animals. These immunocompromised patients are at risk of infection through exposure to pets. Our study highlights the need for increased education of patients regarding how to remain safe around their pets.