Evaluation of Glottic View and Intubation Conditions with Sniffing Position Using Three Different Pillow Heights during Direct Laryngoscopy: A Prospective Analytical Study.

Background: Limited studies are available for assessing the optimal pillow height for sniffing position to obtain the best glottic view during laryngoscopy and intubation in the Indian population. Aims: This study was designed to evaluate laryngoscopic view and intubation conditions in sniffing position using three different pillow heights (without a pillow, 4 cm, and 7 cm) during direct laryngoscopy. Settings and Design: This prospective analytical study was done in a tertiary care teaching institute. Materials and Methods: In 60 patients, direct laryngoscopy was performed in the sniffing position first without a pillow (0 cm), followed by a 4-cm pillow, and then a 7-cm pillow to assess the glottic view after administration of anesthesia. The laryngoscopic views were graded using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and Cormack and Lehane (CL) grade. The pillow with the best laryngoscopic view was subsequently used to intubate the patient. Intubation difficulty was assessed by the Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS). The patient was followed up for 24 h postoperatively to evaluate postoperative complications due to intubation. Statistical Analysis: The categorical data were expressed in frequency and percentages and analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results: With a 4-cm pillow, there are a lower CL grade and a higher POGO score compared to views without a pillow and a 7-cm pillow which was statistically significant. There is a significantly lesser IDS score with a 4-cm pillow. Conclusions: The sniffing position with a 4-cm pillow provides a better laryngoscopic view and improved intubation condition than without a pillow and a 7-cm pillow in the study population.

Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are no surveys documenting the existing regional anaesthesia (RA) practices in our country. This nationwide survey aims to record the existing RA practices, identify any lacunae that might exist and project the future direction of evolution. METHODS: This online survey consisting of 31 questions was sent to all members of the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists and addressed participants' demographic features, central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block practices, drug selection, RA training and safety measures. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0. All categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 2141 responses were received, with participants distributed across the country. Forty-two per cent of the respondents reported that more than 60% of surgeries were performed under RA. Most of the participants use 'traditional' test dose for epidural space confirmation. Fifty participants (2.4%) use ultrasound for neuraxial space identification. Twenty per cent of the participants use a checklist for monitoring post-operative epidural analgesia. 6.7% have undergone specialised training in RA. Around 3.5% of the respondents have performed a wrong-side block. 31.4% of the respondents store intralipid in the operating room. CONCLUSION: The current survey highlights the prevailing practices, various deficiencies in monitoring and the need for RA training programmes. The data accrued can serve as a baseline for future comparison.