RESUMO
The incidence of multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMTs) has increased greatly with the progress of tumor diagnosis and therapy technology. However, triple primary cancer is still very rare, and its genetic change is not clear yet. This case report described a 70-year-old Chinese male patient with triple primary cancers of the esophagus, stomach and right-sided colon. Pathological examination confirmed that each malignant tumor developed independently. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a 599-gene panel revealed five TP53 mutations in three tumor tissues. These variations might contribute to development of the triple primary malignant tumors in the patient. The patient underwent laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy and postoperative radiotherapy for synchronous esophageal and gastric carcinomas. Then, he underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection of right-sided colonic cancer and lysis of abdominal adhesions. By the time of submitting this manuscript, the patient had been well and no sign of recurrence or metastasis had been observed. To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first one to clarify the genetic abnormalities of triple primary cancers of esophagus, stomach and colon in a Chinese patient. It may contribute to understanding the molecular pathogenesis of multiple primary digestive malignancies and providing valuable treatment strategies for the similar patients in the future.
RESUMO
Pancreatic cancer (PC) has high morbidity and mortality. It is the fourth leading cause of cancer death. Its diagnosis and treatment are difficult. Liquid biopsy makes early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer possible. We analyzed the expression profiles of 2,555 serum miRNAs in 100 pancreatic cancer patients and 150 healthy controls. With advanced feature selection methods, we identified 13 pancreatic cancer signature miRNAs that can classify the pancreatic cancer patients and healthy controls. For pancreatic cancer treatment, operation is still the first choice. But many pancreatic cancer patients are already inoperable. Therefore, we compared the 79 inoperable and 21 operable patients and identified 432 miRNAs that can predict whether a pancreatic cancer patient was operable. The functional analysis of the 13 pancreatic cancer signatures and the 432 operability miRNAs revealed the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic cancer and shield light on the diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer in clinical practice.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: It still remains unclear whether patients with atypical meningioma (AM) could benefit from postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) after gross-total resection (GTR). OBJECTIVE: Exploring the effectiveness of PORT on AM patients after GTR. METHODS: Literatures on PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Scopus databases published between January 2000 and January 2019 were searched. After the selection based on the certain exclusion criteria, the Newcastle-Ottawa evaluation scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included literatures. Finally, a meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of PORT on local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in atypical meningioma patients after GTR. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles with 2,008 AM patients were included in the meta-analysis. The 5-year LC, 5-year PFS, and 5-year OS rates were 82.2, 84.1, and 79.0%, respectively, for AM patients receiving PORT after GTR, and they were 71.0, 71.9, and 81.5%, respectively, for those not receiving PORT after GTR. PORT could significantly improve 5-year LC rate (OR [95% Cl] = 2.59 [1.40-4.81], P = 0.002) and 5-year PFS rate (OR [95% Cl] = 1.99 [1.35-2.95], P = 0.001), but did not significantly improve 5-year OS rate (OR [95% Cl] = 1.07 [0.60-1.91], P = 0.828). CONCLUSION: PORT could improve the 5-year LC rate and 5-year PFS rate in AM patients after GTR. AM patients might benefit from PORT after GTR.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prognostic markers are important for neurosurgeons to evaluate the indications for aggressive surgical management. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the number of fractured calvarial bones could predict the outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) after early craniotomy. METHODS: TBI patients who underwent early craniotomy were reviewed. The number of fractured calvarial bones was recorded by referring to preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images. Accordingly, patients were assigned to no calvarial fracture group, single calvarial fracture group, and multiple calvarial fractures group. Good outcome was defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale scores of 4 and 5 at discharge. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of calvarial fracture on outcome. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for the final model. RESULTS: In all, a total of 141 patients were enrolled. Patients with no calvarial fracture had a significantly lower rate of good outcome (12.5%) than did those with a single calvarial fracture (62.2%, P < 0.001) and those with multiple calvarial fractures (48.6%, P = 0.005). Binary logistic regression showed that the number of fractured calvarial bones was an independent imaging marker for predicting outcome (P = 0.003) after adjustment for age, Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission, and decompressive craniectomy. The area under the curve of the final model was 0.863. CONCLUSIONS: The number of fractured calvarial bones is an independent predictor of outcome in TBI patients after early craniotomy. No calvarial facture is associated with poor outcome in these patients.