Anatomic Eligibility for Commercial Branched Endograft Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: First-generation "off-the-shelf" branched endovascular stent grafts are in development for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Prior studies have assessed eligibility rates among highly selected cohorts of patients referred for endovascular treatment, and the broader applicability of these devices to all patients with TAAA is unknown. The aims of this study were to assess the overall suitability of the 3 commercial 4-branched devices with or without adjunct procedure(s) in an unselected cohort of patients with TAAA and to identify areas for improvement in the next generation of devices. METHODS: A retrospective review of three-dimensional centerline reconstructions of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed in consecutive patients with TAAA seen between 2013 and 2017. All patients with contrast-enhanced CT imaging were included, regardless of prior evaluation for suitability for endovascular repair. Eligibility for a device was assessed based on instructions for use (IFU) from the device manufacturer along with prespecified anatomic criteria. Adjunct procedures were defined as carotid-subclavian revascularization, target vessel endovascular intervention, and iliac conduit/revascularization. RESULTS: Of 165 patients with TAAA, 122 had CT scans adequate for study inclusion. Eighteen patients (14.8%) were eligible for at least 1 device by IFU, and 41 (33.6%) could have been made eligible for at least 1 device by an adjunct procedure. Sixty-three (51.6%) were not eligible for any device within IFU even with adjunct procedures, including 31 of 32 patients with TAAA due to dissection. The most common reasons for ineligibility were perivisceral flow channel diameter <20 mm (n = 43) and an inadequate proximal seal zone (n = 29). Women were significantly less likely to be eligible for an off-the-shelf device (P = 0.03) and were more likely to require an iliac procedure to become eligible (P = 0.006). Almost none of the patients with dissection could receive a device even if adjunct procedures were used. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of patients with TAAA could not be made eligible for an off-the-shelf device based on manufacturers' criteria, even with adjunct procedures. Women and patients with TAAA due to dissection had higher rates of ineligibility. These data demonstrate that custom fenestrated devices and low-profile devices are needed to expand eligibility for endovascular repair of TAAA.

Survival and patient-centered outcome in a disease-based observational cohort study of patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Much of the literature describing treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) consists of operative series reported by centers of excellence. These studies are limited by referral and selection bias and exclude patients who are not candidates for the reported modality of repair. Little is known about the patients who are not referred or selected for repair. For those undergoing intervention, outcomes such as functional status after surgery are rarely reported. In this study, we address these gaps by reporting two primary end points: 1-year survival and a "good" outcome (defined as successful aneurysm exclusion, freedom from permanent loss of organ system function, and return to preoperative functional status after surgery) in a cohort of TAAA patients, including all nonoperative and operative patients, irrespective of treatment modality. METHODS: A single-institution database was screened by diagnosis codes for TAAA from 2009 to 2017 using the International Classification of Diseases versions 9 and 10. Diagnosis was confirmed by retrospective chart review and computed tomography findings of aneurysmal degeneration ≥3.2 cm of the paravisceral aorta in continuity with aneurysmal aorta meeting standard criteria for repair. Patients <18 years of age and those with mycotic aneurysm were excluded. Patients were either managed nonoperatively or by one of four operative strategies: (i) open; (ii) endovascular with branched endografts; (iii) hybrid, defined as iliovisceral debranching followed by endograft placement; or (iv) partial repair in which the paravisceral segment was intentionally left unaddressed. RESULTS: Among the entire cohort of 432 patients with TAAA, significant comorbidities were seen in 143 (33%). Forty-seven percent of the patients were managed nonoperatively. Of these, 65% survived to 1 year. A survival benefit was seen in the open, endovascular, and partial, but not hybrid, operative groups compared with the nonoperative group during a 3-year period. Overall 1-year survival was 81%, but only 65% had a good outcome (P = .0016). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of the patients in this inclusive cohort study did not undergo repair despite access to a variety of operative techniques. Many of these patients die in the short term due to high burden of comorbid disease rather than aneurysm rupture. Among those undergoing operation, a notable difference between survival and good outcome was observed. Operation appears to confer a survival advantage among appropriately selected patients with TAAA, but a large proportion are high risk and may not benefit from operative repair due to limited baseline survival and lower probability of good outcome.

0 + 5 Vascular Surgery Residents' Operative Experience in General Surgery: An Analysis of Operative Logs from 12 Integrated Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Integrated (0 + 5) vascular surgery (VS) residency programs must include 24 months of training in core general surgery. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education currently does not require specific case numbers in general surgery for 0 + 5 trainees; however, program directors have structured this time to optimize operative experience. The aim of this study is to determine the case volume and type of cases that VS residents are exposed to during their core surgery training. DESIGN: Accreditation council for graduate medical education operative logs for current 0 + 5 VS residents were obtained and retrospectively reviewed to determine general surgery case volume and distribution between open and laparoscopic cases performed. Standard statistical methods were applied. SETTING: A total of 12 integrated VS residency programs provided operative case logs for current residents. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 41 integrated VS residents in clinical years 2 through 5. RESULTS: During the postgraduate year-1 training year, residents participated in significantly more open than laparoscopic general surgery cases (p < 0.0001). This difference was consistent over the first 3 years of training. The most frequently logged open general surgery cases are hernia repair (20%), skin and soft tissue (7.4%), and breast (6.3%). Residents in programs with core surgery over 3 years participated in significantly more general surgery operations compared with residents in programs with core surgery spread out over 4 years (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: 0 + 5 VS residents perform significantly more open operations than laparoscopic operations during their core surgery training. The majority of these operations are minor, nonabdominal procedures. The 0 + 5 VS residency program general surgery operative training requirements should be reevaluated and case minimums defined. The general surgery training component of 0 + 5 VS residencies may need to be restructured to meet the needs of current and future trainees.